{
  "meta": {
    "exportedAt": "2026-09-22T14:34:10.616Z",
    "formatVersion": 2,
    "selection": {
      "q": "eca",
      "system": "",
      "harm": "",
      "context": "",
      "country": "",
      "role": "",
      "relation": "unknown",
      "evidence": "",
      "year": "2026",
      "response": "",
      "severity": "",
      "verification": "",
      "view": "incidents",
      "sort": "added"
    },
    "totalIncidents": 3,
    "coverage": {
      "cases": 3,
      "countries": 3,
      "languages": 2,
      "unknownLocation": 0,
      "locationPending": 0,
      "unknownLanguage": 1,
      "unknownDate": 0,
      "lawsuits": 1,
      "regulatory": 0,
      "minors": 0,
      "coreRelations": 0,
      "contextualRelations": 0,
      "mixedRelations": 0,
      "unknownRelations": 3,
      "relationPending": 1,
      "relationUnknown": 2
    },
    "countingNote": "Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.",
    "affectedCountNote": "Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.",
    "source": "NOPE Incident Tracker",
    "url": "https://nope.net/incidents",
    "license": "CC BY 4.0"
  },
  "incidents": [
    {
      "id": "2026-gisi-infopro-digital-creteil-ai-dismissals-suspended",
      "caseFacts": {
        "claims": [
          {
            "id": "c1",
            "status": "documented",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "locator": "Page 12: 'ORDONNONS la suspension du projet de réorganisation de la Société GISI et du projet de licenciement collectif (des 8 secrétaires de rédaction) en découlant, incluant la suspension des processus de reclassement, jusqu'à ce qu'il soit procédé à la réalisation des tests en situation réelle et à l'élaboration de numéros 0'; 'PRONONÇONS à l'encontre de la société GISI une astreinte provisoire de 8 000 euros par jour de retard pendant une durée de trois mois'; 'FAIT AU PALAIS DE JUSTICE DE CRETEIL, le 15 septembre 2026'. Page 1: 'ORDONNANCE DU : 15 Septembre 2026', 'N° RG 26/00991'.",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s1"
              },
              {
                "locator": "\"la suspension du projet de réorganisation (...) et du projet de licenciement collectif (des 8 secrétaires de rédaction)\"; \"par jour de retard sur trois mois\"; \"En revanche, les dommages et intérêts réclamés ont été rejetés.\"",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s2"
              },
              {
                "locator": "\"La justice a suspendu mardi en référé un projet de suppression de 8 postes au sein du groupe de presse Gisi (L'Usine nouvelle, LSA, L'Argus de l'assurance...), en lien avec le déploiement de l'intelligence artificielle\"; \"Il a par conséquent suspendu le plan jusqu'à la réalisation de tests complets. Contactée par l'AFP, la direction de Gisi a indiqué se réserver la possibilité de faire appel\".",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s3"
              }
            ],
            "assertion": "On 15 September 2026 the Créteil judicial court, sitting in référé on the application of Gisi's CSE, ordered the suspension of Gisi's reorganisation project and of the resulting collective dismissal of the eight secrétaires de rédaction, including the redeployment processes, until real-situation tests and pilot issues confirm what share of sub-editor tasks the generative-AI tool can take over; it imposed a provisional penalty of 8,000 euros per day of delay for three months, refused the damages provision and awarded 2,000 euros in costs.",
            "causal_attribution": "Established by the court order itself and confirmed by L'Informé and AFP, which each consulted the decision."
