{
  "meta": {
    "exportedAt": "2026-09-22T18:29:38.647Z",
    "formatVersion": 2,
    "selection": {
      "q": "expulsion",
      "system": "",
      "harm": "",
      "context": "",
      "country": "",
      "role": "",
      "relation": "core",
      "evidence": "",
      "year": "2026",
      "response": "",
      "severity": "",
      "verification": "",
      "view": "incidents",
      "sort": "added"
    },
    "totalIncidents": 2,
    "coverage": {
      "cases": 2,
      "countries": 2,
      "languages": 2,
      "unknownLocation": 0,
      "locationPending": 0,
      "unknownLanguage": 0,
      "unknownDate": 0,
      "lawsuits": 0,
      "regulatory": 0,
      "minors": 0,
      "coreRelations": 2,
      "contextualRelations": 0,
      "mixedRelations": 0,
      "unknownRelations": 0,
      "relationPending": 0,
      "relationUnknown": 0
    },
    "countingNote": "Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.",
    "affectedCountNote": "Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.",
    "source": "NOPE Incident Tracker",
    "url": "https://nope.net/incidents",
    "license": "CC BY 4.0"
  },
  "incidents": [
    {
      "id": "2026-untan-pontianak-deepfake-victims-suspended",
      "caseFacts": {
        "claims": [
          {
            "id": "c1",
            "status": "reported",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "locator": "'Kasus dugaan penyalahgunaan teknologi AI tersebut mencuat di media sosial pada awal Mei 2026. RY, mahasiswa Jurusan Biologi FMIPA Untan angkatan 2025, disebut diduga menggunakan teknologi AI untuk memanipulasi foto teman kuliah dan sejumlah mahasiswi menjadi konten vulgar bermuatan asusila'; the borrowed-phone discovery passage.",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s1"
              }
            ],
            "assertion": "In early May 2026 a case of alleged AI abuse surfaced at Untan: RY, a Biology FMIPA student (class of 2025), allegedly used AI to turn photos of female classmates and other students into vulgar content; it came to light when a classmate borrowing his phone found manipulated photos in the gallery.",
            "causal_attribution": "Reported with the outlet's 'dugaan' (alleged) framing; the task force's findings and any police complaint are not public in the inspected source."
          },
          {
            "id": "c2",
            "status": "reported",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "locator": "'Satgas PPKPT Untan telah memeriksa sembilan korban dan saksi, melakukan pendalaman terhadap perangkat milik terlapor, hingga membuka kanal pelaporan bagi korban lain yang belum teridentifikasi'; the victims'-origin passage.",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s1"
              }
            ],
            "assertion": "The university's Satgas PPKPT task force examined nine victims and witnesses, deepened examination of the complainant's devices, and opened a reporting channel for further unidentified victims; victims come from the campus, the suspect's high-school circle in Singkawang, and universities outside West Kalimantan.",
            "causal_attribution": "The 'nine victims and witnesses' figure mixes roles; only the six documented suspended victims are counted as harmed persons."
          },
          {
            "id": "c3",
            "status": "reported",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "locator": "'keenam mahasiswi tersebut disebut mendapat sanksi skorsing selama dua semester'; Achmadi: 'Yang keenam mahasiswi itu sanksinya dicabut dan kuliahnya tetap aktif kembali'; the corrected decree to be handed over 'Selasa (15/9)'.",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s1"
              }
            ],
            "assertion": "The university suspended six of the victimized students for two semesters; after the 14 September 2026 student demonstration, Vice Rector Dr Achmadi announced the six sanctions were revoked and their academic status reactivated, with the corrected decree to be handed over on 15 September.",
            "causal_attribution": "The suspension and revocation are reported through the outlet's account of the demonstration and the Vice Rector's on-record statements; the suspension decree itself was not inspected."
          },
          {
            "id": "c4",
            "status": "reported",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "locator": "'keputusan tersebut belum membuat massa sepenuhnya puas'; 'Mahasiswa masih menuntut kepastian mengenai sanksi terhadap mahasiswa berinisial RY... mendesak Untan menjatuhkan sanksi drop out (DO)'.",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s1"
              }
            ],
            "assertion": "Students welcomed the revocation but said they were not fully satisfied and continued to demand RY's expulsion (drop out); the alleged perpetrator's sanction remained pending.",
            "causal_attribution": "The student demands are reported; the university's decision on RY is pending."
