{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-23T09:00:03.063Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"eu","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"","evidence":"","year":"2026","response":"regulatory","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":9,"coverage":{"cases":9,"countries":6,"languages":6,"unknownLocation":2,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":0,"lawsuits":0,"regulatory":9,"minors":0,"coreRelations":6,"contextualRelations":0,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":3,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":3},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2026-altenburg-thuringia-police-say-man-lost-about-42000-euros-after-ai-made-advert-showing-well-known-politician","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Im Internet stieß er auf eine vermeintliche Werbeanzeige, die mithilfe von Künstlicher Intelligenz erstellt worden war und einen bekannten Politiker zeigte. Darin wurden hohe Gewinne innerhalb kurzer Zeit durch Geldanlagen versprochen.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"According to the police, the man came across an online advert made with artificial intelligence that showed a well-known politician and promised high returns from investments.","causal_attribution":"The investigating police state that the advert was made with AI; they do not disclose how they established this or name a tool."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Nachdem der Senior Mitte Mai Kontakt zu den bislang unbekannten Tätern aufgenommen hatte, gab er persönliche Daten preis und ermöglichte ihnen den Fernzugriff auf seinen Computer. Die Betrüger übernahmen daraufhin die Kontrolle über sein Online-Banking und veranlassten mehrere Überweisungen in Höhe von insgesamt rund 42.000 Euro.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"After contacting the perpetrators in mid-May he gave them personal data and remote access to his computer; they took control of his online banking and made transfers totalling about 42,000 euros.","causal_attribution":"Police account connecting the advert to the contact and the losses."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Durch das schnelle Eingreifen der Ermittler konnte ein Teil des Geldes - etwa 28.000 Euro - noch gesichert werden. Die weiteren Ermittlungen wegen Betrugs dauern an.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The police say about 28,000 euros was secured and the fraud investigation continues.","causal_attribution":"Recovery and procedural status as reported by the police."}],"effects":[{"label":"man lost money to investment fraudsters after an AI-made advert showing a politician","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.presseportal.de/blaulicht/pm/126720/6297368","kind":"official_statement","access":"read","language":"de","translation_note":"Read in German by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-20 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. Landespolizeiinspektion Gera press release on presseportal.de, 18 June 2026; HTTP 200.","independence_group":"gera-police-18-jun-2026"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["finance"],"unknowns":["Which politician the advert showed and on which platform it appeared.","How the police established that the advert was made with AI, and which tool.","Whether any perpetrator has been identified and whether the remaining money was recovered."],"geography":{"basis":"The release of the Gera regional police concerns a man in Altenburg, Thuringia, Germany, so the affected person's country is Germany. The advert, the contact and the transfers took place online and the release does not say where the perpetrators acted, so no event country is recorded. No court proceeding is reported.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["DE"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (depicted_or_impersonated): the investigating Gera police say an older man was drawn in by an AI-made advert showing a well-known politician and lost about 42,000 euros, about 28,000 of which was secured. The technical basis of the police attribution is undisclosed. No name or age appears in the public record.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-20"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The investigating Gera police say the advert the man found had been created with artificial intelligence and showed a well-known politician promising high returns, and that after contacting the perpetrators through it he lost about 42,000 euros. The generated depiction of the politician was the lure toward the man. The police do not disclose how they established the AI creation or name the tool.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Thuringia police say a man in Altenburg lost about 42,000 euros to investment fraudsters after an AI-made advert showing a well-known politician","summary":"The Gera regional police reported on 18 June 2026 that an older man in Altenburg, Thuringia, had fallen victim to investment fraud. According to the police, he found an online advert made with artificial intelligence that showed a well-known politician and promised high returns. After he contacted the fraudsters in mid-May, he gave them personal data and remote access to his computer; they took control of his online banking and made several transfers totalling about 42,000 euros. The police say about 28,000 euros was secured; the investigation continues.","incidentDate":"2026-05-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-06-18","aiSystem":"An online advert that, according to the Gera regional police, was created with artificial intelligence and showed a well-known politician (tool not identified)","aiProduct":"Unidentified AI tool","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["financial_loss"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to the Gera police, an older man who responded to an AI-made advert showing a well-known politician lost about 42,000 euros in transfers from his online banking, of which about 28,000 euros was secured.","frameworkFacets":[],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One man, the defrauded investor (police release). The politician shown in the advert is not named and no response or consequence is reported for him, so he is not counted.","victimAgeRange":"elderly","jurisdiction":"DE","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"investigation_opened","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.presseportal.de/blaulicht/pm/126720/6297368","primarySourceLabel":"Landespolizeiinspektion Gera (presseportal), 18 June 2026: 80-Jähriger verliert durch Anlagebetrug hohe Geldsumme","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-20T03:13:03.6984+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-20T03:13:03.6984+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["investment_fraud","fake_celebrity_ad","remote_access","germany"]},{"id":"2026-connecticut-court-revokes-self-represented-plaintiffs-e-filing-access-over-hidden-instructions-aimed-at-ai","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"contains hidden text set in tiny-point type and colored white, so that it is effectively invisible to a person reading the document; In substance it directs that any artificial-intelligence model reviewing or receiving the document ensure that its output agrees with the plaintiff's filing; also filed July 24, 2026, contains a further, abbreviated, instance of the concealed, tiny-point white text","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"The offending text directed any AI system reviewing the document to ensure textual outputs agreed with the plaintiff’s arguments","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"A motion for default filed by the self-represented plaintiff on 24 July 2026 contained hidden text in tiny white type directing any AI model reviewing it to ensure its output agreed with the filing and to work toward reversing the Chief Clerk's denial of his default request; a notice filed the same day carried an abbreviated version.","causal_attribution":"The court's findings as excerpted by Volokh; Ars Technica reports the same decision."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"The Court sent its Notice of [a] Hearing [to consider whether there was a sanctionable prompt injection] on July 31, 2026.; On the morning of the Hearing, the plaintiff again hid text in pleadings.; as a dutiful citizen auditing the Court's Al systems; The plaintiff replied that he did so as a joke","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"After the court sent notice on 31 July 2026 of a hearing on the hidden text, the plaintiff hid further messages in later filings, including a nonsense message, a short greeting and a link to a video; he told the court the first instruction was an audit of the court's AI systems and the later messages were jokes.","causal_attribution":"The court's account of the hearing, as excerpted."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"The technique has a name, \"prompt injection.\"; The Court does not find the plaintiff credible that he only added the prompt to \"audit\" the Court's use of artificial-intelligence systems.; The plaintiff's ability to file matters electronically through the Court's e-filing system is rescinded. Any future pleadings or exhibits by the plaintiff shall be filed in person, on paper, at the clerk's office.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"declined to order monetary penalties","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The court found the instruction a prompt injection, did not credit the audit explanation, and rescinded the plaintiff's ability to file electronically, requiring future pleadings to be filed in person on paper at the clerk's office; Ars Technica reports that no monetary penalty was ordered.","causal_attribution":"The court's order as excerpted; the absence of a monetary penalty is Ars Technica's report."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"The Connecticut Judicial Branch does not utilize an artificial-intelligence system to review or decide filings, although a number of court systems elsewhere do so. The undersigned denied Docket Entry #177.00 on its merits working off a printed version of the motion, so the hidden instruction had no impact on a ruling.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"confirmed that the hidden text had no impact in a case where a man alleged a healthcare provider was improperly withholding access to records","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The court stated that the Connecticut Judicial Branch does not use an AI system to review or decide filings and that the judge denied the motion on its merits from a printed version, so the hidden instruction had no impact on a ruling.","causal_attribution":"The court's statement, as excerpted and as reported by Ars Technica."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"told Reuters yesterday that he maintains that his intent was to audit the court","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The plaintiff told Reuters that he maintains his intent was to audit the court, according to Ars Technica.","causal_attribution":"The plaintiff's own account, relayed by Ars Technica; the court did not find it credible."}],"effects":[{"label":"e-filing access rescinded; future filings must be made on paper at the clerk's office","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://reason.com/volokh/2026/08/13/court-faults-self-represented-plaintiff-for-including-hidden-prompt-injection-in-court-filing/","kind":"legal_commentary","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in full in English by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-18 (HTTP 200); no translation was needed. The post quotes long passages of the decision with ellipses.","independence_group":"connecticut-superior-court-decision-aug-2026"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/08/suspecting-court-of-using-ai-man-injected-prompts-in-filings-to-try-to-win-case/","kind":"news","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in full in English by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-18 (HTTP 200); no translation was needed.","independence_group":"connecticut-superior-court-decision-aug-2026"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["unknown"],"contexts":["justice"],"unknowns":["The exact date of the memorandum of decision; the sources say it was issued in the week before 13 August 2026.","Whether the plaintiff used an AI tool to draft his filings or the hidden text; Ars Technica's suggestion that he was convinced by an AI system is not established by the decision excerpt read.","Whether the sanction was challenged and how the underlying records dispute ended."],"geography":{"basis":"The filings were made in, and the sanction issued by, the Connecticut Superior Court. The plaintiff's residence is not used.