          },
          {
            "id": "c2",
            "status": "documented",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "locator": "Page 11: 'représenter un risque grave et caractérisé sur la santé physique et mentale de plusieurs catégories de salariés de la société GISI'; 'la société GISI ne justifie pas de la mise en oeuvre des dispositifs de prévention du risque lié à l'introduction de la nouvelle technologie d'IA générative alors que dans le DUERP 2025 qu'elle produit (pièce 5) elle identifie 3 risques en lien avec l'introduction de l'IA (stress lié à l'insécurité de l'emploi lié à l'intelligence artificielle ; changements organisationnels liés à l'introduction de l'intelligence artificielle ; absence de repères liés à l'utilisation de l'IA et manque d'acculturation) mais ne les a pas côtés'. Page 10: 'sans aucune participation des salariés concernés, ni réalisation en situation réelle'; 'L'expert pronostique un risque d'intensification majeur du travail des rédacteurs'.",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s1"
              },
              {
                "locator": "\"un risque grave et caractérisé sur la santé physique et mentale de plusieurs catégories de salariés\".",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s3"
              },
              {
                "locator": "\"Le tribunal judiciaire de Créteil, saisi par le Comité social et économique (CSE) de Gisi\".",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s4"
              },
              {
                "locator": "\"des risques de surcharge de travail (...) et une baisse de la qualité du travail fourni, de l'autonomie et du conflit de valeur, de la perte de sens et de l'altération du collectif\".",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s2"
              }
            ],
            "assertion": "The judge found that implementing the generative-AI project and the dismissal of all sub-editor posts on an approximate evaluation, without real-situation testing or participation of the staff concerned, presented a serious and characterised risk to the physical and mental health of several categories of Gisi staff, and that Gisi had not shown prevention measures although its 2025 risk register listed three AI-related risks including stress linked to AI-related job insecurity.",
            "causal_attribution": "The court's own finding; it concerns a risk to health created by the way the AI-based reorganisation was to be deployed, not an individually diagnosed injury."
          },
          {
            "id": "c3",
            "status": "documented",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "locator": "Page 2: 'La société GISI emploie 127 salariés dont 92 journalistes'; 'un outil dénommé DIGI'; 'Le projet de la société GISI prévoit la suppression de 8 postes de secrétaires de rédaction (SR) et la création de 2 postes de chefs d'édition reprenant une partie des missions des SR, à savoir celles ne pouvant être automatisées par l'outil DIGI'; 'Le 4 mai 2026 le CSE était convié à une réunion dite R0 de présentation du projet'; 'Le 12 mai 2026 la société GISI convoquait le CSE à une première réunion d'information/consultation sur deux projets'; 'le CSE de la société GISI obtenait le 15 juillet 2025 une ordonnance de référé'; 'Par un arrêt du 21 mai 2026 la cour d'appel de Paris confirmait l'ordonnance de référé du 15 juillet 2025'. Page 10: 'la société GISI a évalué à environ 70 % la part des tâches des SR réalisées par l'outil IA'.",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s1"
              },
              {
                "locator": "\"Au sein de Gisi, 8 postes de SR sont menacés\"; \"la société estimant que 70% des tâches des SR peuvent être réalisées par l'IA\"; \"Des reclassements ont été proposés à tous les secrétaires de rédaction\".",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s3"
              },
              {
                "locator": "\"avait déjà contrainte à ouvrir un processus d\".",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s2"
              }
            ],
            "assertion": "Gisi (127 staff, 92 journalists) planned to remove its eight sub-editor posts and create two chef d'édition posts for the tasks its in-house generative-AI tool DIGI could not automate, estimating that the tool would perform about 70% of sub-editor tasks; the project was presented to the CSE on 4 May 2026 and consultation opened on 12 May 2026, after an earlier July 2025 order (confirmed on appeal on 21 May 2026) had required consultation before AI tools were used.",
            "causal_attribution": "Facts recited in the court order and reported by AFP from the company."
          },
          {
            "id": "c4",
            "status": "reported",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "locator": "\"Les quelque 250 journalistes de ces 26 titres au total avaient lancé une grève au printemps pour s'opposer au projet de leur propriétaire de supprimer 19 postes de secrétaires de rédaction\".",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s3"
              },
              {
                "locator": "\"Nous allons poursuivre les tests et faire des numéros complets\"; \"la direction de Gisi a indiqué se réserver la possibilité de faire appel\".",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s5"
              },
              {
                "locator": "\"nous suspendons le projet le temps de finaliser ces tests\".",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s2"
              }
            ],
            "assertion": "Some 250 journalists across Infopro Digital's 26 titles struck in spring 2026 against the owner's plan to cut 19 sub-editor posts because of the AI deployment; after the order Gisi's president said the tests would continue with full pilot issues and that the company reserved the right to appeal.",
            "causal_attribution": "AFP reporting of the strike and of management's reaction; L'Informé carries management's written reply."