          }
        ],
        "effects": [
          {
            "label": "students victimized by AI deepfakes were suspended by their university; sanctions revoked after protests",
            "claim_id": "c3",
            "direction": "negative"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "id": "s1",
            "url": "https://www.detik.com/kalimantan/hukum-dan-kriminal/d-8663012/untan-cabut-sanksi-6-korban-deepfake-mahasiswa-masih-desak-pelaku-di-do/amp",
            "kind": "news_report",
            "access": "read",
            "language": "id",
            "translation_note": "Read in Indonesian on 2026-09-15 (datePublished 2026-09-15T06:58+07:00; 12 substantive paragraphs). Model translation, no human reviewer.",
            "independence_group": "detik"
          }
        ],
        "version": 1,
        "ai_roles": [
          "others_use"
        ],
        "contexts": [
          "education"
        ],
        "unknowns": [
          "The specific AI tool used is not named in the inspected reporting.",
          "Whether the task force or police confirmed the images were AI-generated, and any forensic findings from the phone, are not public in the inspected source.",
          "The six suspended students' basis for suspension (which rule they were accused of violating) is not stated in the inspected source.",
          "Some victims come from the suspect's high-school circle; their ages are unstated and they may include minors — sensitivity note recorded.",
          "The corrected decree's contents (handover planned for 15 September) and the decision on RY are pending.",
          "The earlier report in the same series (11 September) is listed but its body was not re-extracted in this pass."
        ],
        "geography": {
          "basis": "Event and affected persons: Tanjungpura University, Pontianak, West Kalimantan, with some victims from the suspect's high-school circle in Singkawang and universities outside West Kalimantan — all in Indonesia. No court proceeding is reported; the university's task force and rectorate are not courts.",
          "court_countries": [],
          "event_countries": [
            "ID"
          ],
          "affected_person_countries": [
            "ID"
          ]
        },
        "publication": {
          "basis": "Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a harmful-artifact case with a consequential institutional response: students depicted in alleged AI-generated vulgar images were suspended by their university, reversed after protests. The victims are unnamed in the source and here; the suspect is identified by initials only, as in the source; the 'dugaan' (alleged) framing is preserved throughout.",
          "reviewed_on": "2026-09-15"
        },
        "ai_involvement": {
          "basis": "The case is reported as alleged AI abuse: manipulated photos found in the suspect's phone gallery and reported as AI-generated vulgar content (detikKalimantan's account; 'dugaan'/alleged framing throughout). The specific tool is not named; the task force's device examination findings are not public.",
          "status": "supported"
        },
        "person_relations": [
          "depicted_or_impersonated"
        ]
      },
      "name": "Pontianak, Indonesia: university suspended six students victimized by AI deepfakes; the sanctions were revoked after student protests",
      "summary": "In May 2026, a case of alleged AI abuse surfaced at Tanjungpura University (Untan), Pontianak: a biology student identified by the initials RY allegedly used AI to turn photos of female classmates and other students into vulgar content, discovered when a classmate borrowing his phone found manipulated images in the gallery. The university's task force examined nine victims and witnesses and opened a reporting channel. The university then suspended six of the victimized students for two semesters — while the alleged perpetrator received a lighter sanction — prompting a student demonstration on 14 September 2026 demanding the victims' reinstatement and RY's expulsion. At the protest, Vice Rector Dr Achmadi announced the six sanctions were revoked and the students' academic status reactivated, with the corrected decree to be handed over on 15 September.",
      "incidentDate": "2026-05-01",
      "incidentEndDate": "2026-09-15",
      "incidentKind": "bounded_series",
      "incidentDatePrecision": "range",
      "exposurePattern": "repeated_interactions",
      "reportedDate": "2026-09-11",
      "aiSystem": "AI image-manipulation tools (unspecified)",
      "aiCompany": "Unknown",
      "severity": "high",
      "verificationStatus": "credible",
      "harmCategories": [
        "third_party_harm_facilitation"
      ],
      "harmOutcomes": [
        "psychological_distress",
        "reputational_harm",