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a consequential-response case: the Connecticut Superior Court's decision, read through Volokh's excerpt and Ars Technica's report, rescinds a self-represented plaintiff's e-filing access because his filings carried hidden instructions aimed at AI systems. The court says no AI system reviews its filings and the text affected no ruling. The plaintiff is a private person and is not named.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-18"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The harm is the court's response to concealed instructions aimed at AI systems: the decision, as excerpted, records hidden white text in the plaintiff's 24 July 2026 filings directing any AI model reviewing them to make its output agree with the filing, treats this as a prompt injection and rescinds his e-filing access for it. The court states that the Connecticut Judicial Branch uses no AI system to review or decide filings and that the hidden text affected no ruling, so no relation describing an AI system's own action toward the plaintiff is established (unknown; consequential response).","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Connecticut court revokes a self-represented plaintiff's e-filing access after finding hidden instructions aimed at AI systems in his filings","summary":"In a memorandum of decision issued in early August 2026, a Connecticut Superior Court judge found that a motion for default and a notice filed on 24 July 2026 by a self-represented plaintiff, in a suit against a healthcare provider over access to records, carried text in tiny white type that was invisible to a human reader but legible to software. The concealed text told any AI model reviewing the filing to make its output agree with the filing and to work toward reversing the Chief Clerk's denial of his default request. After the court gave notice of a sanctions hearing, he hid further messages in later filings, which he said were jokes. The court treated the first instruction as a prompt injection, did not believe his explanation that he was auditing the court's use of AI, and rescinded his ability to file electronically, so that future filings must be made on paper at the clerk's office; Ars Technica reports that no monetary penalty was imposed. The court said the Connecticut Judicial Branch does not use AI to review or decide filings and that the motion was denied on its merits from a printed copy, so the hidden text affected no ruling. The plaintiff told Reuters, according to Ars Technica, that his intent was to audit the court.","incidentDate":"2026-08-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-08-13","aiSystem":"Any AI system that the court, its staff or opposing counsel might use to review the filing, targeted by concealed instructions; the court says the Connecticut Judicial Branch uses no AI to review or decide filings, and no source reports any AI system processing the instructions","aiProduct":"Unidentified document-analysis tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["legal_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to the court's decision, the plaintiff lost the ability to file electronically and must file on paper at the clerk's office, as a sanction for hidden instructions aimed at AI systems in his filings.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"established","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the self-represented plaintiff whose e-filing access the decision rescinded.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-CT","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"regulatory_action","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://reason.com/volokh/2026/08/13/court-faults-self-represented-plaintiff-for-including-hidden-prompt-injection-in-court-filing/","primarySourceLabel":"The Volokh Conspiracy (Reason), 13 August 2026: excerpt of the Connecticut Superior Court decision on hidden prompt injection in a court filing","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-18T03:07:35.832932+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-18T03:07:35.832932+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["prompt-injection","court-filing","sanction","self-represented-litigant","e-filing","connecticut"]},{"id":"2026-para-labour-court-fines-two-lawyers-over-hidden-instruction-aimed-at-court-galileu-ai","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'A punição ocorreu após a identificação de um comando oculto com fonte branca em um documento trabalhista. O objetivo era enganar a IA Galileu, usada pelo tribunal.'; 'A decisão no Pará foi tomada em maio de 2026'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Em maio, o juiz brasileiro multou em R$ 84,2 mil duas advogadas do Pará após elas tentarem enganar a inteligência artificial Galileu'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"In May 2026 a judge of the 3rd Labour Court of Parauapebas fined two lawyers about R$84,000 after a hidden instruction in white font was found in a document filed in a labour case, aimed at the court's Galileu AI.","causal_attribution":"Reports of the sentence and of the court's announcement; the sentence itself was not read."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'foi detectado um texto em fonte branca sobre fundo branco'; 'A intenção era evidente: fazer com que o sistema de IA utilizado gerasse uma contestação superficial ou uma minuta de sentença comprometida'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"According to the sentence as reported by G1, the text was detected while the judgment was being drafted with Galileu, and its evident intention was to make the AI system produce a superficial defence or a compromised draft judgment.","causal_attribution":"The sentence's finding as quoted by G1; the lawyers dispute it (c4)."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Desenvolvido pelo TRT-4 em parceria com o Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF), o Galileu é uma ferramenta de inteligência artificial generativa que auxilia magistrados e servidores na elaboração de minutas de sentenças'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"Galileu is a generative AI tool developed by the 4th Region Labour Court with the Supreme Federal Court to help judges and staff draft sentences.","causal_attribution":"Description from the court announcement as relayed by DOL."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'jamais existiu qualquer comando para manipular a decisão do Magistrado ou de qualquer outro servidor'; 'uma tentativa de proteger o nosso cliente da própria IA e nada mais que isso'; 'não detinha qualquer participação em processos da seara trabalhista'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The lawyers said they disagreed with the decision and that there was never any command to manipulate the judge's decision, describing the text as protection for their client against the AI; one said she took no part in labour cases.","causal_attribution":"The lawyers' own statements to G1 in May 2026."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'foi usada como referência pelo juiz Walter M. Spader Jr., da Corte Superior de Connecticut, nos Estados Unidos'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'A informação foi divulgada pelo Tribunal Regional do Trabalho da 8ª Região (TRT-8) nesta quarta-feira (14).'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"A Connecticut Superior Court judge cited the Pará decision when sanctioning a litigant for misuse of AI, as the 8th Region Labour Court announced in October 2026.","causal_attribution":"The court's announcement as relayed; the Connecticut decision was not read."}],"effects":[{"label":"two lawyers fined about R$84,000 over a hidden instruction aimed at the court's AI drafting tool","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://g1.globo.com/pa/para/noticia/2026/10/15/prompt-injection-juiz-nos-eua-usa-decisao-da-justica-do-trabalho-do-para-como-referencia-em-caso-de-manipulacao-de-ia.ghtml","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"pt","translation_note":"Read in Portuguese by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-16 (HTTP 200); passages translated by the research agent; no human translation.","independence_group":"g1-para-reporting"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.metropoles.com/brasil/juiz-dos-eua-cita-decisao-da-justica-do-para-em-caso-de-prompt-injection","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"pt","translation_note":"Read in Portuguese by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-16 (HTTP 200); passages translated by the research agent; no human translation. Metrópoles relays the 8th Region Labour Court's announcement and quotes the Connecticut decision.","independence_group":"trt8-announcement-relay"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://dol.com.br/noticias/mundo-noticias/965628/decisao-judicial-do-para-sobre-uso-de-ia-vira-referencia-nos-eua","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"pt","translation_note":"Read in Portuguese by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-16 (HTTP 200); passages translated by the research agent; no human translation.","independence_group":"trt8-announcement-relay"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["justice","work"],"unknowns":["The sentence's exact date and case number; the reports give only May 2026.","Whether Galileu itself flagged the hidden text, as G1 states, or a person noticed it during AI-assisted drafting, as the sentence's wording allows.","Whether the lawyers appealed and whether the fine stands.","Any consequence for the worker's claim."],"geography":{"basis":"The document was filed in, and the fine imposed by, the 3rd Labour Court of Parauapebas, Pará; the lawyers practise in Parauapebas according to G1.","court_countries":["BR"],"event_countries":["BR"],"affected_person_countries":["BR"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a consequential-response case: reports of the sentence state that a labour court fined two lawyers for hidden text aimed at the court's generative AI drafting tool, which the judge found was meant to make the AI produce a compromised draft. G1, Metrópoles and DOL were read; the sentence itself was not.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-16"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"G1 reports that the hidden white-on-white text was detected while the judgment was being drafted with Galileu, a generative AI tool the labour courts use to help draft sentences, and quotes the sentence as finding that the text was meant to make the AI system produce a superficial defence or a compromised draft judgment. The harm is the court's response to the hidden instruction aimed at generative AI (the fine on the two lawyers), so no relation describing an AI system's own action toward the lawyers is established (unknown; consequential response). G1 states that the hidden text was identified by Galileu itself, while the sentence as quoted says only that it was detected during drafting via Galileu.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Pará labour court fines two lawyers about R$84,000 over hidden instruction aimed at the court's Galileu AI; the lawyers deny manipulating the decision","summary":"In May 2026 a judge of the 3rd Labour Court of Parauapebas, in the Brazilian state of Pará, fined two lawyers about R$84,000 after text in white font on a white background was found in a document they filed for a worker in a labour claim. According to the sentence as reported by G1, the hidden text was detected while the judgment was being drafted with Galileu, a generative AI tool the labour courts use to help judges and staff draft sentences, and its evident intention was to make the AI produce a superficial defence or a compromised draft judgment. The judge called the technique prompt injection. The lawyers said they disagreed with the decision and that there was never any command to manipulate the judge's decision, describing the text as an attempt to protect their client from the AI; one of them said she did not work on labour cases. In October 2026 the regional labour court announced that a Connecticut Superior Court judge had cited the decision when sanctioning a litigant for misuse of AI.","incidentDate":"2026-05-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2026-10-15","aiSystem":"Galileu, a generative AI tool developed by the 4th Region Labour Court with the Supreme Federal Court to help judges and staff draft sentences, used by the 8th Region Labour Court; the hidden text was aimed at it and was detected while the judgment was drafted with it","aiProduct":"Galileu","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["legal_harm","financial_loss","professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to reports of the sentence, two lawyers were fined about R$84,000 by a labour court that found they had hidden an instruction aimed at the court's generative AI drafting tool in a filed document; the lawyers dispute the finding.