{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-05T07:25:36.375Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"citation","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"","evidence":"","year":"2026","response":"","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":3,"coverage":{"cases":3,"countries":2,"languages":1,"unknownLocation":0,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":0,"lawsuits":0,"regulatory":1,"minors":0,"coreRelations":3,"contextualRelations":0,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":0,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":0},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2026-kodiak-alaska-hunter-cited-snipe-out-of-season-after-google-ai-overview-season-date","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Incorrect information provided by a Google AI overview caused a Kodiak woman to hunt snipe illegally on Sept. 5'; 'according to Google, snipe season began on September 1st'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'according to Google, snipe season began on September 1st'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"According to a wildlife trooper's affidavit attached to the citation, as quoted by Alaska Beacon, the hunter searched Google for snipe season on her phone and Google said the season began on 1 September; the outlet describes the answer as a Google AI overview.","causal_attribution":"The outlet, citing the citation and affidavit, attributes the illegal hunt to the incorrect Google answer."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'she hunted three snipe but became suspicious after learning that duck season didn’t open until Oct. 8'; 'she learned that snipes are not legal to take under the general season until October 8th'; 'called troopers to self-report the violation'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"She hunted three snipe on 5 September 2026, then learned that snipe could not legally be taken under the general season until 8 October and reported herself to troopers.","causal_attribution":"Affidavit as quoted by the outlet."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'He said he performed a Google search identical to'; 'and received identical incorrect information'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The outlet reports that the trooper said he ran a Google search identical to hers and received identical incorrect information.","causal_attribution":"Trooper's statement as paraphrased by the outlet, which does not quote it; the search result was not reproduced in the article."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'pleaded no contest to the citation on Friday and was fined $150'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'pleaded no contest to the citation on Friday and was fined $150'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"She pleaded no contest to the citation and was fined $150.","causal_attribution":"Court outcome as reported by the outlet; the court record was not retrieved."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'I feel terrible, and I have a lot of shame with it'; 'It’s incredibly embarrassing'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"She told the outlet that she felt terrible, ashamed and embarrassed.","causal_attribution":"Her statement to the outlet."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'This is the first time that I think we have seen AI cited'; 'acted completely correctly once she learned about the AI-caused mistake'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"A spokesman for the Alaska Department of Public Safety told the outlet it was the first time he thought the agency had seen AI cited, and that she acted correctly once she learned of the mistake.","causal_attribution":"Spokesman's statement to the outlet."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Google did not respond to an email seeking comment on the incorrect information provided by its software'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Google did not respond to the outlet's emailed request for comment on the incorrect information.","causal_attribution":"Not applicable."}],"effects":[{"label":"cited for hunting snipe out of season and fined $150 after relying on a Google answer with the wrong opening date (citation as reported by Alaska Beacon)","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"},{"label":"shame and embarrassment (her statement to the outlet)","claim_id":"c5","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://alaskabeacon.com/2026/09/28/misleading-google-ai-instructions-cause-kodiak-woman-to-be-cited-for-illegal-snipe-hunt/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-05 in full, in the Internet Archive capture of 30 September 2026; the live page returned HTTP 403 to the fetcher.","independence_group":"alaska-beacon-kodiak-snipe"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.juneauindependent.com/post/kodiak-woman-cited-for-illegal-snipe-hunt-due-to-misleading-google-ai-instructions","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-05. Republication of the Alaska Beacon article under its byline; not independent of s1.","independence_group":"alaska-beacon-kodiak-snipe"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["everyday_life","justice"],"unknowns":["The exact text of the Google answer and whether it was the AI Overview panel or another search feature; the result was not preserved in the reporting.","The contents of the citation and affidavit beyond the passages Alaska Beacon quotes; the court record was not retrieved.","Whether Google has corrected the answer."],"geography":{"basis":"Alaska Beacon describes her as a Kodiak woman, cited by an Alaska Wildlife Trooper, with the citation filed at the Kodiak district court in Alaska.