{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-12T09:11:51.234Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"employee","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"","evidence":"","year":"unknown","response":"","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":4,"coverage":{"cases":4,"countries":2,"languages":1,"unknownLocation":2,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":4,"lawsuits":0,"regulatory":0,"minors":0,"coreRelations":3,"contextualRelations":1,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":0,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":0},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2026-england-former-social-media-employee-finds-ai-altered-image-of-herself-in-ex-employer-ad-first-person","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'My former role at a brand was in social media and I regularly created content to feature in organic and paid media. Majority of the content was taken on my phone in my own home'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The poster says she worked in social media for a brand, regularly creating content for its organic and paid media, much of it filmed on her own phone at home.","causal_attribution":"Poster's account."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'It’s been 4 months since I worked there and recently I came across a social media ad that uses an image of me and it’s been made with AI. The original image is a still taken from a video I made while working there'; 'The still is the same image however my eyes are a different colour and tattoos are gone'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The poster says that about four months after leaving she came across a social media ad using an image of her made with AI: a still from a video she filmed while employed, altered so that her eyes are a different colour and her tattoos are gone.","causal_attribution":"Poster's account; the AI alteration is her inference from the changed image. No employer statement was retrieved."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'It was used with ChatGPT, I know that’s the only ai they used plus I can tell'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"In a reply the poster says the alteration was done with ChatGPT, which she identifies as the only AI tool the company used.","causal_attribution":"Poster's inference; the tool is not otherwise established."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'I feel incredibly uncomfortable that my image was put through AI for these purposes'; 'It’s pretty upsetting to see a version of yourself on the internet'; 'it was in general something I opposed to openly without getting people’s consent'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The poster says she finds the use of her altered image upsetting and disturbing, and that she had opposed using people's images without consent while at the company.","causal_attribution":"Poster's account of her own reaction."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'I have seen other ads with me being reused since I left which I expected for a while, but they haven’t been altered'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The poster says she expected content she made to be reused in ads after she left, and that other reused ads have not been altered.","causal_attribution":"Poster's account; distinguishes the altered ad from ordinary reuse."}],"effects":[{"label":"AI-altered image of a former employee used in an ex-employer's ad without her consent (poster's account)","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.reddit.com/r/LegalAdviceUK/comments/1wzqiel/former_job_made_ai_ad_with_my_image_uk/","kind":"forum_post","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-08: full self-text and the 36 comments retrieved through the arctic_shift archive API by post ID, 13 of them replies by the poster. The poster handle is not recorded.","independence_group":"reddit-legaladviceuk-ex-employer-ai-ad-poster"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["work","privacy"],"unknowns":["The employer and brand, and the platforms on which the ad ran.","The tool actually used; ChatGPT is the poster's inference.","When the ad was created and first shown; the poster says only that she came across it recently, about four months after leaving.","Whether the employer responded to any request to stop using the altered image.","The contractual position on content the poster made during her employment."],"geography":{"basis":"The poster states \"This is in England\", which places her former employment and the ad she saw in the UK. No court proceedings; the ACAS conciliation she mentions concerns her dismissal and is not a court.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["GB"],"affected_person_countries":["GB"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the public-forum rule as a concrete first-person account of an AI-altered likeness used in a former employer's advertisement without the person's consent, with the alteration and the ChatGPT identification attributed to the poster as her inference. Described with attribution and without corroboration; the employer is not named, the poster's handle is not recorded, and details of her dismissal are omitted.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-08"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The poster says a still from her own video was put through AI and used in her former employer's social media ad with her eye colour changed and her tattoos removed, and in a reply identifies the tool as ChatGPT because it was the only AI tool the company used and she can tell from the image. The AI system's output, an altered depiction of the poster, is the artifact in the ad, and the poster connects seeing that altered version of herself to her discomfort and distress. The identification of AI and of ChatGPT rests on the poster's inference from the altered image and her knowledge of the company's tools; no employer statement or ad metadata was retrieved, so the status is suspected.","status":"suspected"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Former social-media employee in England says her ex-employer's ad uses an AI-altered still of her, eye colour changed and tattoos removed (first-person)","summary":"In a public post to r/LegalAdviceUK created on 7 October 2026, a person who says she worked in social media for a brand in England, creating content for its organic and paid media, writes that about four months after leaving she came across a social media ad using an image of her that had been made with AI. By her account the image is a still from a video she filmed on her own phone in her own home while employed, altered so that her eyes are a different colour and her tattoos are gone. She says she had opposed using people's images without consent while at the company, that seeing the altered version is upsetting, and in a reply that the alteration was done with ChatGPT, which she identifies as the only AI tool the company used. The employer is not named and did not respond in the thread. The account is the poster's alone and uncorroborated.","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-10-07","aiSystem":"An AI image tool that, by the poster's account, her former employer used to alter a still from her video for a social media ad; in a reply she identifies it as ChatGPT (\"the only ai they used plus I can tell\")","aiProduct":"ChatGPT (suspected)","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The poster says an AI-altered version of her image, with changed eye colour and removed tattoos, was used in her former employer's social media ad without her consent, which she describes as upsetting and disturbing (first-person account, uncorroborated).