{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-15T07:02:06.740Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"court","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"","evidence":"","year":"unknown","response":"regulatory","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":4,"coverage":{"cases":4,"countries":3,"languages":3,"unknownLocation":1,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":4,"lawsuits":0,"regulatory":4,"minors":0,"coreRelations":3,"contextualRelations":0,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":1,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":1},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2026-derbyshire-police-detective-removed-from-duties-over-alleged-ai-created-evidential-material","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'A criminal investigation has been launched into an allegation of perverting the course of justice after the alleged use of AI systems by an officer to create evidential material in a number of cases.'; 'The officer involved has been removed from frontline duties, pending the outcome of the investigation. No arrests have been made.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'A criminal investigation has been launched into an allegation of perverting the course of justice after the alleged use of AI systems by an officer to create evidential material in a number of cases.'; 'The officer involved has been removed from frontline duties, pending the outcome of the investigation. No arrests have been made.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Derbyshire Police launched a criminal investigation into an allegation of perverting the course of justice after the alleged use of AI systems by an officer to create evidential material in a number of cases, and removed the officer from frontline duties; no arrests had been made.","causal_attribution":"The force's own statement, relayed by two outlets; one origin."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'We are engaging with defence teams and the courts in appropriate cases.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'We are working with Derbyshire police as it conducts enquiries into the alleged use of artificial intelligence by an officer.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The Crown Prosecution Service said it was working with Derbyshire Police and engaging with defence teams and the courts in appropriate cases.","causal_attribution":"CPS statements given to each outlet."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'the detective is alleged to have used an AI chatbot to prepare documents including victim impact statements and case summaries for prosecutors'; 'It is claimed he prompted the software to maximise the impact of statements and to produce material likely to support charging decisions.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'People familiar with the case reportedly said that the officer instructed a chatbot to prepare documents intended to maximize the chance of conviction and a severe sentence.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"According to sources familiar with the matter, the detective allegedly used an AI chatbot to prepare documents including victim impact statements and case summaries for prosecutors, prompting it to maximise the impact of statements and to support charging decisions.","causal_attribution":"Unnamed sources' allegations as reported; not confirmed by the force."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'A number of rape convictions are being reviewed after a police detective was suspended'; 'has not disclosed how many convictions are under review'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"A number of rape convictions were reported to be under review after the detective was suspended; the CPS had not disclosed how many convictions were under review.","causal_attribution":"One legal outlet's report; the CPS did not give a number."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'It could lead to a mistrial'; 'a detective constable in Derbyshire Police was under criminal investigation for allegedly using AI to'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"In October 2026 the IOPC director-general said AI mistakes could lead to a mistrial, after the disclosure that a Derbyshire detective constable was under criminal investigation for allegedly using AI to create evidential material and had been suspended from frontline duties.","causal_attribution":"The watchdog head's interview remarks as relayed; context for the consequence."}],"effects":[{"label":"officer removed from frontline duties and placed under criminal investigation over alleged AI-created evidence","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jun/12/police-officer-under-criminal-investigation-over-alleged-use-of-ai","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-14 (HTTP 200). Relays the force's statement to the Financial Times and adds a CPS statement given to The Guardian.","independence_group":"derbyshire-police-and-cps-statements"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy8wppwdxl6o","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-14 (HTTP 200). Carries the same force statement and a CPS statement given to the BBC, so it shares an origin with s1.","independence_group":"derbyshire-police-and-cps-statements"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.scottishlegal.com/articles/england-police-officer-suspended-over-allegations-of-using-ai-to-bias-evidence-in-rape-cases","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-14 (HTTP 200). Attributes the chatbot and document details and the conviction review to unnamed sources familiar with the matter.","independence_group":"sources-familiar-with-the-matter"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.ibtimes.sg/ais-false-facts-raise-alarm-across-policing-data-protection-uk-guernsey-95045","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-14 (HTTP 200). Relays the IOPC director-general's interview with the Financial Times and people familiar with the case.","independence_group":"ft-iopc-interview"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["unknown"],"contexts":["work","justice"],"unknowns":["Which AI system was used, and when","How many cases are affected, which documents reached prosecutors or courts, and whether any charging decision or conviction relied on AI-generated material","The outcome of the criminal investigation and of the case reviews","Whether the officer disputes the allegation"],"geography":{"basis":"Event: the investigation and removal from duties by Derbyshire Police, an English force, concerning cases it handled (s1, s2). Affected person: a serving Derbyshire Police officer (s1, s2). No court proceeding about the officer is reported.