{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-24T07:33:06.960Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"damages","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"unknown","evidence":"","year":"","response":"lawsuit","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":3,"coverage":{"cases":3,"countries":3,"languages":3,"unknownLocation":0,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":0,"lawsuits":3,"regulatory":0,"minors":0,"coreRelations":0,"contextualRelations":0,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":3,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":3},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2025-maastricht-university-ai-fraud-sanction-over-nonexistent-sources-upheld-by-dutch-council-of-state","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Bij beslissing van 11 december 2025 heeft de examencommissie zich op het standpunt gesteld dat'; 'ongeoorloofd gebruik gemaakt van kunstmatige intelligentie (hierna: AI)'; 'houdt in dat er een formele waarschuwing wordt opgenomen in haar studentendossier, dat alle toetsonderdelen van het vak ongeldig worden verklaard'; 'niet mag deelnemen aan de herkansing van het vak'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"On 11 December 2025 the examination board found that the student had committed fraud in a weekly assignment and had made unauthorised use of AI, and imposed a formal warning in her student file, invalidation of all assessment components of the course and exclusion from the resit.","causal_attribution":"Recorded in the Council of State's ruling."},{"id":"c2","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'de verdenking van fraude ziet op het gebruik van AI in drie van de vier bronnen bij de opdracht'; 'weergegeven bronnen bestaan niet en de manier waarop deze zijn opgenomen in de opdracht duidt op het gebruik van AI'; 'Er is geen technische analyse verricht, er is geen AI-detectietool ingezet'; 'omdat het onderzoek naar de vermeende fraude niet met behulp van technische middelen is verricht'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The examination board based the finding on three of four cited sources that named a different journal or edition, year, incomplete title or page numbers from existing articles; it said the sources did not exist and that the way they were included pointed to the use of AI. The Council of State's ruling records that the investigation was not carried out with technical means; the student argued that no technical analysis or AI-detection tool was used.","causal_attribution":"The board's reasoning and the absence of a detection tool are recorded in the ruling; the AI use itself is the board's inference."},{"id":"c3","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Verder is nooit aan haar gevraagd of zij gebruik heeft gemaakt van AI.'; 'heeft de opdracht afgerond in tijdnood en haar internetverbinding was op dat moment slecht.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The student argued that she was never asked whether she had used AI and that she completed the assignment under time pressure with a poor internet connection, relying on memory and notes.","causal_attribution":"The ruling documents that the student made these arguments, not their truth."},{"id":"c4","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'De examencommissie heeft met hoge waarschijnlijkheid aangetoond dat het ingediende werk door kunstmatige intelligentie is gegenereerd.'; 'Bij beslissing van 5 maart 2026 heeft het CBE het door'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"On 5 March 2026 the university's examination appeals board rejected her appeal, holding that the examination board had shown with high probability that the work was AI-generated.","causal_attribution":"Recorded in the ruling."},{"id":"c5","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Datum uitspraak: 12 augustus 2026'; 'verklaart het beroep ongegrond;'; 'wijst het verzoek om schadevergoeding af.'; 'Door de beschuldiging en de aantekening leidt zij reputatieschade en psychische schade.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"On 12 August 2026 the Council of State dismissed her appeal and her claim for damages, in which she said the accusation and the note in her file caused her reputational and psychological harm.","causal_attribution":"The dismissal is documented; the reputational and psychological harm is the student's claim as recorded in the ruling."}],"effects":[{"label":"formal fraud warning, invalidation of all course assessments and exclusion from the resit","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"appeal and damages claim dismissed by the Council of State","claim_id":"c5","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://data.rechtspraak.nl/uitspraken/content?id=ECLI:NL:RVS:2026:4720","kind":"court_record","access":"read","language":"nl","translation_note":"Read in full in Dutch and translated by the research agent (an AI); no human translation.","independence_group":"raad-van-state-ecli-nl-rvs-2026-4720"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["unknown"],"contexts":["education","justice"],"unknowns":["Whether the student used an AI tool, and which one.","When the assignment was submitted; the ruling dates only the examination board's decision."],"geography":{"basis":"The assignment, sanction and appeals concern Maastricht University and the Council of State in the Netherlands, as the ruling states. The student's own country is not stated; the use of an interpreter at the hearing does not establish it.","court_countries":["NL"],"event_countries":["NL"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as an institution's consequential response to suspected AI use: Maastricht University sanctioned a student for fraud after attributing non-existent sources to AI without a detection tool, and the Dutch Council of State upheld the sanction and rejected her damages claim. The facts rest on the published ruling.