{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-23T07:27:24.439Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"chatgpt","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"","evidence":"","year":"2026","response":"lawsuit","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":3,"coverage":{"cases":3,"countries":1,"languages":4,"unknownLocation":2,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":0,"lawsuits":3,"regulatory":0,"minors":1,"coreRelations":3,"contextualRelations":0,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":0,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":0},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2026-brasilia-labour-court-upholds-dismissal-of-manager-it-found-used-chatgpt-to-alter-ifood-delivery-photos","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'alegando que foi admitido em 09/06/2024 na função de Gerente, sendo desligado em 19/03/2026'; 'sustentando que o reclamante foi dispensado por justa causa em 19/03/2026 devido à prática de improbidade, consistente na utilização de inteligência artificial para fraudar fotos de pedidos no aplicativo iFood'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The claimant was hired as a manager on 9 June 2024 and dismissed for cause on 19 March 2026; the employer alleged dishonesty consisting of using artificial intelligence to falsify photos of orders on the iFood app.","causal_attribution":"The judgment records the dates and the employer's ground for dismissal."},{"id":"c2","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'presenciado o reclamante utilizar o \"ChatGPT\" para adulterar uma foto de pedido incompleto'; 'manipulou a imagem por inteligência artificial para simular o envio correto e contestar a reclamação do cliente junto ao suporte do iFood'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Uma testemunha afirmou ter presenciado o gerente utilizar o ChatGPT para adulterar a fotografia de um pedido entregue de forma incompleta.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The court found, on a witness's account, that the manager used ChatGPT to alter a photo of an incomplete order in which two of four soft drinks had been sent, to simulate correct delivery and contest the customer's complaint with iFood support.","causal_attribution":"The judgment documents the court's acceptance of the witness's account; the AI use rests on her testimony as weighed by the court."},{"id":"c3","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'configurando flagrante ato de improbidade e mau procedimento (art. 482, \"a\" e \"b\", da CLT)'; 'Reconheço, portanto, a validade da dispensa por justa causa em'; 'julgo IMPROCEDENTES os pedidos'; 'BRASILIA/DF, 30 de julho de 2026.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'julgou improcedentes todos os pedidos formulados pelo ex-gerente e manteve a validade da dispensa por justa causa'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The judge held the conduct to be dishonesty and misconduct under art. 482(a) and (b) of the labour code, upheld the dismissal for cause, dismissed all the claimant's claims and ordered him to pay 10% counsel fees with enforcement suspended.","causal_attribution":"Established by the judgment's reasons and operative part."},{"id":"c4","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Refuto a tese do autor de que a justa causa teria sido \"fabricada\"'; 'em represália ao ajuizamento da ação'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The court rejected the claimant's argument that the dismissal was fabricated in retaliation for filing his claim.","causal_attribution":"Established by the judgment; it records the claimant's contrary position."}],"effects":[{"label":"dismissal for cause upheld, with severance items denied and suspended counsel fees","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://arq.migalhas.com.br/arquivos/2026/8/4D8C4684057908_GerentequeusavaChatGPTparaburl.pdf","kind":"court_record","access":"read","language":"pt","translation_note":"Read in Portuguese by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-23; the English assertions are the agent's translation and no human translator reviewed them. The published judgment PDF (parties' names redacted), read in full.","independence_group":"trt10-0000335-2026"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.migalhas.com.br/quentes/461530/justa-causa-e-mantida-por-uso-do-chatgpt-para-burlar-suporte-do-ifood","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"pt","translation_note":"Read in Portuguese by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-23; the English assertions are the agent's translation and no human translator reviewed them. Migalhas reports the judgment and links its PDF; it is a report of the same document.","independence_group":"trt10-0000335-2026"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["work","justice"],"unknowns":["How many photos were altered and whether any customer or iFood lost money because of them.","The claimant's own account of the AI use, which the published reasons do not record.","Whether the claimant appealed to the Regional Labour Court."],"geography":{"basis":"The claim was heard by the 2nd Labour Court of Brasília, a Brazilian court, so the court country is BR. Neither the judgment nor Migalhas states where the business or the workplace is, so the event country is left unknown rather than inferred from the court's seat; the claimant's residence is not stated.","court_countries":["BR"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a court-decided case: a labour court found, on witness evidence, that a manager used ChatGPT to alter a delivery photo to contest a customer's complaint and upheld his dismissal for cause on that ground. The case is documented by the judgment.