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["GB"],"affected_person_countries":["GB"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a reported consequential-response case: Derbyshire Police said they opened a criminal investigation and removed an officer from frontline duties after the alleged use of AI systems to create evidential material in a number of cases, and the CPS said it was engaging with defence teams and courts. Details of the chatbot use and the review of rape convictions come from unnamed sources and are attributed as such. The officer is not named and the allegations are untested.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-14"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The harm is the force's response to alleged AI use: Derbyshire Police say they opened a criminal investigation and removed the officer from frontline duties after the alleged use of AI systems by the officer to create evidential material in a number of cases. Unnamed sources say an AI chatbot prepared victim impact statements and case summaries for prosecutors. The AI system is not identified, and no source establishes which outputs reached a decision about a particular person, so the relation is recorded as unknown under the consequential-response exemption.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Derbyshire Police remove a detective from frontline duties and open a criminal investigation over alleged use of AI to create evidential material","summary":"Derbyshire Police said in June 2026 that it had launched a criminal investigation into an allegation of perverting the course of justice after the alleged use of AI systems by an officer to create evidential material in a number of cases, and that the officer had been removed from frontline duties; no arrests had been made. The Crown Prosecution Service said it was engaging with defence teams and the courts in appropriate cases. Scottish Legal News, citing sources familiar with the matter, reported that the detective allegedly used an AI chatbot to prepare documents including victim impact statements and case summaries for prosecutors. It also reported that a number of rape convictions were being reviewed. In October 2026 the head of the Independent Office for Police Conduct referred to the case when warning that AI mistakes could lead to a mistrial. The officer is not named, the AI system is not identified, and the allegations have not been tested.","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-06-12","aiSystem":"AI systems allegedly used by a police officer to create evidential material; sources describe an AI chatbot used to prepare victim impact statements and case summaries (system not identified)","aiProduct":"Unidentified chatbot","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm","legal_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Derbyshire Police removed an officer from frontline duties and opened a criminal investigation over the alleged use of AI to create evidential material; prosecutors are engaging with defence teams and courts about affected cases.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the officer removed from frontline duties and under criminal investigation (claim c1). He is counted among other people because his use of AI is alleged, not established. Defendants and complainants in potentially impacted cases are not counted, because no source reports a decided outcome for any of them.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"GB","platformType":"chatbot","outcomeType":"investigation_opened","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jun/12/police-officer-under-criminal-investigation-over-alleged-use-of-ai","primarySourceLabel":"The Guardian, 12 June 2026: Derbyshire police officer investigated over AI-generated 'evidential material'","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-14T03:13:55.387027+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-14T03:13:55.387027+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["consequential-response","police","evidence","criminal-investigation","derbyshire","england"]},{"id":"2026-chaco-saenz-pena-fbi-alert-over-chatgpt-school-shooting-plan-two-men-detained","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'bajo directivas de la Fiscalía Federal de Presidencia Roque Sáenz Peña, iniciaron actuaciones de investigación criminal a raíz de una alerta emitida por el FBI'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'La investigación se inició a partir de una alerta de la Oficina Federal de Investigaciones (FBI) de Estados Unidos'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Gendarmería Nacional says its investigators, under the federal prosecutor of Presidencia Roque Sáenz Peña, opened a criminal investigation after an alert issued by the FBI.","causal_attribution":"Official release; Infobae relays the same official information, so one origin."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'mediante consultas en la plataforma de inteligencia artificial Chat GPT, afirmaba poseer armas, explosivos y municiones junto con un plan detallado para perpetrar un tiroteo masivo en establecimientos educativos locales'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'un usuario radicado en Chaco había realizado consultas en la plataforma de inteligencia artificial en las que afirmaba contar con armas, explosivos y municiones'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"According to Gendarmería, the alert warned of a user in Roque Sáenz Peña who, in consultations on ChatGPT, claimed to possess weapons, explosives and ammunition and a detailed plan for a mass shooting at local educational establishments.","causal_attribution":"Gendarmería's description of the FBI alert; the consultations themselves and ChatGPT's replies are not published."