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-16"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The harm is the university's sanction for suspected AI use: its examination board concluded from non-existent and garbled citations in three of four sources that the student had made unauthorised use of AI and imposed a formal warning, invalidated the course's assessments and excluded her from the resit, and the Council of State upheld that decision on 12 August 2026. No detection tool or technical analysis was used and the student offered a different explanation, so AI use is recorded as suspected and the relation as unknown under the consequential-response exemption.","status":"suspected"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Dutch Council of State upholds Maastricht University fraud sanction on a law student whose assignment cited non-existent sources the university attributed to AI","summary":"On 11 December 2025 an examination board at Maastricht University found that a European Law School student had committed fraud in a weekly assignment whose purpose was to find and correctly cite legal sources. The board said three of the four sources contained wrong journals, years, titles and page numbers, that the sources did not exist, and that the way they were included pointed to the use of AI; it concluded the student had made unauthorised use of AI. The sanction was a formal warning in the student's file, invalidation of all assessment components of the course and exclusion from the resit. The student argued that no technical analysis or AI-detection tool had been used, that she was never asked whether she had used AI, and that the errors came from completing the work in a hurry from memory and notes with a poor internet connection. The university's examination appeals board rejected her appeal on 5 March 2026, and on 12 August 2026 the Administrative Jurisdiction Division of the Council of State dismissed her further appeal and her claim for damages for reputational and psychological harm.","incidentDate":"2025-12-11","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-08-12","aiSystem":"No AI tool is named. The examination board inferred from non-existent and garbled source citations that the assignment had been generated with AI; no detection tool or technical analysis was used","aiProduct":"Unidentified AI writing tool (suspected)","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["educational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The student received a formal fraud warning in her file, had all assessment components of the course invalidated and was excluded from the resit after the university attributed non-existent sources to AI; the Council of State upheld the sanction and rejected her claim of reputational and psychological harm (ECLI:NL:RVS:2026:4720).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One sanctioned student (ruling). She is counted under other people harmed because her use of AI is the university's inference and is not established.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"NL","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_dismissed","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://data.rechtspraak.nl/uitspraken/content?id=ECLI:NL:RVS:2026:4720","primarySourceLabel":"Council of State (Netherlands), ruling ECLI:NL:RVS:2026:4720, case 202601147/1/A2, 12 August 2026","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-16T03:11:28.361182+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-16T03:11:28.361182+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["ai-use-accusation","academic-integrity","education","fabricated-sources","sanction-upheld","ai-involvement-suspected"]},{"id":"2026-us-hospital-chain-data-scientist-alleges-firing-after-reporting-unauditable-ai-staffing-tool","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'This is a retaliatory discharge action brought by Russell against HCA under the Tennessee'; 'Case 3:26-cv-00983 Document 1 Filed 07/15/26'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Angelique Russell filed a retaliatory-discharge complaint against HCA Healthcare in the Middle District of Tennessee on 15 July 2026 under the Tennessee Public Protection Act.","causal_attribution":"Established by the filed complaint."