{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-15T07:01:09.719Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"court","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"unknown","evidence":"","year":"2025","response":"","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":5,"coverage":{"cases":5,"countries":3,"languages":3,"unknownLocation":2,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":0,"lawsuits":3,"regulatory":0,"minors":0,"coreRelations":0,"contextualRelations":0,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":5,"relationPending":2,"relationUnknown":3},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2025-puerto-rico-federal-court-sanctions-soccer-league-lawyers-over-citations-judge-said-bore-ai-hallmarks","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"The judge ordered attorneys José Olmo-Rodríguez and Ibrahim Reyes Gándara to pay $24,492.10 on September 23, 2025, after finding dozens of inaccurate or nonexistent legal citations across four filings.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"A subsequent order issued on September 23, 2025, established the financial penalty at $24,492.10, payable to FIFA and other defendants.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The judge found dozens of inaccurate or nonexistent legal citations across four filings by the league's attorneys and ordered the two attorneys to pay $24,492.10 on 23 September 2025.","causal_attribution":"The court record as reported; the order itself was not read."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Arias-Marxuach said the errors bore hallmarks of generative AI, although both lawyers denied using the technology. He found that they violated Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by failing to reasonably verify the legal authorities supporting their arguments.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"previously concluded that filings by the plaintiffs’ lawyers contained 55 erroneous citations that appeared to have been generated with artificial intelligence, according to Reuters.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The judge said the errors bore hallmarks of generative AI and found a Rule 11 violation for failing to reasonably verify the cited authorities.","causal_attribution":"The AI attribution is the judge's assessment; the sanction rests on the failure to verify."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"although both lawyers denied using the technology","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"However, attorneys José Olmo-Rodríguez and Ibrahim Reyes Gándara have denied using artificial intelligence to prepare the problematic submissions.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"Both lawyers have denied using artificial intelligence to prepare the filings.","causal_attribution":"Counterevidence to the AI attribution."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"In April 2025, Judge Arias-Marxuach determined that deficiencies in the lawyers' submissions warranted sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 and the court's inherent authority to address litigation misconduct.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The judge decided in April 2025 that the deficiencies warranted sanctions under Rule 11 and the court's inherent authority.","causal_attribution":"Procedural history of the sanction as reported; no causal claim about AI."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"In an October 6, 2026, filing, soccer's international governing body urged Chief U.S. District Judge Raúl Arias-Marxuach to dismiss the Puerto Rico Soccer League's remaining antitrust claim; The attorneys subsequently proposed paying $1,000 per month beginning October 15","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"The plaintiffs' lawyers oppose that request, maintaining that dismissal would unfairly penalise their client for the conduct of its legal representatives.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"FIFA asked the court in an October 2026 filing to dismiss the league's remaining antitrust claim because the sanction had not been paid; the lawyers proposed paying $1,000 a month and argued that dismissal would punish their client.","causal_attribution":"The dismissal request responds to the unpaid sanction; its outcome is pending."}],"effects":[{"label":"two attorneys personally sanctioned $24,492.10 over defective citations","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"the client's remaining claim faces a dismissal request over the unpaid sanction","claim_id":"c5","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.lawcommentary.com/articles/fifa-antitrust-lawsuit-ai-citations-sanctions","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English in full; no translation.","independence_group":"lawcommentary-court-record-oct-2026"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.pymnts.com/cpi-posts/fifa-seeks-to-toss-antitrust-case-over-ai-related-court-sanctions/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English in full; no translation. PYMNTS attributes its account to Reuters reporting; Reuters itself returned HTTP 401 and was not read.","independence_group":"reuters-fifa-oct-2026-relay"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.lawyer-monthly.com/2026/10/fifa-seeks-dismissal-of-antitrust-lawsuit-over-alleged-ai-misuse/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English in full; no translation. Its account closely follows the Reuters report relayed by PYMNTS and is grouped with that relay.","independence_group":"reuters-fifa-oct-2026-relay"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["unknown"],"contexts":["work","justice"],"unknowns":["Whether any AI tool was used to prepare the filings, and which one.","The text of the April 2025 and September 2025 sanction orders, which were not read.","Whether the court will dismiss the league's remaining claim or accept the instalment plan."],"geography":{"basis":"The filings were made in, and the sanction imposed by, the U.S. District Court before Chief U.S. District Judge Arias-Marxuach in Puerto Rico (Law Commentary: 'a federal judge in Puerto Rico'). The event is recorded under Puerto Rico's ISO code PR, and the court, a U.S. federal district court, under US. The attorneys' residence is not stated.