{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-18T06:03:27.399Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"fact-checking","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"","evidence":"","year":"","response":"","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":3,"coverage":{"cases":3,"countries":1,"languages":3,"unknownLocation":2,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":0,"lawsuits":0,"regulatory":0,"minors":0,"coreRelations":3,"contextualRelations":1,"mixedRelations":1,"unknownRelations":0,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":0},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2026-author-of-book-the-future-of-truth-acknowledges-synthetic-and-misattributed-quotes-linked-to-ai-research-tools","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Yet a New York Times investigation this week found what Rosenbaum now acknowledges are “a handful of improperly attributed or synthetic quotes” linked to his use of AI tools while researching the book.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"A New York Times investigation found what the author acknowledges are a handful of improperly attributed or synthetic quotes in The Future of Truth, linked to his use of AI tools while researching it.","causal_attribution":"Ars Technica, relaying the Times and the author's acknowledgement."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Tools like OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude were used heavily to gather information, he said ... Those tagged AI-generated notes were then passed on to a fact-checker and two copy editors provided by the publisher, Rosenbaum said.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The author says ChatGPT and Claude were used heavily to gather information for the book, with AI-sourced material tagged in his notes and passed to a fact-checker and copy editors provided by the publisher.","causal_attribution":"The author, interviewed by Ars Technica."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Of the 285 outside citations in the book, six have been identified by the Times as problematic, including three so-called “synthetic quotes” that have no apparent source.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Six of the book's 285 outside citations were identified by the Times as problematic, including three synthetic quotes with no apparent source.","causal_attribution":"Ars Technica, citing the Times."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"These quotes include one that tech reporter Kara Swisher told the Times she “never said” and another that Northeastern University professor Lisa Feldman Barrett said “don’t appear in [my] book, and they are also wrong.” ... Rosenbaum is now working with editors on what he says is a full “citation audit” that will correct future editions.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Kara Swisher told the Times she never said a quote attributed to her, and Lisa Feldman Barrett said quotes attributed to Barrett do not appear in Barrett's book and are wrong; the author is working with editors on a citation audit to correct future editions.","causal_attribution":"Ars Technica, relaying the Times and the author."},{"id":"c5","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"EDITOR's NOTE 5/29/26: After an additional review of an excerpt from The Future of Truth: How AI Reshapes Reality, WIRED editorial leadership has determined that it does not meet our editorial standards. It has been removed.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"WIRED removed an excerpt from the book on 29 May 2026 after an additional review, saying it did not meet its editorial standards.","causal_attribution":"WIRED's own editor's note."}],"effects":[{"label":"a published book carried synthetic and misattributed quotes the author links to AI research tools, leading to a citation audit and correction pledge","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"two people to whom quotes were attributed said the quotes were not theirs","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/05/ai-put-synthetic-quotes-in-his-book-but-this-author-wants-to-keep-using-it/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-18 (HTTP 200); no translation was involved and no human reviewer read it. Ars Technica (Kyle Orland), published 22 May 2026; it relays the New York Times investigation and quotes its own interview with the author. The Times article was not readable (HTTP 403).","independence_group":"ars-rosenbaum-interview"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.wired.com/story/book-excerpt-the-future-of-truth-steven-rosenbaum/","kind":"other","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-18 (HTTP 200); the page now carries only WIRED's editor's note of 29 May 2026. The removed excerpt itself was not inspected.","independence_group":"wired-editors-note"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["work","everyday_life"],"unknowns":["Which AI tool produced each synthetic or misattributed quote.","Whether a corrected edition has been issued and how many further citations were affected.","WIRED's specific reasons for removing the excerpt beyond its editorial standards."],"geography":{"basis":"The sources read do not state where the book was researched or where the people quoted live; a publisher's or outlet's location is not used. No court proceeding is reported.