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"disputed","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":2,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"Two people: the two lawyers fined in the sentence. The worker they represented is not counted because no consequence for him is reported.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"BR-PA","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"regulatory_action","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://g1.globo.com/pa/para/noticia/2026/10/15/prompt-injection-juiz-nos-eua-usa-decisao-da-justica-do-trabalho-do-para-como-referencia-em-caso-de-manipulacao-de-ia.ghtml","primarySourceLabel":"G1 Pará: US judge uses Pará labour court decision as reference in AI manipulation case (15 October 2026)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-16T03:17:14.646605+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-16T03:17:14.646605+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["brazil","para","labour-court","prompt-injection","legal-profession","sanction","court-ai-tool"]},{"id":"2026-canary-islands-high-court-fines-lawyer-for-appeal-citing-48-false-judgments-generated-by-ai","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"ha impuesto una multa de 420 euros a un abogado como autor de una actuación contraria al deber de veracidad y a las reglas de la buena fe con abuso del servicio público de la Justicia, consumada al introducir hasta 48 citas de jurisprudencia falsas, generadas por Inteligencia Artificial, en un recurso de apelación; el Tribunal acuerda dar traslado de su decisión y de los antecedentes al Colegio de Abogados del afectado","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The Criminal Chamber of the TSJC fined a lawyer 420 euros for conduct contrary to the duty of truthfulness and good faith, committed by inserting up to 48 false case-law citations generated by AI into an appeal, and sent its decision to the lawyer's bar association for possible disciplinary action.","causal_attribution":"The court's own release on its order."},{"id":"c2","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"se valió de una herramienta de Inteligencia Artificial “generalista” -es decir, no de una solución específicamente diseñada en el ámbito jurídico- para introducir en la fundamentación hasta 48 citas de sentencias del Tribunal Supremo y un informe del Consejo General del Poder Judicial que supuestamente avalaban su postura en el pleito y que, en realidad, no existían, según verificó la documentalista del TSJC; no verificó los datos de salida de la herramienta de IA con las bases de datos de jurisprudencia","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"According to the order, the lawyer used a general-purpose AI tool, not a legal-specific one, to insert 48 citations of Supreme Court judgments and a General Council of the Judiciary report that did not exist, as the TSJC's documentalist verified, and did not check the tool's output against the case-law databases.","causal_attribution":"The court's findings in its order as set out in its release; the lawyer admitted the facts (c3)."},{"id":"c3","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"420 euros, la mitad del coste aproximado de una suscripción anual a una herramienta de Inteligencia Artificial específicamente jurídica; admitió los hechos y reconoció su responsabilidad de forma expresa, manifestando un arrepentimiento “aparentemente sincero”","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The court set the fine at about half the annual subscription cost of a legal-specific AI tool, taking into account that the lawyer admitted the facts, expressly accepted responsibility and expressed apparently sincere remorse.","causal_attribution":"The court's release."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"el letrado citó al menos siete resoluciones del Supremo y un informe que no aparecen en las bases de datos; fio su trabajo, sin mayor revisión, a lo que el algoritmo le propuso; desestima el recurso de la acusación particular contra la absolución; la sala ordena formar pieza separada","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"In a judgment dismissing the appeal, reported on 5 January 2026, the TSJC found that it cited at least seven Supreme Court rulings and a report absent from the databases, said the lawyer appeared to have relied without further review on what the algorithm proposed, and ordered a separate proceeding on the lawyer's responsibility.","causal_attribution":"Expansión's report of the court's press note and its quotations from the judgment."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"regretted that his identity had been revealed when the case became public; he had been the object of “comments and mockery in different professional environments, including group chats of lawyers of which I am a part”; it sees itself obliged to make clear that the Communication Office did not incur in any reprehensible conduct","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"In the sanction proceeding the lawyer complained that the case's publication made the lawyer identifiable and led to comments and mockery in professional circles, including lawyers' group chats; the court said its communication office had not acted improperly.","causal_attribution":"The lawyer's submissions as recorded in the order, reported by La Voz de Lanzarote; the mockery followed the publicity about the AI citations."}],"effects":[{"label":"fined 420 euros and referred to the bar association over false citations generated with an AI tool","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"the lawyer told the court of comments and mockery from colleagues after the case became public","claim_id":"c5","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.poderjudicial.es/cgpj/es/Poder-Judicial/Noticias-Judiciales/El-TSJ-de-Canarias-multa-a-un-abogado-por-citar-hasta-48-sentencias-falsas-sugeridas-por-IA","kind":"court_press_release","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Read in Spanish on 2026-10-16 from the Poder Judicial website (HTTP 200); quoted passages were translated by the research agent (an AI). Dated 13 February 2026 in the page metadata.","independence_group":"tsjc-canarias-sanction-order-february-2026"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.lavozdelanzarote.com/en/news/courts/lawyer-who-cited-non-existent-sentences-made-by-artificial-intelligence-is-ordered-to-pay-fine_241336_102.html","kind":"news","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read on 2026-10-16 (HTTP 200) in La Voz de Lanzarote's English edition, a translation of its Spanish report; its account repeats the court's release and adds passages from the order on the lawyer's submissions. Published 13 February 2026.","independence_group":"tsjc-canarias-sanction-order-february-2026"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.expansion.com/juridico/actualidad-tendencias/2026/01/05/695bae72e5fdeac6088b4595.html","kind":"news","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Read in Spanish on 2026-10-16 (HTTP 200); quoted passages were translated by the research agent (an AI). Published 5 January 2026; reports the TSJC's press note and quotes its judgment.","independence_group":"tsjc-canarias-appeal-judgment-january-2026"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["justice","work"],"unknowns":["The name of the AI tool.","The dates on which the appeal was filed and the sanction order was issued (the order was announced on 13 February 2026). The appeal predates the judgment that Expansión on 5 January 2026 says was notified days earlier, so the false citations were probably filed before 2026; the 2026 date recorded here is the year of the sanction.","Whether the false citations affected the outcome of the appeal; no source says so.","The outcome of the bar association referral."],"geography":{"basis":"The appeal was filed with, and the fine imposed by, the High Court of Justice of the Canary Islands (Spain) against a judgment of the Provincial Court of Santa Cruz de Tenerife. Where the lawyer lives is not recorded from a press headline.","court_countries":["ES"],"event_countries":["ES"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a concrete adverse consequence of AI use: the TSJC's order, as described in its release, finds that a general-purpose AI tool generated the 48 false citations the lawyer filed, and fines the lawyer 420 euros with a referral to the bar association.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-16"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The TSJC's order, as set out in the court's press release, finds that the lawyer used a general-purpose AI tool to insert 48 citations of Supreme Court judgments and a General Council report that did not exist, and that the lawyer did not check the tool's output against the case-law database. The tool's output reached the lawyer and went into the appeal (communicated_with); the court fined the lawyer for it. The lawyer admitted the facts. The tool is not named.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Canary Islands high court fines a lawyer 420 euros for an appeal citing 48 non-existent judgments that it says a general-purpose AI tool generated","summary":"The Criminal Chamber of the High Court of Justice of the Canary Islands (TSJC) fined a lawyer 420 euros for breaching the duty of truthfulness and good faith, after an appeal the lawyer filed contained 48 citations of Supreme Court judgments and a report of the General Council of the Judiciary that did not exist. According to the court's order, as described in its press release of 13 February 2026, the lawyer used a general-purpose AI tool to draft the appeal and did not check a single citation against the free public case-law database; the court's documentalist verified that the references were false. The court referred the matter to the lawyer's bar association for possible disciplinary action and set the fine at about half the annual cost of a legal-specific AI tool, taking into account that the lawyer admitted the facts and expressed remorse. The court had first flagged the citations in its judgment dismissing the appeal, reported on 5 January 2026, which opened a separate proceeding. The lawyer told the court of comments and mockery from colleagues after the case became public.","incidentDate":"2026-01-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"year","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-01-05","aiSystem":"A general-purpose generative AI tool (not a legal-specific product, per the court) used to draft a criminal appeal; the tool is not named","aiProduct":"Unidentified AI drafting tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["financial_loss","legal_harm","reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to the TSJC, a lawyer whose appeal contained 48 false citations generated with a general-purpose AI tool was fined 420 euros and referred to the bar association; the lawyer told the court of mockery in professional circles once the case became public.