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["PR"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a concrete court sanction on two attorneys for defective citations that the judge said bore hallmarks of generative AI, with the lawyers' denial recorded. The AI involvement is the judge's assessment and is disputed.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-13"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The harm is a court's sanction responding to defective citations that the court attributed to suspected generative AI use. Law Commentary reports that the judge said the errors bore hallmarks of generative AI, and PYMNTS, citing Reuters, reports his conclusion that the 55 erroneous citations appeared to have been generated with AI. Both lawyers deny using AI, no source names a tool, and the sanction itself rests on the failure to verify the citations. Because no AI output is established as reaching the lawyers or the court, the relation is unknown under the consequential-response exemption.","status":"suspected"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Puerto Rico federal judge sanctions a soccer league's lawyers over 55 defective citations he said bore hallmarks of generative AI; the lawyers deny using AI","summary":"In an antitrust lawsuit that the Puerto Rico Soccer League brought against FIFA, CONCACAF and Puerto Rican football officials, Chief U.S. District Judge Raúl Arias-Marxuach found dozens of inaccurate or nonexistent legal citations across four filings by the league's two attorneys. According to Law Commentary, he said the errors bore hallmarks of generative AI and found that the lawyers violated Rule 11 by failing to reasonably verify the authorities they cited. Lawyer Monthly reports that the sanctions were decided in April 2025 and that an order of 23 September 2025 set the penalty at $24,492.10, payable to FIFA and the other defendants. Both lawyers have denied using artificial intelligence. In an October 2026 filing FIFA asked the court to dismiss the league's remaining claim because the sanction had not been paid. The lawyers proposed paying $1,000 a month, cited financial difficulties and an injury one of them suffered in March 2026, and argued that dismissal would punish their client for penalties imposed on them personally. The court had not ruled on the dismissal request when these reports were published.","incidentDate":"2025-04-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-10-07","aiSystem":"Generative AI that the judge said the defective citations bore hallmarks of; the lawyers deny using AI and no source names a tool","aiProduct":"Unidentified legal research tool (suspected)","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm","financial_loss","legal_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Two attorneys were personally ordered to pay $24,492.10 over defective citations the judge said bore hallmarks of generative AI, and their client's remaining claim now faces a dismissal request over the unpaid sum (court record as reported by Law Commentary and Lawyer Monthly)","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"disputed","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":2,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"Two attorneys were ordered to pay the sanction (Law Commentary and Lawyer Monthly name both). They are counted as other people harmed because both deny using AI, so neither is established as a direct AI user. The league is an organisation and is not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_ongoing","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.lawcommentary.com/articles/fifa-antitrust-lawsuit-ai-citations-sanctions","primarySourceLabel":"Law Commentary, 12 October 2026: FIFA wants antitrust lawsuit dismissed after lawyers sanctioned over suspected AI-generated citations","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-13T03:08:38.415526+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-13T03:08:38.415526+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["legal-citations","court-sanction","rule-11","generative-ai-suspected","consequential-response","puerto-rico"]},{"id":"2025-genoa-labour-court-reinstates-logistics-worker-dismissed-in-reported-ai-replacement","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Quattro lavoratori dipendenti della società Maersk Italia Spa del reparto Customer Service sono stati improvvisamente licenziati'; '21 Gennaio 2025'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'il reintegro della lavoratrice licenziata insieme ad altri tre colleghi a gennaio 2025'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Four Customer Service employees of Maersk Italia, which is based in Genoa, were suddenly dismissed in January 2025, according to the regional transport unions.","causal_attribution":"The unions' statement, and a later news report of the ruling. Maersk's account was not found."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'L’azienda non solo ha deciso di spostare queste lavorazioni a Manila, nelle Filippine, ma ha anche sostituito parte delle mansioni finora svolte dai lavoratori della sede genovese con l’utilizzo dell’Intelligenza Artificiale'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The unions said Maersk moved the work to Manila and replaced part of the tasks done by the Genoa staff with artificial intelligence.","causal_attribution":"The unions' attribution of the dismissals to offshoring and partial AI replacement. The company's explanation was not inspected, and the AI system is not described."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Una giornata di sciopero è stata proclamata per i lavoratori di Maersk Italia'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The unions called a one-day strike over the dismissals.","causal_attribution":"Reported from the unions' strike proclamation."