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (communicated_with, own use) with a contextual made_claim_about relation: Ars Technica reports that the author of The Future of Truth acknowledged synthetic and misattributed quotes linked to his AI research tools, that two people to whom quotes were attributed rejected them, and that he committed to a citation audit; WIRED removed an excerpt. The Times investigation is relayed by Ars.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-18"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The author acknowledges that the improperly attributed or synthetic quotes are linked to his use of AI tools while researching the book, and says ChatGPT and Claude were used heavily to gather information that was tagged as AI-sourced in his notes. Ars, citing the Times, counts three synthetic quotes with no apparent source; quotes attributed to Swisher and Barrett are among those they reject. Which tool produced each quote is not stated.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with","made_claim_about"]},"name":"Author of The Future of Truth acknowledges synthetic and misattributed quotes linked to his AI research tools; two people quoted say the quotes are not theirs","summary":"Ars Technica reported on 22 May 2026 that a New York Times investigation that week found what Steven Rosenbaum acknowledged are \"a handful of improperly attributed or synthetic quotes\" in his book The Future of Truth: How AI Reshapes Reality, linked to his use of AI tools while researching it. Rosenbaum told Ars that ChatGPT and Claude were used heavily to gather information and that AI-sourced material was tagged in his notes and passed to a fact-checker and copy editors provided by the publisher. According to Ars, the Times identified six problematic citations among the book's 285 outside citations, including three synthetic quotes with no apparent source. Tech reporter Kara Swisher told the Times she never said a quote attributed to her, and professor Lisa Feldman Barrett said quotes attributed to Barrett do not appear in Barrett's book and are wrong. Rosenbaum said he was working with editors on a citation audit to correct future editions. WIRED later removed an excerpt from the book, saying it did not meet its editorial standards.","incidentDate":"2026-05-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-05-22","aiSystem":"ChatGPT and Claude, which the author says were used heavily to gather information for the book's research-based chapters (which tool produced each faulty quote is not stated)","aiProduct":"ChatGPT and Claude (reported)","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A published book contained synthetic and misattributed quotes that its author links to AI research tools; two people to whom quotes were attributed said the quotes were not theirs, the author committed to correcting future editions, and WIRED removed an excerpt, giving only its editorial standards as the reason.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":2,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"One AI user: the author, who acknowledged the errors and faces a citation audit. Two others: Swisher and Barrett, who each objected to quotes attributed to them. Other people whose quotes may be affected are not named in the sources read, so the count is a lower bound. Readers are not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/05/ai-put-synthetic-quotes-in-his-book-but-this-author-wants-to-keep-using-it/","primarySourceLabel":"Ars Technica, 22 May 2026: AI put synthetic quotes in his book. But this author wants to keep using it","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-18T03:12:35.559817+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-18T03:12:35.559817+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["ai-fabricated-quotes","misattribution","book-publishing","chatgpt","claude","fact-checking","made-claim-about"]},{"id":"2026-sweden-fact-checkers-say-clickbait-network-spread-false-posts-with-ai-generated-images-claiming-mp-confessed-to-election-fraud","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'Politikern Mohamed Abdukardir Ali påstås ha erkänt valfusk och gripits under dramatiska former, men påståendena som nu sprids på Facebook är falska'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Bilderna som fått dem att reagera handlar om V-ledamoten Mohamed Ali, och påstår att han nu erkänner valfusk och har gripits av polis. Men bakom dessa falska uppgifter ligger ingen svensk nyhetssajt'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'Andra inlägg innehåller osanna uppgifter om att Ali gripits, erkänt brott eller hållit presskonferenser.