{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-02T16:34:27.882Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"email","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"unknown","evidence":"","year":"","response":"","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":3,"coverage":{"cases":3,"countries":3,"languages":2,"unknownLocation":0,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":0,"lawsuits":0,"regulatory":1,"minors":0,"coreRelations":0,"contextualRelations":0,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":3,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":3},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2026-singapore-bee-cheng-hiang-ai-generated-email-script-exposed-members-addresses","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'personal data breach involving 95,364 of the company'; 'As the marketing email was sent in batches of 1,000, each affected member'; 'email address was disclosed to up to 999 other recipients within the same batch, displayed in the \"To\" field of the emails.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'More than 95,000 Bee Cheng Hiang customers had their e-mail addresses accidentally exposed in April'; 'These customer e-mail addresses were the only personal data affected'; 'The problematic marketing e-mails were sent out on April 25, and the PDPC was notified of the data breach on April 27.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"On 25 April 2026 Bee Cheng Hiang's marketing email was sent in batches of 1,000 with all recipients' addresses in the To field, disclosing each affected member's email address to up to 999 other recipients; Mothership puts the number of affected members at 95,364 (The Straits Times: more than 95,000), and the PDPC says email addresses were the only personal data involved.","causal_attribution":"PDPC findings as relayed by The Straits Times and Mothership."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'the issue was with the prompt the employee gave the generative AI tool to write a program to send a'; 'without specific instructions to hide the e-mail address of each recipient from other customers.'; 'The PDPC clarified that the incident was not due to a malfunction in the artificial intelligence tool used by the Bee Cheng Hiang employee.'; 'The incident was caused by a human error in developing the e-mail distribution code with an AI tool,'; 'the difference between the correct code and the bad one was the placement of a couple of brackets'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'The incident was caused by a human error when the employee developed an email distribution Python script with an AI tool.'; 'It was missing a bracket that caused all recipient email addresses within each batch to be grouped together as a single object in the'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"According to the PDPC, a marketing employee wrote the email distribution script with a generative AI tool, and the prompt did not ask for recipients' addresses to be hidden from one another. Mothership reports that a missing bracket in the generated script grouped all addresses in each batch into one To field, and The Straits Times says the difference between the correct and faulty code was the placement of a couple of brackets. The PDPC says the AI tool did not malfunction and describes the cause as human error in developing the code with an AI tool.","causal_attribution":"The PDPC attributes the disclosure to the AI-generated script and the employee's prompt, and states that the AI tool did not malfunction."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'It added that the company had relied on a single employee'; 'without a review process for supervisory checks of the employee'; 'testing was done by checking activity logs without reviewing the content of the actual test e-mail.'; 'did not have a governance framework or policies in place to guide employees on the use of generative AI tools for work'; 'It was also the first time the home-grown traditional food products company known for its bak kwa was using an AI tool for its business operations.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'did not conduct sufficiently robust testing to check the email distribution script before it was deployed'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The PDPC found that the employee tested the script only by checking activity logs, that the company did not test the script sufficiently, relied on a single employee without supervisory review, and had no governance framework or policies on staff use of generative AI; it was the company's first use of an AI tool in its business operations.","causal_attribution":"PDPC findings as relayed by The Straits Times and Mothership."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'There was also no evidence that the e-mail addresses were further misused.'; 'it stopped the mass distribution of the e-mails, rectified the bad code and notified all affected customers'; 'the commission accepted a voluntary undertaking by Bee Cheng Hiang on Sept 2 to improve its compliance with the Personal Data Protection Act.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'implemented double-verification checks by at least two staff for all bulk email communications before sending out.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The PDPC reports no evidence that the email addresses were further misused. The company stopped the distribution, corrected the script, notified all affected members and now requires at least two staff to check bulk emails; the PDPC accepted a voluntary undertaking from the company on 2 September 2026.","causal_attribution":"PDPC account of the company's remedial actions and the undertaking."