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-23"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The court accepted a witness's account that the manager used ChatGPT to alter a photo of an incomplete order so that it showed all the items, and that he used the altered image to contest a customer's complaint with iFood support. It held that conduct to be dishonesty and upheld his dismissal for cause on that ground, so the image ChatGPT produced for him is the conduct the sanction rests on. The employer also cited disrespectful conduct; the court's reasons rest on the image manipulation.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Brasília labour court upholds the for-cause dismissal of a manager it found used ChatGPT to alter a delivery photo to contest an iFood customer's complaint","summary":"In a judgment of 30 July 2026, the 2nd Labour Court of Brasília (Regional Labour Court of the 10th Region) upheld the dismissal for cause, on 19 March 2026, of a manager hired in June 2024. The employer said he had used artificial intelligence to falsify photos of orders on the iFood delivery app. A witness told the court she saw him use ChatGPT to alter a photo of an incomplete order, in which two of four soft drinks had been sent, so that it appeared complete, and use it to contest the customer's complaint to iFood support. The judge found this an act of dishonesty and misconduct that broke the trust required of a manager, rejected his claim that the dismissal was fabricated in retaliation for a claim he had filed the day before, dismissed all his claims, denied severance items and ordered him to pay 10% counsel fees, suspended because he was granted free legal aid. The legal news site Migalhas reported the judgment on 3 August 2026. No appeal is reported.","incidentDate":"2026-03-19","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-08-03","aiSystem":"ChatGPT, which a witness told the court the manager used to edit a photo of an incomplete order so that it showed all the items; the court accepted her account","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm","financial_loss","legal_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A labour court upheld a manager's dismissal for cause after finding, on a witness's account, that he used ChatGPT to alter a delivery photo to contest a customer's iFood complaint; he lost severance items and his claims, and was ordered to pay suspended counsel fees.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"established","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the dismissed manager, whose own ChatGPT use the court found. Customers whose complaints were contested are not counted because the judgment describes no loss to any of them.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"BR","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_dismissed","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://arq.migalhas.com.br/arquivos/2026/8/4D8C4684057908_GerentequeusavaChatGPTparaburl.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"2nd Labour Court of Brasília, judgment of 30 Jul 2026, case 0000335-04.2026.5.10.0002 (PDF published by Migalhas)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-23T03:22:30.753826+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-23T03:22:30.753826+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["brazil","labour-court","dismissal","chatgpt","image-editing","delivery-app"]},{"id":"2026-swiss-federal-supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-243-page-appeal-appellant-said-was-drafted-with-intensive-chatgpt-support","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Mit einer 243 Seiten umfassenden Eingabe vom 10. September 2026 (Postaufgabe) reicht A.________ Beschwerde in öffentlich-rechtlichen Angelegenheiten'; 'stellt 17 Rechtsbegehren'; 'knapp achteinhalb Seiten'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The appellant filed a 243-page appeal with 17 requests against a cantonal judgment of just under eight and a half pages about his daughter's entitlement to the 2024 electricity-price bonus, posted on 10 September 2026.","causal_attribution":"Established by the published judgment."},{"id":"c2","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Der Beschwerdeführer gibt an, die Ausarbeitung der Rechtsschrift sei nur durch seine \"überdurchschnittliche Intelligenz\" und seine \"analytischen Fähigkeiten\" sowie \"durch die intensive Unterstützung von ChatGPT Plus [...]\" möglich gewesen.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'unterstützt von ChatGPT Plus und nach eigenen Angaben dank seiner «überdurchschnittlichen Intelligenz»'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The appellant stated that preparing the brief had been possible only through his above-average intelligence, his analytical skills and the intensive support of ChatGPT Plus.","causal_attribution":"The judgment documents that the appellant made this statement; how much of the brief the tool produced is his account."},{"id":"c3","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Urteil vom 28. September 2026'; 'der Rückgriff auf Künstliche Intelligenz (KI) bei der Ausarbeitung der Beschwerdeschrift den Beschwerdeführer nicht von der Einhaltung der allgemeinen Begründungsanforderungen entbindet und keinen Freipass für ausufernde Rechtsschriften bildet'; 'Auf die Beschwerde wird nicht eingetreten.