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"Facebook posts falsely claimed that the MP had confessed to election fraud and had been arrested by police.","causal_attribution":"Two separate reviews (Källkritikbyrån and SVT Verifierar) describe the posts and call them false; Omni relays the first."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Mellan den 10:e och 15:e oktober har sidan publicerat tolv inlägg med Mohamed Ali i fokus, som tillsammans genererat omkring fyratusen reaktioner.'; 'I den artikeln påstås att polisen utfört en husrannsakan mot en lokal kopplad till Ali och i ett kassaskåp hittat'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Between 10 and 15 October 2026 the page Dagens Fina Stund published twelve posts focused on the MP that drew about four thousand reactions, and linked articles claimed police had found foreign currency and false identity documents in a search of premises connected to him.","causal_attribution":"Källkritikbyrån's own count and description."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'påståendena som nu sprids på Facebook är falska och bilderna AI-genererade'; 'använder sedan AI-verktyg för att generera fejkinnehåll som spinner vidare på dessa'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Källkritikbyrån states that the images in the posts were AI-generated.","causal_attribution":"The fact-checker does not describe its method for identifying the images as AI-generated."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'publicerad av den vietnamesiska klickbetesfabriken BeeUp'; 'Gemensamt för dessa sajter har varit ett återkommande adminkonto vid namn Hupchao, som vi kunnat knyta till BeeUp:s vd'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Utåt sett presenterar sig bolaget som en viral marknadsföringsbyrå, men i själva verket pumpar det ut AI-genererat innehåll i stor skala, säger Jonathan Lundberg, journalist vid Källkritikbyrån.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Källkritikbyrån links the page through a recurring administrator account to BeeUp, a Vietnamese company that presents itself as a viral marketing agency and, according to the fact-checker, produces AI-generated fake content at scale.","causal_attribution":"One origin: Källkritikbyrån's review, relayed in SVT as a quotation."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'”Utvisa honom!”, ryter kommentar efter kommentar på Facebook. Bilderna som fått dem att reagera handlar om V-ledamoten Mohamed Ali'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Facebook commenters reacted to the images about the MP with demands such as 'Utvisa honom!' (deport him).","causal_attribution":"SVT's observation of the comments; their number is not stated."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Därefter följde uppgifter om misstänkt valfusk i samband med hans personvalskampanj.'; 'Mohamed Ali dementerar detta'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The posts followed reports of suspected election fraud connected with the MP's personal-vote campaign, which he denies.","causal_attribution":"Context reported by SVT; it bears on why the fabricated stories drew attention, not on the AI images."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Drivkrafterna verkar vara ekonomiska snarare än någon vilja att påverka det svenska politiska landskapet.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"SVT says the drivers behind the page appear to be economic rather than an attempt to influence Swedish politics.","causal_attribution":"SVT's assessment of motive."}],"effects":[{"label":"falsely depicted as arrested and confessing to election fraud, drawing hostile comments","claim_id":"c5","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://kallkritikbyran.se/klicksajt-sprider-falska-pastaenden-om-mohamed-abdukardir-ali-v/","kind":"fact_check","access":"read","language":"sv","translation_note":"Read in Swedish by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-18 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. Källkritikbyrån review published 16 October 2026, HTTP 200, full article read.","independence_group":"kallkritikbyran-review-oct-2026"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/fejkade-nyheter-om-v-ledamoten-mohamed-ali-sprids","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"sv","translation_note":"Read in Swedish by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-18 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. SVT Verifierar article published 17 October 2026, HTTP 200; the article text was read, the accompanying video was not viewed. Its AI wording is a quotation of a Källkritikbyrån journalist.","independence_group":"svt-verifierar-review-oct-2026"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://omni.se/sajt-i-vietnam-sprider-falska-pastaenden-om-mohamed-ali/a/aOLpWa","kind":"news_relay","access":"read","language":"sv","translation_note":"Read in Swedish by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-18 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. Omni summary published 16 October 2026 of Källkritikbyrån's review, HTTP 200; it derives from the