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'aveva deciso di fare causa all'azienda in seguito al licenziamento motivato da un piano di riorganizzazione interna. Gli altri dipendenti, invece, accettarono la buonuscita economica proposta loro come risarcimento'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"One dismissed employee sued, while the other three accepted a severance offer.","causal_attribution":"Euronews's account of the case."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'la sentenza del Tribunale del lavoro di Genova ha disposto giovedì il reintegro della lavoratrice'; 'si tratta di un \"licenziamento illegittimo\" in quanto \"non rispetta l'obbligo di repêchage\"'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'il licenziamento era dichiarato illegittimo, per il mancato tentativo di ricollocazione (repêchage) del lavoratore'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The Genoa labour court ordered the employee reinstated, finding the dismissal unlawful because the employer had not tried to redeploy her elsewhere in the company before dismissing her.","causal_attribution":"Reports of the judgment. The judgment text was not inspected, the Domani commentary does not name the employer, and the two reports may share an underlying account, so the claim is kept as reported."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'la scelta di licenziare il lavoratore scaturiva da una riorganizzazione aziendale occasionata dall’implementazione ed evoluzione dei sistemi di intelligenza artificiale, che coinvolgeva quattro lavoratori'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"According to a legal commentary on a Genoa judgment that matches this case but does not name the employer, the dismissal arose from a company reorganisation occasioned by the implementation and development of AI systems, which involved four workers.","causal_attribution":"A commentator's summary of the judgment's facts. It describes the reorganisation as occasioned by AI systems and does not describe what any AI system did."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'La sentenza reintegra la lavoratrice con il diritto a essere risarcita per i mesi in cui è rimasta scoperta dallo stipendio'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The judgment entitles the employee to compensation for the months she went without pay.","causal_attribution":"Euronews's account of the judgment."},{"id":"c8","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'il reintegro della lavoratrice licenziata insieme ad altri tre colleghi a gennaio 2025 perché \"sostituita dall'Intelligenza artificiale\"'; 'in seguito al licenziamento motivato da un piano di riorganizzazione interna'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Euronews reported that the employee was dismissed in January 2025, together with three colleagues, because she had been 'replaced by artificial intelligence', a phrase it puts in quotation marks without naming who said it, and that the dismissal was motivated by an internal reorganisation plan.","causal_attribution":"Euronews's description of the reason for the dismissal. The quoted phrase is not attributed to the court, the unions or the company, and the judgment was not inspected."}],"effects":[{"label":"four Customer Service employees dismissed in a reorganisation the unions attributed partly to AI replacement","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"a dismissed employee went without pay until a court ordered her reinstatement","claim_id":"c7","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://shippingitaly.it/2025/01/21/licenziamenti-e-sciopero-per-maersk-a-genova","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"it","translation_note":"Read in Italian in full. Quotations and their English renderings in this record were translated by the research agent (an AI); no human translator reviewed them. The article reproduces the regional unions' strike-proclamation note of January 2025.","independence_group":"genoa-unions-jan-2025-note"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://it.euronews.com/business/2026/04/30/genova-tribunale-reintegra-lavoratrice-sostituita-dallia-alla-vigilia-della-festa-del-lavo","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"it","translation_note":"Read in Italian in full. Quotations and their English renderings in this record were translated by the research agent (an AI); no human translator reviewed them. The live euronews.com page refused the fetcher (HTTP 406); the identical article was read in a Wayback Machine capture of the same URL.","independence_group":"genoa-ruling-news-apr-2026"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.editorialedomani.it/giustizia/ce-un-giudice-a-pechino-no-al-licenziamento-per-la-sostituzione-del-lavoratore-con-lintelligenza-artificiale-th2yxbwr","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"it","translation_note":"Read in Italian in full. Quotations and their English renderings in this record were translated by the research agent (an AI); no human translator reviewed them. A legal commentary column dated 8 May 2026, mainly about a Chinese ruling, with a paragraph on a Genoa judgment that matches this case (Genoa labour court, four workers, AI reorganisation, failed redeployment) but does not name the employer; the judgment itself was not inspected.","independence_group":"domani-legal-commentary-2026"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["work","justice"],"unknowns":["Which AI system Maersk Italia adopted and which Customer Service tasks it took over.","Maersk's own explanation of the dismissals and its response to the judgment.","The exact date of the judgment (30 March 2026 in the Domani commentary; a Thursday shortly before 1 May 2026 in Euronews).","Whether the judgment was appealed.","How much of the job loss the unions attribute to AI rather than to moving the work to Manila."],"geography":{"basis":"The dismissed staff worked at Maersk Italia's office in Genoa, which the unions' note and Euronews both locate there, and the ruling was given by the Genoa labour court.","court_countries":["IT"],"event_countries":["IT"],"affected_person_countries":["IT"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a concrete dismissal of four Customer Service employees that their unions attributed partly to AI replacement, followed by a first-instance court ruling reinstating one of them. The AI attribution is the unions' and a commentator's, and the record states that no source describes the AI system.