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Russell determined that Timpani, an AI system whose daily census predictions help set nurse'; 'a rolling basis, leaving HCA permanently unable to reproduce or audit the staffing decisions'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'She accused HCA of routinely deleting data the tool uses to create schedules, which prevented auditing how well it worked'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that Timpani, an AI system whose daily census predictions help set nurse staffing, overwrote the data behind its predictions so that HCA could not reproduce or audit the staffing decisions it drove.","causal_attribution":"The plaintiff's allegation; WIRED relays the same complaint."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'On March 5, 2026, weeks after Russell first raised Timpani'; 'HCA placed Russell on a Performance Improvement Plan'; 'On April 3, 2026, days after Russell escalated her concerns to HCA'; 'HCA terminated her employment.'; 'The performance deficiencies cited in the PIP were pretextual.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'sued the company for allegedly firing her in retaliation for raising concerns about Timpani'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that HCA placed Russell on a performance improvement plan on 5 March 2026, weeks after she first raised the defects, and terminated her on 3 April 2026, days after she escalated her concerns to its Director of Responsible AI and compliance department, and that the stated performance reasons were pretextual.","causal_attribution":"The plaintiff's allegation of retaliation; untested."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'HCA has yet to formally respond in court, and Russell declined to comment.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"WIRED reported that HCA had yet to respond formally in court and that Russell declined to comment.","causal_attribution":"Status as reported by WIRED on 2 October 2026."}],"effects":[{"label":"a data science manager says she was put on a performance plan and fired after reporting that an AI staffing tool could not be audited","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.tnmd.110375/gov.uscourts.tnmd.110375.1.0.pdf","kind":"court_record","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in full in English on 2026-10-13 (RECAP PDF, HTTP 200, converted with pdftotext); no translation. The complaint establishes that the allegations were made, not that they are true.","independence_group":"russell-complaint"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.wired.com/story/ai-making-mess-of-nurses-schedules-they-say-its-a-safety-issue/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in full in English on 2026-10-13 (HTTP 200); WIRED summarises the complaint and adds that HCA had not responded and Russell declined comment, so it is grouped with the complaint.","independence_group":"russell-complaint"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["work"],"unknowns":["HCA's response to the allegations and its stated reasons for the termination.","Whether the Timpani defects alleged in the complaint have been confirmed or corrected."],"geography":{"basis":"The complaint states that Russell performed her work for HCA remotely from Minnesota and that HCA has its principal place of business in Nashville, Tennessee; the suit was filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. The event country rests on where the work was performed and the employer is based, both in the United States.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a consequential-response case: a former HCA data science manager alleges in a federal complaint that she was fired after reporting that HCA's Timpani AI staffing system could not be audited. The allegations are attributed to the complaint and have not been tested; the plaintiff is named because she brought the suit publicly.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-13"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The harm alleged is HCA's response to an employee's objection to its AI system: the complaint says Russell reported that Timpani, an AI system whose census predictions help set nurse staffing, could not be audited or reproduced, escalated this to HCA's Director of Responsible AI and compliance department, and was placed on a performance plan and fired. No AI output about Russell is alleged, so no relation describing an AI system's action toward her is established (unknown; consequential response). The connection to AI rests on the complaint's allegations.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Lawsuit says HCA fired a data science manager after she reported that its Timpani AI nurse-staffing tool could not be audited","summary":"Angelique Russell, a former manager of data science at HCA Healthcare, sued the hospital chain in federal court in Tennessee on 15 July 2026 for retaliatory discharge. Her complaint alleges that she found that Timpani, an AI system whose daily census predictions help set nurse staffing, overwrote the data behind its predictions so that its staffing decisions could not be audited or reproduced; that HCA placed her on a performance improvement plan weeks after she raised this; and that HCA fired her on 3 April 2026, days after she escalated her concerns to its Director of Responsible AI and its compliance department. She says the performance reasons were pretextual. These are allegations; HCA had not formally responded in court when WIRED reported on the suit on 2 October 2026.","incidentDate":"2026-04-03","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-07-15","aiSystem":"Timpani, which the complaint describes as an AI-enabled staffing and census forecasting system developed by HCA whose daily census predictions help set nurse staffing levels","aiProduct":"Timpani","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm","financial_loss"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to her complaint, Russell was placed on a performance improvement plan and then fired after reporting that HCA's Timpani AI staffing system could not be audited; she seeks lost pay and damages. HCA had not formally responded in court when WIRED reported the suit.