fact-checker and is not independent of it.","independence_group":"kallkritikbyran-review-oct-2026"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["public_life","elections"],"unknowns":["Which tool produced the images and how Källkritikbyrån identified them as AI-generated.","The MP's own response to the fabricated posts and whether he or his party reported them to Facebook or police.","How many people saw or believed the posts; reactions and followers do not establish this.","Whether Facebook removed the page or posts."],"geography":{"basis":"The depicted MP is a member of the Swedish Riksdag from Borlänge (Källkritikbyrån, SVT). The fabricated posts were published on Facebook, and Källkritikbyrån attributes the page to a company in Vietnam; no source states where the posts were made or read, so no event country is inferred from the posts' language or intended audience.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["SE"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published on Källkritikbyrån's review, which states that the images in posts falsely claiming the MP confessed to election fraud and was arrested were AI-generated, and on SVT Verifierar's separate review of the same posts, which reports Facebook commenters reacting to the images with calls for his deportation. The AI attribution is the fact-checker's, with its technical basis undisclosed.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-18"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Källkritikbyrån, which reviewed the posts, states that the claims are false and the images AI-generated, and that the network behind the page uses AI tools to generate fake content; SVT quotes a Källkritikbyrån journalist on the firm's AI-generated content. The fact-checker does not describe how it identified the images as AI-generated or name a tool, so the technical basis of the attribution is undisclosed. The generated images depicting the MP are part of the fabricated posts that drew the hostile reactions SVT reports.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Swedish fact-checkers say a clickbait network spread false posts with AI-generated images claiming MP Mohamed Ali confessed to election fraud and was arrested","summary":"Between 10 and 15 October 2026 a Swedish-language Facebook page published twelve posts about Mohamed Abdukardir Ali, a Left Party (V) member of the Riksdag, including claims that he had confessed to election fraud and that police had detained him in the middle of a press conference. The fact-checking site Källkritikbyrån reported on 16 October that the claims are false and the images AI-generated, and linked the page through a shared administrator account to BeeUp, a Vietnamese firm that presents itself as a viral marketing agency. SVT Verifierar reported on 17 October that the images claim he confesses to election fraud and has been arrested, and that comment after comment on Facebook reacted with demands such as 'Utvisa honom!' (deport him). The posts built on real reports of suspected election irregularities connected with his personal-vote campaign in Borlänge, which he denies. No source names the image tool, describes how the images were identified as AI-generated, or reports his response to the fabricated posts.","incidentDate":"2026-10-10","incidentEndDate":"2026-10-15","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-10-16","aiSystem":"Unidentified AI image generation used to produce images in fabricated Facebook posts and articles about the MP, according to Källkritikbyrån","aiProduct":"Unidentified image tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Fabricated Facebook posts with images that fact-checkers say were AI-generated falsely presented the MP as having confessed to election fraud and been arrested; SVT reports Facebook commenters reacting with demands for his deportation.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the depicted MP, falsely presented as arrested and confessing (Källkritikbyrån, SVT), with hostile comments reported in reaction (SVT). The page's followers, reactions and readers are not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"SE","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://kallkritikbyran.se/klicksajt-sprider-falska-pastaenden-om-mohamed-abdukardir-ali-v/","primarySourceLabel":"Källkritikbyrån, 16 October 2026: clickbait site spreads false claims about Mohamed Abdukardir Ali (V)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-18T03:08:02.727327+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-18T03:08:02.727327+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["ai-generated-images","disinformation","politics","sweden","facebook","clickbait-network","depicted-or-impersonated","fact-check"]},{"id":"2026-bangladesh-tv-channel-instagram-face-swap-sexual-videos-of-two-actresses-fact-checker-says-ai","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'গত ১৩ অক্টোবর একটি বেসরকারি টেলিভিশন চ্যানেলের ইনস্টাগ্রাম অ্যাকাউন্টে'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'গতকাল ভোররাতে আপত্তিকর এই ভিডিওগুলো আপলোড হওয়ার পর বিকেলে মুছে ফেলার আগ পর্যন্ত তা প্রায় চার লক্ষাধিকবার দেখা হয়ে যায়।'