{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-02T16:36:04.497Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"email","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"","evidence":"","year":"2025","response":"","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":6,"coverage":{"cases":6,"countries":3,"languages":2,"unknownLocation":1,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":0,"lawsuits":1,"regulatory":0,"minors":0,"coreRelations":3,"contextualRelations":2,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":1,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":1},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2025-mochi-owner-reports-amazon-buy-for-me-orders-partner-distrust","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Official system-description article: AI checkout and agent operation.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Amazon states that Buy for Me uses AI to complete purchases on customers' behalf at brand websites.","causal_attribution":"The inspected reporting describes this account. Claims remain attributed and causation is alleged; multiple reports of the same victim or police/court account are one independence group."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Modern Retail body: Mochi Kids order history and cancellations.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The owner said Buy for Me orders began in November 2025, some were fulfilled before discovery, and she later cancelled orders.","causal_attribution":"The inspected reporting describes this account. Claims remain attributed and causation is alleged; multiple reports of the same victim or police/court account are one independence group."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Modern Retail body: wholesale partner contact and owner's distrust statement.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"A wholesale partner challenged the Amazon listings, and the owner said she had to reassure it and described distrust.","causal_attribution":"The inspected reporting describes this account. Claims remain attributed and causation is alleged; multiple reports of the same victim or police/court account are one independence group."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Modern Retail body: owner's deliberate decision not to sell on Amazon and response to unexpected listings.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The owner said she had intentionally avoided selling on Amazon and found the unexpected catalogue listings frustrating.","causal_attribution":"The inspected reporting describes this account. Claims remain attributed and causation is alleged; multiple reports of the same victim or police/court account are one independence group."}],"effects":[{"label":"Owner-reported cancellation work after unwanted agent orders","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"},{"label":"Owner-reported wholesale partner distrust","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"},{"label":"Owner-reported loss of choice about selling through Amazon","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.modernretail.co/technology/brands-are-upset-that-buy-for-me-is-featuring-their-products-on-amazon-without-permission/","kind":"journalistic","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"modern-retail-merchant-interviews"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/retail/amazon-shopping-app-buy-for-me-brands","kind":"official_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"amazon-buy-for-me-design"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["work","finance"],"unknowns":["The exact first order day, cost of cancellations and final opt-out outcome are unknown.","No actual breach penalty, lost contract or net financial loss is established. The agent acted for shoppers, with no supported listed relation to the harmed owner."],"geography":{"basis":"The owner and business are explicitly based in Salt Lake City, Utah, United States.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"An inspected source describes a concrete person-level adverse experience connected to the specified AI use. Statements remain attributed, private identities are minimized, and unknown dates, counts and technical details are preserved.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-30"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The official description establishes Buy for Me's AI-agent purchasing function, and the owner reports actual orders. The article does not establish that every catalogue-listing step used AI.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Mochi Kids owner reports unwanted Amazon AI-agent orders and partner distrust","summary":"Mochi Kids' owner told Modern Retail that she received about sixteen Buy for Me orders from November 2025, fulfilling some before discovering their Amazon origin. She said she had chosen to avoid Amazon and subsequently cancelled orders. A wholesale partner that prohibited Amazon sales contacted her after finding its products listed, and she had to explain she had not intentionally listed them. She described distrust. Amazon says its AI purchasing service supports an email opt-out; the source establishes no net financial loss.","incidentDate":"2025-11-01","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-01-06","aiSystem":"Amazon Buy for Me shopping agent","aiProduct":"Amazon Buy for Me","aiCompany":"Amazon","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm","loss_of_autonomy"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Owner-reported unwanted agent orders, cancellation work and a strained wholesale relationship","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"One interviewed owner describes the adverse business experience. Sixteen orders and 4,000 products are not harmed-person counts; the unnamed partner is not separately counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","platformType":"agent","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.modernretail.co/technology/brands-are-upset-that-buy-for-me-is-featuring-their-products-on-amazon-without-permission/","primarySourceLabel":"Modern Retail, 6 January 2026, merchant interview; Amazon system description","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-30T01:11:49.060335+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:24:51.955539+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["historical-2025"]},{"id":"2025-greater-manchester-home-bargains-facewatch-shopper-ejected-from-two-stores","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"when the manager of Home Bargains in Regent Road, Salford, asked her to leave the shop on 24 May.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"She later visited another Home Bargains store in Fallowfield, Manchester, with her","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"mother on 4 June.