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'debido a que los dos involucrados utilizaban la plataforma Chat GPT para consultar y obtener un plan específico para realizar un ataque en un Centro Educativo'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The release's opening paragraph says the two people involved used ChatGPT to consult and obtain a specific plan for an attack on an educational centre.","causal_attribution":"Official summary sentence; its body describes one user, and no source says what ChatGPT supplied."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Con la orden emitida por el Juzgado Federal de Garantías'; 'secuestraron dos agendas con anotaciones manuscritas que reflejan la planificación logística para la comisión del atentado'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Durante el procedimiento encontraron dos agendas con anotaciones manuscritas'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"On a federal court order, gendarmes searched the home and seized two notebooks with handwritten notes on the logistics of the attack, bladed weapons and tools, a fuel can, a book with Nazi symbols, cash and computers.","causal_attribution":"Official account of the search."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'los gendarmes procedieron a la detención comunicada de dos ciudadanos mayores de edad, quienes quedaron alojados en sedes policiales a disposición de la magistratura interviniente'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Gendarmería Nacional logró detener en Chaco a dos sujetos'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"On the judge's order, two adults were detained and held at the disposal of the court.","causal_attribution":"Official account; Perfil relays it via the NA agency."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'La investigación comenzó después de que el FBI detectara que uno de los sospechosos utilizaba ChatGPT para realizar consultas vinculadas con la preparación de un ataque armado'; 'El blanco era la Universidad de la Cuenca del Plata'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Infobae reports, citing the official information, that the FBI detected one of the suspects using ChatGPT for queries about preparing an armed attack, and names the target as a university in Corrientes.","causal_attribution":"One outlet's account drawing on the official information."}],"effects":[{"label":"home searched and two adults detained after an FBI alert about ChatGPT consultations","claim_id":"c5","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.argentina.gob.ar/noticias/chaco-gendarmes-detuvieron-dos-hombres-que-mediante-inteligencia-artificial-planificaban-un","kind":"official_statement","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Spanish, read in the original; the English renderings in claims and public text were made by the research agent (an AI) and were not reviewed by a human translator. Gendarmería Nacional release on argentina.gob.ar, 13 October 2026, read live (HTTP 200).","independence_group":"gendarmeria-nacional-release-2026-10-13"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.infobae.com/sociedad/policiales/2026/10/13/detuvieron-a-dos-jovenes-chaquenos-que-planeaban-un-tiroteo-en-una-universidad-el-fbi-los-detecto-por-sus-consultas-a-chatgpt/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Spanish, read in the original; the English renderings in claims and public text were made by the research agent (an AI) and were not reviewed by a human translator. Infobae, 13 October 2026, read live (HTTP 200); relays the official information.","independence_group":"gendarmeria-nacional-release-2026-10-13"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.perfil.com/noticias/nea/chaco-cayeron-dos-jovenes-acusados-de-planificar-con-inteligencia-artificial-un-tiroteo-masivo-en-una-universidad.phtml","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Spanish, read in the original; the English renderings in claims and public text were made by the research agent (an AI) and were not reviewed by a human translator. Perfil, 13 October 2026, read live (HTTP 200); relays the account via the NA agency.","independence_group":"gendarmeria-nacional-release-2026-10-13"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["justice"],"unknowns":["What ChatGPT replied to the consultations, and whether it supplied any plan","Who detected the consultations and how they reached the FBI","The date of the search and the detentions","Whether both detainees used ChatGPT (the release body describes one user, its opening paragraph says both)","Any charge or court finding; the accusations are allegations"],"geography":{"basis":"The release places the user, the search and the detentions in Presidencia Roque Sáenz Peña, Chaco, Argentina, under an Argentine federal prosecutor and court. The FBI that issued the alert is a US agency, but no event in the United States is described.","court_countries":["AR"],"event_countries":["AR"],"affected_person_countries":["AR"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a reported case on Gendarmería Nacional's own release, relayed by Infobae and Perfil: an FBI alert about a user's ChatGPT consultations describing weapons and a school-shooting plan led to a court-ordered search and the detention of two adults in Chaco. All press items rest on the one official account; the planned attack is an allegation.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-14"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Gendarmería Nacional's release says the investigation began from an FBI alert concerning a user's consultations on ChatGPT, in which he claimed to have weapons, explosives and ammunition and a detailed plan for a school shooting; the search and the two detentions followed from that investigation. The person's exchanges with the chatbot are what triggered the alert (communicated_with). What ChatGPT replied, and who detected the consultations and passed them to the FBI, are not reported.