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Das Bundesgericht trat wegen der übermässig weitschweifigen Rechtsschrift nicht auf die Beschwerde ein.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'Il Tribunale federale non è entrato nel merito del ricorso, giudicandolo eccessivamente prolisso.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"In judgment 2C_549/2026 of 28 September 2026 the court found the brief excessively prolix, held that recourse to AI in preparing it did not release the appellant from the pleading requirements and was no free pass for sprawling briefs, gave him no period to correct it and declined to hear the appeal.","causal_attribution":"Established by the reasons and operative part of the judgment; both blue News editions report it."},{"id":"c4","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Folglich ist davon auszugehen, dass er absichtlich und ohne nachvollziehbare Gründe eine 243-seitige Beschwerdeschrift eingereicht hat'; 'Es werden keine Gerichtskosten erhoben.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The court treated the length as deliberate because the appellant's covering letter showed he knew the rule on prolix briefs, and it waived court costs.","causal_attribution":"Established by the judgment."}],"effects":[{"label":"a self-represented appellant's federal appeal was not heard after the court found his ChatGPT-assisted brief excessively prolix","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://entscheidsuche.ch/docs/CH_BGer/CH_BGer_002_2C-549-2026_2026-09-28.html","kind":"court_record","access":"read","language":"de","translation_note":"Read in full in German by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-23 (HTTP 200); the English assertions are the agent's translation and no human translator reviewed them. The published (anonymised) judgment text; the appellant's brief and covering letter were not available.","independence_group":"bger-2c-549-2026"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.bluewin.ch/de/news/schweiz/basler-wehrt-sich-mit-243-seiten-gegen-kurzes-urteil-das-bundesgericht-staunt-li.3641865","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"de","translation_note":"Read in full in German by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-23 (HTTP 200); the English assertions are the agent's translation and no human translator reviewed them. blue News reports the judgment; it cites no other source.","independence_group":"bger-2c-549-2026"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.bluewin.ch/it/attualita/svizzera/sono-piu-intelligente-della-media-scrive-243-pagine-con-chatgpt-ma-il-tribunale-federale-lo-boccia-li.3642114","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"it","translation_note":"Read in full in Italian by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-23 (HTTP 200); the English assertions are the agent's translation and no human translator reviewed them. Italian edition of the blue News report.","independence_group":"bger-2c-549-2026"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["justice"],"unknowns":["Which parts of the brief ChatGPT Plus produced and how the appellant used it; the judgment records only his statement.","The appellant's reaction to the judgment and whether he has pursued the bonus claim by any other route."],"geography":{"basis":"The judgment was given by the Swiss Federal Supreme Court on an appeal from the Basel-Stadt Court of Appeal over a Basel-Stadt cantonal benefit; blue News describes the appellant as a Basel father. No event country is recorded from the court's seat.","court_countries":["CH"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["CH"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published because the Swiss Federal Supreme Court's judgment documents that it declined to hear an appeal whose 243-page brief the appellant said was prepared with intensive ChatGPT Plus support, holding that AI use is no free pass for prolix briefs. The extent of the tool's role rests on the appellant's statement as recorded by the court.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-23"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The published judgment records the appellant's own statement that preparing his 243-page brief had been possible through the intensive support of ChatGPT Plus, so the chatbot produced drafting help in his exchanges with it. The court found that brief excessively prolix, said that recourse to AI in preparing it was no free pass for sprawling briefs, and for that reason declined to hear the appeal. The extent of the tool's contribution rests on the appellant's statement; the court does not identify which passages it produced.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Switzerland: Federal Supreme Court refuses to hear a 243-page appeal that the appellant said was drafted with intensive ChatGPT Plus support","summary":"A father in a dispute with the canton of Basel-Stadt over an electricity-price bonus for his newborn daughter filed a 243-page appeal with 17 requests to Switzerland's Federal Supreme Court, about 28 times the length of the cantonal judgment he challenged, which ran to just under eight and a half pages. He told the court that drafting it had been possible only through his \"above-average intelligence\", his analytical skills and the intensive support of ChatGPT Plus. In judgment 2C_549/2026 of 28 September 2026 the presiding judge, sitting alone, found the brief excessively prolix, held that using artificial intelligence did not release him from the pleading requirements and was no free pass for sprawling briefs, refused him a period to shorten it and declined to hear the appeal. No court costs were imposed. blue News reported the judgment on 20 October 2026.","incidentDate":"2026-09-28","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-10-20","aiSystem":"ChatGPT Plus, which the appellant told the court had given intensive support in drafting his 243-page appeal; the court records his statement and does not say which parts the tool wrote","aiProduct":"ChatGPT (reported)","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["legal_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to the published judgment, the appellant's federal appeal was not heard on the merits after the court found his 243-page brief, which he said was drafted with intensive ChatGPT Plus support, excessively prolix and declined to let him shorten it; no costs were imposed.