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the plaintiff who alleges she was fired. Nurses and patients affected by staffing are not counted in this record.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-TN","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.tnmd.110375/gov.uscourts.tnmd.110375.1.0.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"Complaint, Russell v. HCA Healthcare, Inc., M.D. Tenn. No. 3:26-cv-00983, filed 15 July 2026 (ECF 1)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-13T03:27:47.102175+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-13T03:27:47.102175+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["workplace-ai","retaliation","whistleblower","hospital","staffing","lawsuit"]},{"id":"2026-gisi-infopro-digital-creteil-ai-dismissals-suspended","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Page 12: \"ORDONNONS la suspension du projet de réorganisation de la Société GISI et du projet de licenciement collectif (des 8 secrétaires de rédaction) en découlant, incluant la suspension des processus de reclassement, jusqu'à ce qu'il soit procédé à la réalisation des tests en situation réelle et à l'élaboration de numéros 0\"; \"PRONONÇONS à l'encontre de la société GISI une astreinte provisoire de 8 000 euros par jour de retard pendant une durée de trois mois\"; \"DISONS n'y avoir lieu à référé sur la demande de condamnation de la société GISI au paiement d'une provision à valoir sur des dommages et intérêts\"; \"une somme de 2 000,00 €\"; \"FAIT AU PALAIS DE JUSTICE DE CRETEIL, le 15 septembre 2026.\" Page 1: \"N° RG 26/00991\".","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"\"la suspension du projet de réorganisation (...) et du projet de licenciement collectif (des 8 secrétaires de rédaction)\"; \"8 000 euros par jour de retard sur trois mois\"; \"En revanche, les dommages et intérêts réclamés ont été rejetés.\"","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"\"La justice a suspendu mardi en référé un projet de suppression de 8 postes au sein du groupe de presse Gisi\"; \"Il a par conséquent suspendu le plan jusqu'à la réalisation de tests complets.\"","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"On 15 September 2026 the Créteil judicial court, sitting in référé on the application of Gisi's works council (CSE), ordered the suspension of Gisi's reorganisation project and of the resulting collective dismissal of the eight secrétaires de rédaction, including the redeployment processes, until real-situation tests and pilot issues confirm what share of sub-editor tasks the generative-AI tool can take over. It imposed a provisional penalty of 8,000 euros per day of delay for three months, refused the damages provision and awarded the CSE 2,000 euros in costs.","causal_attribution":"Established by the order itself; L'Informé, which published it, and AFP, which consulted it, report the same operative terms."},{"id":"c2","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Page 10: \"sans aucune participation des salariés concernés, ni réalisation en situation réelle, la société GISI a évalué à environ 70 % la part des tâches des SR réalisées par l'outil IA\"; \"que la mise en œuvre du projet de développement de l'IA générative et du projet de licenciement de l'ensemble des emplois de SR sur cette base approximative et non étayée par une mise en situation\". Page 11: \"réelle paraît dans ces conditions représenter un risque grave et caractérisé sur la santé physique et mentale de plusieurs catégories de salariés de la société GISI.\"; \"stress lié à l'insécurité de l'emploi lié à l'intelligence artificielle\"; \"mais ne les a pas côtés\".","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"\"un risque grave et caractérisé sur la santé physique et mentale de plusieurs catégories de salariés\"","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"\"des risques de surcharge de travail (...) et une baisse de la qualité du travail fourni, de l'autonomie et du conflit de valeur, de la perte de sens et de l'altération du collectif.\"","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The judge found that carrying out the generative-AI project and the dismissal of all the sub-editor posts on an approximate basis, without real-situation testing or participation of the staff concerned, appeared to present a serious and characterised risk to the physical and mental health of several categories of Gisi staff. The order also records that Gisi had not shown prevention measures, although its 2025 risk register listed three AI-related risks, including stress linked to AI-related job insecurity.","causal_attribution":"The court's own finding of a risk created by how the AI-based reorganisation was to be carried out; no individually diagnosed injury is reported."