          },
          {
            "id": "c5",
            "status": "reported",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "locator": "\"with five of the eight affected journalists having already received pre-dismissal interview letters\"; \"newsroom positions accompanied by training were offered to all affected editorial secretaries, although some declined them\".",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s6"
              }
            ],
            "assertion": "Digital Watch, citing Stratégies, reports that five of the eight affected sub-editors had already received pre-dismissal interview letters and that Gisi had offered three chef d'édition roles and one technical editor-in-chief position, with newsroom posts offered to all affected sub-editors, some of whom declined.",
            "causal_attribution": "Secondary summary attributing the detail to Stratégies (not readable from this host); reported only. Its count of three chef d'édition roles differs from the two posts in the order."
          }
        ],
        "effects": [
          {
            "label": "eight sub-editors faced collective dismissal in favour of a generative-AI tool; a court found a serious risk to the physical and mental health of several categories of staff",
            "claim_id": "c2",
            "direction": "negative"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "id": "s1",
            "url": "https://linforme.files.sirius.press/files/1789566133007-SECURISE_ordonnance%20du%2015%20septembre%202026-2.pdf",
            "kind": "court_order",
            "access": "read",
            "language": "fr",
            "translation_note": "Court record: Tribunal judiciaire de Créteil, section des référés, ordonnance de référé of 15 September 2026, RG 26/00991, CSE de la société Gisi v. SAS Gisi, published by L'Informé (watermarked, 12 scanned pages without a text layer). Pages 1, 2, 10, 11 and 12 read visually in French on 2026-09-19; pages 3-9 not read. Quotations are transcribed from the page images.",
            "independence_group": "tj-creteil-order"
          },
          {
            "id": "s2",
            "url": "https://www.linforme.com/medias-culture/article/lsa-l-usine-nouvelle-la-justice-retoque-le-remplacement-des-journalistes-par-l-ia_8645.html",
            "kind": "news_report",
            "access": "read",
            "language": "fr",
            "translation_note": "Read in French on 2026-09-19 (L'Informé, 15 Sep 2026, updated 16 Sep with Infopro Digital's reaction). The served page truncates the opening paragraph; the court's findings, the penalty, the union reaction and management's reply are readable. L'Informé published the order.",
            "independence_group": "linforme"
          },
          {
            "id": "s3",
            "url": "https://www.cbnews.fr/medias/justice-suspend-projet-suppressions-postes-liees-ia-chez-usine-nouvelle-lsa",
            "kind": "news_report",
            "access": "read",
            "language": "fr",
            "translation_note": "Read in French on 2026-09-19 (CB News, 16 Sep 2026, AFP dispatch). AFP states it consulted the decision; carries Gisi president Isabelle André's comments.",
            "independence_group": "afp"
          },
          {
            "id": "s4",
            "url": "https://www.bfmtv.com/economie/emploi/vie-de-bureau/un-risque-grave-et-caracterise-sur-la-sante-physique-et-mentale-la-justice-suspend-un-projet-de-suppressions-de-postes-liees-a-l-ia-dans-les-medias-du-groupe-gisi_AD-202609160444.html",
            "kind": "news_report",
            "access": "read",
            "language": "fr",
            "translation_note": "Read in French on 2026-09-19 (BFM Business with AFP, 16 Sep 2026). Same AFP dispatch with a definition of the sub-editor role.",
            "independence_group": "afp"
          },
          {
            "id": "s5",
            "url": "https://www.liberation.fr/economie/medias/la-justice-suspend-un-projet-de-suppressions-de-postes-liees-a-lia-dans-le-groupe-de-presse-infopro-digital-20260916_H7LH5VX6A5EDBFWSDNNM3DPB3U/",
            "kind": "news_report",
            "access": "read",
            "language": "fr",
            "translation_note": "Read in French on 2026-09-19 via the MSN content API copy (Libération, 16 Sep 2026, AFP). Same dispatch, adding the staff representative and SNJ-CGT reactions given to L'Informé.",
            "independence_group": "afp"
          },
          {
            "id": "s6",
            "url": "https://dig.watch/updates/french-court-ai-job-cuts-journalists",
            "kind": "news_report",
            "access": "read",
            "language": "en",
            "translation_note": "Read in English on 2026-09-19 (Digital Watch Observatory, 17 Sep 2026). A secondary summary that attributes the pre-dismissal-letter and redeployment details to Stratégies, whose own article returns 403 to this host.",
            "independence_group": "strategies-via-digital-watch"
          }
        ],
        "version": 1,
        "ai_roles": [
          "institutional_use"
        ],
        "contexts": [
          "work",
          "justice"
        ],
        "unknowns": [
          "Whether Gisi has appealed the order.",
          "Whether the pre-dismissal procedure for the sub-editors has been formally withdrawn and whether all eight remain employed; individual health effects are not reported.",
          "Pages 3-9 of the order (the parties' submissions) were not read.",
          "The status of Groupe Moniteur's separate redundancy plan (PSE) covering the remaining sub-editor posts.",
          "Digital Watch, citing Stratégies, reports three chef d'édition roles offered; the order and AFP record two chef d'édition posts. The difference (offers versus created posts, or a Stratégies error) is unresolved."