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the appellant who used ChatGPT Plus to prepare the brief and whose appeal was not heard.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"CH","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_dismissed","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://entscheidsuche.ch/docs/CH_BGer/CH_BGer_002_2C-549-2026_2026-09-28.html","primarySourceLabel":"Swiss Federal Supreme Court, judgment 2C_549/2026 of 28 September 2026 (electricity-price bonus), via entscheidsuche.ch","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-23T03:06:24.620487+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-23T03:06:24.620487+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["switzerland","federal-supreme-court","self-represented-litigant","chatgpt","prolix-brief","appeal-not-heard"]},{"id":"2026-tumbler-ridge-chatgpt-shooting","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c_deaths","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Opening investigation paragraph and paragraph on autopsies for eight victims and the suspect.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_rcmp"},{"locator":"Paragraph identifying eight people killed on 10 February before the shooter killed herself; victim-identification caption.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_cbc_ban"},{"locator":"Paragraph beginning “Van Rootselaar carried out” and subsequent account of the deaths at home and school.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_mj"}],"assertion":"On 10 February 2026, eight victims were killed in Tumbler Ridge, British Columbia; the shooter also died. The eight-victim count excludes the shooter.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_event","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"RCMP identification paragraphs and victim-identification caption, including correction of stepbrother to half-brother.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_cbc_ban"},{"locator":"PDF p.10, Background A, describes deaths at home, six at school and shooter’s death.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_motion"},{"locator":"Paragraphs 25–28, PDF pp.8–10.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc"}],"assertion":"The victims were the shooter’s mother and 11-year-old half-brother at home, and five students and an education assistant at the secondary school. The 18-year-old shooter died by suicide.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_injuries","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraph after the two-scene investigation update identifies two surviving victims remaining in hospital.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_rcmp"},{"locator":"Paragraphs 27–28, PDF pp.9–10; paragraph 1 describes 25 injured seeking care.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc"}],"assertion":"At least two surviving victims required hospital care. Other injuries were reported; the provincial complaint distinguishes two students transported to Vancouver from approximately 25 people seeking local medical care. These descriptions do not establish an exact deduplicated injury total.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_trauma","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraphs 2–6 and 17, PDF pp.2–4 and 7.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_deeley"},{"locator":"Paragraphs 2–3, PDF p.2.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_hoekstra"},{"locator":"Paragraph 28, PDF pp.8–9, explicitly describes severe and lasting trauma.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bertrand"},{"locator":"Paragraph 28, PDF p.9, explicitly describes severe and lasting trauma.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_ac"},{"locator":"Paragraph 28, PDF p.9: 'fired several shotgun blasts through the classroom doors that struck the wall behind their heads'; 'will haunt her for the rest of her life.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_rushlow"}],"assertion":"Survivor complaints report lasting psychological harm among students and educators, including a head teacher and his son F.D., a gym teacher, a grade 7 teacher, a student and her sister, and A.C. These are individual accounts of harm, not a count of everyone present at school.","causal_attribution":"The complaints attribute these harms to the shooting and allege a contribution from OpenAI; that contribution is contested."},{"id":"c_ai_connection","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.1, June 2025 account-review paragraph; p.2, repeat-policy-violator section.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_openai"},{"locator":"Opening second-account account and paragraph citing three sources with knowledge and material reviewed from the ChatGPT history.