},{"id":"c3","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Page 2: \"La société GISI emploie 127 salariés dont 92 journalistes (91 selon la société GISI).\"; \"un outil dénommé DIGI\"; \"Le projet de la société GISI prévoit la suppression de 8 postes de secrétaires de rédaction (SR) et la création de 2 postes de chefs d'édition reprenant une partie des missions des SR, à savoir celles ne pouvant être automatisées par l'outil DIGI\"; \"Le 4 mai 2026 le CSE était convié à une réunion dite R0 de présentation du projet.\"; \"Le 12 mai 2026 la société GISI convoquait le CSE à une première réunion d'information/consultation sur deux projets\"; \"obtenait le 15 juillet 2025 une ordonnance de référé du tribunal judiciaire de Créteil enjoignant à la société GISI de suspendre l'utilisation des outils d'IA jusqu'à l'achèvement de la consultation du CSE\"; \"Par un arrêt du 21 mai 2026 la cour d'appel de Paris confirmait l'ordonnance de référé du 15 juillet 2025\". Page 10: \"la société GISI a évalué à environ 70 % la part des tâches des SR réalisées par l'outil IA\".","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"\"Au sein de Gisi, 8 postes de SR sont menacés.\"; \"la société estimant que 70% des tâches des SR peuvent être réalisées par l'IA.\"","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"Gisi (127 staff, 92 of them journalists according to the order, 91 according to Gisi) planned to remove its eight sub-editor posts and create two chef d'édition posts for the tasks its in-house generative-AI tool DIGI could not automate, estimating that the tool would perform about 70% of sub-editor tasks. The project was presented to the CSE on 4 May 2026 and formal consultation opened on 12 May 2026, after an earlier référé order of 15 July 2025, confirmed on appeal on 21 May 2026, had required Gisi to suspend use of AI tools until the CSE was consulted.","causal_attribution":"Facts recited in the order; AFP reports the same plan from the company."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"\"Les quelque 250 journalistes de ces 26 titres au total avaient lancé une grève au printemps pour s'opposer au projet de leur propriétaire de supprimer 19 postes de secrétaires de rédaction en conséquence de ce déploiement.\"","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"\"Nous allons poursuivre les tests et faire des numéros complets\"; \"la direction de Gisi a indiqué se réserver la possibilité de faire appel.\"","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"\"nous suspendons le projet le temps de finaliser ces tests.\"","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Some 250 journalists across Infopro Digital's 26 titles struck in spring 2026 against the owner's plan to cut 19 sub-editor posts as a consequence of the AI deployment. After the order, Gisi's management told AFP it reserved the possibility of an appeal, and its president said the tests would continue with complete issues.","causal_attribution":"AFP's reporting of the strike and of management's comments; L'Informé carries management's written reply. One AFP origin plus the company's own statements."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"\"with five of the eight affected journalists having already received pre-dismissal interview letters\"; \"newsroom positions accompanied by training were offered to all affected editorial secretaries, although some declined them.\"","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"}],"assertion":"Digital Watch, citing Stratégies, reports that five of the eight affected sub-editors had already received letters inviting them to pre-dismissal interviews, and that newsroom posts with training were offered to all of them, some of whom declined.","causal_attribution":"A secondary summary of Stratégies, which could not be read; reported only."},{"id":"c6","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Page 6: \"La société GISI rappelle que le projet concerne la suppression de 8 postes de secrétaires de rédaction représentant moins de 7 % des effectifs ; que le risque invoqué est supposé et non avéré ; qu'aucune surcharge de travail n'est établie\"; \"Elle précise que 38 réunions et ateliers ont été organisés avec les équipes éditoriales pour concevoir et tester l'outil\"; \"l'ensemble des salariés concernés pourrait bénéficier d'un reclassement en particulier sur les postes de chef d'édition\"","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Before the court Gisi argued that the project concerned eight posts, under 7% of its staff, that the risk alleged was supposed rather than proven and that no work overload had been established. It said 38 meetings and workshops had been held with editorial teams to design and test the tool, and that all the staff concerned could be redeployed, in particular to the chef d'édition posts.","causal_attribution":"The order documents that Gisi made these submissions; the court did not accept them as defeating the CSE's application."