        ],
        "geography": {
          "basis": "Gisi is registered in Créteil with its seat in Gentilly (Val-de-Marne) per the order; the staff work for its French titles; court: Tribunal judiciaire de Créteil.",
          "court_countries": [
            "FR"
          ],
          "event_countries": [
            "FR"
          ],
          "affected_person_countries": [
            "FR"
          ]
        },
        "publication": {
          "basis": "Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a work-lane case of an institutional AI decision with concrete consequences for identified staff: eight sub-editors were subject to a collective dismissal plan justified by a generative-AI tool, and a court found the deployment presented a serious and characterised risk to the physical and mental health of several categories of staff and suspended it. The court order (primary record), L'Informé and AFP copies read; the affected people are unnamed.",
          "reviewed_on": "2026-09-19"
        },
        "ai_involvement": {
          "basis": "The court order and AFP identify the generative-AI tool (DIGI) as the basis of the reorganisation and of the dismissal of the eight sub-editor posts, and the court's health-risk finding concerns deploying that tool without real-situation testing. The tool did not communicate with, decide about or depict the affected people; it was to take over their tasks, so none of the listed relations applies and the relation is recorded as unknown.",
          "status": "supported"
        },
        "person_relations": [
          "unknown"
        ]
      },
      "name": "Créteil, France: a court suspended Gisi's (Infopro Digital) plan to cut eight sub-editor posts in favour of a generative-AI tool, finding a serious and characterised risk to the physical and mental health of several categories of staff",
      "summary": "Gisi, the Infopro Digital subsidiary publishing L'Usine nouvelle, LSA and L'Argus de l'assurance (127 staff, 92 journalists), presented to its works council (CSE) on 4 May 2026 a reorganisation built around 'DIGI', an in-house generative-AI editorial tool, and on 12 May 2026 opened consultation on the reorganisation and on the resulting collective dismissal of its eight secrétaires de rédaction (sub-editors), to be replaced by two chefs d'édition, on the company's estimate that the tool would take over about 70% of sub-editor tasks. Some 250 journalists across Infopro Digital's 26 titles had struck in spring 2026 against a group-wide plan to cut 19 sub-editor posts, and according to Digital Watch (citing Stratégies) five of the eight Gisi sub-editors had received pre-dismissal interview letters. The CSE, relying on an expert report, went to the Créteil judicial court in July. On 15 September 2026 the référé judge found that deploying the plan without real-situation testing presented 'un risque grave et caractérisé sur la santé physique et mentale de plusieurs catégories de salariés', ordered the suspension of the reorganisation and the collective dismissal (including the redeployment processes) until real-situation tests and full pilot issues are produced, with a provisional penalty of 8,000 euros per day for three months, and refused the damages provision. Gisi said it would continue the tests and reserved the right to appeal.",
      "incidentDate": "2026-05-04",
      "incidentKind": "ongoing_experience",
      "incidentDatePrecision": "day",
      "exposurePattern": "product_change",
      "reportedDate": "2026-09-15",
      "aiSystem": "'DIGI', Gisi's in-house generative-AI editorial tool (transcription of interviews, drafting and correction help; planned spelling, grammar and typography correction, editorial-coherence and fact-reliability checks)",
      "aiCompany": "Gisi (Groupe Industrie Service Infos), a subsidiary of Infopro Digital (deployer of the in-house 'DIGI' generative-AI tool)",
      "severity": "medium",
      "verificationStatus": "unverified",
      "harmCategories": [],
      "harmOutcomes": [
        "professional_harm"
      ],
      "harmOutcomeSummary": "Eight sub-editors at Gisi faced collective dismissal because a generative-AI tool was to take over most of their tasks (five had received pre-dismissal interview letters, per Digital Watch citing Stratégies), and a court found that the plan, deployed without real-situation testing, presented a serious and characterised risk to the physical and mental health of several categories of staff; the court suspended the dismissals pending tests.",