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Chaco, Argentina: Gendarmería says two men were detained after an FBI alert that one of them told ChatGPT he had weapons and a plan for a school shooting","summary":"Argentina's Gendarmería Nacional said on 13 October 2026 that its investigators in Presidencia Roque Sáenz Peña, Chaco, under the direction of the federal prosecutor there, opened a criminal investigation after an alert from the US FBI. According to the release, the alert warned of a user in the town who, in consultations on ChatGPT, claimed to have weapons, explosives and ammunition and a detailed plan for a mass shooting at local educational establishments; the release's opening paragraph says the two people involved used ChatGPT to consult and obtain a specific plan for an attack. Gendarmes searched a home on a federal court order, seized notebooks with handwritten plans for the attack, bladed weapons and tools, a fuel can, a book with Nazi symbols, cash and computers, and detained two adults on the judge's order. Infobae, relaying the official information, reports that the target was a university in Corrientes. The accusations are allegations, and what ChatGPT replied is not reported.","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-10-13","aiSystem":"ChatGPT (named by Gendarmería Nacional as the platform \"Chat GPT\"): the alert concerned a user's consultations on it in which he claimed to have weapons, explosives and ammunition and a plan for a school shooting. Who detected the consultations and passed them to the FBI is not stated.","aiProduct":"ChatGPT (reported)","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["loss_of_liberty","legal_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to Gendarmería Nacional, an FBI alert about a user's ChatGPT consultations describing weapons and a school-shooting plan led to a court-ordered search of a home in Presidencia Roque Sáenz Peña and the detention of two adults, who remain at the disposal of the federal court; no charge or finding is reported.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"Two adults detained, per the Gendarmería release (\"dos ciudadanos mayores de edad\"). The release body describes one user whose ChatGPT consultations the FBI alert concerned, and Infobae says one of the suspects used ChatGPT; that person is counted as a participant user. The release's opening paragraph says both used ChatGPT, but the body and the press describe one user, so the second detainee is counted as another person harmed. No one at the targeted institutions is reported harmed.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"AR","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"investigation_opened","outcomeStatus":"pending","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.argentina.gob.ar/noticias/chaco-gendarmes-detuvieron-dos-hombres-que-mediante-inteligencia-artificial-planificaban-un","primarySourceLabel":"Gendarmería Nacional (argentina.gob.ar), 13 October 2026: two men detained in Chaco over a planned shooting","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-14T03:05:19.420524+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-14T03:05:19.420524+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["chatgpt","fbi","law-enforcement-report","arrest","alleged-attack-plan","argentina","chaco","spanish-language"]},{"id":"2026-tallinn-administrative-court-fines-complainants-ai-drafted-document-invented-scientists","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Kaebajad pöördusid halduskohtusse raieloa vaidlustamiseks ja saatsid kohtule dokumendi, kus viidati lageraie mõjusid puudutavatele teadustöödele'; 'Kohus avastas, et viidetes nimetatud Eesti teadlasi ei ole päriselt olemas ja kirjeldatud teadustöid polnud võimalik leida'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Kohus avastas, et viidetes nimetatud Eesti teadlasi ei ole päriselt olemas ja kirjeldatud teadustöid polnud võimalik leida'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Complainants contesting a felling permit sent the Tallinn Administrative Court a document citing scientific work on the effects of clear-cutting; the court found that the Estonian scientists named in the references do not exist and that the studies described could not be found.","causal_attribution":"The court's finding as reported by two outlets carrying the same account (one chain); the ruling was not read."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Tallinna Halduskohus määras trahvi kaebajatele, kes esitasid kohtule tehisaru abil koostatud dokumendi, mis sisaldas viiteid välja mõeldud teadlaste töödele'; 'Kaebajad vastasid, et tehisaru kasutamine pole keelatud ja nad ei tahtnud kohut eksitada'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Tallinna halduskohus määras esimest korda kohtusse pöördujatele trahvi, sest kaebuses leidus tehisaru loodud valeväiteid'; 'Kohus nõudis kaebajatelt selgitust, kuidas see dokument on sündinud'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The reports describe the document as drafted with the help of AI (Delfi Ärileht) and the complaint as containing false statements created by AI (ERR); asked by the court how the document had been produced, the complainants replied that using AI is not forbidden and that they had not meant to mislead the court. Neither report says which complainant operated the tool or names it.","causal_attribution":"The outlets' description of the document and the complainants' reported reply (one chain). The reply defends AI use on the complainants' side without identifying who used the tool."