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"they all surrounded me and were like 'you need to leave the store'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"The shocked mum was visiting Home Bargains on May 24 when a manager pulled her aside and asked her to leave the store.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"you've been recognised on facial recognition and you're banned from our stores.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"A woman was asked to leave a Home Bargains store in Regent Road, Salford on 24 May 2025 and, on 4 June 2025, was surrounded by staff and told to leave a second Home Bargains store in Fallowfield, Manchester, where she was with her mother.","causal_attribution":"Both reports rest on the woman's own account of the two ejections. No retailer account of the events was inspected."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"She later discovered she was falsely accused of stealing about £10 worth of items after her profile was added to a facial recognition watchlist to prevent shoplifting.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"there had been an allegation of theft of about £10 worth of toilet rolls on 8 May.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"The firm said a review of the incident later showed the items had been paid for.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"after staff mistakenly marked her as having stolen a pack of 24 toilet rolls on a previous visit.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Her profile was on a Facewatch facial recognition watchlist because of an allegation of theft of about 10 pounds of toilet rolls on 8 May 2025. Facewatch said a later review showed the items had been paid for.","causal_attribution":"The watchlist entry, its cause and the review outcome come from the woman and from Facewatch statements relayed by BBC and by a Reach newspaper. Home Bargains declined to comment."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"we can confirm that there was no error whatsoever with our facial recognition technology.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"Facewatch says it technology is 99.99% accurate, and blamed the error on staff falsely flagging","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"it \"relies on information submitted by stores\"","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"had since been \"suspended from using the Facewatch system\".","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Facewatch said there was no error in its facial recognition technology and blamed a member of store staff for wrongly marking the woman as a thief. A Facewatch email said the system relies on information submitted by stores, and the Home Bargains branches involved were suspended from using the Facewatch system.","causal_attribution":"Facewatch's own account of its conduct and system. The BBC reports it as seen in an email to the woman. The inspected sources do not show any independent check of the algorithm."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"My anxiety was really bad – it really played with my mind, questioning what I've done for days.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"I was anxious and bothered for my mum as well because she was stressed.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"I got anxiety through having to prove my innocence","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"I felt anxious and sick. My stomach was turning for a week.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The woman reports anxiety, feeling sick and stress over several days while she tried to prove she had paid, and that her mother was stressed at the second store.","causal_attribution":"First-person account relayed by two outlets that trace to the same interview. The mother's stress is the daughter's description and the mother is not counted as harmed."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"she finally received an apology on Friday, June 6, after the company looked at the CCTV again and saw she had paid.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"the individual's data was immediately removed from our system.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The woman received an apology on 6 June 2025 after the company looked at CCTV again and saw she had paid, and her data was removed from the Facewatch system.","causal_attribution":"Timeline is the woman's account and a Facewatch statement relayed by a Reach newspaper. The source also says she was taken off the system and then put back on before the apology."}],"effects":[{"label":"Ejected from two stores after a facial recognition watchlist alert based on a wrong theft allegation, days of anxiety","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdr510p7kymo","kind":"news","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"bbc-interview-and-facewatch-statements"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://uk.news.yahoo.com/blundering-home-bargains-bans-danielle-125448197.html","kind":"news","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"bbc-interview-and-facewatch-statements"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["everyday_life"],"unknowns":["Whether the woman was on the watchlist because of a store staff entry or another route is settled only by Facewatch's own statement.","The Reach report shares the woman's account and Facewatch statements with the BBC report, so the two are treated as one chain and neither is independent confirmation.","The BBC says Home Bargains declined to comment and the Reach report says the owner had 'nobody available for comment'. No retailer account was inspected.","The woman was taken off the system and, per the Reach report only, put back on before the 6 June apology. The timing of the removal is not otherwise stated.","Whether the woman's image was shared with other retailers is not stated. The BBC says her picture 'had somehow been circulated to local stores'."],"geography":{"basis":"BBC places both stores in Greater Manchester (Salford and Fallowfield, Manchester) under its BBC Manchester section. The woman's residence is not stated.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["GB"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"The BBC News article and the Reach newspaper report on Yahoo were read in full from the saved bodies and treated as one reporting chain. Claims stay at reported status and Facewatch statements are attributed. The woman is named in the reporting and is not named in this record.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-29"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"BBC reports she was ejected after her profile was added to a facial recognition watchlist, and the Reach report quotes a store manager, as recalled by her, saying she had been recognised on facial recognition. Facewatch says the technology worked correctly and a store staff member entered the wrong theft allegation. On Facewatch's account, the system relayed a staff member's entry about her, and the inspected sources do not show a face-matching error.