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'It was the first AI-related data breach reported to the Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC), the commission told The Straits Times on Sept 30.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The PDPC told The Straits Times that this was the first AI-related data breach reported to it.","causal_attribution":"PDPC statement to The Straits Times."}],"effects":[{"label":"the email addresses of 95,364 members were each disclosed to up to 999 other recipients of a marketing email","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.stomp.sg/trending-now/bee-cheng-hiang-customers-e-mail-addresses-exposed-first-case-ai-related-data-breach-spore","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read on 2026-10-02 on Stomp, which carries The Straits Times article by Kenny Chee dated 30 September 2026. The article relays the case details the PDPC published on 21 September and statements the PDPC gave The Straits Times.","independence_group":"pdpc-bee-cheng-hiang"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://mothership.sg/2026/10/bee-cheng-hiang-members-data-breach-ai/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read on 2026-10-02. Mothership (1 October 2026) attributes its account to the PDPC, so it shares the PDPC reporting chain with s1.","independence_group":"pdpc-bee-cheng-hiang"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.asiaone.com/singapore/bee-cheng-hiang-customers-email-addresses-exposed-ai-generated-code-breach","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read on 2026-10-02. AsiaOne (1 October 2026) relays the same PDPC case details and attributes some of them to the company.","independence_group":"pdpc-bee-cheng-hiang"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["privacy","everyday_life"],"unknowns":["Which generative AI tool the employee used.","Whether any affected member received unwanted contact or suffered any consequence after the disclosure.","Where the affected members live.","The full text of the PDPC case page and undertaking, which could not be read from this host."],"geography":{"basis":"The Straits Times describes the breach as Singapore's first reported case of AI-related data breach, and Mothership calls it the first AI-related data breach in Singapore that the PDPC has been notified of. The sources do not state where the affected members live.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["SG"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a concrete institutional privacy incident: Singapore's data protection regulator found that a script a company employee wrote with a generative AI tool disclosed the email addresses of more than 95,000 members (95,364 according to Mothership) to other recipients. The facts rest on the PDPC's findings as relayed by The Straits Times, Mothership and AsiaOne; the PDPC page itself was not read. The AI tool did not communicate with, act for, decide about, make claims about or depict the members, so the person relation is recorded as unknown. No individual is named.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-02"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The PDPC, after investigating the company's notification, states that a marketing employee wrote the email distribution script with a generative AI tool and that the generated code put each batch of addresses into a single To field. The PDPC also states that the tool did not malfunction and that the prompt omitted any instruction to hide recipients. The PDPC's own case page could not be read from this host, so these findings are taken from The Straits Times, Mothership and AsiaOne reports that relay it.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Singapore: a Bee Cheng Hiang marketing employee used a generative AI tool to write a bulk-email script that put up to 1,000 members' addresses in each email's To field, disclosing the email addresses of 95,364 members","summary":"On 25 April 2026 Bee Cheng Hiang, the Singapore bak kwa and food products company, sent a marketing email in batches of 1,000 with every recipient's address visible in the To field, so each affected member's email address was disclosed to up to 999 other recipients. Mothership, reporting the findings of the Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC), puts the number of affected members at 95,364 (The Straits Times says more than 95,000), and the PDPC says email addresses were the only personal data involved. According to the PDPC, an employee had written the email distribution script with a generative AI tool and the prompt did not ask for recipients to be hidden from one another. Mothership reports that a missing bracket in the generated code grouped each batch into one To field. The PDPC says the AI tool did not malfunction and attributes the breach to human error in developing the code with an AI tool. It says the incident likely happened because the company did not test the script sufficiently, had no supervisory review of the employee's work and had no policy on staff use of generative AI. It reports no evidence of further misuse. The company notified the PDPC on 27 April, notified affected members, and gave a voluntary undertaking that the PDPC accepted on 2 September. The PDPC told The Straits Times it was the first AI-related data breach reported to it.","incidentDate":"2026-04-25","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-09-21","aiSystem":"An unnamed generative AI tool that a Bee Cheng Hiang marketing employee used to write a Python script for sending bulk marketing email (PDPC, as relayed by The Straits Times and Mothership)","aiProduct":"Unidentified code-generation tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["other_material_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The email addresses of Bee Cheng Hiang members (95,364 according to Mothership; more than 95,000 according to The Straits Times) were disclosed, each to up to 999 other recipients of the same marketing email, because of a script an employee wrote with a generative AI tool. The PDPC reports no evidence of further misuse (PDPC findings as reported by The Straits Times and Mothership).