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_mj"}],"assertion":"The shooter used ChatGPT before the shooting. OpenAI acknowledged an account belonging to the perpetrator, while Mother Jones independently reported reviewing material from the shooter’s ChatGPT history.","causal_attribution":"These distinct evidentiary routes establish the reported AI connection, not that ChatGPT caused or determined the attack."},{"id":"c_ban","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.1, paragraph beginning “As we shared with you”.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_openai"},{"locator":"Direct company responses in the opening paragraphs; RCMP confirmation that contact followed the shooting.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_cbc_ban"}],"assertion":"OpenAI acknowledged that automated detection led to human review and closure of the shooter’s first ChatGPT account in June 2025, without a police referral. It said the visible activity did not meet its then-current threshold for credible and imminent planning.","causal_attribution":"The company’s acknowledgement establishes its stated decision and rationale, not whether that decision satisfied a legal duty."},{"id":"c_second_account","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.2, “Enhance our System to Detect Repeat Policy Violators”.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_openai"}],"assertion":"OpenAI acknowledged that the shooter used a second ChatGPT account despite its repeat-violator detection system. It said it discovered that account after the shooter was publicly identified and then shared it with law enforcement.","causal_attribution":"Continued access is acknowledged; its causal significance and whether different enforcement would have prevented the attack remain unresolved."},{"id":"c_promises","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF pp.1–3, four commitments and the enhanced-referral statement on p.2.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_openai"}],"assertion":"In its 26 February letter to Canadian ministers, OpenAI committed to stronger referral criteria, direct Canadian law-enforcement contacts, localized support and improved repeat-violator detection. It said its enhanced protocol would refer the June 2025 account if discovered then.","causal_attribution":"A policy commitment is not proof of implementation or effectiveness."},{"id":"c_apology","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Opening paragraphs on publication by Tumbler RidgeLines, company authentication and date; apology passage.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_apology"}],"assertion":"Sam Altman’s apology letter, dated 23 April and publicly reported on 24 April, expressed regret that OpenAI had not alerted law enforcement. CBC reported that an OpenAI spokesperson confirmed the letter’s authenticity.","causal_attribution":"Regret and acknowledgement of non-reporting do not establish legal liability or causation."},{"id":"c_march","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Opening filing paragraphs, “Lifelong harms” and “Chatbot acted as therapist: claim” sections.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_march"},{"locator":"Caption PDF p.2 identifies M.G. and her mother; Background F, PDF p.14 identifies the prior B.C. action.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_motion"}],"assertion":"On 9 March 2026, the family of the critically injured student identified as M.G. in the U.S. proceedings filed a B.C. Supreme Court claim, including her younger sister and mother. They alleged serious physical and psychological harms and prior knowledge of violent planning by OpenAI.","causal_attribution":"Claims of company knowledge and causal responsibility remain allegations."},{"id":"c_april","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.2, recital lists the seven actions and 29 April filing date.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_relation"},{"locator":"Background F, PDF p.14, B.C. filing discontinued and refiled in this District.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_motion"},{"locator":"Paragraph beginning “It will replace” states the earlier Canadian case was being voluntarily withdrawn.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bbc"}],"assertion":"Seven family actions were filed in Northern District of California federal court on 29 April 2026 against Sam Altman and OpenAI entities. They replaced the earlier B.C. family action, whose discontinuance is described in the defence motion.","causal_attribution":"This records procedural history, not the truth of the complaints."},{"id":"c_damages","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"BBC damages paragraph specifying the prospective amount for this individual case.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bbc"}],"assertion":"On 29 April, the BBC reported counsel’s prospective request for more than US$1 billion in damages in M.G.’s case. This was a requested amount, not an award or an established aggregate loss.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_september_suits","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF pp.2–3, recitals listing seven April and thirty September actions and 9 September relation.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_relation"},{"locator":"Opening paragraphs identify students, teachers and a principal.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_npr"}],"assertion":"Thirty additional survivor actions were filed on 2 September 2026, including students, teachers and the principal. The court related them to Stacey v. Altman on 9 September; with the seven April actions, the private litigation comprised 37 cases.","causal_attribution":"Case counts are not people counts, and related cases are not independent corroboration of shared allegations."