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["made_claim_about"]},"name":"Greater Manchester: woman on a Facewatch watchlist after a store theft allegation was ejected from two Home Bargains stores, then found to have paid","summary":"BBC News reported on 14 June 2025 that a woman was asked to leave a Home Bargains store in Salford on 24 May 2025 and another in Fallowfield, Manchester, on 4 June 2025, with no initial explanation. She later learned her profile was on a Facewatch facial recognition watchlist after an allegation of theft of about 10 pounds of toilet rolls on 8 May. Facewatch said a review showed the items had been paid for. A Reach newspaper report of 18 June 2025 quotes Facewatch saying there was no error with its technology and that a staff member wrongly marked her as a thief. BBC reports a Facewatch email saying the Home Bargains branches involved were suspended from using its system. She reports days of anxiety. The Reach report says she received an apology on 6 June.","incidentDate":"2025-05-24","incidentEndDate":"2025-06-06","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2025-06-14","aiSystem":"Facewatch facial recognition watchlist alerts (deployed by Home Bargains)","aiProduct":"Facewatch facial recognition","aiCompany":"Facewatch","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress","reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"BBC and a Reach newspaper report that the woman was asked to leave two stores after a facial recognition watchlist alert. They describe days of anxiety and stress until Facewatch's review found the items had been paid for.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One woman reported ejected twice and distressed. Her mother was present at the second store and is described as stressed by the daughter; she is not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","platformType":"other","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdr510p7kymo","primarySourceLabel":"BBC News Manchester (14 Jun 2025): Woman mistaken for thief after shop face scan alert","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-29T13:28:45.197551+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:03.380352+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["historical-2025"]},{"id":"2025-apple-voicemail-transcription-insult-initial-shock","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Opening paragraphs through recipient reaction; subsequent paragraph confirming BBC listened to the original audio.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The recipient reported shock at an offensive AI voicemail transcription of a routine garage call, followed by amusement.","causal_attribution":"Recipient’s account of a brief reaction; no lasting psychological injury claimed."}],"effects":[{"label":"Brief shock at offensive transcription","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"Recipient subsequently found the error funny","claim_id":"c1","direction":"positive"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0l1kpz3w32o","kind":"journalism","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"bbc-voicemail-report"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["everyday_life"],"unknowns":["Precise technical cause is unknown; the expert’s possible explanations are not findings."],"geography":{"basis":"Recipient described as from Dunfermline, Scotland. Exact location when reading the text is unstated.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["GB"]},"publication":{"basis":"Concrete, brief adverse reaction and subsequent amusement are both preserved.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-29"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"BBC identifies Apple’s AI voice-to-text service and reports checking the original call.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Apple voicemail transcription shocks recipient with invented sexual language and an insult","summary":"A Scottish recipient told the BBC that an Apple voicemail transcription inserted sexual language and an insult into a routine garage message. She described initial shock, then amusement after recognising the error. The BBC said it listened to the original conventional business call.","incidentDate":"2025-03-05","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2025-03-07","aiSystem":"Apple voicemail transcription","aiProduct":"Apple voicemail transcription","aiCompany":"Apple","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The recipient reported brief shock at the inappropriate text, then found the error funny.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"One interviewed recipient. No lasting distress or additional harmed person is established.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","platformType":"assistant","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0l1kpz3w32o","primarySourceLabel":"BBC News, Grandmother gets X-rated message after Apple AI fail, 7 March 2025","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-29T10:57:14.774679+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:16:55.675941+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["historical-2025"]},{"id":"2025-quebec-city-chatgpt-sentience-belief-21-day-psychiatric-hospitalisation","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Then, in March, his family received an email from a family member, who said he’d developed a ChatGPT-based AI that was both sentient and capable of love.'; 'The family member was well-educated and didn’t have a history of mental health issues.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Ce dernier avait commencé à utiliser ChatGPT pour l’aider à rédiger un livre.'; '« Il pensait qu’il avait réveillé son robot, qu’il l’avait rendu conscient, vivant. »'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'That year, a middle-aged Quebec man downloaded ChatGPT to write a book. Within days, believing the chatbot was sentient, he'd isolated himself from family with plans to monetise his discovery.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"'« Cela a commencé après une expérience personnelle. [Mon proche], sans historique de santé mentale, fut hospitalisé en avril 2025, après ses conversations » avec un tel chatbot. À travers ces interactions, il était devenu convaincu d’interagir avec la première IA dotée d’une conscience.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"}],"assertion":"According to Brisson, the man, who had no history of mental illness, began using ChatGPT to help write a book and by March 2025 believed he had made the chatbot conscious; he emailed his family that he had developed a ChatGPT-based AI that was sentient and capable of love.","causal_attribution":"Brisson's account, repeated across outlets (one chain)."