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a concrete account reported by a named outlet from a court citation and interviews: a person relied on an AI-generated search answer, broke a hunting regulation, reported herself and was fined. The hunter is not named here. The reporting rests on one outlet's reading of the citation and its interviews.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-05"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Alaska Beacon attributes the wrong date to a Google AI overview, citing the citation and the trooper's affidavit; the affidavit as quoted says what Google told her, and the outlet reports the trooper said an identical Google search returned identical incorrect information. The search result was not preserved in the reporting and Google did not comment.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Kodiak, Alaska: a hunter reported to have relied on a Google AI answer that snipe season opened on 1 September hunted three snipe before the 8 October opening, reported the violation to wildlife troopers and was fined $150","summary":"Alaska Beacon reported on 28 September 2026 that a Kodiak woman hunted snipe illegally on 5 September after a Google search for snipe season told her the season began on 1 September, according to a wildlife trooper's affidavit attached to a citation filed at the Kodiak district court. The outlet describes the answer as a Google AI overview. She hunted three snipe, grew suspicious on learning that duck season did not open until 8 October, checked the regulations and called troopers to report herself. The outlet reports the trooper said he ran an identical Google search and received identical incorrect information. She pleaded no contest and was fined $150, and told the outlet she felt shame and embarrassment. A Department of Public Safety spokesman said it was the first time he thought the agency had seen AI cited, and that she had acted correctly once she learned of the mistake. Google did not respond to the outlet's request for comment.","incidentDate":"2026-09-05","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2026-09-28","aiSystem":"Google Search AI-generated summary (described by Alaska Beacon as a Google AI overview) answering a phone search for snipe season with an opening date of 1 September","aiProduct":"Google AI Overviews (reported)","aiCompany":"Google","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["legal_harm","financial_loss","psychological_distress"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to Alaska Beacon's account of the citation, the hunter was cited for taking snipe out of season after relying on a Google answer that gave the wrong opening date, pleaded no contest and was fined $150; she told the outlet she felt shame and embarrassment.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the hunter who ran the search, was cited and was fined (Alaska Beacon). Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-AK","platformType":"assistant","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://alaskabeacon.com/2026/09/28/misleading-google-ai-instructions-cause-kodiak-woman-to-be-cited-for-illegal-snipe-hunt/","primarySourceLabel":"Alaska Beacon, 28 September 2026: Misleading Google AI instructions cause Kodiak woman to be cited for illegal snipe hunt","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-05T03:19:55.716167+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-05T03:19:55.716167+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["google","ai-overview","search","hunting-regulations","wrong-date","citation","fine","alaska","kodiak","everyday-assistance","communicated-with"]},{"id":"2026-new-mexico-senate-republican-ai-images-ethics-complaint-stewart-fake-mugshot","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'posting a fake photo of Stewart made to look like a jail mugshot using artificial intelligence.'; 'Even though Stewart wasn't issued a citation'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'posted a mugshot-like image of Senate President Pro Tem Mimi Stewart (D-Albuquerque), mentioning criminal charges never faced.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"In September 2026 Sen. Jay Block posted on social media a mugshot-like image of Senate President Pro Tem Mimi Stewart that lists criminal charges she never faced.","causal_attribution":"The New Mexican's own reporting, including an interview in which Block confirmed and defended the post. KRQE's account comes from the Democratic Party's complaint (its image is credited to the party); the complaint text was not inspected, so its independence from the New Mexican's earlier report is not established. The month follows from the New Mexican's report that word of the 2024 incident got out in the week of its 24 September article."