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Page 4: \"qu'elle est caractérisée au regard du calendrier de la société GISI qui prévoit la consultation des salariés de fin juillet à mi-septembre 2026 et des licenciements à compter de mi-octobre 2026\"","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"According to the CSE's submissions recorded in the order, Gisi's timetable provided for consulting employees from late July to mid-September 2026 and for dismissals from mid-October 2026.","causal_attribution":"The CSE's account of the company's timetable, as summarised in the order; the order does not make a finding on it."}],"effects":[{"label":"eight sub-editors faced a collective dismissal plan built on a generative-AI tool taking over their tasks; a court found a serious risk to staff health and suspended it","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://linforme.files.sirius.press/files/1789566133007-SECURISE_ordonnance%20du%2015%20septembre%202026-2.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"fr","translation_note":"Tribunal judiciaire de Créteil, référé order of 15 September 2026 (RG 26/00991), CSE of Gisi v. SAS Gisi, as published by L'Informé (watermarked scan of 12 pages, no text layer). Re-fetched on 2026-10-17 and all 12 pages read as page images in French; the research agent (an AI) transcribed and translated the passages relied on. Pages 4 to 7 record the parties' submissions, which the order summarises; the parties' own filings and the expert report were not available.","independence_group":"tj-creteil-order"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.linforme.com/medias-culture/article/lsa-l-usine-nouvelle-la-justice-retoque-le-remplacement-des-journalistes-par-l-ia_8645.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"fr","translation_note":"L'Informé, 15 Sep 2026, updated 16 Sep 2026 with Infopro Digital's reply; read in French by the research agent (an AI). On 2026-10-17 the served page showed only the opening lines (subscriber page); the passages relied on are from the fuller page captured on 2026-09-19 and re-read today. L'Informé published the order.","independence_group":"linforme"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.cbnews.fr/medias/justice-suspend-projet-suppressions-postes-liees-ia-chez-usine-nouvelle-lsa","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"fr","translation_note":"CB News, 16 Sep 2026, AFP dispatch; re-read in French on 2026-10-17 by the research agent (an AI). AFP states it consulted the decision.","independence_group":"afp"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.bfmtv.com/economie/emploi/vie-de-bureau/un-risque-grave-et-caracterise-sur-la-sante-physique-et-mentale-la-justice-suspend-un-projet-de-suppressions-de-postes-liees-a-l-ia-dans-les-medias-du-groupe-gisi_AD-202609160444.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"fr","translation_note":"BFM Business with AFP, 16 Sep 2026; re-read in French on 2026-10-17 by the research agent (an AI). Same AFP dispatch, adding a definition of the sub-editor role.","independence_group":"afp"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.liberation.fr/economie/medias/la-justice-suspend-un-projet-de-suppressions-de-postes-liees-a-lia-dans-le-groupe-de-presse-infopro-digital-20260916_H7LH5VX6A5EDBFWSDNNM3DPB3U/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"fr","translation_note":"Libération, 16 Sep 2026, AFP; the site returned HTTP 403 on 2026-10-17, so the MSN content-API copy saved on 2026-09-19 was re-read in French by the research agent (an AI). Same AFP dispatch, adding staff-representative reactions given to L'Informé.","independence_group":"afp"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://dig.watch/updates/french-court-ai-job-cuts-journalists","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Digital Watch Observatory, 17 Sep 2026; re-read in English on 2026-10-17. A secondary summary attributing the pre-dismissal-letter and redeployment details to Stratégies, whose own article was not readable from this host.","independence_group":"strategies-via-digital-watch"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["work","justice"],"unknowns":["Whether Gisi has appealed the order; no appeal was found in reports up to 8 October 2026.","Whether any dismissal letter has been sent since the order, and whether all eight sub-editors remain employed.","The individual health effects on the sub-editors or other staff; the court found a risk and no individual injury is reported.","Which three of the eight had not received pre-dismissal interview letters, and whether the redeployment offers were accepted.","Digital Watch, citing Stratégies, reports three chef d'édition roles and one technical editor-in-chief position offered; the order and AFP record two chef d'édition posts. The difference is unresolved.","The status of the separate redundancy plan at Infopro Digital's other subsidiary, Groupe Moniteur."],"geography":{"basis":"The order describes Gisi as a French professional-press company registered at the Créteil trade register and its titles (L'Usine nouvelle, LSA, L'Argus de l'assurance) as the newsrooms concerned; the court is the Tribunal judiciaire de Créteil.","court_countries":["FR"],"event_countries":["FR"],"affected_person_countries":["FR"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a consequential response to AI adoption at work: the court order documents an employer's collective dismissal plan for eight sub-editors whose tasks a generative-AI tool was to take over, and the court's finding that carrying it out without real-situation tests appeared to present a serious and characterised risk to the health of several categories of staff. The order (read in full), L'Informé and the AFP dispatch were read; no affected staff member is named.