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person counted: the poster, whose altered likeness she says appears in the ad. The alteration was the former employer's use, so the poster is counted under others' use rather than as a direct user.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"GB","platformType":"other","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.reddit.com/r/LegalAdviceUK/comments/1wzqiel/former_job_made_ai_ad_with_my_image_uk/","primarySourceLabel":"r/LegalAdviceUK, 7 October 2026: \"Former job made AI ad with my image uk\"","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-08T03:27:59.814816+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-08T03:27:59.814816+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["first-person","reddit","likeness","advertising","image-alteration","workplace","england","data-protection"]},{"id":"2025-washington-trooper-alleges-ai-deepfake-workplace-harassment","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Article body: attorney's most recent video allegation and circulation account.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The trooper's attorney alleges that an AI deepfake falsely depicting an intimate interaction circulated within the patrol.","causal_attribution":"The inspected reporting describes this account. Claims remain attributed and causation is alleged; multiple reports of the same victim or police/court account are one independence group."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Article body: attorney discrimination and weaponisation statements.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The attorney describes this as harassment based on the trooper's sexual orientation.","causal_attribution":"The inspected reporting describes this account. Claims remain attributed and causation is alleged; multiple reports of the same victim or police/court account are one independence group."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Article body: spokesperson response.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The agency said employees should be free from harassment and declined comment on pending litigation.","causal_attribution":"The inspected reporting describes this account. Claims remain attributed and causation is alleged; multiple reports of the same victim or police/court account are one independence group."}],"effects":[{"label":"Alleged intimate impersonation circulated as workplace harassment","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.fox13seattle.com/news/trooper-sues-washington-state-patrol-over-ai-deepfake-video","kind":"journalistic","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"original-account-aiid-1345"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["work","privacy"],"unknowns":["The video's creator, generation tool and first circulation date are unknown.","The lawsuit outcome and alleged past employment events are not established as effects of this video."],"geography":{"basis":"The target works in Western Washington for the Washington State Patrol, United States. The precise court location is not stated in the inspected body.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"An inspected source describes a concrete person-level adverse experience connected to the specified AI use. Statements remain attributed, private identities are minimized, and unknown dates, counts and technical details are preserved.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-30"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The attorney directly labels the video an AI deepfake. The actual video and complaint were not inspected; the allegation is not upgraded to a factual finding.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Washington trooper alleges AI video was circulated as workplace harassment","summary":"A Washington State Patrol trooper's attorney told FOX 13 that coworkers circulated a deepfake AI video falsely depicting the trooper in an intimate interaction with another coworker. The attorney described the video as harassment based on sexual orientation. The agency said it valued employees' dignity and declined to comment on pending litigation. The video's first date, creator and circulation extent are unknown; earlier job and disciplinary allegations are separate.","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2025-12-30","aiSystem":"Alleged AI-generated impersonation video","aiProduct":"Unidentified video tool","aiCompany":"Unknown","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["exploitation_or_abuse","reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Alleged intimate impersonation circulated as workplace harassment","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"One trooper is described as the harassment target. The other depicted coworker's personal consequences are not reported.","victimAgeRange":"adult","platformType":"other","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.fox13seattle.com/news/trooper-sues-washington-state-patrol-over-ai-deepfake-video","primarySourceLabel":"FOX 13 Seattle, 30 December 2025, attorney interview and agency response","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-30T01:11:12.924913+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:58:25.649299+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":[]},{"id":"2025-havre-game-coffee-store-phone-scam-reported-ai-voice-replication","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"were recently the victim of an over the phone scam which compromised bank details and monetary losses from the store","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The store reported that an over-the-phone scam compromised bank details and caused the store monetary losses.","causal_attribution":"The store's account as relayed by the outlet; no amounts, bank or police confirmation are given."