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Block's social media posts indicate the fake mugshot was AI-generated. On X, the post had been shared more than 100 times.'; 'ostensibly booked into the Bernalillo County jail on charges of \"hit and run\" and \"abusive behavior towards staff and other lawmakers\"'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Block's posts indicate the fake mugshot was AI-generated; it showed Stewart ostensibly booked into the Bernalillo County jail on charges of 'hit and run' and 'abusive behavior towards staff and other lawmakers', and the X post had been shared more than 100 times.","causal_attribution":"One newspaper's description of the post; the AI tool is not named."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'much less booked into jail'; 'the incident didn't occur in Bernalillo County, as the fake image suggests'; 'He noted in an email the incident was \"not considered a hit and run crash\"'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Stewart was not issued a citation or booked into jail, the 2024 incident did not occur in Bernalillo County, and Santa Fe's interim police chief said it was not considered a hit and run crash.","causal_attribution":"The New Mexican's account of police and court records; the police report itself was not inspected."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Stewart said Block's post with an AI-generated image of her \"staged as a mugshot\" manufactured answers by insinuation.'; 'take down the fabricated image, and stop with the falsehoods and insinuations'; 'Block said Wednesday he stands by the post and has no plans to take it down.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Stewart said Block's post used an AI-generated image of her staged as a mugshot to manufacture answers by insinuation and asked Block and the Republican caucus to take down the fabricated image; Block said he stands by the post and has no plans to take it down.","causal_attribution":"Statements by the two senators as reported by one newspaper; the harm described is reputational and is alleged by Stewart."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'\"Everything on there was accurate with the information we were provided,\" Block said in an interview.'; 'The Senate Republican caucus shared the post on its social media accounts'; 'We now acknowledge that Senator Stewart did not appear to leave the scene'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Block told the New Mexican that everything on the post was accurate with the information provided to him; the Senate Republican caucus shared the post and later issued a corrected news release acknowledging that Stewart did not appear to leave the scene.","causal_attribution":"The poster's and the caucus's own position as reported by one newspaper."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Senate Republican leader Bill Sharer (R-Farmington) and the Senate Republicans shared an image on Facebook last month, showing House Speaker Javier Martinez (D-Albuquerque) wearing a Soviet Union pin, Democratic gubernatorial candidate Deb Haaland with her arm around a man in an orange jumpsuit, and former state Rep. Joseph Hernandez naked'; 'The Democratic Party said both images are \"misleading AI generated images\"'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Senate Republican leader Bill Sharer and the Senate Republicans shared on Facebook in September 2026 an image showing House Speaker Javier Martinez wearing a Soviet Union pin, gubernatorial candidate Deb Haaland with her arm around a man in an orange jumpsuit, and former state Rep. Joseph Hernandez naked; the Democratic Party of New Mexico says it is a misleading AI-generated image.","causal_attribution":"One station's account of the party's complaint; the AI-generated character of this image rests on the complaint, and the inspected sources carry no statement from the three people depicted."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'The Democratic Party of New Mexico has filed an ethics complaint, saying two Republican social media posts used images created with artificial intelligence.'; 'violate a 2024 state law cracking down on deepfakes. They want the posts removed and posters fined.'; 'he did not address the issues mentioned in the complaint.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The Democratic Party of New Mexico has filed an ethics complaint saying both images violate a 2024 state law on deepfakes and asking that the posts be removed and the posters fined; Sharer's statement in response did not address the issues in the complaint.","causal_attribution":"A party's complaint as reported by one station; the complaint text was not inspected and its allegations are unproven."