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Seejärel määras halduskohus ühele kaebuse esitajale trahvi 150 eurot ja veel üheksale kaebajale 50 eurot'; 'Kohus nentis, et kaebajatel pole küll keelatud tehisaru kasutada, aga on üldteada, et tehisaru võib väljastada eksitavat või isegi valeinfot'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Seejärel määras halduskohus ühele kaebuse esitajale trahvi 150 ja veel üheksale kaebajale 50 eurot'; 'kaebajad vastutavad kohtule esitatud väidete õigsuse eest'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The court fined one complainant 150 euros and nine other complainants 50 euros each, stating that complainants are not forbidden to use AI, that AI is generally known to produce misleading or false information, and that complainants are responsible for the accuracy of what they submit.","causal_attribution":"Court step as reported (one chain); the ruling was not read."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Samuti andis kohus kaebajatele võimaluse esitada viidatud teadustööd kirjalike tõenditena ja hoiatas, et võib neid muidu kohtu eksitamise katse eest trahvida'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Samuti andis kohus kaebajatele võimaluse esitada viidatud teadustööd kirjalike tõenditena ja hoiatas, et võib neid muidu kohtu eksitamise katse eest trahvida'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Before fining them, the court gave the complainants the chance to submit the cited works as written evidence and warned that it could otherwise fine them for attempting to mislead the court.","causal_attribution":"Court step as reported (one chain)."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Trahvimise peale esitatud määruskaebust arutanud Tallinna Ringkonnakohus nõustus halduskohtuga'; 'Riigikohus ei võtnud sel nädalal asja menetlusse, mistõttu on trahv nüüd jõustunud'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The Tallinn Circuit Court, hearing the appeal against the fine, agreed with the administrative court, and Delfi Ärileht reports that the Supreme Court declined to take the case in the week of its 26 June 2026 report, so the fines are in force.","causal_attribution":"Appeal steps as reported by Delfi Ärileht only; the appeal rulings were not read and ERR does not report the appeals."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Ülalmainitud kaasuses määrati trahv halduskohtumenetluse seadustiku kohaselt, kus seisab, et menetlusosalist, kes esitab kohtule teadlikult või raskest hooletusest faktiväite, mis ei ole tõene, võib kohus teda trahvida eelneva hoiatuseta'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'Seadus võimaldab kohtul määrata menetlusosalisele kuni 3200 eurot trahvi, kuid arvestada tuleb ka tema varalist seisundit, rikkumise olemust ja muid asjaolusid'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"ERR reports that the fine was imposed under the Code of Administrative Court Procedure, which allows the court to fine without prior warning a participant who knowingly or through gross negligence submits an untrue factual assertion; Delfi Ärileht reports that the law allows a fine of up to 3200 euros subject to the person's financial situation and the nature of the breach.","causal_attribution":"Legal basis as described by the outlets; the statute and the ruling were not read."}],"effects":[{"label":"a court fined one complainant 150 euros and nine others 50 euros each over a document, reported as drafted with AI, that cited scientists who do not exist","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"},{"label":"the complainants' submission cited scientists who do not exist and studies that could not be found, and the court warned them of a fine for attempting to mislead it","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://arileht.delfi.ee/artikkel/120593306/valjamoedud-teadlased-ja-uuringud-kohus-maaras-tehisaru-luulude-eest-eesti-esimese-ai-trahvi","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"et","translation_note":"Read in Estonian by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-08 (live, HTTP 200; Delfi Ärileht, published 26 June 2026 at 10:39); no human translator reviewed it and the translation of the cited passages is the research agent's own. Its four case paragraphs match the ERR report sentence for sentence, which indicates one court-information chain; same independence group as ERR. The court rulings were not read. 'tehisaru' is rendered as AI, 'kaebajad' as complainants, 'raieluba' as felling permit and 'määruskaebus' as an appeal against the ruling.","independence_group":"tallinn-administrative-court-ai-fine-announcement-2026-06"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.err.ee/1610063551/kohus-maaras-tehisaru-loodud-valevaidete-tottu-kaebajatele-trahvid","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"et","translation_note":"Read in Estonian by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-08 (live, HTTP 200; ERR, published 26 June 2026); no human translator reviewed it and the translation of the cited passages is the research agent's own. Its four case paragraphs match the Delfi Ärileht report sentence for sentence; same independence group. It adds an interview with the chair of the administrative court and a paragraph on the legal basis of the fine. The court rulings were not read.","independence_group":"tallinn-administrative-court-ai-fine-announcement-2026-06"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["justice"],"unknowns":["Which AI tool was used, which of the ten complainants operated it, and whether anyone drafted the document on their behalf.","The dates on which the document was submitted, the fines were imposed and the circuit court ruled; only the report date (26 June 2026) and the Supreme Court's refusal in that week are reported.","The outcome of the felling-permit dispute itself.","The case numbers and full reasoning of the three courts; no ruling was read.","Whether the complainants were represented by counsel."],"geography":{"basis":"The events recorded are court events in Estonia: both reports say the complainants sent the document to the Tallinn Administrative Court, which fined them, and Delfi Ärileht says the Tallinn Circuit Court and the Supreme Court dealt with the appeals and calls it Estonia's first AI fine. The reports do not state where the complainants live or where the tool was used, so affected-person countries are left empty.","court_countries":["EE"],"event_countries":["EE"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Full review of a published case: complainants who submitted to the Tallinn Administrative Court a document reported as drafted with AI, citing scientists who do not exist, were fined 150 and 50 euros, and Delfi Ärileht reports the fines in force after the appeals. The account is one court-information chain carried by Delfi Ärileht and ERR, read in Estonian by the research agent; every claim is reported because no ruling was read. The complainants reportedly denied intent to mislead and the court did not forbid AI use; both are preserved. No complainant is named.