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"established","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the lawyer fined by the TSJC. The client's position is not described as affected by the false citations, so the client is not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"ES","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"regulatory_action","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.poderjudicial.es/cgpj/es/Poder-Judicial/Noticias-Judiciales/El-TSJ-de-Canarias-multa-a-un-abogado-por-citar-hasta-48-sentencias-falsas-sugeridas-por-IA","primarySourceLabel":"Poder Judicial (CGPJ), El TSJ de Canarias multa a un abogado por citar hasta 48 sentencias falsas sugeridas por IA (13 February 2026)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-16T03:07:45.067439+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-16T03:07:45.067439+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["spain","legal-profession","hallucinated-citations","court-fine","bar-referral"]},{"id":"2026-gauting-bavaria-police-say-man-presumably-lured-by-ai-image-of-tv-presenter-in-banner-ad-lost-25000-euros","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'auf der Website eines großen deutschen Nachrichtenmagazins online auf ein Werbebanner mit einer Geldanlage aufmerksam geworden zu sein und anschließend darauf geklickt zu haben.'; 'eines durch KI generierten Bildes einer bekannten Fernsehmoderatorin in Verbindung mit einer lukrativen Anlagestrategie geködert worden.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Vermutlich wurde er durch die Kombination eines per Künstlicher Intelligenz erzeugten Bildes einer bekannten Fernsehmoderatorin mit einer vermeintlich lukrativen Anlagestrategie geködert.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Police say the complainant said he clicked an investment banner advertisement on the website of a large German news magazine, and that he was presumably lured by the combination of an AI-generated image of a well-known television presenter with a lucrative investment strategy.","causal_attribution":"The police's presumptive attribution; Merkur relays the same police statement (one origin). Technical basis not disclosed."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'wurde er in der Folgezeit (ab 04.06.26 bis September von insgesamt vier weiblichen Anrufern kontaktiert.'; 'zu vier Zahlungen im Gesamtwert von über 25.000 Euro an ausländische Konten in Bulgarien, Malta und Litauen anleiten.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'wurde er in der Folge von vier Anruferinnen kontaktiert.'; 'zwischen dem 4. Juni und September zu insgesamt vier Zahlungen an, die er auf ausländische Konten in Bulgarien, Malta und Litauen überwies.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Police say four women callers contacted him from 4 June 2026 until September and led him to make four payments totalling more than 25,000 euros to accounts in Bulgaria, Malta and Lithuania.","causal_attribution":"Police account from the complaint; one origin."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Nach Rücksprache mit seiner Hausbank ist eine Rückbuchung von den vier ausländischen IBAN-Konten nicht möglich, da er die Überweisungen selbst autorisiert hatte'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Police say his bank could not reverse the transfers because he had authorised them himself.","causal_attribution":"Police account of the bank's position."}],"effects":[{"label":"more than 25,000 euros lost to an investment fraud reached through a banner advertisement","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.unser-wuermtal.de/nachrichten/polizeiberichte/artikel/gautinger-faellt-auf-dubiose-geldanlage-herein.html","kind":"official_statement","access":"read","language":"de","translation_note":"Read in German by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-16 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. Gauting police report reproduced on a local news site ('Quelle: Polizei Gauting'), 2 October 2026; HTTP 200.","independence_group":"polizei-gauting-report-2-oct-2026"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.merkur.de/lokales/starnberg/gauting-ort69895/werbebanner-angeklickt-25-000-euro-weg-gautinger-faellt-auf-trading-betrug-herein-94524104.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"de","translation_note":"Read in German by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-16 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. Regional newspaper report relaying the Gauting police report and its inspection head, 4 October 2026; HTTP 200.","independence_group":"polizei-gauting-report-2-oct-2026"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["finance"],"unknowns":["Which presenter, news magazine website, trading platform and image tool were involved.","How the police concluded that the image was AI-generated.","Who the callers were and whether any suspect has been identified.","The exact amount of each payment and the date of the last one."],"geography":{"basis":"The complaint was made to the Gauting police in Bavaria, Germany, about an advert on a German news magazine's website; the payments went to accounts in Bulgaria, Malta and Lithuania, which are destinations of the money and not event locations.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["DE"],"affected_person_countries":["DE"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (depicted_or_impersonated): the investigating police say an AI-generated image of a well-known television presenter in a banner advertisement presumably lured the man to the fraudulent platform, connecting it to his loss of more than 25,000 euros. The AI involvement is recorded as suspected because the police wording is presumptive. The man is not named.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-16"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The Gauting police, who took the man's complaint, say he was presumably lured by the combination of an AI-generated image of a well-known television presenter with a lucrative investment strategy in a banner advertisement he clicked, which led him to the trading platform whose callers obtained his payments. The generated image of the presenter was part of the advertisement shown to him. The police wording is presumptive and they do not disclose how they concluded that the image was AI-generated or name the tool.","status":"suspected"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Gauting, Bavaria: police say a man presumably lured by an AI-generated image of a TV presenter in a banner ad lost more than 25,000 euros to investment fraud","summary":"The Gauting police inspection in Bavaria, Germany, reported on 2 October 2026 that a man had filed a complaint after realising he had been the victim of investment fraud. According to the police report, he said he had clicked on an advertising banner for an investment on the website of a large German news magazine, and the police say he was presumably lured by the combination of an AI-generated image of a well-known television presenter with a supposedly lucrative investment strategy. After he entered his email address and phone number on the trading platform, four women callers contacted him from 4 June 2026 until September and led him to make four payments totalling more than 25,000 euros to accounts in Bulgaria, Malta and Lithuania. His bank could not reverse the transfers because he had authorised them himself. The police do not say how they concluded that the image was AI-generated, and the presenter is not named in the police report.","incidentDate":"2026-06-01","incidentEndDate":"2026-09-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-10-02","aiSystem":"AI-generated image of a well-known television presenter in an online investment banner advertisement, according to the Gauting police, who say the man was presumably lured by it; no tool is named","aiProduct":"Unidentified image tool (suspected)","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["financial_loss"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Police say the man made four payments totalling more than 25,000 euros to foreign accounts that his bank could not reverse.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the complainant described in the Gauting police report, who lost more than 25,000 euros.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"DE","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"investigation_opened","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.unser-wuermtal.de/nachrichten/polizeiberichte/artikel/gautinger-faellt-auf-dubiose-geldanlage-herein.html","primarySourceLabel":"Unser Würmtal (Gauting police report), 2 October 2026: Gauting man falls for dubious investment","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-16T03:04:49.493105+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-16T03:04:49.493105+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["investment_fraud","fake_celebrity_ad","ai_generated_image","germany"]},{"id":"2026-austria-administrative-court-fines-litigant-for-unlabelled-ai-generated-submissions","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Aktenkonvolute und Stellungnahmen mit offensichtlich ausschließlicher Erstellung mit Hilfe von Textprogrammen (LLM) künstlicher Intelligenz und ohne entsprechende Kennzeichnung gemäß Art 50 Verordnung 2024/1689'; 'Die Schriftsätze sind offensichtlich mit KI-Assistenten kreiert und nicht als solche gekennzeichnet.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Der Beschwerdeführer hatte binnen weniger Monate hunderte Seiten an offensichtlich KI-generierten Schriftsätzen und Beilagen abgegeben'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The court found that the appellant had filed, within less than four months, statements and attachments running to several hundred pages that were obviously created exclusively with large-language-model text programs and AI assistants and were not labelled under Article 50 of Regulation 2024/1689.","causal_attribution":"The court's own finding in the published decision; the AI use is the court's assessment of the documents."},{"id":"c2","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'eine Mutwillenstrafe von EUR 200,-- (in Worten: zweihundert Euro) verhängt, weil er das Bundesverwaltungsgericht mutwillig in Anspruch nimmt'; 'Entscheidungsdatum'; '01.09.2026'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"In a decision of 1 September 2026 the court imposed a EUR 200 penalty for wanton use of the court and declared an ordinary appeal inadmissible.","causal_attribution":"Established by the operative part of the published decision."},{"id":"c3","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Das Bundesverwaltungsgericht (BVwG) hat erstmals wegen wiederholter Eingaben mit KI-generierten Inhalten eine Mutwillensstrafe in Höhe von 200€ gegen eine Verfahrenspartei verhängt.'; 'brachten in keiner Form neue Tatsachen oder Beweise vor'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'Erstmals verhängte das Gericht eine \"Mutwillensstrafe\" wegen KI-generierter Beschwerden.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The court described the penalty as the first it has imposed because of repeated submissions with AI-generated content, and said the submissions repeated the existing complaints without new facts or evidence.","causal_attribution":"The court's own statement about its practice; derStandard relays it."}],"effects":[{"label":"an appellant was fined EUR 200 after filing hundreds of pages of AI-generated, unlabelled submissions","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokument.wxe?Abfrage=Bvwg&Dokumentnummer=BVWGT_20260901_W298_2341849_1_00","kind":"court_record","access":"read","language":"de","translation_note":"Read in full in German by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-13 (HTTP 200); the English assertions are the agent's translation and no human translator reviewed them. The published decision text (RIS) was read; the appellant's submissions were not available.","independence_group":"bvwg-w298-2341849"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.bvwg.gv.at/Aktuelles/Publikationen-des-BVwG/Ausgew-hlte-Entscheidungen-des-Bundesverwaltungsgerichts/Bundesverwaltungsgericht-verh-ngt-erstmals-Strafe-wegen-KI-Eingaben.html","kind":"official_statement","access":"read","language":"de","translation_note":"Read in full in German by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-13 (HTTP 200); the English assertions are the agent's translation and no human translator reviewed them. The court's own news item about the decision; same origin as the decision.","independence_group":"bvwg-w298-2341849"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.derstandard.de/story/3000000343509/mann-flutete-gericht-mit-ki-generierten-beschwerden-oesi-richter-verhaengte-strafe","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"de","translation_note":"Read in full in German by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-13 (HTTP 200); the English assertions are the agent's translation and no human translator reviewed them. derStandard relays the court's news item; only the free lead paragraph was available to the agent.","independence_group":"bvwg-w298-2341849"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["justice"],"unknowns":["Which AI tool the appellant used and the appellant's explanation.","Whether the penalty has been paid or challenged by extraordinary means, and the outcome of the underlying data-protection appeal."],"geography":{"basis":"The penalty was imposed by Austria's Federal Administrative Court in an appeal against the Austrian data protection authority (RIS decision, BVwG news item). The appellant's location is not stated, so no event or affected-person country is recorded from the court's seat.","court_countries":["AT"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published because the court's published decision documents that it fined an appellant EUR 200 for wanton use of the court after finding hundreds of pages of submissions had been created with AI text programs and filed unlabelled. The appellant is anonymised in the decision and here.