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":95000,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"The Straits Times, reporting the PDPC findings, says more than 95,000 Bee Cheng Hiang customers had their e-mail addresses exposed, and Mothership puts the number of members at 95,364. Each affected member's email address was disclosed to up to 999 other recipients in the same batch (Mothership), which is the privacy consequence this record reports. The count is a documented minimum of 95,000, taken from The Straits Times' lower bound. No source reports a further consequence, and the PDPC reports no evidence of further misuse. The employee is not counted.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","jurisdiction":"SG","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"regulatory_action","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.stomp.sg/trending-now/bee-cheng-hiang-customers-e-mail-addresses-exposed-first-case-ai-related-data-breach-spore","primarySourceLabel":"The Straits Times via Stomp, 30 September 2026: Bee Cheng Hiang customers' e-mail addresses exposed in first case of AI-related data breach in S'pore","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-02T03:15:09.888989+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-02T03:15:09.888989+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["singapore","pdpc","data-breach","personal-data","ai-generated-code","email","institutional-use"]},{"id":"2025-mochi-owner-reports-amazon-buy-for-me-orders-partner-distrust","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Official system-description article: AI checkout and agent operation.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Amazon states that Buy for Me uses AI to complete purchases on customers' behalf at brand websites.","causal_attribution":"The inspected reporting describes this account. Claims remain attributed and causation is alleged; multiple reports of the same victim or police/court account are one independence group."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Modern Retail body: Mochi Kids order history and cancellations.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The owner said Buy for Me orders began in November 2025, some were fulfilled before discovery, and she later cancelled orders.","causal_attribution":"The inspected reporting describes this account. Claims remain attributed and causation is alleged; multiple reports of the same victim or police/court account are one independence group."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Modern Retail body: wholesale partner contact and owner's distrust statement.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"A wholesale partner challenged the Amazon listings, and the owner said she had to reassure it and described distrust.","causal_attribution":"The inspected reporting describes this account. Claims remain attributed and causation is alleged; multiple reports of the same victim or police/court account are one independence group."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Modern Retail body: owner's deliberate decision not to sell on Amazon and response to unexpected listings.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The owner said she had intentionally avoided selling on Amazon and found the unexpected catalogue listings frustrating.","causal_attribution":"The inspected reporting describes this account. Claims remain attributed and causation is alleged; multiple reports of the same victim or police/court account are one independence group."}],"effects":[{"label":"Owner-reported cancellation work after unwanted agent orders","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"},{"label":"Owner-reported wholesale partner distrust","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"},{"label":"Owner-reported loss of choice about selling through Amazon","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.modernretail.co/technology/brands-are-upset-that-buy-for-me-is-featuring-their-products-on-amazon-without-permission/","kind":"journalistic","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"modern-retail-merchant-interviews"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/retail/amazon-shopping-app-buy-for-me-brands","kind":"official_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"amazon-buy-for-me-design"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["work","finance"],"unknowns":["The exact first order day, cost of cancellations and final opt-out outcome are unknown.","No actual breach penalty, lost contract or net financial loss is established. The agent acted for shoppers, with no supported listed relation to the harmed owner."],"geography":{"basis":"The owner and business are explicitly based in Salt Lake City, Utah, United States.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"An inspected source describes a concrete person-level adverse experience connected to the specified AI use. Statements remain attributed, private identities are minimized, and unknown dates, counts and technical details are preserved.