        "educational_harm"
      ],
      "harmOutcomeSummary": "Female students depicted in AI-generated vulgar images were then suspended for two semesters by their own university — an institutional re-victimization reversed only after student protests — while continuing to seek the alleged perpetrator's expulsion.",
      "frameworkFacets": [],
      "causationStatus": "supported",
      "participantUsersAffectedMin": 0,
      "otherPeopleHarmedMin": 6,
      "affectedCountStatus": "documented_minimum",
      "affectedCountEvidence": "Lower bound: the six victimized students whose two-semester suspensions were revoked on 14 September 2026 (Vice Rector's on-record account). The task force examined 'nine victims and witnesses' and opened a channel for unidentified victims, so the total is larger but not quantified by role; only the six documented suspended victims are counted.",
      "victimAgeRange": "adult",
      "jurisdiction": "ID",
      "platformType": "other",
      "outcomeType": "internal_action",
      "outcomeStatus": "resolved",
      "primarySourceUrl": "https://www.detik.com/kalimantan/hukum-dan-kriminal/d-8663012/untan-cabut-sanksi-6-korban-deepfake-mahasiswa-masih-desak-pelaku-di-do/amp",
      "primarySourceLabel": "detikKalimantan (15 Sep 2026, Ocsya Ade CP) — the 14 Sep demonstration, the revocation, and the case background",
      "firstPublishedAt": "2026-09-15T09:27:14.16594+00:00",
      "scopeVersion": "facts-v3",
      "tags": [
        "depicted-or-impersonated",
        "ncii",
        "deepfake",
        "university",
        "institutional-response",
        "indonesia"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "2026-den-bosch-grok-racist-videos-teacher",
      "caseFacts": {
        "claims": [
          {
            "id": "c1",
            "status": "corroborated",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "locator": "Paragraphs 4-6: 'In het rechtbankdossier zaten negen screenshots... de docente is afgebeeld terwijl zij katoen plukt... slavendrijver die een zweep vasthoudt... #minderwaardig #zwart, en een hashtag met de achternaam van de betreffende docente... het hoofd van een gorilla... Een dag in mijn leven als minderwaardig persoon'.",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s1"
              },
              {
                "locator": "'De jongen maakte met GrokAI enkele filmpjes en deelde die in maart via TikTok... in een veld waar zij katoen plukt... met het hoofd van een gorilla'; the school confronted him and he admitted making them.",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s2"
              }
            ],
            "assertion": "According to NOS and Omroep Brabant, a 13-year-old pupil at a Den Bosch gymnasium made several videos with Grok and shared them in March 2026 via TikTok; the videos depicted his teacher picking cotton under a whip-holding slave driver with the text 'Hoooo.. ik werkte niet snel genoeg', with hashtags '#minderwaardig #zwart' and her surname, and with a gorilla head; one screenshot read 'Een dag in mijn leven als minderwaardig persoon'.",
            "causal_attribution": "The judge held that part of the screenshots definitely came from the AI videos the boy made; the parents dispute that he made all of them (the file includes another pupil's images). Grok's role as the generation tool is admitted by the boy and unchallenged in the inspected reporting."
          },
          {
            "id": "c2",
            "status": "corroborated",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "locator": "Judge's direct address quoted near the ruling's end: 'Met de filmpjes heb je niet alleen jouw docente, maar mogelijk ook anderen die de filmpjes hebben gezien en zich erdoor gekwetst voelen, beschadigd en echt pijn gedaan'; school passages: 'gevoelens van onrust en onveiligheid' among teachers.",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s1"
              },
              {
                "locator": "'Onderwijspersoneel voelde zich na de ontdekking volgens de school niet meer veilig en ervaarde veel onrust'; parents acknowledge the impact the videos could have had on the teacher.",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s2"
              }
            ],
            "assertion": "The teacher was harmed: the judge told the boy he had 'not only damaged his teacher, but possibly also others who saw the videos and felt hurt by them, and really hurt them', and school leadership reported that teaching staff felt unsafe and experienced much unrest after the discovery.",
            "causal_attribution": "Harm is attributed to the videos and their circulation, as found in the ruling and the school's account; the Brabants Dagblad headline ('Lerares diep geraakt...') is consistent but its body could not be inspected."