      "frameworkFacets": [],
      "causationStatus": "supported",
      "participantUsersAffectedMin": 0,
      "otherPeopleHarmedMin": 8,
      "affectedCountStatus": "partial",
      "affectedCountEvidence": "The order suspends 'le projet de licenciement collectif (des 8 secrétaires de rédaction)' and AFP reports eight sub-editor posts threatened at Gisi; Digital Watch, citing Stratégies, says five of the eight had received pre-dismissal interview letters. The court's health-risk finding extends to 'plusieurs catégories de salariés' without a number. Eight counted plus unquantified others: partial.",
      "victimAgeRange": "adult",
      "jurisdiction": "FR",
      "platformType": "other",
      "outcomeType": "lawsuit_ongoing",
      "outcomeStatus": "ongoing",
      "primarySourceUrl": "https://linforme.files.sirius.press/files/1789566133007-SECURISE_ordonnance%20du%2015%20septembre%202026-2.pdf",
      "primarySourceLabel": "Tribunal judiciaire de Créteil, ordonnance de référé of 15 September 2026 (RG 26/00991), CSE de la société Gisi v. SAS Gisi, as published by L'Informé",
      "firstPublishedAt": "2026-09-20T03:19:47.791082+00:00",
      "scopeVersion": "facts-v3",
      "tags": [
        "work",
        "journalism",
        "layoffs",
        "generative-ai",
        "newsroom-automation",
        "france",
        "creteil",
        "labour-court",
        "occupational-health",
        "institutional-use"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "2026-arnold-sainsburys-facewatch-misidentification",
      "caseFacts": {
        "claims": [
          {
            "id": "c1",
            "status": "reported",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "locator": "'The incident happened on 6 August as Arnold... was waiting for a staff member to approve an alcohol purchase'; '\"The staff member said I'd been identified by the AI, and the cameras had flagged me,\" he told BBC London'; 'After being escorted off the premises, Arnold said he had looked back from the entrance and saw an overhead CCTV monitor alert with a red circle surrounding his face.'",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s1"
              }
            ],
            "assertion": "On 6 August 2026 at Sainsbury's East Dulwich store, two managers told Arnold he could not be served because of an incident earlier in the week, a staff member said he had been identified by the AI, and he was escorted out; he saw a monitor alert circling his face as he left.",
            "causal_attribution": "Arnold's own account to the BBC; the retailer confirms the wrongful challenge and apologised."
          },
          {
            "id": "c2",
            "status": "reported",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "locator": "'Sainsbury's head office contacted Arnold the following day to apologise, maintaining the incident had been caused by \"human error\" rather than software failure'; spokesperson: 'The incident was caused by human error, not the facial recognition technology'; Facewatch: 'A correct alert was sent to the retailer, but was subsequently subject to human error in the way it was handled in store'.",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s1"
              }
            ],
            "assertion": "Sainsbury's apologised the next day, attributed the mistake to human error rather than the facial-recognition technology, and paused the Facewatch system at the Dulwich store while it investigates; Facewatch said a correct alert had been sent and was mishandled in store.",
            "causal_attribution": "Company statements as quoted by the BBC; they contest the system's role, which is why AI involvement is recorded as disputed."
          },
          {
            "id": "c3",
            "status": "reported",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "locator": "'In September, Warren Rajah was ordered out of a branch in Elephant and Castle after being wrongly flagged by the same Facewatch software - with the security firm later confirming he was not even on its system.'",
                "relation": "supports",
                "source_id": "s1"
              }
            ],
            "assertion": "A second shopper, Warren Rajah, was ordered out of a Sainsbury's in Elephant and Castle in September 2025 after being wrongly flagged by the same Facewatch software, which later confirmed he was not on its system.",
            "causal_attribution": "Reported by the BBC as background to the same deployment; not part of this case count."