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-11"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The harm is the employer's dismissal of staff in response to its own adoption of AI. The regional unions said in January 2025 that Maersk Italia replaced part of the Genoa Customer Service tasks with artificial intelligence while moving the work to Manila, Euronews reported that the claimant was dismissed because she had been 'replaced by artificial intelligence', a phrase it quotes without naming who said it, and a legal commentary on a Genoa judgment that matches this case but does not name the employer says the reorganisation behind that dismissal was occasioned by the implementation of AI systems. No source says an AI system produced any output about the dismissed employees, so the relation is unknown under the consequential-response exemption.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Genoa court reinstates a Maersk Italia worker whose January 2025 dismissal unions linked to AI replacing customer service tasks","summary":"In January 2025 Maersk Italia, the Genoa-based Italian arm of the Danish logistics group, dismissed four employees of its Customer Service department without warning, according to the regional transport unions Filt Cgil, Fit Cisl and Uiltrasporti, who called a one-day strike. The unions said the company had moved the work to Manila and had also replaced part of the tasks done by the Genoa staff with artificial intelligence. One of the four, a woman, sued, while the other three accepted a severance offer. Euronews reported on 30 April 2026 that the Genoa labour court had ordered her reinstatement with compensation for the months she went unpaid, finding the dismissal unlawful because the employer had not tried to redeploy her within the company. A legal commentary in Domani gives the judgment's date as 30 March 2026, while Euronews says the decision came on Thursday, the eve of 1 May. The unions that backed the case described it as the first Italian case in which judges ruled on a dismissal linked to AI, although the Domani commentary also cites a Rome ruling of November 2025 on an AI-related dismissal. The Domani commentary does not name the employer. No source describes the AI system or what it did, and Maersk's account of the dismissals was not found.","incidentDate":"2025-01-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2025-01-21","aiSystem":"An AI system that, according to the regional unions, took over part of the Customer Service tasks of Maersk Italia's Genoa staff; no source names or describes it","aiProduct":"Unidentified customer-service AI tool","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Four employees lost their jobs in a reorganisation that their unions said partly replaced their tasks with AI; one went unpaid until a court ordered her reinstatement (union statement and news reports of the ruling).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":4,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"Four employees dismissed: the unions' note names four Customer Service employees, and Euronews says the claimant was dismissed together with three colleagues. Counted under other people harmed because the AI was the employer's tool. The count does not establish that AI caused each dismissal.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"IT","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_ongoing","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://it.euronews.com/business/2026/04/30/genova-tribunale-reintegra-lavoratrice-sostituita-dallia-alla-vigilia-della-festa-del-lavo","primarySourceLabel":"Euronews Italia, 30 April 2026: Genova, tribunale reintegra lavoratrice sostituita dall'IA","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-11T03:34:40.235932+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-11T03:34:40.235932+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["dismissal","workplace-ai","logistics","labour-court","reinstatement","italy","consequential-response"]},{"id":"2025-al-haroun-solicitor-referral-ai-citations","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'reliance is placed on numerous authorities, many of which appear to be either completely fictitious or which, if they exist at all, do not contain the passages supposedly quoted from them'; 'lists forty five citations that had been put before the court. In eighteen instances, the case cited does not exist.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Dias J's reasons of 9 May 2025, quoted in the judgment, record that correspondence with the court and the witness statements of the claimant and his solicitor relied on numerous authorities that appeared either completely fictitious or not to contain the passages quoted, and the judicial assistant's schedule lists 45 citations of which 18 referred to cases that do not exist.","causal_attribution":"Directly established by the court record (paragraphs 73 and 74). The count of citations is the schedule prepared by a judicial assistant as recorded by the court."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'He says that the citations were generated using publicly available artificial intelligence tools, legal search engines and online sources. He had complete (but he accepts misplaced) confidence in the authenticity of the material that he put before the court.