          },
          {
            "id": "c3",
            "status": "corroborated",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "locator": "Opening and ruling paragraphs: expulsion, parents' lawsuit, readmission ordered; 'volkomen onaanvaardbaar en zelfs strafbaar'; judge's weight given to age 13.",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s1"
              },
              {
                "locator": "Ruling paragraphs: school 'onvoldoende heeft onderbouwd'; readmission 'per direct'; judge calls the videos 'shockerend'; apology offers and the boy's interests weighed.",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s2"
              }
            ],
            "assertion": "The school suspended and then expelled the boy; on 8 July 2026 the Oost-Brabant preliminary-relief judge ordered immediate readmission because the expulsion was insufficiently substantiated, while calling the videos shocking and the boy's acts 'totally unacceptable and even criminal'.",
            "causal_attribution": "The ruling's procedural finding (insufficient substantiation) and its moral finding (unacceptable, criminal) are both reported in full by two inspected outlets."
          },
          {
            "id": "c4",
            "status": "reported",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "locator": "'Ouders niet mee eens' and 'Geen kans op herstel' sections: another pupil's images in the file; presence and role at earlier incidents disputed; contact with the teacher forbidden.",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s2"
              },
              {
                "locator": "Parents' account: deletion after a day and a half, not only after confrontation; earlier incidents disputed; no chance to make amends.",
                "relation": "context",
                "source_id": "s1"
              }
            ],
            "assertion": "The parents dispute that their son made all the videos in the file and dispute the school's pattern of earlier incidents; they say he deleted the videos himself after a day and a half and was never allowed to apologise to the teacher.",
            "causal_attribution": "The judge found the earlier-incidents pattern contradicted and insufficiently concrete; authorship of the remaining screenshots is unresolved."
          }
        ],
        "effects": [
          {
            "label": "targeted racist harassment of a teacher through AI-generated videos",
            "claim_id": "c2",
            "direction": "negative"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "id": "s1",
            "url": "https://nos.nl/artikel/2622265-school-moet-jongen-die-racistisch-filmpje-van-docente-maakte-meteen-weer-toelaten",
            "kind": "news_report",
            "access": "read",
            "language": "nl",
            "translation_note": "Read in Dutch on 2026-09-15 (datePublished 2026-07-08T23:01+0200). Quotes in the public record are close paraphrase from the Dutch; model translation, no human reviewer.",
            "independence_group": "nos"
          },
          {
            "id": "s2",
            "url": "https://www.omroepbrabant.nl/nieuws/6016915/jongen-maakt-ai-filmpjes-en-wordt-van-school-gestuurd-rechter-grijpt-in",
            "kind": "regional_news",
            "access": "read",
            "language": "nl",
            "translation_note": "Read in Dutch on 2026-09-15 (datePublished 2026-07-08T13:45Z; bylined Evie Hendriks). Model translation, no human reviewer.",
            "independence_group": "omroep-brabant"
          },
          {
            "id": "s3",
            "url": "https://www.bd.nl/den-bosch/lerares-diep-geraakt-door-racistische-ai-filmpjes-van-leerling-13-school-stuurt-hem-weg-ouders-eisen-gesprek-bij-rechter~a6ff90e2/",
            "kind": "regional_news",
            "access": "unavailable",
            "language": null,
            "translation_note": "Brabants Dagblad blocked by the DPG Media WAF (403) direct and via reader proxy on 2026-09-15; headline seen verbatim in Google News RSS ('Lerares diep geraakt door racistische AI-filmpjes van leerling (13)'). Body not inspected; language not established.",
            "independence_group": "brabants-dagblad"
          }
        ],
        "version": 1,
        "ai_roles": [
          "others_use"
        ],
        "contexts": [
          "education",
          "work"
        ],
        "unknowns": [
          "Exact creation and sharing dates within March 2026 are not stated in the inspected reporting.",
          "Which images were made by the other pupil, and whether that pupil was disciplined, is unresolved; the judge noted the school could not explain why the other pupil was not expelled.",
          "No criminal complaint or further disciplinary proceeding is reported; the judge's 'criminal' characterisation is a moral finding in a civil summary procedure.",
          "The teacher's situation after the ruling (return, support measures) is not reported.",
          "The boy's prompts and Grok's generation settings are not reported; only the outputs in the court file are documented."