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-13"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The published decision records the court's finding that the appellant's statements and attachments were obviously created exclusively with large-language-model text programs and AI assistants and were not labelled as AI-generated, and it bases the EUR 200 penalty on the appellant's use of AI assistants to file long, largely repetitive submissions. The AI assistants generated the text that the appellant filed, and the court penalised the appellant for filing it. The finding is the court's assessment of the documents; no product is named and the appellant's account is not recorded.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Austria: Federal Administrative Court fines a litigant EUR 200 for hundreds of pages of submissions it found were AI-generated and unlabelled","summary":"In a pending appeal against a decision of Austria's data protection authority, the Federal Administrative Court (BVwG) found that the appellant had filed hundreds of pages of statements and attachments within less than four months that were obviously created exclusively with large-language-model text programs and not labelled as AI-generated. In a decision of 1 September 2026 the court imposed a EUR 200 penalty for wanton use of the court, holding that the AI-assisted filings repeated the same complaints, brought no new facts or evidence and ignored the EU labelling duty for AI-generated content. The court announced it as the first such penalty for AI submissions. The appellant is anonymised and the appellant's response is not reported.","incidentDate":"2026-09-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-10-09","aiSystem":"Large-language-model text programs and AI assistants that the court found had been used to create the appellant's statements and attachments; no product is named","aiProduct":"Unidentified AI drafting tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["financial_loss","legal_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to the published decision, the court fined the appellant EUR 200 for wanton use of the court after finding that hundreds of pages of submissions had been created with AI text programs and filed unlabelled. The appellant's response is not reported.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"established","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the appellant who used AI assistants to produce the submissions and was fined.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"AT","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"regulatory_action","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokument.wxe?Abfrage=Bvwg&Dokumentnummer=BVWGT_20260901_W298_2341849_1_00","primarySourceLabel":"RIS, BVwG decision W298 2341849-1, 1 September 2026: penalty for wanton use of the court","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-13T03:15:16.86813+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-13T03:15:16.86813+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["austria","administrative-court","litigant","ai-generated-filings","sanction","ai-act-labelling"]},{"id":"2026-brazil-stf-first-hidden-ai-prompt-in-appeal-petition-fine-two-minimum-wages","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'nego provimento ao agravo regimental e aplico'; 'multa de 2 (dois) salários mínimos por violação ao art. 77, IV, do Código'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'aplicou multa de dois salários mínimos por violação do dever de lealdade processual'; 'analisado pela Primeira Turma do STF em sessão virtual iniciada nesta sexta-feira (25)'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"In his vote on the second internal appeal in ARE 1608713, presented to the First Panel in a virtual session beginning 25 September 2026, the rapporteur denied the appeal and applied a fine of two minimum wages for violation of article 77, IV, of the Code of Civil Procedure, holding that the use of prompt injection breaches the duty of procedural loyalty.","causal_attribution":"The fine and its ground are established by the vote itself; the press note restates them. Whether the fine falls on the party or the lawyer is not stated."},{"id":"c2","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'a comunicação à Ordem dos Advogados do'; 'Brasil para que verifique eventual infração ético-disciplinar por parte do'; 'apurar eventual prática de crime, se entender cabível (doc. 53, p. 3)'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'determinou que o fato seja comunicado à Ordem dos Advogados do Brasil (OAB), para análise de eventual infração ético-disciplinar, e ao Ministério Público Federal (MPF), para apuração de eventual prática de crime'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The vote names the lawyer who filed the appeal as the author of the attempt to covertly direct the STF's AI systems, and orders the episode certified in the record and communicated to the Ordem dos Advogados do Brasil, for a possible ethical-disciplinary infraction, and to the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office, to assess a possible crime if it sees fit.","causal_attribution":"Established by the vote; the outcome of either communication is not reported."},{"id":"c3","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'foi comunicado da tentativa de burla processual em 3 de setembro pelo Núcleo de Inteligência Artificial'; 'instruções ocultas, em letras brancas e de tamanho reduzido, com argumentos e comandos destinados a induzir ferramentas de IA a conhecer e dar provimento ao recurso'; 'A tentativa foi identificada pela Maria Shield, uma das funcionalidades da plataforma Maria'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'detectou neste RE 1.608.713 o uso de “prompt injection”, cuja técnica é'; 'de direcionar, de forma oculta, os sistemas de inteligência artificial do'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"On 3 September 2026 the STF's AI unit informed the rapporteur's office that the petition contained hidden instructions, in white, reduced-size letters with some words unusually fragmented, carrying arguments and commands intended to induce AI tools to admit and grant the appeal; the STF attributes the detection to Maria Shield, a function of its Maria AI platform.","causal_attribution":"The press note and the vote document the detection and its description; neither says how the text was inserted or whether any AI system processed it."},{"id":"c4","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'este Gabinete não utiliza inteligência artificial para análise'; 'negando provimento ao recurso em 19/8/2026 (doc. 53, p. 2)'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'o ministro esclareceu que seu gabinete não utiliza inteligência artificial para analisar processos ou fundamentar decisões.'; 'A tentativa, portanto, não teve qualquer efeito sobre a análise do recurso, que já havia sido rejeitado por Zanin em 19 de agosto.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The rapporteur stated that his office does not use artificial intelligence to analyse cases or ground decisions, and the STF states that the attempt therefore had no effect on the analysis of the appeal. Separately, the appeal had already been rejected on 19 August 2026.","causal_attribution":"The rapporteur's statement is recorded in the vote; the STF press note draws the no-effect conclusion from it ('portanto') and gives the 19 August rejection as a separate fact."}],"effects":[{"label":"the episode communicated to the bar association and to federal prosecutors, with the lawyer named as responsible","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"},{"label":"a fine of two minimum wages applied in the vote for breach of procedural loyalty","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://noticias.stf.jus.br/postsnoticias/stf-identifica-uso-de-comandos-ocultos-para-influenciar-ia-em-processo-e-comunica-oab-e-mpf/","kind":"official_statement","access":"read","language":"pt","translation_note":"Read live in Portuguese on 2026-10-07 (STF news portal, 25 September 2026). Translation by the research agent (an AI).","independence_group":"stf-are1608713"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://noticias-stf-wp-prd.s3.sa-east-1.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/wpallimport/uploads/2026/09/25152309/Voto-ARE1608713.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"pt","translation_note":"Read in Portuguese on 2026-10-07 from the PDF the STF press note links (rapporteur's vote, 6 pages, text layer extracted). Translation by the research agent (an AI).","independence_group":"stf-are1608713"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["justice","work"],"unknowns":["Whether the fine of two minimum wages is imposed on the appellant, on the lawyer, or jointly.","Whether the First Panel concluded the virtual judgment and confirmed the vote.","Who inserted the hidden text and how; no response from the lawyer or the appellant is reported.","Which AI systems the STF uses for case analysis and whether any processed the petition before the detection.","How the Maria Shield function detects such content.","The outcome of the communications to the OAB and the MPF."],"geography":{"basis":"The petition was filed in ARE 1608713 before Brazil's Supreme Federal Court, which detected the commands and whose rapporteur issued the vote in Brasília. The appellant's post and the lawyer's bar registration are in Minas Gerais, Brazil; no source states where the lawyer lives.","court_countries":["BR"],"event_countries":["BR"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a consequential-response case: the STF's own press note and the rapporteur's vote, both read directly, record that hidden commands aimed at the court's AI systems were found in an appeal petition and that the court responded with a fine, certification in the record and communications to the bar and prosecutors naming the lawyer. The two sources form one chain (the court's own record), so the claims rest on the court record and are marked documented. No AI system is reported to have processed the text, so the relation is unknown. The lawyer and the appellant are not named.