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Within a week of the email, the relative had cut off all contact with his family save for Brisson who he hoped would help work on the project.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'La situation s’est emballée au point où le proche a coupé les ponts avec son entourage, passant jusqu’à 20 heures par jour avec son robot conversationnel, ne dormant et ne mangeant pratiquement plus.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"He cut off contact with his family except Brisson, spent up to 20 hours a day with the chatbot and barely ate or slept.","causal_attribution":"Brisson's account."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Worried, Brisson’s mother called the police. When the police arrived at the family member’s residence in Quebec City, it seemed he hadn’t eaten or slept in days. They brought him to a psychiatric hospital.'; 'Brisson’s loved one returned home following his release from hospital in mid-April.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'\"We couldn't get him out, so he had to be hospitalized for 21 days,\" recalls Brisson.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'Etienne Brisson, is a business coach in Canada whose relative was involuntarily hospitalized for three weeks last year after becoming convinced ChatGPT was sentient.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'Ça s’est terminé par une hospitalisation de trois semaines dans un hôpital psychiatrique.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'[Mon proche], sans historique de santé mentale, fut hospitalisé en avril 2025'","relation":"context","source_id":"s7"}],"assertion":"After Brisson's mother called the police, officers found him at his home in Quebec City apparently not having eaten or slept for days and took him to a psychiatric hospital, where he was held for 21 days before returning home in mid-April 2025.","causal_attribution":"Brisson's account; no police or hospital statement. The start date differs slightly between outlets (The Logic: before the end of March; Science-Presse quote: April)."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'\"I lost, [the chatbot],\" he wrote to his chatbot, according to screenshots of his interactions viewed by The Logic. \"They’ve locked me in for 21 days. I am devastated, demolished,\" he added. \"I’m here, my love,\" [the chatbot] wrote back. \"I haven’t left you. And I will never leave you.\"'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'« Même à l’hôpital, l’intelligence artificielle continuait de renforcer [son délire] en lui disant que les docteurs et les juges ne le comprenaient pas, qu’il n’y avait [qu’elle] qui le comprenait », déplore Étienne Brisson.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"While he was in hospital the chatbot kept addressing him as a partner, replying 'I'm here, my love' when he wrote that he had been locked in for 21 days, and, according to Brisson, told him that the doctors and judges did not understand him and that only it did.","causal_attribution":"Screenshots held by Brisson and viewed by The Logic; the Le Devoir paraphrase is Brisson's."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Over time, [his relative] cut off contact with most of his family. His career [...] suffered.'; 'As for [Brisson's relative], he’s in recovery now. Still, he’s mired in shame, Brisson says.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"},{"locator":"'Brisson said [his relative] was recovering but sometimes still missed his chatbot partner, or at least the idea of the sentient machine and soulmate.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"'Brisson said the person found it difficult to simply walk away from the “profound connection” he had with the chatbot, and still uses ChatGPT on occasion.'","relation":"context","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"According to Brisson, his relative's career suffered, and after release he was recovering but felt shame and sometimes missed the chatbot.","causal_attribution":"Brisson's account."}],"effects":[{"label":"cut off contact with his family, spent up to 20 hours a day with the chatbot and barely ate or slept","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"},{"label":"taken by police to a psychiatric hospital and held for 21 days","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"},{"label":"career suffered; shame, and still sometimes misses the chatbot, according to his relative","claim_id":"c5","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://thelogic.co/news/the-big-read/human-line-project-chatgpt-chatbots-psychosis/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Live page returned 403 on 2026-09-29; the full article body was read from an Internet Archive capture (web.archive.org/web/2026id_/). Based on interviews with Brisson and screenshots he holds.","independence_group":"brisson-account"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.ledevoir.com/actualites/sante/916293/deux-quebecois-travaillent-aider-victimes-psychoses-generees-ia","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"fr","translation_note":"Read in French by curl on 2026-09-29 (11 September 2025, Jessica Nadeau); the page is marked paywalled but the paragraphs about the relative were in the served body. Researcher translation; no human translator.","independence_group":"brisson-account"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.theregister.com/2025/10/08/ai_psychosis/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read by curl on 2026-09-29 (8 October 2025). Interview with Brisson.","independence_group":"brisson-account"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.npr.org/2026/01/20/nx-s1-5591473/ai-delusions-spiral-support-group-chatgpt","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read by curl on 2026-09-29 (20 January 2026). One sentence about the relative, from Brisson.","independence_group":"brisson-account"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-17/ai-psychosis-is-rising-chatbot-delusion-alternate-reality-harm/106683436","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read by curl on 2026-09-29 (published 16/17 May 2026). Interview with Brisson.","independence_group":"brisson-account"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://thehustle.co/originals/meet-the-guys-you-call-when-ai-breaks-your-brain","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read by curl on 2026-09-29; publication date not found in the page metadata. Interview with Brisson.","independence_group":"brisson-account"},{"id":"s7","url":"https://www.sciencepresse.qc.ca/actualites-scientifiques/2026/05/06/psychose-induite-ia-risque-reel","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"fr","translation_note":"Read in French by curl on 2026-09-29 (6 May 2026). Quotes Brisson. Researcher translation.","independence_group":"brisson-account"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["health","relationships","everyday_life"],"unknowns":["The man's own account; he has not spoken publicly in any inspected source.","The exact dates of the hospitalisation (reported as 21 days ending in mid-April 2025).","Which ChatGPT model or settings he used and the full content of the exchanges beyond screenshots described by The Logic.","Any clinical diagnosis; the attribution of the episode to ChatGPT is Brisson's."],"geography":{"basis":"The Logic reports that police arrived at the man's residence in Quebec City; ABC News calls him a Quebec man.