          }
        ],
        "effects": [
          {
            "label": "publicly treated as a shoplifter and escorted out after a facial-recognition alert; retailer apologised",
            "claim_id": "c1",
            "direction": "negative"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "id": "s1",
            "url": "https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cddjlmeqjgyo",
            "kind": "news_report",
            "access": "read",
            "language": "en",
            "translation_note": "Read in English on 2026-09-16 (datePublished 2026-08-17; BBC London; Arnold's interview, Sainsbury's and Facewatch statements, Big Brother Watch comment).",
            "independence_group": "bbc"
          }
        ],
        "version": 1,
        "ai_roles": [
          "institutional_use"
        ],
        "contexts": [
          "everyday_life"
        ],
        "unknowns": [
          "Whether the system's alert concerned Arnold's face or another person's, and what the staff saw on the alert, is not established; the retailer and vendor say the alert was correct and mishandled.",
          "The outcome of Sainsbury's investigation and whether the system was reinstated at the store are not reported.",
          "Arnold's place of residence is not stated.",
          "No second reporting chain was inspected; the BBC account is the only source read."
        ],
        "geography": {
          "basis": "Event: Sainsbury's East Dulwich superstore, London (BBC London). Affected person: a London-based promoter working next door to the store; the BBC does not state his residence, so his country rests on the event setting. No court.",
          "court_countries": [],
          "event_countries": [
            "GB"
          ],
          "affected_person_countries": [
            "GB"
          ]
        },
        "publication": {
          "basis": "Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as an ordinary adverse experience with an automated system: a named shopper, in his own BBC interview, describes being publicly treated as a shoplifter after a facial-recognition alert, and the retailer confirms the wrongful challenge and apologised while disputing the system's role. Low severity; the dispute over AI involvement is recorded rather than resolved.",
          "reviewed_on": "2026-09-16"
        },
        "ai_involvement": {
          "basis": "Arnold says staff told him the AI had flagged him and that he saw a monitor alert circling his face; Sainsbury's and Facewatch say a correct alert was generated and then mishandled by staff, attributing the wrong-person challenge to human error. The inspected source does not settle whether the system matched his face or another person's, so the relation between the system and him is recorded as unknown.",
          "status": "disputed"
        },
        "person_relations": [
          "unknown"
        ]
      },
      "name": "London: shopper told to leave a Sainsbury's after staff said the store's facial-recognition system had flagged him as a shoplifter; the retailer blamed human error and paused the system at the branch",
      "summary": "On 6 August 2026 Matt Arnold, 46, was stopped by two managers at a self-service till in Sainsbury's East Dulwich store, told he could not be served because of an incident 'earlier in the week', and escorted out; he says a staff member told him he had been 'identified by the AI' and that he saw a monitor alert with a red circle around his face on his way out. Sainsbury's apologised the next day, said the mistake was 'caused by human error, not the facial recognition technology', and paused its Facewatch live facial-recognition system at the branch while it investigates; Facewatch said a correct alert had been sent and was then mishandled in store. Arnold described the experience as humiliating and a 'terrifying glimpse of the future'. It follows an earlier wrongful challenge of another shopper at a Sainsbury's in Elephant and Castle.",
      "incidentDate": "2026-08-06",
      "incidentKind": "single_event",
      "incidentDatePrecision": "day",
      "exposurePattern": "single_interaction",
      "reportedDate": "2026-08-17",
      "aiSystem": "Facewatch live facial recognition (deployed by Sainsbury's)",
      "aiCompany": "Facewatch",
      "severity": "low",
      "verificationStatus": "credible",
      "harmCategories": [],
      "harmOutcomes": [
        "psychological_distress",
        "reputational_harm"
      ],
      "harmOutcomeSummary": "A shopper was publicly treated as a shoplifter and escorted out of a supermarket after an alert from the store's facial-recognition system; he describes humiliation and lasting unease, and the retailer apologised.",
      "frameworkFacets": [],
      "causationStatus": "disputed",
      "participantUsersAffectedMin": 0,
      "otherPeopleHarmedMin": 1,
      "affectedCountStatus": "exact",
      "affectedCountEvidence": "One person, Matt Arnold, was challenged and escorted out; the earlier Elephant and Castle shopper is a separate reported incident and is not counted here.",