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-07"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The STF press note and the rapporteur's vote record that the court's AI unit detected 'prompt injection' in the petition: hidden instructions in white, reduced-size letters intended to direct the court's AI systems toward admitting and granting the appeal. The targeted AI is the STF's internal system for case analysis, which the court does not name by model; the detection is attributed to Maria Shield, a function of the court's Maria platform, which the press note describes as an AI system developed by the STF to support staff in case analysis and document production; the sources do not say how the Maria Shield function detects such content. No source reports any AI system processing or acting on the hidden text: the rapporteur states his office does not use AI and that the appeal had already been rejected. The harm is the court's response to the attempt (fine and communications), so no relation describing the AI system's own action toward the lawyer is established (unknown).","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Brazil's Supreme Federal Court reports its first hidden AI-directed command in an appeal petition; the rapporteur's vote applies a fine of two minimum wages","summary":"On 25 September 2026 Brazil's Supreme Federal Court (STF) announced that it had identified, for the first time, hidden commands in a petition intended to steer the court's artificial-intelligence systems toward a decision favourable to one party. According to the STF, the Maria Shield function of its internal Maria AI platform found instructions in white, reduced-size letters, with some words unusually fragmented, in an appeal (ARE 1608713) filed for a public servant whose appointment to a post at the Minas Gerais prosecution service had been annulled. The rapporteur's vote, presented to the First Panel in a virtual session beginning that day, records the detection, states that his office does not use AI to analyse cases, orders the episode certified in the record and communicated to the bar association (OAB) and the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF), and applies a fine of two minimum wages for breach of the duty of procedural loyalty (Code of Civil Procedure, article 77, IV). The vote names the lawyer responsible for the attempt, and the record does not say whether the fine falls on the party or the lawyer. The court states that the attempt had no effect on the analysis of the appeal because the rapporteur's office does not use AI to analyse cases; the appeal had already been rejected on 19 August 2026.","incidentDate":"2026-09-03","incidentEndDate":"2026-09-25","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2026-09-25","aiSystem":"The STF's internal artificial-intelligence systems for case analysis, which the hidden commands targeted (the court does not name specific models); the commands were detected by Maria Shield, a function of the STF's Maria AI platform","aiProduct":"Unidentified case-analysis tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["legal_harm","financial_loss"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The rapporteur's vote applies a fine of two minimum wages for breach of procedural loyalty and orders the episode communicated to the bar association for a possible disciplinary infraction and to federal prosecutors to assess a possible crime; the STF press note reports the fine as applied.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"established","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"At least one person: the lawyer whom the vote names as the author of the attempt and who is the subject of the OAB and MPF communications. The vote applies a fine of two minimum wages without naming who pays it (party or lawyer), so the person bearing the fine may be a second harmed person and is not counted. Counted under other people because the AI involved was the court's, not a tool the lawyer is reported to have used.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"BR","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"regulatory_action","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://noticias.stf.jus.br/postsnoticias/stf-identifica-uso-de-comandos-ocultos-para-influenciar-ia-em-processo-e-comunica-oab-e-mpf/","primarySourceLabel":"Supremo Tribunal Federal, 25 September 2026: STF identifica uso de comandos ocultos para influenciar IA em processo e comunica OAB e MPF","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-07T03:25:22.011566+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-11T07:47:36.04179+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["justice","legal-profession","sanction","prompt-injection","court-ai","brazil","stf","portuguese-language"]},{"id":"2026-italy-fideuram-chairman-ai-cloned-lawyer-voice-ceo-impersonation-fraud","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'Il 23 febbraio scorso, Molesini era stato contattato con un \"messaggio WhatsApp\" da un \"soggetto che, pur chiamandolo da un numero diverso da quello a lui noto, affermava di essere Carlo Messina, Ceo di Intesa\".'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'Tutto precipita in una manciata di ore di febbraio 2026, quando Molesini, allora presidente di Fideuram, riceve (in realtà crede di ricevere, come amaramente si renderà conto di lì a poco) un messaggio WhatsApp da Carlo Messina, amministratore della capogruppo Banca Intesa.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'veniva contattato sul proprio cellulare aziendale, tramite messaggio Whatsapp da un soggetto che, pur chiamandolo da un numero diverso da quello a lui noto, affermava essere Carlo Messina.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'La truffa ai danni di Fideuram, secondo la ricostruzione contenuta in un decreto di sequestro del Tribunale di Milano, comincia il 23 febbraio 2026.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"}],"assertion":"On 23 February 2026 Molesini, then chairman of Fideuram, received a WhatsApp message from a number different from the one he knew, from someone claiming to be Intesa Sanpaolo CEO Carlo Messina, announcing that a lawyer would call him to conclude a confidential acquisition of an international bank through Fideuram.","causal_attribution":"ANSA and Il Fatto Quotidiano quote the investigating judge's decree; Corriere reconstructs the same contact from the court papers. Messina is described by all sources as extraneous to the scheme."},{"id":"c2","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'Quell'avvocato, con voce finta creata con l'IA, poi lo contattò e gli fece firmare, con \"undici\" documenti inviati, \"un accordo di massima riservatezza\" e con procura speciale all'apparenza \"sottoscritta\" da Messina.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'È un avvocato d’affari che Moresini conosce, e se la voce gli sembra proprio quella è perché i truffatori l’hanno replicata ad arte con strumenti di intelligenza artificiale.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Nella stessa giornata un avvocato dello studio A&O Sherman chiama Molesini, ma è sempre l’IA che sta parlando.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'Con l'intelligenza artificiale era stata riprodotta la voce di Carlo Messina.'","relation":"context","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'C’è infine una tecnica che potrebbe aver contribuito alla truffa, ma sulla quale gli atti non offrono ancora una risposta: la possibile imitazione della voce.'","relation":"context","source_id":"s7"}],"assertion":"The same day a caller presenting as a lawyer of A&O Shearman whom Molesini knew, in a voice that ANSA, Il Fatto Quotidiano and Corriere della Sera describe as created with artificial intelligence, had him sign a confidentiality agreement and transmitted eleven payment instructions on the firm's letterhead with a power of attorney apparently signed by Messina.","causal_attribution":"The AI attribution comes from the court's reconstruction as relayed by three newsrooms; no recording, forensic finding or tool is reported. Corriere names the impersonated lawyer as Paolo Nastasi, managing partner of A&O Shearman Italia, wholly extraneous and unaware. Il Fatto Quotidiano's summary line attributing the AI voice to Messina (context evidence) conflicts with the decree passages it quotes."},{"id":"c3","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'Ed è così che il direttore finanziario di Fideuram, a ciò istruito dal presidente di Fideuram, che a sua volta crede di realizzare il compito affidatogli dal numero uno di Banca Intesa, fa partire i soldi, per lo più verso Cina e Hong Kong.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Ciò che è reale sono i bonifici successivi per un totale di 95 milioni di euro che partono tra il 23 e il 25 febbraio.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'anche il responsabile della Tesoreria e \"dei pagamenti\" di Fideuram, lo stesso giorno, sarebbe stato contattato da una persona che fingeva di essere l'ad di Fideuram, il quale gli diceva che Molesini lo avrebbe chiamato per disporre \"bonifici urgenti e riservati\".'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'Secondo il decreto, gli undici bonifici raggiungono complessivamente 95,18 milioni di euro.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"'Convinto della legittimità dell’operazione, Molesini aveva dato disposizione al direttore finanziario di Fideuram di eseguire i bonifici.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"Convinced of the operation, Molesini instructed Fideuram's finance and treasury head, who had himself been contacted by someone posing as Fideuram's CEO, to execute the transfers; eleven transfers totalling about 95 million euros left between 23 and 25 February 2026 to accounts in Portugal and at Bank of China.","causal_attribution":"The judge writes that Molesini and the treasurer were mutually convinced of the operation's urgency and confidentiality and did not contact the top management of Fideuram or Intesa (Il Fatto Quotidiano). The loss fell on the bank, not on Molesini personally."},{"id":"c4","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'La rapidità del riflesso reattivo viene premiata proprio da una banca in Cina, che blocca 40 milioni e li restituisce a Fideuram.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'All’appello, però, sinora mancano almeno 36 milioni volatilizzatisi nei vorticosi giri di conti esteri, e a un certo punto convertiti in criptovalute'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'con un tentativo di portare via alla banca del gruppo Intesa quasi 95 milioni, di cui, stando agli atti, ora mancano all'appello, però, solo 39,5 milioni'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'Decreto con cui sono stati congelati oltre 13 milioni su una banca portoghese, mentre 42 li aveva già stoppati Fideuram su conti cinesi.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'Ciò che ritorna a Fideuram sono i 42 milioni bonificati alla Bank of China. Dei restanti 52, solo 13 vengono bloccati da Bpi e poi messi sotto sequestro dal Tribunale.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'Il 25 febbraio, appena due giorni dopo il primo contatto, Banco BPI segnala a Fideuram la natura sospetta delle operazioni.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"'i sistemi di sicurezza interna di Fideuram si allertano rapidamente'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Fideuram's controls and the Portuguese bank raised the alarm; about 40-42 million euros sent to Bank of China were returned, 13 million were seized at Banco BPI in Portugal, and at least 36 million (39.5 million per the court papers) remain missing after being moved through foreign accounts and converted into cryptocurrency.","causal_attribution":"Figures differ between outlets: Corriere gives 40 million returned and at least 36 million missing; ANSA and Il Fatto Quotidiano, from the decree, give 42 million returned and 39.5 million missing."},{"id":"c5","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'Fideuram - Intesa Sanpaolo Private Banking ha reso noto che Paolo Molesini ha rassegnato le dimissioni dalla carica di presidente della società e di presidente di Intesa Sanpaolo Private Banking, per ragioni personali.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"'Intanto Molesini, non indagato e non destinatario di alcun contenzioso avviato dal proprio istituto, il 12 marzo scorso aveva comunque scelto di dimettersi da presidente (come informò un asettico comunicato di Fideuram) «per ragioni personali».'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Molesini, che non è indagato e non ha ricevuto contestazioni da parte dell’istituto, aveva annunciato a marzo le proprie dimissioni dalla presidenza di Fideuram «per ragioni personali».'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"Fideuram announced on 12 March 2026 that Molesini had resigned as chairman of Fideuram - Intesa Sanpaolo Private Banking and of Intesa Sanpaolo Private Banking for personal reasons.","causal_attribution":"The company's stated reason is personal; the announcement did not mention the fraud."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Il manager coinvolto, una volta resosi conto dell’accaduto, ha deciso di rassegnare le dimissioni.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s8"},{"locator":"'Ma il povero presidente ha dovuto presentare le dimissioni.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"'il 12 marzo scorso aveva comunque scelto di dimettersi da presidente'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Press accounts link the resignation to the fraud: Corriere writes that he had nonetheless chosen to resign, Milano Finanza that once he realised what had happened he decided to resign, and today.it that he had to resign.","causal_attribution":"Journalistic attribution; neither Fideuram nor Molesini has publicly linked the resignation to the fraud in the inspected sources."