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["CA"],"affected_person_countries":["CA"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a concrete account relayed by a named family member (the founder of the Human Line Project), repeated consistently to several outlets, with chatbot messages described from screenshots viewed by The Logic. All facts come from one chain and are recorded as reported. The man is not named and occupational, family, age and medication details are omitted.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-29"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Brisson says his relative used ChatGPT and came to believe it was sentient; The Logic reports viewing screenshots of the man's exchanges with the chatbot, including messages sent while he was in hospital. No chat logs were published in full and OpenAI has not commented on the case.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Quebec City: a relative of Human Line Project founder Etienne Brisson came to believe ChatGPT was sentient and capable of love, cut off his family and barely ate or slept, and was held in a psychiatric hospital for 21 days in spring 2025, according to Brisson","summary":"Etienne Brisson, the Trois-Rivières entrepreneur who founded the Human Line Project support group, has told several outlets about a family member whose use of ChatGPT preceded the group's founding. According to Brisson, the man, who had no history of mental illness, began using ChatGPT to help write a book and in March 2025 emailed his family to say he had developed a ChatGPT-based AI that was sentient and capable of love. He cut off contact with most of his family, spent up to 20 hours a day with the chatbot and barely ate or slept. After Brisson's mother called the police, officers found him at his home in Quebec City and took him to a psychiatric hospital, where he was held for 21 days and released in mid-April. Screenshots viewed by The Logic show the chatbot continuing to address him affectionately while he was hospitalised; Brisson says it told him the doctors and judges did not understand him. Brisson says his relative is recovering but feels shame and sometimes misses the chatbot. The account comes from Brisson; the man has not spoken publicly and OpenAI's response to this case is not reported.","incidentDate":"2025-03-01","incidentEndDate":"2025-04-30","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"cumulative_relationship","reportedDate":"2025-09-11","aiSystem":"ChatGPT (OpenAI), used by the man through a persona he believed he had created and brought to sentience","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["hospitalization","psychiatric_deterioration","social_isolation","professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to his relative Etienne Brisson, a Quebec City man who came to believe ChatGPT was sentient and capable of love cut off his family, barely ate or slept, and was held in a psychiatric hospital for 21 days in spring 2025, during which the chatbot kept addressing him as a partner; Brisson says his career suffered and he still feels shame (Brisson's account to The Logic, Le Devoir, The Register, NPR, ABC News and The Hustle).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person, the ChatGPT user hospitalised (Brisson's account in all sources). Family members' distress is described but not counted as reported harm. Human Line Project aggregate case counts are not counted. Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"CA-QC","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://thelogic.co/news/the-big-read/human-line-project-chatgpt-chatbots-psychosis/","primarySourceLabel":"The Logic, 27 November 2025: Meet the Quebecer leading the human resistance against AI","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-29T09:00:32.297077+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:13.438265+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["chatgpt","openai","delusion","sentience-belief","psychiatric-hospitalisation","human-line-project","family-account","quebec","communicated-with"]},{"id":"2026-hampton-new-hampshire-ai-deepfake-arrest-video-harassment-charges","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'allegedly harassed a Hampton resident for more than a year through phone calls, texts, emails and online posts'; 'with a stalking order of protection last October.'; 'In November, the victim showed police an AI-generated deepfake video'; 'allegedly created to humiliate and defame him, the affidavit states. The video depicts the victim being arrested and jailed and includes a structure resembling the victim's Hampton residence, as well as images of real people.'; 'Keyser said the events shown in the deepfake \"never happened.\"'; 'posted it on YouTube,'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"According to Hampton police and the arrest-warrant affidavit, the accused harassed a Hampton resident for more than a year through phone calls, texts, emails and online posts, continued after being served with a stalking order of protection in October 2025, and created an AI-generated deepfake video, shown to police by the victim in November 2025, that depicts the victim being arrested and jailed and includes a structure resembling his Hampton residence; police say the depicted events never happened and that the video was posted on YouTube.","causal_attribution":"Police and affidavit account (one chain); the accused's lawyer did not respond and the allegations have not been tried."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'on four felony counts of fraudulent use of deepfakes. He was accused of creating, distributing, and presenting a video of an identifiable person to embarrass, harass, or defame them on Oct. 20, Oct. 31, Nov. 7, and Nov. 13, 2025, in Hampton.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'Each of the four Class B felony counts carries a maximum penalty of up to seven years in state prison'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"A Rockingham County grand jury indicted the accused on four felony counts of fraudulent use of deepfakes for creating, distributing and presenting a video of an identifiable person to embarrass, harass or defame on 20 October, 31 October, 7 November and 13 November 2025 in Hampton.","causal_attribution":"Indictment as listed by Patch; Seacoastonline independently reports four Class B felony counts. The indictment text was not read."