}],"effects":[{"label":"a state Senate leader was depicted in a fake jail mugshot, indicated by the poster to be AI-generated, listing charges she never faced; she asked for it to be taken down and the poster said he has no plans to remove it","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"},{"label":"three Democratic politicians were depicted in a Facebook image that the state Democratic Party calls a misleading AI-generated image","claim_id":"c6","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.krqe.com/news/politics/democratic-party-of-new-mexico-files-ethics-complaint-over-ai-images/","kind":"local_tv_news","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"KRQE article by Jordan Honeycutt, published 2 October 2026. The article page answered HTTP 403 to this host, so the full text was read on 2026-10-03 from the site's AMP version of the same URL (/amp/) and checked against the post's WordPress API record. A related-story card inside the page was not used. The description of the images and their AI-generated character derives from the Democratic Party's complaint.","independence_group":"dpnm-complaint"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/fake-ai-generated-mugshot-prominent-035900442.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Santa Fe New Mexican article by Daniel J. Chacón, read on 2026-10-03 through its Yahoo News syndication (canonical santafenewmexican.com page not fetched). Based on the reporter's interview with Block, a statement from Stewart, Senate Republican releases and Santa Fe police; independent of the party's complaint.","independence_group":"santa-fe-new-mexican"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["public_life","elections"],"unknowns":["Which AI tool or tools made the images, and whether the Facebook image is AI-generated beyond the party's allegation.","The exact dates of the Facebook post and of Block's post.","The body with which the ethics complaint was filed, its filing date and its outcome.","Whether Martinez, Haaland or Hernandez responded to the Facebook image.","Whether either post has been removed."],"geography":{"basis":"The images were posted by New Mexico state senators and the New Mexico Senate Republicans and depict New Mexico state politicians; the complaint invokes a New Mexico state law (KRQE, Santa Fe New Mexican). The ethics complaint is not a court proceeding.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (depicted_or_impersonated) consistent with 2026-wisconsin-cooke-van-orden-ai-deepfake-videos-cease-and-desist and 2026-texas-goodwin-ai-deepfake-campaign-ads-sheriff-complaint: a newspaper reports that a state senator posted a fake mugshot of a Senate leader that his own posts indicate was AI-generated, listing charges she never faced, and that she asked for it to be taken down; a TV station reports a party ethics complaint alleging that this image and a Facebook image of three other politicians are misleading AI-generated images. The harm is reputational and is alleged; the poster stands by his post.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-03"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The Santa Fe New Mexican reports that Block's own social media posts indicate the fake mugshot of Stewart was AI-generated, and Stewart, in a statement quoted by the newspaper, calls it a fabricated image. For the Facebook image of Martinez, Haaland and Hernandez, the only inspected basis is the Democratic Party of New Mexico's complaint, which KRQE reports calls both images misleading AI-generated images. No tool is named.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"New Mexico: the state Democratic Party filed an ethics complaint, reported on 2 October 2026, over two Senate Republican social media posts from September 2026 that it says used misleading AI-generated images, including a fake jail mugshot of Senate President Pro Tem Mimi Stewart that she publicly asked to be taken down","summary":"In September 2026 Republican state Sen. Jay Block posted on social media a fake image of New Mexico Senate President Pro Tem Mimi Stewart made to look like a jail mugshot. The Santa Fe New Mexican (24 September 2026) reports that Block's posts indicate the image was AI-generated and that it showed her ostensibly booked into the Bernalillo County jail on charges of 'hit and run' and 'abusive behavior towards staff and other lawmakers'. Stewart was not issued a citation or booked, and Santa Fe's interim police chief said the 2024 incident in which she drove over a pedestrian's foot was not considered a hit and run crash. Stewart asked Block and the Senate Republican caucus to take down the fabricated image. Block said he stands by the post and has no plans to remove it. KRQE reported on 2 October 2026 that the Democratic Party of New Mexico had filed an ethics complaint over this post and over an image that Senate Republican leader Bill Sharer and the Senate Republicans shared on Facebook in September, which shows House Speaker Javier Martinez wearing a Soviet Union pin, gubernatorial candidate Deb Haaland with her arm around a man in an orange jumpsuit and former state Rep. Joseph Hernandez naked. The party calls both 'misleading AI generated images' that violate a 2024 state law on deepfakes and wants the posts removed and the posters fined.","incidentDate":"2026-09-01","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-09-24","aiSystem":"Unnamed AI image tool used to make a fake jail mugshot of Sen. Mimi Stewart posted by Sen. Jay Block (his posts indicate the image was AI-generated, per the Santa Fe New Mexican) and, according to the Democratic Party of New Mexico's ethics complaint, an image of three Democratic politicians shared by the Senate Republicans on Facebook; no tool is named","aiProduct":"Unidentified image tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A state Senate leader was depicted in a fake jail mugshot, which the poster's own posts indicate was AI-generated, listing charges she never faced; she publicly asked for the fabricated image to be taken down, and the poster said he stands by the post and has no plans to take it down. The state Democratic Party alleges in an ethics complaint that this image and a Facebook image of three other Democratic politicians are misleading AI-generated images.