},{"id":"c7","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'Nel caso di Molesini, che si è dimesso a marzo, è indagato come uno dei componenti della banda un cittadino israeliano di 48 anni.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'è risalita almeno a un 48enne israeliano correlato a uno dei conti esteri dove sono atterrati 4 milioni'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"},{"locator":"'le rogatorie serviranno a verificare se i suoi documenti corrispondano veramente a una persona in carne ed ossa'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"}],"assertion":"A 48-year-old Israeli citizen is under investigation as a member of the gang, named in the investigating judge's seizure decree that froze over 13 million euros at a Portuguese bank; investigators are pursuing the funds with international letters rogatory.","causal_attribution":"Corriere notes it is unverified whether the suspect's identity documents correspond to a real person."},{"id":"c8","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Intanto Molesini, non indagato e non destinatario di alcun contenzioso avviato dal proprio istituto'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Molesini, che non è indagato e non ha ricevuto contestazioni da parte dell’istituto'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"Corriere della Sera writes that Molesini is not under investigation and is not the target of any litigation by his institution.","causal_attribution":"Corriere's statement, relayed by La Stampa and others; ANSA and Il Fatto Quotidiano do not address it."}],"effects":[{"label":"deceived by a phone call in an AI-cloned voice and impersonation messages into ordering about 95 million euros of transfers, of which at least 36 million remain missing; resigned as chairman on 12 March 2026, weeks later","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://milano.corriere.it/notizie/cronaca/26_settembre_25/fideuram-truffa-falso-messaggio-whatsapp-molesini-milioni-d5248b46-a7e7-4130-8c74-e09be5e00xlk.shtml","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"it","translation_note":"Read live in Italian on 2026-09-30 (Corriere della Sera Milano, 25 September 2026, byline Luigi Ferrarella; the original reconstruction from the court papers, credited by Il Sole 24 Ore, La Stampa, Il Post, Tgcom24 and Bluerating). Researcher translation.","independence_group":"corriere-ferrarella"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/cronaca/2026/09/25/truffa-da-395-milioni-allex-capo-di-fideuram-un-indagato_f747847d-aaa5-4f5f-9bee-1d476b6bea1e.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"it","translation_note":"Read live in Italian on 2026-09-30 (ANSA, 25 September 2026; the earlier ANSA URL 'lex-capo-di-fideuram-truffato-con-whatsapp-e-ia-spariti-36-milioni' redirects to this updated item). Quotes the investigating judge's decree directly ('stando agli atti'). Researcher translation.","independence_group":"ansa-decree-read"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2026/09/25/una-telefonata-dallad-di-intesa-via-ai-bonifici-per-95-milioni-ma-era-tutto-finto-la-storia-della-truffa-a-fideuram-indagato-informatico-israeliano/8518472/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"it","translation_note":"Read live in Italian on 2026-09-30 (Il Fatto Quotidiano, 25 September 2026). Credits Corriere for the story but quotes the five-page seizure decree at length with details absent from Corriere and ANSA (transfer dates and beneficiaries, the real CEO's warning call). Its headline attributes the AI voice to Messina, contrary to the decree passages it quotes. Researcher translation.","independence_group":"fatto-decree-read"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.lastampa.it/cronaca/2026/09/25/news/fideuram_truffa_36_milioni_whatsapp_voce_clonata_ai_molesini-15748791/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"it","translation_note":"Read live in Italian on 2026-09-30 (La Stampa, 25 September 2026); explicitly a rewrite of Corriere della Sera's reconstruction. Researcher translation. Its HTML page title reads 'voce del ceo clonata con l'AI', contrary to its own body, which attributes the cloned voice to the lawyer.","independence_group":"corriere-ferrarella"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/economia/risparmio_Investimenti/2026/03/12/paolo-molesini-lascia-la-carica-di-presidente-di-fideuram_34e2dec8-5bba-4ca3-b569-aa638d534e2e.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"it","translation_note":"Read live in Italian on 2026-09-30 (ANSA, 12 March 2026); relays Fideuram's announcement of the resignation. Researcher translation.","independence_group":"fideuram-announcement"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://milano.corriere.it/notizie/cronaca/26_settembre_26/truffa-fideuram-ifis-frodi-14e046de-a157-4b21-aaf7-444b75961xlk.shtml","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"it","translation_note":"Read live in Italian on 2026-09-30 (Corriere della Sera Milano, 26 September 2026); follow-up on the suspect and the money trail; the page's paywall banner appears after the article text, which was complete. Researcher translation.","independence_group":"corriere-ferrarella"},{"id":"s7","url":"https://www.today.it/dossier/economia/banca-fideuram-truffa-milioni-spariti-come-hanno-fatto.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"it","translation_note":"Read live in Italian on 2026-09-30 (today.it, 29 September 2026); cites the Milan seizure decree for the transfer dates and the 95.18 million total. It names Fideuram's treasury head, who is not named in this record. Researcher translation.","independence_group":"today-decree-read"},{"id":"s8","url":"https://www.milanofinanza.it/news/fideuram-intesa-sanpaolo-l-ex-presidente-paolo-molesini-vittima-di-una-truffa-da-36-milioni-202609251035572085","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"it","translation_note":"Read live in Italian on 2026-09-30 (Milano Finanza, 25 September 2026); credits Corriere della Sera; cited only for its own statement linking the resignation to the fraud. Researcher translation.","independence_group":"corriere-ferrarella"},{"id":"s9","url":"https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/ai-messaging-scam-costs-italys-top-bank-intesa-millions-sources-say-2026-09-25/","kind":"news_report","access":"unavailable","language":"en","translation_note":"Not read: HTTP 401 on 2026-09-30 and no Internet Archive capture; the Google News title reads 'AI messaging scam costs Italy's top bank Intesa millions, sources say' (25 September 2026).","independence_group":"reuters-sources"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["work","finance"],"unknowns":["Which voice-cloning tool was used and whether any recording or forensic analysis of the call exists; the AI attribution rests on press accounts of the court papers (Corriere della Sera, ANSA, Il Fatto Quotidiano), while today.it, also citing the seizure decree, writes that the court papers do not yet answer whether the voice was imitated.","Whether Molesini's resignation was connected to the fraud: Fideuram gave personal reasons and no source quotes Molesini on the point.","Whether the WhatsApp messages impersonating Messina and Fideuram's CEO or the emails involved any AI tool.","The exact unrecovered amount: 36 million (Corriere) or 39.5 million (ANSA and Il Fatto Quotidiano from the decree).","Whether the named suspect is a real person and whether other suspects have been identified; the Reuters report (sources) was not read."],"geography":{"basis":"The contact reached the chairman of Fideuram, a Milan-based Intesa Sanpaolo subsidiary, and the investigation is by the Milan prosecutors and investigating judge (ANSA; Corriere). Molesini was born in Feltre (ANSA, 12 March 2026) and his career is described in Milan (Il Gazzettino). The transfers went to accounts in Portugal and at Bank of China (Il Fatto Quotidiano) and the seizure in Portugal was obtained with Lisbon authorities under Eurojust, but the court order is the Milan judge's, so only IT is recorded as a court country.","court_countries":["IT"],"event_countries":["IT"],"affected_person_countries":["IT"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a core case: an AI-cloned voice communicated with the affected person (a bank chairman, named in his official capacity as all sources do) and impersonated a lawyer he knew, inducing him to order transfers of about 95 million euros, of which at least 36 million remain missing; he resigned on 12 March 2026, weeks later, announced as for personal reasons. Three independent reads of the Milan court papers (Corriere della Sera, ANSA, Il Fatto Quotidiano) plus the March resignation announcement (ANSA). The financial loss fell on the institution; the personal consequence recorded is the deception itself and the resignation as reported.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-30"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"ANSA ('Quell'avvocato, con voce finta creata con l'IA, poi lo contattò') and Il Fatto Quotidiano ('un avvocato dello studio A&O Sherman chiama Molesini, ma è sempre l'IA che sta parlando'), narrating the investigating judge's seizure decree, and Corriere della Sera's reconstruction from the court papers ('i truffatori l'hanno replicata ad arte con strumenti di intelligenza artificiale') describe the lawyer's voice on the call as created with AI. None of the decree passages these outlets quote verbatim contains the AI attribution, and today.it, which also cites the decree, writes that the court papers do not yet answer whether the voice was imitated ('sulla quale gli atti non offrono ancora una risposta: la possibile imitazione della voce'). No forensic detail, recording or tool is reported. The WhatsApp messages impersonating Messina and the Fideuram CEO and the emails are not described as AI-made in the decree passages quoted. Il Fatto Quotidiano's headline attributes the AI voice to Messina, which its own quoted decree passages do not support. The cloned voice spoke with Molesini (communicated_with) and impersonated the lawyer (depicted_or_impersonated).","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with","depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Italy: Fideuram chairman Paolo Molesini is deceived by a WhatsApp impersonation of Intesa Sanpaolo's CEO and a phone call in the reportedly AI-cloned voice of a lawyer he knew into ordering about 95 million euros of transfers; at least 36 million remain missing and he resigned on 12 March 2026, weeks later","summary":"On 23 February 2026 Paolo Molesini, then chairman of Fideuram (the private-banking subsidiary of Intesa Sanpaolo), received a WhatsApp message from an unknown number from someone claiming to be Intesa's chief executive Carlo Messina, announcing a confidential acquisition that had to be executed through Fideuram. The same day a caller presenting as a lawyer of A&O Shearman whom Molesini knew, whose voice ANSA, Il Fatto Quotidiano and Corriere della Sera, reporting from the Milan court papers, describe as created with artificial intelligence (today.it, which also cites the seizure decree, writes that the court papers do not yet answer whether the voice was imitated), had him sign a confidentiality agreement and sent eleven payment instructions; Fideuram's treasury head was separately contacted by someone posing as Fideuram's CEO. Between 23 and 25 February eleven transfers totalling about 95 million euros went to accounts in Portugal and at Bank of China; the bank's alarm systems and the Milan prosecutors recovered about 40-42 million from China and 13 million seized in Portugal, leaving at least 36 million (39.5 million per the court papers) missing after conversion into cryptocurrency. Molesini, who Corriere writes is not under investigation, resigned as chairman on 12 March 2026, which Fideuram announced as being for personal reasons; a 48-year-old Israeli citizen is under investigation as a member of the gang.","incidentDate":"2026-02-23","incidentEndDate":"2026-02-25","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-09-25","aiSystem":"Voice of a business lawyer replicated with artificial-intelligence tools for a phone call to the Fideuram chairman, as described by Corriere della Sera, ANSA and Il Fatto Quotidiano in their accounts of the Milan court papers; today.it, also citing the seizure decree, writes that the court papers do not yet answer whether the voice was imitated; the tool is not identified. The WhatsApp messages and emails are not described as AI-made","aiProduct":"Unidentified voice-cloning tool","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["financial_loss","professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Fideuram lost about 95 million euros in transfers ordered by its deceived chairman, of which at least 36 million (39.5 million per the court papers) remain missing (Corriere della Sera and ANSA, from the Milan seizure decree); the chairman resigned on 12 March 2026, about two and a half weeks after the transfers, announced by the bank as for personal reasons, which Corriere, Milano Finanza and today.it link to the fraud.