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-17"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The court order records that Gisi's reorganisation removes the eight sub-editor posts because, on Gisi's estimate, its in-house generative-AI tool DIGI would perform about 70% of their tasks, and that the collective dismissal derives from that project. The harm is the employer's response to its decision to adopt the tool: a dismissal plan and the health risk the court found in carrying it out without real-situation tests. The tool produced no output about, toward or on behalf of the sub-editors, so the relation is unknown and the case is reviewed as a consequential response to AI adoption.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Créteil, France: court suspends Gisi's plan to cut eight sub-editor posts in favour of a generative-AI tool, citing risk to staff health","summary":"Gisi, the Infopro Digital subsidiary that publishes L'Usine nouvelle, LSA and L'Argus de l'assurance, presented its works council (CSE) on 4 May 2026 with a reorganisation built around DIGI, an in-house generative-AI editorial tool. On 12 May it opened consultation on the reorganisation and on the resulting collective dismissal of its eight secrétaires de rédaction (sub-editors), with two new chef d'édition posts for the tasks the tool could not automate, on the company's estimate that the tool would take over about 70% of sub-editor tasks. Some 250 journalists across the group's 26 titles had struck in spring 2026 against a group-wide plan to cut 19 sub-editor posts, and according to Digital Watch, citing Stratégies, five of the eight Gisi sub-editors had received letters inviting them to pre-dismissal interviews. The CSE went to court in July. On 15 September 2026 the Créteil référé judge found that carrying out the plan on an approximate basis without real-situation testing appeared to present 'un risque grave et caractérisé sur la santé physique et mentale de plusieurs catégories de salariés'. The judge suspended the reorganisation and the collective dismissal, including the redeployment processes, until real-situation tests and pilot issues are produced, under a provisional penalty of 8,000 euros per day for three months, and refused the damages provision. Gisi had argued that the risk was supposed rather than proven. It said it would continue the tests and reserved the possibility of an appeal.","incidentDate":"2026-05-04","incidentKind":"ongoing_experience","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"product_change","reportedDate":"2026-09-15","aiSystem":"'DIGI', Gisi's in-house generative-AI editorial tool (transcription of interviews, drafting and correction help; planned spelling, grammar and typography correction, editorial-coherence and fact-reliability checks)","aiProduct":"DIGI editorial tool","aiCompany":"Gisi (Groupe Industrie Service Infos), a subsidiary of Infopro Digital (deployer of the in-house 'DIGI' generative-AI tool)","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Eight sub-editors at Gisi faced collective dismissal because, on the company's estimate, a generative-AI tool would take over most of their tasks (five had received pre-dismissal interview letters, per Digital Watch citing Stratégies). A court found that carrying out the plan without real-situation testing appeared to present a serious and characterised risk to the physical and mental health of several categories of staff, and suspended the dismissals pending tests.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":5,"affectedCountStatus":"partial","affectedCountEvidence":"Five counted: Digital Watch, citing Stratégies, reports that 'five of the eight affected journalists' had received pre-dismissal interview letters, a concrete step of the dismissal procedure. The other three sub-editors were subject to the same suspended dismissal plan and were offered redeployment (AFP, from the company), and the court's health-risk finding extends to 'plusieurs catégories de salariés' without a number. These are not counted because no adverse step specific to them is reported: partial.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"FR","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_ongoing","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://linforme.files.sirius.press/files/1789566133007-SECURISE_ordonnance%20du%2015%20septembre%202026-2.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"Tribunal judiciaire de Créteil, référé order of 15 September 2026 (RG 26/00991), published by L'Informé","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-20T03:19:47.791082+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-17T03:03:38.186484+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["work","journalism","dismissal-plan","generative-ai","newsroom-automation","france","creteil","interim-court-order","occupational-health","institutional-use"]}]}