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-08"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Delfi Ärileht reports that the complainants submitted a document drafted with the help of AI, and ERR that the complaint contained false statements created by AI; both report that the complainants, asked how the document was produced, replied that using AI is not forbidden and that they had not meant to mislead the court (c2). The AI output is the document's references to Estonian scientists who do not exist and studies that could not be found (c1), and the court fined the complainants for submitting it (c3). The relation communicated_with records that the tool's output was delivered to the complainants' side, who submitted it and defended their use of AI; the reports do not say which of the ten complainants operated the tool, whether anyone drafted it for them, or what tool was used, so the relation is established for the complainant group and not for each person, and no complainant is counted as a direct user. The harm is the court's sanction for the submission, reviewed as a consequential response; no court ruling was read.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Estonia: Tallinn Administrative Court reported to have fined ten complainants over an AI-drafted filing that cites scientists who do not exist","summary":"According to Delfi Ärileht and ERR (both 26 June 2026), complainants who went to the Tallinn Administrative Court to contest a felling permit sent the court a document that cited scientific work on the effects of clear-cutting. The court found that the Estonian scientists named in the references do not exist and that the studies could not be found. It asked how the document had been produced, gave the complainants the chance to submit the cited works, and warned of a fine for attempting to mislead the court. The complainants replied that using AI is not forbidden and that they had not meant to mislead the court. The court fined one complainant 150 euros and nine others 50 euros each, saying complainants are responsible for the accuracy of what they submit. Delfi Ärileht reports that the Tallinn Circuit Court agreed and that the Supreme Court declined the case that week, so the fines are in force. No report names the tool or says which complainant used it.","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-06-26","aiSystem":"Unidentified AI tool with which, according to the reports of the court's ruling, the complainants' document was drafted; the document cited scientists who do not exist","aiProduct":"Unidentified AI writing tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["legal_harm","financial_loss"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A court fined one complainant 150 euros and nine others 50 euros each, ten people in all, for submitting a document, reported as drafted with AI, that cited scientists who do not exist; Delfi Ärileht reports that the Circuit Court agreed and that the fines are in force (Delfi Ärileht; ERR for the fines).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":10,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"Ten people fined: one complainant 150 euros and nine other complainants 50 euros each (Delfi Ärileht; ERR). The reports treat the complainants together as the submitters of the AI-drafted document and do not say which of them operated the tool, so none is counted as a direct user; all ten are counted under other people harmed rather than inventing a split. The total is exact as reported; the allocation between direct users and others is unknown.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","jurisdiction":"EE","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"regulatory_action","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://arileht.delfi.ee/artikkel/120593306/valjamoedud-teadlased-ja-uuringud-kohus-maaras-tehisaru-luulude-eest-eesti-esimese-ai-trahvi","primarySourceLabel":"Delfi Ärileht, 26 June 2026: Invented scientists and studies, court imposes Estonia's first AI fine","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-05T03:33:19.084955+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-08T03:13:55.986988+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["hallucinated-citations","court-filing","court-fine","estonia","tallinn","administrative-court","own-use","estonian-language"]},{"id":"2026-manhattan-da-deepfake-ncii-site-seizure","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'September 14, 2026'; 'today announced the Office’s seizure of 12 domain names of illegal websites used for unlawfully disseminating, publishing, and selling non-consensual celebrity “deepfake” videos'; 'we have seized these websites pursuant to a court order'; 'Our investigations into these websites and similar operations are ongoing'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"da"},{"locator":"'On Monday, the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office announced the seizure of 12 domains'.","relation":"context","source_id":"wired"}],"assertion":"On 14 September 2026 the Manhattan District Attorney's Office announced that it had seized 12 domain names of websites it says were used for unlawfully disseminating, publishing and selling non-consensual deepfake videos, that the seizure was pursuant to a court order, and that its investigations were ongoing.","causal_attribution":"The official release directly establishes the date and content of the office's announcement. It does not establish the truth of the underlying allegations, identify the sites or operators, or report any charge."