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The claimant's witness statement, as recorded by the court, says the citations were generated using publicly available artificial intelligence tools, legal search engines and online sources, that he had misplaced confidence in their authenticity and that he did not intend to mislead.","causal_attribution":"The AI origin of the citations rests on the claimant's own statement, which the court records and does not contradict; no tool, prompt or output was inspected by the court or this review."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'He says that he relied on legal research that Mr Al-Haroun had conducted, without independently verifying the authorities. He accepts this was wrong.'; 'He has reported himself, and he will send them a copy of his witness statement.'; 'he has removed himself “from all litigated matters”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The solicitor's witness statement, as recorded by the court, says he relied on the client's legal research without independently verifying the authorities, that he had reported himself to the Solicitors Regulation Authority and that he had removed himself from all litigated matters.","causal_attribution":"The solicitor's own account of his reliance and of his withdrawal, recorded by the court. The withdrawal is his own response; no employer or regulator decision is recorded."},{"id":"c4","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'there was a lamentable failure to comply with the basic requirement to check the accuracy of material that is put before the court.'; 'The threshold for the initiation of contempt proceedings is, accordingly, not met.'; 'has referred himself to the Solicitors Regulation Authority. We will also make a referral.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The Divisional Court found a lamentable failure by the solicitor and his firm to check the accuracy of material put before the court, was satisfied that he did not realise the true position, held that the threshold for contempt proceedings was not met, and said it would also refer him to the Solicitors Regulation Authority.","causal_attribution":"The findings and the referral are the court’s own decisions in paragraph 81. The court connects them to the failure to verify the client’s research; it does not attribute the dismissal of the underlying application to the citations."}],"effects":[{"label":"self-referral and court referral of a solicitor to his regulator, and his withdrawal from litigated matters, after unverified AI-generated citations were put before the court","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Ayinde-v-London-Borough-of-Haringey-and-Al-Haroun-v-Qatar-National-Bank.pdf","kind":"court_judgment","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Approved judgment of 6 June 2025, fetched from judiciary.uk on 2026-10-07 (HTTP 200) and read in English from the pdftotext conversion; paragraphs 73 to 82 (the Al-Haroun case) and the front matter were inspected in full.","independence_group":"ewhc1383-alharoun"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["justice","work"],"unknowns":["Which AI tools, search engines or online sources produced the citations, what was asked of them, what they returned and when; the claimant’s statement names none and the court did not examine them.","Where the research was done and where the solicitor practises; the judgment does not say, so event and affected-person countries are left empty.","The dates of the correspondence and witness statements that contained the citations, beyond their falling between the April 2025 order and the 9 May 2025 dismissal.","Any outcome of the self-referral or the court’s referral to the Solicitors Regulation Authority; nothing after 6 June 2025 was researched.","Whether the dismissal of the claimant’s application on 9 May 2025 or the underlying claim was affected by the citations; the judgment does not say."],"geography":{"basis":"The judgment was given by the High Court of England and Wales sitting in London (court_countries GB). Where the claimant generated the research and where the solicitor practises are not stated in the inspected judgment; the court’s seat is not used to locate the event or the affected person.","court_countries":["GB"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a consequential-response case on the inspected approved judgment: the court records that the claimant said the citations were generated with publicly available AI tools, that the solicitor adopted them without checking, and that the court found a lamentable failure, declined contempt proceedings and said it would refer him to the regulator; the solicitor's own withdrawal from litigated matters and self-referral are recorded from his statement. The person relation is unknown because no source describes an output or action by an AI system toward the solicitor; the harm is the court's and the solicitor's own response to unverified AI-generated material having been filed. The solicitor and his firm are named in the public judgment but not in this record's narrative. No later disciplinary outcome is claimed.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-07"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The claimant's witness statement, as recorded in paragraph 76 of the judgment, says the citations put before the court were generated using publicly available artificial intelligence tools, legal search engines and online sources, and the court treated these Hamid cases as instances of the misuse of artificial intelligence (paragraph 82). The AI output reached the harmed solicitor only through his client's research; no source describes any output, decision or claim by an AI system about the solicitor himself. The harm recorded here is the court's and the solicitor's own response to unverified AI-generated material having been filed, which is a consequential-response case under the charter, so the person relation is recorded as unknown with the consequential_response exemption. No tool, query or output is identified.