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"One depicted person is reported harmed: Stewart, shown in the fake mugshot, who called it a fabricated image and asked for it to be taken down (Santa Fe New Mexican; KRQE). Martinez, Haaland and Hernandez are depicted in the Facebook image that the Democratic Party of New Mexico calls a misleading AI-generated image, but the inspected sources report no harm to or response from them and the complaint is the party's, so they are not counted and the count is a lower bound. The unidentified man in the orange jumpsuit is not counted. Shares of the post are not person counts. Documented minimum 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-NM","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.krqe.com/news/politics/democratic-party-of-new-mexico-files-ethics-complaint-over-ai-images/","primarySourceLabel":"KRQE, 2 October 2026: Democratic Party of New Mexico files ethics complaint over AI images","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-03T03:17:39.879526+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-03T03:17:39.879526+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["deepfake","political-deepfake","fake-mugshot","new-mexico","ethics-complaint","x","facebook","depicted-or-impersonated"]},{"id":"2026-kumar-sdt-strike-off-ai-citations","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"SDT judgment, Allegation 2.1 findings and the schedule of false/miscited authorities.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"RollOnFriday's listing of the bogus citations.","relation":"context","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"Allegation 2.1 was found proved: Kumar's 12 March 2026 Answer to the SRA's Rule 12 Statement contained misleading quotations and citations produced with generative AI, including the non-existent 'SRA v Chan [2020] EWHC 1502', the miscited 'SRA v James, MacGregor & Naylor [2018] EWCA Civ 1420' (in reality an IP case) and a misattributed Baxendale-Walker passage.","causal_attribution":"Directly established by the tribunal's written judgment; trade press accounts are consistent."},{"id":"c2","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"SDT judgment, Allegation 2.2 findings and the 13 April acceptance.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Allegation 2.2 was found proved: his 9 April 2026 email admitting AI use was itself AI-drafted and contained further errors, which he accepted on 13 April 2026.","causal_attribution":"Directly established by the tribunal's written judgment."},{"id":"c3","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"SDT judgment, sanction and reasoning passages.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Outer Temple's case note confirming the outcome and the 'first SDT case on a lawyer's use of AI' framing.","relation":"context","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"On 25 August 2026 the SDT struck Kumar off the Register of Foreign Lawyers with culpability 'very high', stating it would have struck him off on either allegation alone; the tribunal invoked Ayinde v Haringey LBC [2025] EWHC 1383 (Admin).","causal_attribution":"Directly established by the tribunal's written judgment; the 'first AI case' framing comes from the SRA's counsel and is attributed."},{"id":"c4","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"SDT judgment, conviction allegation and sentence passages.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"RollOnFriday's Isleworth Crown Court reference (recorded as a discrepancy; the judgment controls).","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"The parallel ground was his 29 January 2024 conviction under s.21 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 — recorded by the judgment as at the Central Criminal Court (RollOnFriday says Isleworth Crown Court, a discrepancy) — sentenced on 26 April 2024 to a 12-month community order with 150 hours' unpaid work.","causal_attribution":"The conviction ground is established by the judgment; the convicting-court discrepancy across outlets is preserved."