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Individuals under investigation allegedly used artificial-intelligence (“AI”) image and video creation tools to turn pre-existing photos and videos of approximately 1,200 real people into what appear to be hyper-realistic images and videos of those individuals engaging in sexual conduct'; 'They then used these websites to disseminate, publish, and sell these videos and other similar non-consensual intimate imagery'; 'The approximately 1,200 victims of these websites and the content creators who use these websites to sell their NCII videos are overwhelmingly women and primarily public-facing individuals, including actors, politicians, athletes, musicians, social justice advocates, and social media influencers'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"da"},{"locator":"'Around 1,200 people—overwhelmingly women—were depicted in nonconsensual sexual images and videos on the websites, the office says'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"wired"}],"assertion":"The DA's office alleges that individuals under investigation used AI image and video creation tools to turn pre-existing photos and videos of approximately 1,200 real people into sexual images and videos that were then published and sold on the sites, and describes the victims as overwhelmingly women and primarily public-facing figures (actors, politicians, athletes, musicians, social justice advocates and social media influencers).","causal_attribution":"The AI mechanism, the approximate figure and the description of the victims are the prosecuting office's allegations; WIRED attributes the same figure to the office, so the two passages share one origin. The figure is an estimate, not a documented minimum, and no counting method, ages or individual outcomes are given."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'WIRED independently observed several of the sites’ homepages being replaced by takedown notices'; 'late last week, with the sites now saying they have been taken over following a seizure warrant issued by a New York State Supreme Court'; 'Archived versions of the websites show some videos had been watched tens of thousands of times, with one of the websites claiming to have been online since 2018'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"wired"}],"assertion":"WIRED says it independently observed several of the sites' homepages replaced by seizure notices late in the week before the announcement, with the notices citing a seizure warrant issued by a New York State Supreme Court, and that archived versions of the sites showed some videos watched tens of thousands of times and one site claiming to have been online since 2018.","causal_attribution":"The reporter's own observations of the notices and archived pages. The warrant was not inspected, and a site's claim about its own age does not establish when any depiction was made."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Most videos took the shape of actual pornographic movies, manipulated to instead show targets’ faces instead of the original actors'; 'many videos appeared to be reposts of content that had originally be shared on the MrDeepFakes website'; 'On at least two of the seized websites, elected officials were given profiles containing their name and position, along with a grid of manipulated videos hosting their likeness'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"wired"}],"assertion":"A researcher at the American Sunlight Project told WIRED that most videos on the sites were pornographic films manipulated to show the targets' faces, that many appeared to be reposts of content first shared on the MrDeepFakes website, and that at least two of the seized sites gave elected officials profiles with their names and positions.","causal_attribution":"Researcher observations reported by WIRED. The article's politician figures combine people mentioned with people who appeared and are internally inconsistent, so they are not used as a tally of depicted people."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'These horrific violations of privacy follow victims into their careers and personal lives and take an immense toll on emotional and mental wellbeing'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"da"},{"locator":"'district attorney Alvin Bragg said in a statement'.","relation":"context","source_id":"wired"}],"assertion":"District Attorney Bragg said the violations of privacy follow victims into their careers and personal lives and take an immense toll on emotional and mental wellbeing.","causal_attribution":"A general statement by the prosecutor about this kind of harm; it does not establish any individual's outcome."}],"effects":[{"label":"Non-consensual AI-generated sexual depictions of about 1,200 people (the DA's estimate) published and sold on 12 websites","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"da","url":"https://manhattanda.org/manhattan-d-a-s-office-seizes-domains-of-12-illegal-websites-selling-ai-generated-deep-fakes/","kind":"official_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-07 (live HTTP 200; also read 2026-09-17 and 2026-10-06). Press release dated September 14, 2026 announcing the seizure of 12 domain names, the office's allegations about AI-created non-consensual imagery of approximately 1,200 people, the DA's statement and the ongoing investigation. The release does not name the sites or any operator.","independence_group":"manhattanda"},{"id":"wired","url":"https://www.wired.com/story/new-york-seizes-a-dozen-celebrity-deepfake-websites/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-07 (live HTTP 200; also read 2026-09-17 and 2026-10-06). WIRED, Sep 14, 2026 (Matt Burgess). Its 1,200 figure and the description of the victims are attributed to the DA's office and share that origin. Its own contributions are the reporter's observation of seizure notices before the announcement, archived-site observations