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"it sounded just like me","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"they had also duped my number meaning they had both of our personal cells","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"An employee received a call on a personal phone that appeared to come from the employee's own number and heard a voice the employee said sounded just like the owner. The owner said the scammers had duplicated both personal numbers.","causal_attribution":"The owner relays the employee's account. The owner did not hear the call."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"This scam, however, is utilizing a new way of tricking people: AI voice replication.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The reporting outlet describes the scam as using AI voice replication.","causal_attribution":"Outlet statement. The article gives no evidence that the voice was synthetic rather than a human imitation."}],"effects":[{"label":"Compromised bank details and monetary loss to a small store","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://hilinetoday.com/sugar-and-dice-targeted-by-complex-scam-involving-ai-deepfake-voice-replication/","kind":"local_news","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"hilinetoday-havre"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["finance","work"],"unknowns":["Date of the calls (the report says 'recently').","Amount lost and whether any was recovered.","Whether the voice was actually AI-generated.","Whether police, the bank or a voice analysis was involved.","Only one outlet was found; a search for a second Havre source found none.","Country and state are not stated in the article text (Havre is named)."],"geography":{"basis":"The article text names Havre and a mall but gives no state or country. Publisher navigation is not used to assign a country.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Concrete event reported to a local outlet by the store owner, with a reported financial loss to the store. The event start is not established: the sole source says 'recently' in a 4 February 2025 article. AI involvement is the reporter's statement and rests on the employee's impression, so it is recorded as suspected.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-29"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The reporter states the scam used AI voice replication. The owner's quotes do not mention AI or cloning; the only supporting detail is the employee's claim, relayed by the owner, that the caller's voice sounded like the owner. No recording, analysis, police or bank statement is cited.","status":"suspected"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated","communicated_with"]},"name":"Game and coffee store in Havre reports phone scam in which an employee heard what sounded like the owner's voice","summary":"In a 4 February 2025 report by Hi-Line Today, the owner of a game and coffee store in a Havre shopping mall said an employee received a call on a personal phone that appeared to come from the employee's own number and carried what the employee described as the owner's voice. The owner said the scammers had also duplicated the owner's number. The article says the store reported that the scam compromised bank details and caused monetary losses; the owner said the employee was not blamed. The reporter describes the scam as using AI voice replication. The only support for a cloned voice is the employee's claim, relayed by the owner.","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2025-02-04","aiSystem":"Unspecified AI voice replication tool (reported by the outlet, not identified)","aiProduct":"Unidentified voice-cloning tool (suspected)","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["financial_loss"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A local outlet reports that the store said the phone scam compromised bank details and caused monetary losses to the store (amounts not stated).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"unquantified","affectedCountEvidence":"The article does not state that the owner personally lost money. The reported loss is the store's. No harm to the deceived employee is reported. No person harm is counted, and the store is not counted as a person.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","platformType":"other","primarySourceUrl":"https://hilinetoday.com/sugar-and-dice-targeted-by-complex-scam-involving-ai-deepfake-voice-replication/","primarySourceLabel":"Hi-Line Today, 4 February 2025","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-29T12:41:59.799063+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:04.411814+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":[]},{"id":"2026-england-gemini-meet-notetaker-kept-transcribing-prospects-after-host-left-first-person","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'My boss was in a meeting with a prospective client and his business partner'; 'Gemini Notetaker was on.'; 'my boss said goodbye and left the meeting, and the two business partners stayed on the call to discuss the proposal and the other agencies they were looking at.'; 'What they didn't know was that Gemini was still taking notes'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'it was on meet.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"During a Google Meet pitch with Gemini note-taking on, the agency's boss left at the end, the prospective client's two business partners stayed on the call to discuss the proposal and competing agencies, and Gemini kept taking notes of that discussion.","causal_attribution":"Poster's account; the poster does not say they attended the meeting and describes reading the conversation in the notes and transcript."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'My boss sent me the notes and transcript from the meeting to create a follow-up deck'; 'They named the other agency they were looking at and talked about personal details of who they spoke to specifically on the call.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The boss sent the poster the notes and transcript to build a follow-up deck from them; the partners had named a competing agency and talked about personal details of the people they had spoken to.","causal_attribution":"Poster's account of what they received and were asked to do."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'I assumed the notetaker stops when the person who activates them leaves'; 'I don't think they were aware because the things they spoke about were very in detail and slightly scathing towards my boss' proposal.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The poster believes the partners did not know they were still being transcribed; the poster says they had assumed the note-taker stops when the person who started it leaves.","causal_attribution":"The poster's inference from the content of the discussion; commenters disputed it, arguing Meet notifies all participants."},{"id":"c4","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Google Meet informs all meeting participants that notes are being taken and the pencil icon appears on all participants' screens.'; 'The meeting organizer and participants internal to the host’s organization can start or stop notes.