      "victimAgeRange": "adult",
      "jurisdiction": "GB",
      "platformType": "other",
      "outcomeType": "internal_action",
      "outcomeStatus": "ongoing",
      "primarySourceUrl": "https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cddjlmeqjgyo",
      "primarySourceLabel": "BBC News London, 17 August 2026: Sainsbury's branch halts AI use as shopper wrongly challenged (interview with Arnold; Sainsbury's and Facewatch statements)",
      "firstPublishedAt": "2026-09-16T03:16:36.926518+00:00",
      "scopeVersion": "facts-v3",
      "tags": [
        "facial-recognition",
        "facewatch",
        "retail",
        "united-kingdom",
        "london",
        "automated-decision",
        "everyday-life"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "2026-mount-shasta-gemini-planned-climb-rescue",
      "metadataReview": {
        "version": 1,
        "geography": {
          "basis": "Geographic fields reviewed against the cited retained dossier passages. This is a metadata review, not a new source or causal review. Residence, event setting and court are recorded separately. Affected-person countries refer to reported location or residence, not citizenship or a complete residence history.",
          "evidence": [
            {
              "kind": "existing_record",
              "locator": "a Mount Shasta summit attempt",
              "location": "summary",
              "supports": [
                "event_countries",
                "affected_person_countries"
              ],
              "countries": [
                "US"
              ]
            }
          ],
          "court_countries": [],
          "event_countries": [
            "US"
          ],
          "affected_person_countries": [
            "US"
          ]
        },
        "unresolved": [
          "No court country established in this review. Regulatory authorities and police locations are not automatically courts.",
          "Source languages remain unreviewed; no source body was newly inspected for this record during this metadata pass."
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-09-15",
        "source_reviews": []
      },
      "name": "Mount Shasta climb planned with Google Gemini: night stranding, knee injury and rescue (Siskiyou County, California)",
      "summary": "Three novice hikers from Roseville, California, planned a Mount Shasta summit attempt with Google's Gemini, which the Siskiyou County Sheriff's Office said advised them to carry far less food and water than their group needed for what became a multi-day ordeal. After reaching the summit at 7 p.m. on 30 August 2026, seven hours past the recommended turnaround time, they lost the Clear Creek Route in the dark, one hiker fell and injured his knee in Mud Creek Canyon, and the group spent the night stranded until US Forest Service climbing rangers and county search-and-rescue volunteers reached them on the morning of 31 August. The sheriff's office called the reliance on Gemini 'a critical misstep'.",
      "incidentDate": "2026-08-29",
      "incidentEndDate": "2026-08-31",
      "incidentKind": "single_event",
      "incidentDatePrecision": "range",
      "exposurePattern": "unknown",
      "reportedDate": "2026-09-02",
      "aiSystem": "Google Gemini",
      "aiCompany": "Google",
      "severity": "low",
      "verificationStatus": "credible",
      "harmCategories": [],
      "harmOutcomes": [
        "physical_injury"
      ],
      "harmOutcomeSummary": "One hiker fell and injured his knee during a night descent off the route. The group of three spent the night stranded in the steep drainage of Mud Creek Canyon without adequate food or water and was found 'exhausted, hungry and thirsty' the next morning. All three received medical aid and walked out with rescuers; no hospitalization was reported.",
      "frameworkFacets": [
        "P1d",
        "P5b",
        "P5c"
      ],
      "pathwayDirection": "inward",
      "causationStatus": "supported",
      "participantUsersAffectedMin": 3,
      "otherPeopleHarmedMin": 0,
      "affectedCountStatus": "exact",
      "affectedCountEvidence": "The sheriff's account documents all three AI-using hikers stranded and requiring rescue and medical aid, including one with a knee injury.",
      "victimAgeRange": "adult",
      "jurisdiction": "US-CA",
      "platformType": "assistant",
      "outcomeType": "media_coverage",
      "outcomeStatus": "resolved",
      "primarySourceUrl": "https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/news/mount-shasta-hikers-rescued-california-ai-incorrect-instructions/",
      "primarySourceLabel": "CBS Sacramento: Hikers rescued from California's Mount Shasta after ascent planned with incorrect AI information (quotes the Siskiyou County Sheriff's Office statement)",
      "firstPublishedAt": "2026-09-05T11:55:07.681677+00:00",
      "scopeVersion": "participant-v2",
      "tags": [
        "gemini",
        "google",
        "physical-safety",
        "trip-planning",
        "rescue",
        "competence-boundaries",
        "us",
        "adult"
      ]
    }
  ]
}