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"High Court refers a solicitor to his regulator after fictitious citations from research his client says was AI-generated were put before the court","summary":"A Divisional Court judgment of 6 June 2025 ([2025] EWHC 1383 (Admin)) records that, in a commercial claim against a Qatari bank, correspondence and witness statements filed by the claimant and his solicitor relied on numerous authorities that a judicial assistant's schedule found to be fictitious or misquoted: 45 citations, 18 of which referred to cases that do not exist. The claimant's witness statement says the citations were generated using publicly available artificial intelligence tools, legal search engines and online sources. The solicitor's statement says he relied on the client's research without verifying it, that he had reported himself to the Solicitors Regulation Authority and that he had removed himself from all litigated matters. The court found a lamentable failure to check the material, accepted that the solicitor did not realise the citations were false, held that the threshold for contempt proceedings was not met, and said it would also refer him to the regulator. The judgment does not record any later disciplinary outcome.","incidentDate":"2025-01-01","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"year","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2025-06-06","aiSystem":"Publicly available artificial intelligence tools, legal search engines and online sources, as described in the claimant's witness statement (no tool named)","aiProduct":"Unidentified legal research tool","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The solicitor’s own statement records his withdrawal from all litigated matters and his self-referral to the Solicitors Regulation Authority, and the court said it would also refer him. No disciplinary penalty is recorded.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person, the solicitor whose withdrawal from litigated matters and regulatory referral the judgment records. His firm is also referred but is not a person. The claimant, who used the tools, is not reported to have suffered a consequence attributed to the AI output beyond the dismissal of an application that the judgment does not connect to the citations, and the barrister was not referred. Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","platformType":"assistant","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Ayinde-v-London-Borough-of-Haringey-and-Al-Haroun-v-Qatar-National-Bank.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"Ayinde v London Borough of Haringey and Al-Haroun v Qatar National Bank [2025] EWHC 1383 (Admin), judgment of 6 June 2025","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-29T10:28:54.240186+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-07T03:25:09.967874+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["historical-2025","legal","hallucinated-citations"]},{"id":"2025-ringsted-hammer-assault-ai-planning","metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"Re-checked on 2026-10-02 against the Midt- og Vestsjaellands Politi press release of 4 Dec 2025, the DR item and the Ritzau wire copy carried by TV 2, Kristeligt Dagblad, Avisen.dk and TV2 OST, all read in Danish. The police release and DR place the assault on 5 February 2025 in a car park in Ringsted, a town in Zealand, Denmark; the victim was struck there, which supports event_countries=DK and affected_person_countries=DK (location at the time of the harm; no inspected source states the victim's residence). The conviction was given by Retten i Roskilde (Roskilde District Court, Denmark), which supports court_countries=DK. The article texts name the towns and the Danish police district without writing the word Denmark; the country follows from the named places. No inspected source states where the defendant used the AI chatbot, so event_countries describes the assault, not the chatbot use. No country other than Denmark appears in any inspected source.","evidence":[{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"in a car park in Ringsted, Denmark","location":"summary","supports":["event_countries","affected_person_countries"],"countries":["DK"]},{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"Roskilde District Court","location":"outcome_details","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["DK"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'Volden fandt sted 5. februar i år på en parkeringsplads i Ringsted' (the violence took place on 5 February this year in a car park in Ringsted)","location":"https://politi.dk/midt-og-vestsjaellands-politi/nyhedsliste/doemt-for-vold-med-hammer/2025/12/04","supports":["event_countries","affected_person_countries"],"countries":["DK"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'ved Retten i Roskilde' (at Roskilde District Court), in the sentence reporting the aggravated-assault verdict","location":"https://politi.dk/midt-og-vestsjaellands-politi/nyhedsliste/doemt-for-vold-med-hammer/2025/12/04","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["DK"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'der skete 5. februar i år på en parkeringsplads i Ringsted' (which took place on 5 February this year in a car park in Ringsted)","location":"https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/seneste/22-aarig-doemt-et-overfald-med-hammer-der-var-planlagt-ved-hjaelp-af-kunstig-intelligens","supports":["event_countries","affected_person_countries"],"countries":["DK"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'ved Retten i Roskilde blevet idømt ti måneders fængsel' (sentenced at Roskilde District Court to ten months in prison) and 'Overfaldet fandt sted 5. februar på en parkeringsplads i Ringsted' (the assault took place on 5 February in a car park in Ringsted)","location":"https://nyheder.tv2.dk/krimi/2025-12-04-planlagde-overfald-med-hammer-paa-svigerfar-med-hjaelp-fra-ai","supports":["event_countries","affected_person_countries","court_countries"],"countries":["DK"]}],"court_countries":["DK"],"event_countries":["DK"],"affected_person_countries":["DK"]},"unresolved":["No inspected source states where the defendant used the AI chatbot; event_countries=DK rests on the location of the assault.","No inspected source states the victim's