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Objectionable videos depicting two actresses were posted on a private television channel's Instagram account on 13 October 2026; Dhaka Files reports they were uploaded before dawn and removed in the afternoon after roughly 400,000 views.","causal_attribution":"Outlets' reports of the posting; the date comes from Prothom Alo and is consistent with Dhaka Files' 'yesterday' in a 14 October report. The view count is Dhaka Files' figure alone."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'ঘটনাটি অনুসন্ধান করেছে তথ্য যাচাইকারী প্রতিষ্ঠান রিউমর স্ক্যানার। গতকাল বুধবার প্রকাশিত প্রতিবেদনে প্রতিষ্ঠানটি জানিয়েছে, আলোচিত ভিডিওগুলো আসল নয়। অন্য ভিডিওতে ফেস সোয়াপ প্রযুক্তির মাধ্যমে দুই অভিনেত্রীর মুখ বসিয়ে সেগুলো তৈরি করা হয়েছে।'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'অনুসন্ধানী ফ্যাক্ট-চেকিং সংস্থা'; 'প্রতিবেদনে স্পষ্ট জানানো হয়েছে যে, ইনস্টাগ্রামে প্রচারিত ভিডিও দুটি সম্পূর্ণ কৃত্রিম ও সম্পাদিত। ফেস সোয়াপ প্রযুক্তি অর্থাৎ এআই ব্যবহার করে প্রাপ্তবয়স্কদের সাইটের মূল ভিডিওতে তারকাদের মুখমণ্ডল বসিয়ে এসব কনটেন্ট তৈরি করা হয়েছে।'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The fact-checker Rumor Scanner reported that the videos were not genuine and had been made by placing the two actresses' faces onto other videos with face-swap technology; Dhaka Files' relay adds that the source videos came from adult websites.","causal_attribution":"Rumor Scanner's finding, relayed by both outlets (one origin); the report itself was not read. The adult-website source detail and the AI gloss come from Dhaka Files' relay."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'পরে চ্যানেল কর্তৃপক্ষ জানায়, তাদের অ্যাকাউন্ট হ্যাক করে এআই প্রযুক্তির অপব্যবহারে তৈরি ভুয়া ছবি ও ভিডিও প্রকাশ করা হয়েছে। অ্যাকাউন্ট পুনরুদ্ধার করে সেসব সরিয়ে ফেলা হয়েছে বলেও জানায় প্রতিষ্ঠানটি।'; 'মাছরাঙা কর্তৃপক্ষও এ ঘটনায় দুঃখ প্রকাশ করেছে এবং আইনি পদক্ষেপ নেওয়ার কথা জানিয়েছে।'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'অবশেষে গতকাল সন্ধ্যায় বিটিআরসি, সিআইডি এবং বনানী থানার সহায়তায় অ্যাকাউন্ট পুনরুদ্ধার ও সব আপত্তিকর ভিডিও সরিয়ে নেওয়ার কথা আনুষ্ঠানিকভাবে জানায় মাছরাঙা টেলিভিশন কর্তৃপক্ষ। একই সঙ্গে অনিচ্ছাকৃত এমন বিভ্রান্তির জন্য দুঃখ প্রকাশ করা হয়।'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The channel said its account had been hacked and that fake images and videos made by misusing AI had been published; it said it recovered the account with help from BTRC, the CID and Banani police station, removed the videos, expressed regret and announced legal action.","causal_attribution":"The channel's statement relayed by both outlets (one origin). The AI wording is the channel's as relayed by Prothom Alo; the BTRC/CID/police detail is Dhaka Files' alone; legal action is Prothom Alo's alone."},{"id":"c4","status":"disputed","evidence":[{"locator":"'তবে অ্যাকাউন্ট হ্যাকের দাবি সত্ত্বেও পৃষ্ঠার নিয়মিত সংবাদ প্রকাশ অব্যাহত থাকা এবং দেরিতে পদক্ষেপ নেওয়াকে কেন্দ্র করে তৈরি হয়েছে নানা ধোঁয়াশা।'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Dhaka Files reports doubts about the hack claim, because routine news posts continued from the account during the period and the channel acted late.","causal_attribution":"Dhaka Files' own observation of the account and of online reaction; it disputes the channel's account of how the videos came to be posted, not the face-swap finding."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'পোস্টের শুরুতেই তিনি লিখেছেন, ‘এআই ব্যবহার করে কারও নামে মিথ্যা ও বানোয়াট কনটেন্ট তৈরি করা এবং কাউকে হেয় করার উদ্দেশ্যে তা ছড়িয়ে দেওয়া কোনো বিনোদন নয়। এটি একটি অপরাধ।’'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"On 15 October one of the actresses wrote on her Facebook page that making false and fabricated content in someone's name with AI and spreading it to demean them is not entertainment but a crime.","causal_attribution":"The actress's own post as quoted by Prothom Alo; the post itself was not read."}],"effects":[{"label":"sexual depiction of two actresses in face-swapped videos posted publicly","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.prothomalo.com/entertainment/tv/wocy6jzwbn","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"bn","translation_note":"Read in Bengali by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-16 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. Prothom Alo entertainment report, 15 October 2026 (11:30 BST), relaying the channel's statement, the Rumor Scanner fact-check and the actress's Facebook post; HTTP 200.","independence_group":"prothom-alo-15-oct-2026"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://dhakafiles.com/entertainment/maasranga-tv-instagram-hack-claim-and-fake-star-videos","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"bn","translation_note":"Read in Bengali by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-16 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. Dhaka Files entertainment report, 14 October 2026, with its own account of the posting, deletion and hack-claim