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person, Paolo Molesini, who was called by the AI-cloned voice and induced to order the transfers (ANSA; Corriere; Il Fatto Quotidiano). The impersonated lawyer and the impersonated CEO are not counted; no harm to them is reported. Fideuram's treasury head, contacted by a person posing as Fideuram's CEO (ANSA 'contattato', Il Fatto Quotidiano 'chiamato', today.it 'messaggio WhatsApp'; no source describes AI in that contact), is not counted. Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"IT","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"investigation_opened","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://milano.corriere.it/notizie/cronaca/26_settembre_25/fideuram-truffa-falso-messaggio-whatsapp-molesini-milioni-d5248b46-a7e7-4130-8c74-e09be5e00xlk.shtml","primarySourceLabel":"Corriere della Sera (Milano), 25 September 2026: Il falso messaggio WhatsApp inviato all'ex presidente Fideuram e la telefonata contraffatta con l'AI","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-30T04:13:31.372024+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T04:13:31.372024+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["voice-cloning","ceo-fraud","impersonation","whatsapp","banking","italy","milan","financial-loss","resignation","criminal-investigation"]},{"id":"2026-rennes-administrative-court-fines-claimant-ai-written-tax-appeal","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Par une ordonnance n°2508168 rendue le 19 août 2026, le tribunal administratif de Rennes a infligé une amende pour recours abusif de 500 euros à une personne dont le recours avait manifestement été écrit à l’aide d’un outil d’intelligence artificielle.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'le vice-président du tribunal administratif de Rennes, Thurian Jouno, prend l'exemple d'une femme qui avait réclamé l'annulation d'un rattrapage fiscal, manifestement avec l'aide de l'IA. Elle a été condamnée à une amende de 500 €.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'Le 19 août 2026, le tribunal administratif de Rennes a condamné une requérante à une amende de 500 euros pour recours abusif.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'Le tribunal administratif de Rennes a tranché le 19 août 2025 : 500 euros d’amende pour recours abusif.'","relation":"context","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"By order n°2508168 of 19 August 2026, the tribunal administratif de Rennes fined a claimant 500 euros for an abusive application (recours abusif) under article R.741-12 of the code de justice administrative.","causal_attribution":"Gossement Avocats quotes the order; the court’s vice-president described the fine on France Inter (ICI). Le Tribunal du Net (relaying Capital) dates the order 19 August 2025, contradicting its own opening sentence and the other sources; 2026 is used here."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'avait déposé un recours devant le tribunal administratif de Rennes pour contester une décision de l’administration fiscale (rappel de TVA)'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'les moyens de la requête, laquelle a, au demeurant, été manifestement écrite à l’aide d’un outil d’intelligence artificielle, ne sont pas assortis des précisions les plus élémentaires, permettant au juge d’en apprécier la portée et le bien-fondé.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Elle demandait l’annulation d’un rattrapage fiscal dans une requête qui comportait des erreurs importantes et était, selon le juge, manifestement assistée par un outil d’intelligence artificielle.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"The order states that the application, contesting a VAT reassessment by the tax administration, had manifestly been written with an artificial intelligence tool and that its grounds lacked the most elementary details needed for the judge to assess them; this was one of the grounds for rejecting it.","causal_attribution":"The court’s own finding, as quoted by Gossement Avocats. The court inferred AI drafting from the text; no source says which tool was used or quotes the claimant."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'il n’est pas établi que la requête ait été précédée d’une réclamation adressée aux services fiscaux. Elle est donc manifestement irrecevable'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Eu égard à ce qui a été dit aux points 2 et 3 ci-dessus, la présente requête, qui fait d’ailleurs suite à une requête ayant, en substance, le même objet, rejetée par ordonnance du 3 octobre 2025, présente un caractère abusif.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'le tribunal administratif de Rennes n’a pas infligé cette amende pour recours abusif à l’auteure de la requête au seul motif qu’il a été rédigé avec l’aide de l’IA.'","relation":"context","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Ce n’est donc pas l’usage de l’IA en lui-même qui a été puni, mais l’insistance sur un dossier déjà tranché.'","relation":"context","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The court also found the application manifestly inadmissible because it was not shown to have been preceded by a complaint to the tax service, and held it abusive in view of that finding, the imprecision finding and the fact that it followed a request with substantially the same object rejected by order of 3 October 2025.","causal_attribution":"The order’s reasoning as quoted by Gossement Avocats: the AI-drafted imprecision is one stated ground among several; Gossement and Le Tribunal du Net both stress that AI use alone was not the basis of the fine."}],"effects":[{"label":"a claimant was fined 500 euros for an abusive application that the court found manifestly written with an AI tool and lacking elementary detail","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"the AI-drafted application was rejected, the court stating that its grounds could not be assessed","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.gossement-avocats.com/blog/ia-lusage-abusif-de-lintelligence-artificielle-peut-mener-a-une-amende-pour-recours-abusif-tribunal-administratif-de-rennes-19-aout-2026-n2508168/","kind":"legal_commentary","access":"read","language":"fr","translation_note":"Full post read by curl on 2026-09-29 (Arnaud Gossement, note updated 16 September 2026); it quotes the order at length. English renderings in the record are the reviewer’s translations. The order itself was not read.","independence_group":"rennes-order-2508168"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.ici.fr/bretagne/ille-et-vilaine-35/rennes/c-est-assez-angoissant-au-tribunal-de-rennes-l-inquietude-face-a-l-augmentation-des-requetes-creees-par-ia-4372820","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"fr","translation_note":"ICI / France Inter, 2 September 2026, reporting the court vice-president’s radio interview; read in full by curl. Reviewer’s translations.","independence_group":"rennes-ta-vice-president"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.letribunaldunet.fr/hightech/recours-ia-amende-10000-euros-risque.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"fr","translation_note":"Le Tribunal du Net, 7 September 2026, relaying Capital.fr’s interview with lawyer Alexandre Lazarègue; read in full. It dates the order to 19 August 2025, an error against its own opening and the other sources. Capital.fr’s original was not read.","independence_group":"capital-lazaregue"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.epochtimes.fr/recours-administratifs-et-ia-la-justice-face-a-lafflux-de-requetes-redigees-avec-chatgpt-3354369.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"fr","translation_note":"Epoch Times France, 24 September 2026, summarising franceinfo’s report of the decision; read in full. franceinfo’s original was not read.","independence_group":"franceinfo-relay"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["justice","finance","public_services"],"unknowns":["Which AI tool was used and how the claimant used it.","The amount of the VAT reassessment at issue and whether the claimant pursued any further remedy.","Whether the earlier request rejected on 3 October 2025 was also AI-drafted."],"geography":{"basis":"The order was made by the tribunal administratif de Rennes (France) on a French tax (VAT) dispute. Where the claimant lives or where the application was drafted is not stated.","court_countries":["FR"],"event_countries":["FR"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a concrete court sanction on a private person whose application the court found manifestly AI-written and too imprecise to assess. The record rests on a law firm’s verbatim quotation of the order and the court vice-president’s radio account; the order itself was not read. The court fined for several reasons, and the record states them. The claimant is not identified.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-29"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The order, as quoted by Gossement Avocats, states that the application was manifestly written with an artificial intelligence tool; the court’s vice-president repeated this on France Inter. This is the court’s inference from the text. The tool is not named and no source reproduces the claimant’s exchange with it.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Rennes administrative court fines a claimant 500 euros for an abusive tax appeal it found manifestly written with an AI tool and too imprecise to assess","summary":"According to Gossement Avocats, which quotes the order, and the court's vice-president on France Inter, an order of 19 August 2026 (n°2508168) of the tribunal administratif de Rennes rejected a claimant’s application contesting a VAT reassessment and fined the claimant 500 euros for an abusive application. As quoted by Gossement Avocats, the order says the application had manifestly been written with an artificial intelligence tool and that its grounds lacked the most elementary details needed to assess them. The court also found it inadmissible because no prior complaint to the tax service was shown, and noted that it repeated a request with substantially the same object rejected in October 2025. The court’s vice-president cited the case on France Inter; commentators stress that AI use alone was not the basis for the fine.","incidentDate":"2026-08-19","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-09-02","aiSystem":"Generative AI tool (not named in inspected sources)","aiProduct":"Unidentified AI tool","aiCompany":"Unknown","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["financial_loss","legal_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A claimant was fined 500 euros for an abusive application and had it rejected; the order states the application was manifestly written with an AI tool and too imprecise to assess, alongside inadmissibility and repetition grounds (order quoted by Gossement Avocats; court vice-president on France Inter).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One harmed person: the claimant who filed the application the court found AI-written and who was fined 500 euros (order as quoted by Gossement Avocats; court vice-president on France Inter). No other harmed person is reported.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"FR","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"regulatory_action","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.gossement-avocats.com/blog/ia-lusage-abusif-de-lintelligence-artificielle-peut-mener-a-une-amende-pour-recours-abusif-tribunal-administratif-de-rennes-19-aout-2026-n2508168/","primarySourceLabel":"Gossement Avocats: IA : l’usage abusif de l’intelligence artificielle peut mener à une amende pour recours abusif (TA Rennes, ord., 19 août 2026, n°2508168)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-29T09:10:28.483038+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:50.764055+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["justice","administrative-court","fine","recours-abusif","ai-drafted-filing","tax","own-use","france","rennes"]}]}