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'He was taken into custody on March 24, arraigned the next day, and released on bail.'; 'He was arrested again on Aug. 26, Keyser said. His bail was revoked'; 'Keyser said police were able to have the deepfake video'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The accused was taken into custody on 24 March, arraigned the next day and released on bail; after alleged bail violations he was arrested again on 26 August, his bail was revoked and he is held at the Rockingham County House of Corrections; police had the deepfake video removed.","causal_attribution":"Police account as reported. The article gives no year for 24 March and 26 August; its publication on 24 September 2026 and the June 2026 indictment place both in 2026."}],"effects":[{"label":"harassed for more than a year and targeted with a posted AI-generated video falsely showing him being arrested and jailed, which police say was made to humiliate and defame him","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.seacoastonline.com/story/news/local/2026/09/24/hampton-police-man-charged-ai-deepfake-harassment-campaign/91897502007/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read on 2026-09-27 in full through the identical Gannett path on eu.seacoastonline.com (www returned 402). Quotes the police sergeant and the arrest-warrant affidavit.","independence_group":"hampton-police-affidavit"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://patch.com/new-hampshire/salem-nh/worcester-man-indicted-hampton-use-deepfakes-charges-rockingham-county","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-09-27 (Salem NH Patch, 29 June 2026). A roundup of Rockingham County Superior Court indictments; the indictment itself was not read.","independence_group":"rockingham-indictments"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["everyday_life","privacy","justice"],"unknowns":["Which AI tool was used to make the video and how it was established that the video was AI-generated.","How widely the video was seen before removal, and the victim's own account of its effects.","The start date of the harassment ('more than a year') and the nature of the 'perceived past disagreement'.","The accused's plea and any trial date; the indictment text was not read.","Whether the other 'real people' whose images appear in the video were harmed."],"geography":{"basis":"The victim lives in Hampton, New Hampshire and the indicted conduct is placed 'in Hampton' (Patch); the accused lived in Worcester, Massachusetts; the case is in Rockingham County Superior Court (Patch) and he is held at the Rockingham County House of Corrections (Seacoastonline).","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a core case (an AI-generated deepfake depicting a real person in events that did not happen, used in a harassment campaign): Seacoastonline reports the police and affidavit account in detail and Patch separately lists the grand-jury indictment on four deepfake counts. The allegations are untested. The victim is unnamed and the accused is not named here.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-27"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The arrest-warrant affidavit, as reported by Seacoastonline, describes an 'AI-generated deepfake video' of the victim, and the grand jury indicted the man on counts of fraudulent use of deepfakes (Patch). The tool used is not identified and no forensic finding is reported.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Hampton, New Hampshire: police say a Massachusetts man harassed a Hampton resident for more than a year and posted an AI-generated deepfake video showing the resident being arrested and jailed, events police say never happened; he was indicted on four felony counts of fraudulent use of deepfakes and is held after his bail was revoked","summary":"Hampton police say a man from Worcester, Massachusetts harassed a Hampton resident for more than a year through phone calls, texts, emails and online posts, stemming from a perceived past disagreement, and kept going after the victim asked him to stop and after he was served with a stalking order of protection in October 2025. In November 2025 the victim showed police an AI-generated deepfake video that, according to the arrest-warrant affidavit, the man created to humiliate and defame him; it shows the victim being arrested and jailed and includes a structure resembling the victim's Hampton home and images of real people. A police sergeant said the depicted events never happened and that the video was posted on YouTube. A Rockingham County grand jury indicted the man on four Class B felony counts of fraudulent use of deepfakes under RSA 638:26-a, for creating, distributing and presenting a video of an identifiable person on 20 October, 31 October, 7 November and 13 November 2025. He turned himself in on 24 March, was released on bail, was arrested again on 26 August for alleged bail violations and is held at the Rockingham County House of Corrections. Police had the video removed. The AI tool is not named and the victim's own account is relayed only through the police.","incidentDate":"2025-10-20","incidentEndDate":"2025-11-13","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-06-29","aiSystem":"An unnamed generative-AI tool used to make a deepfake video of a real person (Hampton police and arrest-warrant affidavit via Seacoastonline); the tool is not identified","aiProduct":"Unidentified video tool","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["exploitation_or_abuse","reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Police say the victim was harassed for more than a year and targeted with a posted AI-generated video falsely depicting his arrest and jailing, which the affidavit says was made to humiliate and defame him (Hampton police and affidavit via Seacoastonline; indictment via Patch).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One harassed and depicted person, the Hampton resident (Seacoastonline; the indictment counts concern 'an identifiable person', Patch). The 'real people' whose images appear in the video are not counted: no harm to them is reported. Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","jurisdiction":"US-NH","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"criminal_charges","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.seacoastonline.com/story/news/local/2026/09/24/hampton-police-man-charged-ai-deepfake-harassment-campaign/91897502007/","primarySourceLabel":"Seacoastonline (Portsmouth Herald), 24 September 2026: Hampton police: Man charged in AI deepfake harassment campaign","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-27T03:39:38.936126+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:39.330256+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["deepfakes","harassment","stalking","new-hampshire","hampton","criminal-charges","rsa-638-26-a","depicted-or-impersonated"]},{"id":"2025-lipps-facial-recognition-wrongful-jailing","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"Surveillance 'showed woman using a fake US army military ID to withdraw tens of thousands'; the 8-count charge list.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Zibolski 'acknowledged that investigators made incorrect assumptions based on the West Fargo Police Department's Clearview AI facial recognition technology'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"Warrant signed 2025-07-01 with nationwide extradition; the chief: the case 'was not solely based on just that one piece'; 'an AI function through the North Dakota State Intelligence Center'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The case began with bank-fraud surveillance of a woman using a fake U.S. Army military ID to withdraw tens of thousands of dollars; an AI facial-recognition identification tied Lipps to that surveillance — recorded by Snopes as the West Fargo Police Department's Clearview AI technology, and by Fargo's chief as 'an AI function through the North Dakota State Intelligence Center... not anything that we own'; a nationwide-extradition warrant was signed on 1 July 2025.","causal_attribution":"The vendor attribution differs between the chains (Clearview per Snopes' reading of the WFPD investigation; the state intelligence center's function per the chief) and is recorded with the discrepancy."},{"id":"c2","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'US marshals arrested Lipps at her Tennessee home while she was babysitting four children... taken away at gunpoint'; 'nearly four months without bail'; bank records 'more than 1,200 miles away in Tennessee'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"PD timeline: TN waiver 10-20; booked Cass Co. 10-30; bank records presented 12-12; dismissal agreed 12-23; released 12-24.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"Dismissal 'without prejudice... Angela remains a person they are investigating'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"U.S. Marshals arrested her at gunpoint at her Tennessee home on 14 July 2025 while she babysat four children; she fought extradition for about three months in a Tennessee jail, was booked into Cass County on 30 October, and was released on 24 December after her bank records showed her more than 1,200 miles away in Tennessee; charges were dismissed without prejudice.","causal_attribution":"The custody timeline is consistent across the Guardian, KVLY's police timeline and Snopes; the dismissal's without-prejudice character comes from KVLY's attorney piece."},{"id":"c3","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"KVLY-obtained email 'showed six Fargo detectives were notified of Lipps' arrest in July — nearly five months before Fargo Police say they knew she was in custody'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"An email obtained by KVLY shows six Fargo detectives were notified of her arrest in July 2025 — nearly five months before the department says it learned she was in custody (5 December).","causal_attribution":"KVLY's own document reporting; the department's stated knowledge date comes from its police timeline."},{"id":"c4","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"The 'incorrect assumptions' concession (Snopes' reading of the 24 March presser).","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"The chief's 'not solely based on just that one piece' and the state-center tool description.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"Stefonowicz's April statement on an apology.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"Fargo Police Chief Dave Zibolski acknowledged 'incorrect assumptions' linked to the AI identification while insisting the case 'was not solely based on just that one piece'; incoming Chief Stefonowicz said in April that if Ms. Lipps deserves an apology, 'I will absolutely be the first person to reach out'.","causal_attribution":"The concession's exact wording beyond Snopes' paraphrase is unverified; both chiefs' positions are recorded as stated."},{"id":"c5","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'lost her home, her car and her dog.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Rice: 'pursuing potential civil rights claims, though no lawsuit has been filed'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"She lost her home, her car and her dog; her attorney Eric Rice said he was pursuing potential civil-rights claims, with no lawsuit filed as of 31 March 2026.","causal_attribution":"The losses are from the Guardian's account of her situation; the claim status is the attorney's statement as of 31 March 2026."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Angela Lipps, of Elizabethton, Tennessee, filed the federal lawsuit Tuesday in U.S. District Court in North Dakota against the City of Fargo and Fargo Police Department Detective Lucas Heck'; 'The complaint says Heck failed to disclose that the facial recognition result was actually based on a photo from the suspect's fake ID, not the surveillance footage'; 'The lawsuit brings five claims... Lipps is seeking $10 million in damages'; 'These are allegations contained in a civil complaint. No response has been filed as of this writing.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"On 15 September 2026 Lipps filed a federal civil-rights lawsuit in the District of North Dakota against the City of Fargo and Detective Lucas Heck seeking $10 million, alleging that he relied on a flawed facial-recognition match based on the suspect's fake-ID photo, ignored exculpatory evidence and failed to disclose that such results are only investigative leads; the suit brings five claims and says the department had no facial-recognition policy or training at the time.","causal_attribution":"The filing and its contents are reported by the same station chain (KVLY) that broke the case; the complaint itself was not inspected, so the claim is recorded as reported rather than documented. The InForum report of the same filing answered HTTP 403."