doubts and a relay of the Rumor Scanner fact-check; HTTP 200.","independence_group":"dhaka-files-14-oct-2026"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["privacy","everyday_life"],"unknowns":["Who made the face-swapped videos and who posted them, including whether the account was hacked as the channel says.","Which tool was used; the Rumor Scanner report itself could not be read.","Whether a criminal case was filed and its outcome.","The second actress's response; no statement from her is reported in the sources read."],"geography":{"basis":"Both outlets describe the posting on the Instagram account of a Bangladeshi private television channel and the account recovery with Bangladeshi bodies (BTRC, CID, Banani police station); the actresses are described as two of the country's leading actresses (Dhaka Files). No court proceeding is reported.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["BD"],"affected_person_countries":["BD"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (depicted_or_impersonated): a fact-checker that examined the videos found that face-swap technology placed two actresses' faces onto adult videos, and the channel that posted them says the material was AI-made. The actresses are not named; the hack claim is recorded as disputed.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-16"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The fact-checking organisation Rumor Scanner, which examined the videos, reported (as relayed by Prothom Alo and Dhaka Files) that they were not genuine and had been made by placing the two actresses' faces onto other videos with face-swap technology; Dhaka Files relays that the source videos came from adult websites and glosses face swap as AI. The channel's statement also says the material was made by misusing AI. These face-swapped videos are the sexual depiction of the two actresses that was posted publicly. The fact-check itself could not be read, and the tool used is not named.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Bangladesh: fact-checker says face-swap AI put two actresses' faces on adult videos posted from a TV channel's Instagram account, which says it was hacked","summary":"On 13 October 2026 two videos depicting two Bangladeshi actresses in sexual content were posted on the official Instagram account of the private television channel Maasranga Television. The fact-checking organisation Rumor Scanner reported, as relayed by Prothom Alo and Dhaka Files, that the videos were not genuine and had been made by placing the actresses' faces onto other videos with face-swap technology; Dhaka Files adds that the source videos came from adult websites and describes the technology as AI. The channel said its account had been hacked and that fake images and videos made by misusing AI had been published; it announced that it had recovered the account with the help of BTRC, the CID and Banani police station, removed the videos, expressed regret and said it would take legal action. Dhaka Files reports the videos were viewed roughly 400,000 times before deletion and records doubts about the hack claim, because routine posts continued from the account during the period. On 15 October one of the actresses wrote on her Facebook page that creating and spreading fabricated content in someone's name with AI is a crime. Who made or posted the videos is not established in the sources.","incidentDate":"2026-10-13","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-10-14","aiSystem":"Unidentified face-swap tool that, according to the fact-checker Rumor Scanner as relayed by Prothom Alo and Dhaka Files, placed two actresses' faces onto other videos; Dhaka Files relays that the source videos came from adult websites and describes the face-swap technology as AI; no product is named","aiProduct":"Unidentified video tool","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["exploitation_or_abuse"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to the fact-checker Rumor Scanner, as relayed by two outlets, two actresses were depicted in sexual videos made with face-swap technology and posted from a television channel's Instagram account; one actress publicly objected.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":2,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"Prothom Alo and Dhaka Files relay Rumor Scanner's finding that the two actresses' faces were placed onto the videos (Prothom Alo: 'দুই অভিনেত্রীর মুখ বসিয়ে'). The roughly 400,000 views are an audience figure and are not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"BD","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.prothomalo.com/entertainment/tv/wocy6jzwbn","primarySourceLabel":"Prothom Alo, 15 October 2026: an actress asks when other people's humiliation became a source of income","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-16T03:04:45.711933+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-16T03:12:37.09519+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["face_swap","sexual_deepfake","instagram","television_channel","fact_check","bangladesh"]}]}