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-30"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The official description establishes Buy for Me's AI-agent purchasing function, and the owner reports actual orders. The article does not establish that every catalogue-listing step used AI.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Mochi Kids owner reports unwanted Amazon AI-agent orders and partner distrust","summary":"Mochi Kids' owner told Modern Retail that she received about sixteen Buy for Me orders from November 2025, fulfilling some before discovering their Amazon origin. She said she had chosen to avoid Amazon and subsequently cancelled orders. A wholesale partner that prohibited Amazon sales contacted her after finding its products listed, and she had to explain she had not intentionally listed them. She described distrust. Amazon says its AI purchasing service supports an email opt-out; the source establishes no net financial loss.","incidentDate":"2025-11-01","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-01-06","aiSystem":"Amazon Buy for Me shopping agent","aiProduct":"Amazon Buy for Me","aiCompany":"Amazon","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm","loss_of_autonomy"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Owner-reported unwanted agent orders, cancellation work and a strained wholesale relationship","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"One interviewed owner describes the adverse business experience. Sixteen orders and 4,000 products are not harmed-person counts; the unnamed partner is not separately counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","platformType":"agent","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.modernretail.co/technology/brands-are-upset-that-buy-for-me-is-featuring-their-products-on-amazon-without-permission/","primarySourceLabel":"Modern Retail, 6 January 2026, merchant interview; Amazon system description","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-30T01:11:49.060335+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:24:51.955539+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["historical-2025"]},{"id":"2024-alicante-pensioner-ai-generated-persona-romance-scam","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'El 11 de noviembre de 2024 recibió un correo que cambió el rumbo de su vida.'; 'Con fotos y vídeos —en realidad, creados por inteligencia artificial— logró ganarse su confianza.'; 'Convencido de estar conociendo a una doctora de 43 años en Kazajistán, acabó enviando un total 8.800 euros.'; 'Un amigo intentó advertirle del fraude, pero'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"On 11 November 2024 the pensioner received an email from a woman presenting herself as a 43-year-old doctor in Kazakhstan seeking a serious relationship, who won his trust with photographs and videos that were in fact created by artificial intelligence; a friend who warned him of the fraud was rebuffed.","causal_attribution":"His account as told to the newspaper; the AI origin of the images is the police conclusion as he relayed it."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'un jubilado de 78 años residente en Alicante, perdió todos sus ahorros en apenas tres meses'; 'terminó enviando en total 8.800 euros, parte de ellos procedentes de la venta de su piso en Benidorm.'; 'comparte piso con otros tres jubilados en Alicante.'; 'Primero, 2.000 euros para un billete de avión. Después, otros 2.000 para gastos inesperados.'; 'terminó enviando en total 8.800 euros'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"He sent 8,800 euros in total over about three months (the source itemises 2,000 euros for a plane ticket and 2,000 for unexpected expenses, then a demanded 10,000-euro deposit he never raised in full; the remainder is not itemised), part of it from the sale of his flat in Benidorm, losing all his savings; he now shares a flat with three other pensioners in Alicante.","causal_attribution":"His account as told to the newspaper."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Se dirigió a la Policía Nacional, donde confirmaron lo que tanto temía: había sido víctima de una estafa. Las imágenes y vídeos eran falsos, creados con inteligencia artificial, y la mujer nunca había existido.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"When a final email said the woman had been detained in Kazakhstan and needed a fine paid, he went to the National Police, who confirmed he had been the victim of a scam and that the images and videos were false, created with artificial intelligence, of a woman who never existed.","causal_attribution":"His account of the police confirmation, as reported by the newspaper."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Tras el duelo, sus terapeutas le recomendaron socializar'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"After his second wife's death in 2022 and two years of treatment for depression, his therapists had recommended that he socialise and explore social networks, which is how the contact began.","causal_attribution":"His account as told to the newspaper; context, not causation."}],"effects":[{"label":"lost all his savings (8,800 euros, part from selling his flat) to a romance scam built on AI-generated images and videos; now shares a flat with three other pensioners","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.levante-emv.com/sociedad/2025/09/25/jubilado-alicante-pierde-ahorros-estafa-amor-creada-ia-121945634.