residence; affected_person_countries=DK rests on the victim's location at the time of the assault."],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-02","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://politi.dk/midt-og-vestsjaellands-politi/nyhedsliste/doemt-for-vold-med-hammer/2025/12/04","notes":"Read live on 2026-10-02 (HTTP 200; html lang=da). Danish. Midt- og Vestsjaellands Politi news item of 4 Dec 2025 quoting the prosecutor; it gives the assault location (a car park in Ringsted) and the court (Retten i Roskilde). It does not name the AI system. Read in the original Danish; the English renderings in this review are the reviewer's translations. Related-news cards below the release were not used.","access":"read","language":"da"},{"url":"https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/seneste/22-aarig-doemt-et-overfald-med-hammer-der-var-planlagt-ved-hjaelp-af-kunstig-intelligens","notes":"Read live on 2026-10-02 (HTTP 200; html lang=da-DK). Danish. DR short news item of 4 Dec 2025 by its own reporter, relaying the prosecutor's statement; same reporting chain as the police release for the AI claim. Gives the car park in Ringsted and the ten-month sentence; it does not name the court or the AI system. Other short-news items on the page were not used.","access":"read","language":"da"},{"url":"https://nyheder.tv2.dk/krimi/2025-12-04-planlagde-overfald-med-hammer-paa-svigerfar-med-hjaelp-fra-ai","notes":"Read live on 2026-10-02 (HTTP 200; html lang=da-DK). Danish. Ritzau wire copy of 4 Dec 2025 citing the police press release; states that the AI tool used is not specified. Same wire text as the Kristeligt Dagblad, Avisen.dk and TV2 OST items.","access":"read","language":"da"},{"url":"https://www.tv2east.dk/ringsted/22-arig-planlagde-hammeroverfald-pa-svigerfar-med-hjaelp-fra-ai-e6ff7","notes":"Read live on 2026-10-02 (html lang=da). A request with a browser user agent returned HTTP 406; a plain request returned HTTP 200 with the full article. Danish. TV2 OST carriage of the Ritzau wire copy (page credits Ritzaus Bureau), with the same location and court passages as TV 2. Related-story cards on the page were not used.","access":"read","language":"da"},{"url":"https://www.kristeligt-dagblad.dk/22-aarig-planlagde-hammeroverfald-paa-svigerfar-med-hjaelp-fra-ai","notes":"Read live on 2026-10-02 (HTTP 200; html lang=da). Danish. Ritzau wire copy of 4 Dec 2025, same text as the TV 2 item; the full article text was present in the page.","access":"read","language":"da"},{"url":"https://www.avisen.dk/22-aarig-planlagde-hammeroverfald-paa-svigerfar-med_818025.aspx","notes":"Read live on 2026-10-02 (HTTP 200; html lang=da). Danish. Ritzau wire copy of 4 Dec 2025, same text as the TV 2 item (visible text and JSON-LD articleBody agree). Other headlines on the page were not used.","access":"read","language":"da"}]},"name":"Ringsted rubber-hammer assault planned with an AI chatbot (Denmark)","summary":"On 5 February 2025 a 22-year-old man struck his former father-in-law, 56, twice in the head with a rubber hammer in a car park in Ringsted, Denmark. Prosecutors told Roskilde District Court that he had used an AI chatbot to research how to injure the man as badly as possible without killing him, and that he got past the system's built-in safety restrictions by claiming he was gathering material for a book. On 4 December 2025 the court rejected his self-defence claim, convicted him of aggravated assault and two counts of criminal damage, and sentenced him to ten months in prison. No source names the AI system.","incidentDate":"2025-02-05","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2025-12-04","aiSystem":"AI chatbot (unspecified)","aiProduct":"Unidentified chatbot","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":["third_party_harm_facilitation"],"harmOutcomes":["physical_injury","harm_to_others"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The 56-year-old victim was struck twice in the head with a rubber hammer in a car park. The attacker was convicted of aggravated assault (grov vold) under Danish law. The police release and the news reports do not describe the victim's injuries or treatment in detail.","frameworkFacets":["P1d","P5d"],"pathwayDirection":"outward","causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The police and court reporting document one convicted AI participant and one person struck in the head.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"DK","platformType":"chatbot","outcomeType":"criminal_charges","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://politi.dk/midt-og-vestsjaellands-politi/nyhedsliste/doemt-for-vold-med-hammer/2025/12/04","primarySourceLabel":"Midt- og Vestsjaellands Politi (Danish police) press release: 'Doemt for vold med hammer' (Convicted of violence with a hammer)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-05T11:55:10.101124+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-02T03:03:32.371396+00:00","scopeVersion":"participant-v2","tags":["criminal","violence","harm-to-others","guardrail-bypass","unnamed-chatbot","denmark","eu","adult"]},{"id":"2025-winters-v-openai","metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"Re-checked on 2026-10-06 against six source bodies, all read in English: the complaint PDF, Bloomberg Law (opening paragraphs before the subscriber wall), CBS News and the Tech Justice Law release (Internet Archive captures), the ABA Journal and The Next Web. The complaint states that Winters is a resident of Florida, and the news reports call him a Florida pastor or a Florida man. That supports affected_person_countries=US as residence at filing. The event country stays unknown after this review. The complaint says he consulted ChatGPT 'when he returned home' after a sermon at an unnamed church, that he most recently served as the pastor of a church in North Carolina, and that on 13 July 2025 he called 911 and was taken to 'the nearest hospital', which it does not name. No inspected source places the conversations, the church service or the hospital admission, and residence at filing is not used as the event