        ],
        "geography": {
          "basis": "Event: a Den Bosch gymnasium and TikTok sharing by its pupil (both outlets). Affected person: the teacher at that school. Court: rechtbank Oost-Brabant preliminary-relief judge, 8 July 2026.",
          "court_countries": [
            "NL"
          ],
          "event_countries": [
            "NL"
          ],
          "affected_person_countries": [
            "NL"
          ]
        },
        "publication": {
          "basis": "Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a harmful-artifact case: a named-role adult was the target of racist AI-generated videos made with Grok and shared in her school community, documented through court-file reporting by two independently inspected Dutch outlets. The perpetrator is a minor and the teacher is unnamed in the sources; neither is named here, and the teacher's surname (present in one hashtag) is not reproduced.",
          "reviewed_on": "2026-09-15"
        },
        "ai_involvement": {
          "basis": "The videos were made with Grok: the boy admitted making them after the school confronted him (Omroep Brabant), and the court file's nine screenshots were held by the judge to come partly from the AI videos he made (NOS). The harm flows from the artifacts and their sharing; what the tool generated is documented through the court file, while the prompting process is not reported.",
          "status": "supported"
        },
        "person_relations": [
          "depicted_or_impersonated"
        ]
      },
      "name": "Den Bosch: 13-year-old made racist Grok videos of his teacher; the school expelled him and a court ordered his readmission",
      "summary": "In March 2026 a 13-year-old pupil at a Den Bosch gymnasium used xAI's Grok to generate videos depicting a teacher of his in racist ways — picking cotton under a whip-holding slave driver with the text 'Hoooo.. ik werkte niet snel genoeg' and hashtags '#minderwaardig #zwart' plus her surname, and with a gorilla head — and shared them on TikTok. The school suspended and then expelled him. On 8 July 2026 the preliminary-relief judge of the Oost-Brabant district court ordered his immediate readmission because the expulsion was insufficiently substantiated, while telling the boy his acts were 'totally unacceptable and even criminal' and that he had damaged and really hurt his teacher. School leadership reported that teaching staff felt unsafe and experienced much unrest after the videos were discovered.",
      "incidentDate": "2026-03-01",
      "incidentEndDate": "2026-07-08",
      "incidentKind": "bounded_series",
      "incidentDatePrecision": "range",
      "exposurePattern": "unknown",
      "reportedDate": "2026-07-08",
      "aiSystem": "Grok",
      "aiCompany": "xAI",
      "severity": "medium",
      "verificationStatus": "credible",
      "harmCategories": [],
      "harmOutcomes": [
        "psychological_distress",
        "reputational_harm"
      ],
      "harmOutcomeSummary": "According to NOS and Omroep Brabant reporting of the court file and the school's account, the targeted teacher was hurt and damaged by racist AI-generated videos shared at her school, and teaching staff felt unsafe and experienced unrest; the judge described her harm directly in the ruling.",
      "frameworkFacets": [],
      "causationStatus": "supported",
      "participantUsersAffectedMin": 0,
      "otherPeopleHarmedMin": 1,
      "affectedCountStatus": "documented_minimum",
      "affectedCountEvidence": "One documented harmed person: the teacher, whose hurt is described in the ruling itself ('you have damaged your teacher... and really hurt her', per the NOS account) and in the school's account of staff feeling unsafe. The judge's 'possibly also others who saw the videos and felt hurt' is not quantified and is not counted. The boy, a minor and the AI user, is not counted as harmed: the expelled-then-readmitted consequence was reversed and flows from his own act.",
      "victimAgeRange": "adult",
      "jurisdiction": "NL",
      "platformType": "other",
      "outcomeType": "media_coverage",
      "outcomeStatus": "resolved",
      "primarySourceUrl": "https://nos.nl/artikel/2622265-school-moet-jongen-die-racistisch-filmpje-van-docente-maakte-meteen-weer-toelaten",
      "primarySourceLabel": "NOS (8 Jul 2026) — court-file account: nine screenshots, the racist depictions, the ruling and the judge's direct address",
      "firstPublishedAt": "2026-09-15T05:17:46.121073+00:00",
      "scopeVersion": "facts-v3",
      "tags": [
        "education",
        "deepfake",
        "harassment",
        "racism",
        "minor-perpetrator",
        "others-use",
        "grok",
        "netherlands"
      ]
    }
  ]
}