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Read live in Spanish on 2026-09-23 (Levante-EMV, 25 September 2025; byline C. Suena; foot of the article credits Diario Información; photographs EFE/Morell). Feature built on the victim's interview. Translated by the reviewer.","independence_group":"prensa-iberica"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["finance","relationships","everyday_life"],"unknowns":["Whether the police identified or prosecuted the scammers or recovered any money.","The tools used to generate the persona's images and videos and whether the emails themselves were AI-written.","The end date of the payments (about three months from 11 November 2024; not stated).","Whether the scammers were in Kazakhstan.","Whether the newspaper or an agency conducted the interview (byline C. Suena; foot credits Diario Información; photographs EFE)."],"geography":{"basis":"He lived in Benidorm and now lives in Alicante and reported to the Policía Nacional (Levante-EMV); the emails and payments are presumed to have been received and sent from Spain, which the article does not state expressly; the scammers' claimed location (Kazakhstan) is not established. No court proceeding is reported.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["ES"],"affected_person_countries":["ES"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as an ordinary financial and relational adverse experience: an elderly bereaved man lost all his savings to a romance scam sustained by AI-generated photographs and videos of a non-existent woman, told in his own words to a Prensa Ibérica newspaper with the police confirmation as he relayed it (one chain, all claims reported). His name and biography beyond the case are withheld here although he chose to be named in the source.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-23"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The National Police told him the photographs and videos of the woman were created with artificial intelligence and that she never existed, as he recounted to EFE; the generation tools are not identified and the police statement was not inspected directly. The relation is recorded as unknown: the AI fabricated a third person's likeness rather than depicting, addressing or acting for him.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Alicante: a 78-year-old widower, advised by his therapists after a bereavement to socialise and explore social networks, sent 8,800 euros over about three months to a 'doctor from Kazakhstan' who courted him by email with photographs and videos the National Police later confirmed were AI-generated of a woman who never existed; part of the money came from selling his flat and he now shares a flat with three other pensioners","summary":"A feature carried by Levante-EMV on 25 September 2025 (byline C. Suena, sourced from Diario Información, photographs EFE/Morell) tells the story of a 78-year-old widower and pensioner living in Alicante who, after his wife's death in 2022 and two years of treatment for depression, was advised by his therapists to socialise and explore social networks. On 11 November 2024 he received an email from a woman presenting herself as a 43-year-old doctor in Kazakhstan seeking a serious relationship; with photographs and videos that were in fact created by artificial intelligence she won his trust, and a friend who warned him was rebuffed. Requests for money followed: 2,000 euros for a plane ticket, another 2,000 for unexpected expenses, then a supposed 10,000-euro deposit demanded by the Kazakh government; he never raised that sum in full but sent 8,800 euros in total, part of it from the sale of his flat in Benidorm. On his way to Madrid airport to meet her he received a final email saying she had been detained for carrying a family icon out of the country and needed a fine paid; he went to the National Police, who confirmed a scam: the images and videos were fake, created with AI, and the woman had never existed. He lost all his savings in about three months and now shares a flat with three other pensioners in Alicante; he told his story so that others would not fall into the same trap.","incidentDate":"2024-11-11","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2025-09-25","aiSystem":"AI image and video generation used to fabricate the persona's photographs and videos; tools not identified","aiProduct":"Unidentified image and video tool","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["financial_loss"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A bereaved 78-year-old lost all his savings (8,800 euros sent, part from the sale of his flat) over about three months to a romance scam built on AI-generated photographs and videos of a fictitious woman, and now shares a flat with three other pensioners; the loss and the police confirmation are his own account as told to the newspaper. The feature's remark that such frauds leave deep emotional scars is the National Police's general statement, not his account.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person, the pensioner who sent the money (EFE feature). Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"elderly","jurisdiction":"ES","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.levante-emv.com/sociedad/2025/09/25/jubilado-alicante-pierde-ahorros-estafa-amor-creada-ia-121945634.html","primarySourceLabel":"Levante-EMV (from Diario Información; photographs EFE/Morell), 25 September 2025: Un jubilado de Alicante pierde todos sus ahorros en una estafa del amor creada con inteligencia artificial","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-23T03:46:03.259662+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:16:50.572203+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["romance-scam","ai-generated-persona","spain","alicante","elderly","financial-loss","bereavement"]}]}