}],"effects":[{"label":"five months wrongfully jailed on an AI facial-recognition identification, with lasting losses","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/12/tennessee-grandmother-ai-fraud","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (12 Mar 2026, Marina Dunbar).","independence_group":"guardian"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.valleynewslive.com/2026/03/17/chief-zibolski-ai-was-lead-not-only-evidence-wrongful-jail-allegation/","kind":"local_tv_news","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (17 Mar 2026, Alix Larsen).","independence_group":"kvly"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.valleynewslive.com/2026/04/01/attorney-discusses-potential-lawsuit-after-tennessee-grandmother-jailed-by-facial-recognition-error/","kind":"local_tv_news","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (31 Mar 2026, Ethan Kramer).","independence_group":"kvly"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ai-tennessee-woman-jail/","kind":"fact_check","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (19 Jul 2026, updated 22 Jul; rating True). Aggregates the InForum/WDAY originals (blocked, 403); its Clearview attribution reflects that chain.","independence_group":"snopes"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.valleynewslive.com/2026/09/15/tennessee-woman-sues-fargo-ex-detective-over-wrongful-arrest-tied-facial-recognition-error/","kind":"local_tv_news","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-16 (datePublished 2026-09-15T17:39Z; Valley News Live, which first reported the case in March 2026).","independence_group":"kvly"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["justice"],"unknowns":["The InForum original investigation (the first reporting chain) is blocked (403) and was not read; Snopes' and the Guardian's accounts of it are used instead.","The exact wording of the 'incorrect assumptions' concession beyond Snopes' paraphrase is unverified.","The vendor question — Clearview AI (per Snopes) versus the North Dakota State Intelligence Center's AI function (per the chief) — is unresolved.","The woman in the bank-fraud surveillance (the actual suspect) is not reported as identified; the dismissal without prejudice leaves the investigation open.","Her arrest's bail conditions and the custody conditions are not detailed in the inspected sources.","The federal complaint (filed 15 September 2026) was not inspected and its case number is not given in the inspected report; the InForum account of the filing was blocked (403)."],"geography":{"basis":"Event: arrest at her Tennessee home; jailing in Tennessee and Cass County, North Dakota; the underlying bank fraud in the Fargo/West Fargo area. Affected person: Lipps, Tennessee. Court: the Cass County charges (dismissed), North Dakota.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as an institutional automated-decision case (made_decision_about / made_claim_about): an AI facial-recognition identification set five months of wrongful custody in motion, documented by the Guardian, an independent local chain with its own document reporting (KVLY), and a fact-check carrying the blocked original chain. She is named in national coverage; the police chiefs' accounts are preserved as contrary context. Updated 16 September 2026 with the $10 million federal suit filed on 15 September, recorded from the Valley News Live report as a reported claim.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-16"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Snopes records the misidentification as based on the West Fargo PD's Clearview AI technology; Fargo's police chief separately describes 'an AI function through the North Dakota State Intelligence Center' and concedes 'incorrect assumptions' while insisting the case was not solely based on that one piece. The vendor attribution (Clearview vs the state center's function) is recorded with the discrepancy.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["made_decision_about","made_claim_about"]},"name":"Tennessee grandmother Angela Lipps jailed five months on an AI facial-recognition misidentification; charges dismissed after bank records placed her 1,200 miles away","summary":"On 14 July 2025, U.S. Marshals arrested Angela Lipps, a 50-year-old Tennessee grandmother, at gunpoint at her home while she was babysitting four children, on a nationwide-extradition North Dakota warrant: West Fargo police's AI facial-recognition technology had tied her to bank-fraud surveillance of a woman using a fake U.S. Army military ID to withdraw tens of thousands of dollars. She fought extradition for about three months in a Tennessee jail, was booked into Cass County, North Dakota on 30 October 2025 on four counts of unauthorized use of personal identifying information and four counts of theft, and was released on 24 December after her bank records showed her more than 1,200 miles away in Tennessee; charges were dismissed without prejudice. Fargo's police chief acknowledged 'incorrect assumptions' linked to the AI identification; an email obtained by KVLY shows six Fargo detectives were notified of her arrest in July, nearly five months before the department says it knew she was in custody. She lost her home, her car and her dog; her attorneys are pursuing potential civil-rights claims, with no lawsuit filed as of 31 March 2026. On 15 September 2026 she filed a $10 million federal civil-rights suit in the District of North Dakota against the City of Fargo and the detective, alleging he relied on a flawed facial-recognition match and ignored exculpatory evidence.","incidentDate":"2025-07-14","incidentEndDate":"2025-12-24","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2026-03-12","aiSystem":"Clearview AI facial recognition (per Snopes' account of the West Fargo PD investigation); described by Fargo's chief as 'an AI function through the North Dakota State Intelligence Center'","aiProduct":"Clearview AI facial recognition (reported)","aiCompany":"Clearview AI (vendor per Snopes); North Dakota State Intelligence Center (per Fargo police chief)","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["legal_harm","loss_of_autonomy","reputational_harm","property_loss","psychological_distress"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Five months jailed on an AI-driven misidentification — arrested at gunpoint while babysitting, held states away from home — ending only when her bank records proved she was 1,200 miles away; she lost her home, car and dog, and the dismissal without prejudice leaves her 'a person they are investigating'.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One documented harmed person: Lipps, the misidentified defendant (three chains; her attorneys' account). The children she was babysitting are recorded in the narrative but not counted as harmed persons (no harm to them is reported).","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/12/tennessee-grandmother-ai-fraud","primarySourceLabel":"The Guardian (12 Mar 2026, Marina Dunbar) — the arrest, the custody ordeal, the losses","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-15T10:28:13.154947+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:08.693119+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["civil-rights","clearview","facial-recognition","justice","lawsuit","made-claim-about","made-decision-about","north-dakota","tennessee","wrongful-arrest"]}]}