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"Google's help page says Meet informs all participants when notes are being taken, shows a pencil icon on all participants' screens, and lets only the organizer and participants internal to the host's organization start or stop notes.","causal_attribution":"General product documentation; it does not establish what the partners saw in this meeting."}],"effects":[{"label":"two prospective clients' private discussion after the host left the call was transcribed and summarised without their apparent knowledge","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"the notes, including a named competing agency and personal details, were passed to agency staff to shape a follow-up pitch","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.reddit.com/r/LegalAdviceUK/comments/1wsd4ul/my_boss_recorded_a_transcript_of_a_meeting/","kind":"forum_post","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-29: full self-text retrieved through the arctic_shift archive API by post ID. The poster handle is not recorded.","independence_group":"reddit-meet-notetaker-poster"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.reddit.com/r/LegalAdviceUK/comments/1wsd4ul/my_boss_recorded_a_transcript_of_a_meeting/pckanew/","kind":"forum_comment","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"The poster's own reply in the thread (archive API, 2026-09-29); a near-identical second reply (pckasgw) adds 'it was on meet.'","independence_group":"reddit-meet-notetaker-poster"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.reddit.com/r/LegalAdviceUK/comments/1wsd4ul/my_boss_recorded_a_transcript_of_a_meeting/pckasgw/","kind":"forum_comment","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"The poster's second reply, stating the call was on Google Meet (archive API, 2026-09-29).","independence_group":"reddit-meet-notetaker-poster"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://support.google.com/meet/answer/14754931?hl=en","kind":"company_documentation","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Google Meet Help page for \"Take notes for me\", fetched 2026-09-29 (200). Describes the feature in general; it does not address this meeting.","independence_group":"google-meet-help"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["work","privacy"],"unknowns":["Whether the partners saw or understood Meet's note-taking notice after the host left.","The date of the meeting and the partners' location.","Whether the follow-up deck was made or the prospective client learned of the transcript.","Where the call participants were located."],"geography":{"basis":"The poster titles the post '(England)', answering the subreddit's instruction to say whether the poster is in England, Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland; that locates the poster and the law they ask about, not the call. The post does not say where the boss or the prospective clients were during the Google Meet call. Unknown after review.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter's public-forum rule as a concrete first-person account of an AI note-taker capturing and summarising people who were not its users, with the notes then used commercially, described with attribution and without corroboration. Google's documentation of participant notification is included as context. No handle, company or client name is recorded.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-29"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The poster names Gemini note-taking in a Google Meet call as the tool that kept producing notes and a transcript after the host left; Google's help page documents the feature. No notes or screenshots were published.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["made_claim_about"]},"name":"First-person forum account: an agency employee in England says Gemini note-taking in Google Meet kept transcribing two prospective clients after the agency's boss left the call, and that the boss passed their private post-meeting discussion to staff to shape a follow-up pitch","summary":"In a public post to r/LegalAdviceUK on 28 September 2026, an employee of a marketing agency in England writes that their boss pitched a prospective client and the client's business partner on a Google Meet call with Gemini note-taking switched on. After the boss said goodbye and left, the two business partners stayed on the call to discuss the proposal and the other agencies they were considering, and Gemini kept taking notes. The boss then sent the employee the notes and transcript, which named a competing agency and included 'personal details of who they spoke to specifically on the call', and asked for a follow-up deck built on what the partners liked and disliked. The poster believes the partners did not know they were still being transcribed. Google's help page says Meet tells all participants when notes are being taken; whether the partners noticed is not known. The account is uncorroborated.","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2026-09-28","aiSystem":"Gemini note-taking in Google Meet ('Gemini Notetaker' in the poster's words; Google's help page calls the feature \"Take notes for me\")","aiProduct":"Gemini note-taking in Google Meet","aiCompany":"Google","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["other_material_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"An agency employee reports that Gemini note-taking in Google Meet kept transcribing two prospective clients' private discussion after the agency's host left the call, and that the boss passed the notes, including a named competing agency and personal details, to staff to shape a follow-up pitch; the poster believes the partners were unaware (first-person account, uncorroborated).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":2,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"Two people: 'the two business partners' who stayed on the call and whose discussion was transcribed. They were not the users of the note-taker (the agency's boss was). The poster, who reports discomfort at being asked to use the notes, is not counted. Exact 2.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"GB","platformType":"assistant","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.reddit.com/r/LegalAdviceUK/comments/1wsd4ul/my_boss_recorded_a_transcript_of_a_meeting/","primarySourceLabel":"r/LegalAdviceUK, 28 September 2026: \"My boss recorded a transcript of a meeting without consent (England)\" (public first-person post)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-29T03:21:48.445579+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:36.507533+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["first-person","reddit","gemini","google-meet","meeting-notetaker","transcription","privacy","work","made-claim-about"]}]}