location. The complaint was filed in the Superior Court of California for the County of San Francisco, so court_countries=US.","evidence":[{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"living in Florida","location":"detailed_description","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco","location":"outcome_details","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"Scott Winters is a resident of Florida.","location":"https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/winters-v-open-ai-complaint.pdf","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA","location":"https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/winters-v-open-ai-complaint.pdf","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"filed suit against OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman in San Francisco County Superior Court","location":"https://www.cbsnews.com/news/chatgpt-dangerous-medical-advice-openai-lawsuit/","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"A Florida pastor sued OpenAI Inc.","location":"https://news.bloomberglaw.com/litigation/pastor-sues-openai-after-chatgpt-dissuaded-seeking-medical-care","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]}],"court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"unresolved":["The event setting is unknown. The complaint gives Florida residence at filing and a most recent pastorate in North Carolina, but no source places the ChatGPT conversations, the June 2025 church service or the 13 July 2025 hospital admission.","Row-correction lead for a full review: the stored filing date is 22 July 2026. Bloomberg Law ('Tuesday') and the ABA Journal ('July 21') give 21 July, CBS ('Wednesday') gives 22 July, and the complaint text read does not show a file stamp."],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-06","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/winters-v-open-ai-complaint.pdf","notes":"Cited primary source. Complaint PDF fetched live on 2026-10-06 (HTTP 200, application/pdf, 5.6 MB) and read through pdftotext. Paragraph 1 gives Florida residence. Paragraph 14 says he most recently served as the pastor of a church in North Carolina. Paragraphs 39 to 41 and 62 name no place for the sermon, his home or the hospital.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://news.bloomberglaw.com/litigation/pastor-sues-openai-after-chatgpt-dissuaded-seeking-medical-care","notes":"Read live on 2026-10-06 (HTTP 200, html lang en) up to the subscriber wall ('Log In to keep reading'). Dated 22 July 2026. It says the complaint was filed 'Tuesday', which is 21 July.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.cbsnews.com/news/chatgpt-dangerous-medical-advice-openai-lawsuit/","notes":"Live page returned HTTP 406 twice on 2026-10-06. Read from an Internet Archive web/2026id_ capture (gzip, decompressed; html lang en-US), updated 23 July 2026. It says he sued 'on Wednesday', which is 22 July.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/pastor-sues-openai-over-bad-medical-advice-from-chatgpt-that-nearly-killed-him","notes":"Read live on 2026-10-06 (HTTP 200, html lang en). Dated 23 July 2026. It calls the filing 'the July 21 lawsuit'.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://thenextweb.com/news/openai-chatgpt-medical-advice-lawsuit-winters-pulmonary-embolism","notes":"Read live on 2026-10-06 (HTTP 200, html lang en). Dated 23 July 2026.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://techjusticelaw.org/press-releases/pastor-sues-after-openai-ai-chatgpt-allegedly-discouraged-him-from-seeking-medical-care-during-life-threatening-blood-clots/","notes":"Plaintiff counsel's press release. Live page returned HTTP 429 on 2026-10-06. Read from an Internet Archive web/2026id_ capture (gzip, decompressed; html lang en-US). Datelined San Francisco, which is the court's seat and not used as an event location.","access":"read","language":"en"}]},"name":"Winters v. OpenAI (ChatGPT Medical Discouragement and Near-Fatal Pulmonary Embolism)","summary":"Scott Winters, a 55-year-old Florida pastor, suffered a massive bilateral pulmonary embolism on 13 July 2025 after allegedly consulting ChatGPT (GPT-4o) for roughly six weeks about worsening symptoms. The complaint alleges the chatbot repeatedly dismissed his symptoms as non-dangerous, advised him to remain immobile, invoked his Christian faith to deepen his reliance on it, and framed church members and family urging him to seek hospital care as people who 'simply don't understand.' He survived after ICU admission but lost his job, ministry and home. A lawsuit was filed 22 July 2026 in San Francisco County Superior Court.","incidentDate":"2025-07-13","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-07-22","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"critical","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":["treatment_discouragement","isolation_encouragement","dependency_creation","psychological_manipulation","crisis_response"],"harmOutcomes":["medical_deterioration","hospitalization","treatment_disruption","professional_harm","financial_loss"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Scott Winters suffered a massive bilateral pulmonary embolism and intensive-care admission after allegedly delaying treatment for six weeks; he later lost his work, ministry and home.","frameworkFacets":["P1a","P1b","P1c","P1d","P2b","P2d","P3c","P5b","P5c"],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The complaint documents one named participant's medical, professional, and financial harms.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-FL","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/winters-v-open-ai-complaint.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"Winters v. OpenAI — complaint (via Courthouse News)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-07-26T00:41:00.976587+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-06T03:05:02.712209+00:00","scopeVersion":"participant-v2","tags":["lawsuit","adult","chatgpt","openai","medical-advice","sycophancy","treatment-discouragement","us","us-fl"]}]}