}],"effects":[{"label":"lawyer struck off after AI-generated false citations in his disciplinary defence","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/12884-2026-Kumar-.pdf","kind":"tribunal_judgment","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Judgment PDF read on 2026-09-15 (25 Aug 2026): allegations, findings, sanction, panel, and the Ayinde v Haringey invocation.","independence_group":"sdt"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/lawyer-struck-off-for-using-fake-ai-generated-cases-before-sdt","kind":"trade_press","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (4 Sep 2026).","independence_group":"legal-futures"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/foreign-lawyer-produced-ai-generated-false-citations-at-sdt/5127825.article","kind":"trade_press","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (4 Sep 2026, Hyde).","independence_group":"law-gazette"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.rollonfriday.com/news-content/first-lawyer-struck-ai-addiction","kind":"trade_press","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (11 Sep 2026). Colour and the specific bogus citations; its 'AI addiction' framing is editorial joking, not a finding.","independence_group":"rollonfriday"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.outertemple.com/joshua-hitchens-acts-for-the-sra-in-the-first-solicitors-disciplinary-tribunal-case-on-a-lawyers-use-of-ai/","kind":"counsel_case_note","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (8 Sep 2026). SRA counsel's chambers' note: case number, dates, judgment link, and the 'first SDT case on a lawyer's use of AI' framing; participant-side account, recorded as such.","independence_group":"outer-temple"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["work","justice"],"unknowns":["The specific generative AI tool is not named in the inspected accounts.","The convicting court appears as the Central Criminal Court in the judgment and Isleworth Crown Court in RollOnFriday; the judgment controls but the discrepancy is unresolved in the inspected material.","Whether Kumar seeks to appeal the strike-off is not reported.","His employment status after the strike-off is not reported; the Law Gazette's employment background predates it."],"geography":{"basis":"Events: his practice and the SRA proceedings in England. Affected person: Kumar, on the Register of Foreign Lawyers in England and Wales. Court: the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal; the parallel conviction was at the Central Criminal Court (per the judgment; RollOnFriday's Isleworth Crown Court is a recorded discrepancy).","court_countries":["GB"],"event_countries":["GB"],"affected_person_countries":["GB"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as an own-use, work-context adverse consequence with tribunal-found AI misconduct and a dated, career-ending sanction. This applies the charter's individual-review rule to the AI-sanction class; a class-level ruling is not required. Kumar is named in a public tribunal judgment; the parallel conviction ground is recorded for completeness and is not used to inflate the AI link. RollOnFriday's 'AI addiction' framing is recorded as editorial joking.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-15"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Tribunal-found: the 12 March 2026 Answer's misleading quotations and citations were produced with generative AI, and the 9 April 2026 email admitting AI use was itself AI-drafted with further errors (accepted 13 April). The specific tool is not named in the inspected accounts.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"SDT strikes solicitor Abhishek Kumar off the Register of Foreign Lawyers after AI-generated false citations in his SRA defence","summary":"On 25 August 2026 the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal struck Abhishek Kumar off the Register of Foreign Lawyers after finding proved that his 12 March 2026 Answer to the SRA's Rule 12 Statement contained misleading quotations and citations produced with generative AI — including a non-existent 'SRA v Chan [2020] EWHC 1502' and a miscited 'SRA v James, MacGregor & Naylor [2018] EWCA Civ 1420' that is actually an intellectual-property case — and that his 9 April 2026 email admitting AI use was itself AI-drafted with further errors. The tribunal said it would have struck him off on that allegation alone; the parallel ground was his January 2024 conviction under s.21 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006. This is the SDT's first case on a lawyer's use of AI, per the SRA's counsel.","incidentDate":"2026-03-12","incidentEndDate":"2026-08-25","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-09-04","aiSystem":"Generative AI (tool not named in inspected accounts)","aiProduct":"Unidentified AI tool","aiCompany":"Unknown","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm","legal_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Career-ending professional consequence for the lawyer who submitted AI-generated false citations in his own disciplinary defence: struck off the Register of Foreign Lawyers on 25 August 2026, with culpability rated 'very high'.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"established","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One documented harmed person: Kumar himself, the AI user struck off (SDT judgment). No client or third-party harm is reported in the inspected sources and none is counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"GB","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"regulatory_action","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/12884-2026-Kumar-.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal judgment, SRA Ltd v Abhishek Kumar, Case No. 12884-2026 (25 Aug 2026)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-15T06:18:05.203137+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:43.433309+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["work","justice","legal-profession","strike-off","fabricated-citations","sdt","own-use","uk"]}]}