and interviews with two researchers. The politician numbers it reports mix people mentioned with people who appeared and are not used as a count.","independence_group":"wired"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["privacy","justice"],"unknowns":["An exact or minimum number of depicted people and the office's counting method; the 1,200 figure is an estimate.","When the depictions were created and published; one site claimed to have been online since 2018.","Which AI tools were used and where the generation, hosting and the depicted people were located.","The identities of the operators and uploaders; no arrests or charges are reported.","Ages of the depicted people and any individual outcome; the DA speaks generally about the toll on victims.","The seizure warrant and its date; WIRED reports it from the sites' notices and it was not inspected."],"geography":{"basis":"Court US: the seizure was executed by the Manhattan District Attorney's Office under a court order, which WIRED reports as a New York State Supreme Court seizure warrant. Event unknown: no inspected source states where the depictions were generated or published or where the operators are, and the seat of the seizing authority does not locate the abuse. Affected people unknown: the depicted people are not enumerated, and WIRED's references to US, UK and European politicians mix people mentioned with people who appeared.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a bounded series of alleged non-consensual AI-generated sexual depictions: the DA's release describes AI image and video tools turning real people's photos and videos into sexual imagery sold on 12 seized sites, and a researcher quoted by WIRED describes face-swapped pornographic videos on those sites. The 14 September 2026 announcement is documented; the allegations, the approximately 1,200 estimate and the researcher observations are attributed and the dates and count of the depictions remain unknown. No individual victim is named.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-07"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The DA's release states that individuals under investigation used AI image and video creation tools to turn pre-existing photos and videos of approximately 1,200 real people into hyper-realistic sexual images and videos that were then disseminated, published and sold on the 12 seized sites; the non-consensual depiction and its sale are the reported harm. A researcher quoted by WIRED describes the videos on the sites as pornographic films manipulated to show the targets' faces, and WIRED reports the sites advertised the material as deepfakes. The specific tools, the original files and the generated material were not inspected, and the account of the AI mechanism rests on the prosecuting office.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Manhattan DA says 12 seized websites sold AI-generated sexual deepfakes of about 1,200 people; the depictions' dates and an exact count are not established","summary":"On 14 September 2026 the Manhattan District Attorney's Office announced that it had seized, under a court order, 12 domain names of websites it says were used to disseminate, publish and sell non-consensual 'deepfake' videos, and said its investigations were ongoing. The office alleges that people under investigation used AI image and video creation tools to turn existing photos and videos of approximately 1,200 real people, overwhelmingly women and mostly public-facing figures, into sexual images and videos that were then sold. The 1,200 figure is the office's estimate and is not a documented count. WIRED reported that it had observed seizure notices on several of the sites in the days before the announcement and quoted researchers who described the videos as pornographic films manipulated to show the targets' faces, many apparently reposted from the defunct MrDeepFakes site. When the depictions were made and published is not established; one site claimed to have been online since 2018.","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-09-14","aiSystem":"AI image and video creation tools, not identified, which the Manhattan DA alleges were used to create the non-consensual sexual imagery","aiProduct":"Unidentified image and video tool","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["exploitation_or_abuse"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The Manhattan DA alleges that about 1,200 real people, overwhelmingly women, were depicted without consent in AI-generated sexual images and videos published and sold on 12 websites it seized. The DA says such violations take an immense toll on victims' wellbeing and careers; no individual outcome, age or exact count is established.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"unquantified","affectedCountEvidence":"The DA's office gives an approximate estimate of 1,200 depicted people and WIRED attributes that figure to the office; neither source states an exact total, a lower bound or a counting method, so the numeric fields are zero placeholders for an unquantified count and the estimate stays in attributed prose. Twelve is the number of domains, not people. WIRED's politician numbers mix people mentioned with people who appeared and are not a count of depicted people. Audience figures (views) are not counted. The depicted people are not reported as users of the tools.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"investigation_opened","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://manhattanda.org/manhattan-d-a-s-office-seizes-domains-of-12-illegal-websites-selling-ai-generated-deep-fakes/","primarySourceLabel":"Manhattan District Attorney's Office press release, 14 September 2026: Office seizes domains of 12 illegal websites selling AI-generated deepfakes","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-17T03:27:44.31761+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-07T03:25:01.633732+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["deepfake","ncii","non-consensual-imagery","manhattan-da","new-york","celebrities","united-states","depicted-or-impersonated"]}]}