},{"id":"c_survivor_accounts","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraphs 2–6, PDF pp.2–4.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_deeley"},{"locator":"Paragraphs 2–3, PDF p.2.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_hoekstra"},{"locator":"Paragraph 2, PDF p.2.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bertrand"},{"locator":"Paragraph 2, PDF p.2.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_ac"}],"assertion":"The inspected September complaints include a head teacher’s account of attempting to resuscitate a student and his son F.D.’s account of sheltering; a 19-year-old student’s serious injury and hospital transport and her sister’s experience of sheltering; a gym teacher’s account of coming under fire; and 13-year-old A.C.’s account of surviving in the library.","causal_attribution":"The experiences and harms are pleaded accounts. Their existence does not establish the complaints’ causal allegations against OpenAI."},{"id":"c_liability_allegations","status":"disputed","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraphs 7–9, 41–46 and 54–59; nine cause-of-action headings.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_deeley"},{"locator":"PDF p.15 main text, lines 3–9: claims called nonviable and accusations against senior personnel baseless.","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s_motion"},{"locator":"Direct Kwon statement rejecting political/public-relations factors and the allegations about internal decisions.","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s_npr"}],"assertion":"The survivor complaints allege negligent design and warnings, negligent entrustment and undertaking, aiding and abetting, product liability and emotional distress. They allege staff urged a police referral and that reputation and IPO interests influenced leadership’s refusal. OpenAI disputes these allegations.","causal_attribution":"These are contested legal and causal theories, not findings that OpenAI facilitated or could have prevented the deaths."},{"id":"c_leadership_dispute","status":"disputed","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraph 54, PDF p.17, information-and-belief allegation.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_deeley"},{"locator":"Kwon emailed statement and later explanation of reporting lines.","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s_npr"},{"locator":"PDF p.15 main text, lines 3–9.","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s_motion"}],"assertion":"The September complaints allege Chris Lehane or someone in his reporting chain made the non-referral decision and Altman ratified it. Jason Kwon denied Lehane’s involvement and said the investigations and legal teams report to him. OpenAI’s court motion also denied Altman’s personal involvement in the June review or referral decision.","causal_attribution":"Responsibility for the internal decision remains disputed; the allegation is not independently corroborated by matching complaint templates."},{"id":"c_july_counsel","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Opening paragraphs naming counsel and later paragraph distinguishing any provincial action from families’ litigation.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_july"}],"assertion":"On 7 July, B.C. announced retention of CFM Lawyers and Stranch, Jennings & Garvey to explore legal action against OpenAI and its decision-makers. That announcement described preparation for a separate provincial action.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_bc_filing","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.1 caption, parties, eight counts and ECF filing stamp; signature on p.39.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc"},{"locator":"21 September statement announcing California legal action.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc_release"}],"assertion":"On 21 September, the Province of British Columbia and the Board of Education of School District No. 59 (Peace River South) filed a federal complaint against Sam Altman and four OpenAI entities in the Northern District of California, case 26-cv-10743. The complaint pleads eight causes of action.","causal_attribution":"The filing is documented; the pleaded allegations are not established facts."},{"id":"c_bc_relief","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraphs 3–4, 31–38 and Prayer for Relief, PDF pp.37–39.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc"}],"assertion":"The Province and school board seek recovery of extraordinary response and recovery costs, including health care, victim services, educational continuity, demolition and a replacement school and wellness centre. They also request punitive and other relief, changes to safeguards and reporting, durable account enforcement and independent compliance audits.","causal_attribution":"This establishes relief requested, not a damages award or proof that the defendants caused those expenditures."},{"id":"c_bc_harm","status":"disputed","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraphs 1–8, 25–38, 45–50, 68–71 and 75–82 (PDF pp.27–28 for continued-access allegation).","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc"},{"locator":"School-demolition reporting and OpenAI’s direct response; no admission of the complaint’s liability theory.","relation":"context","source_id":"s_cbc_bc"},{"locator":"PDF pp.8–10 and p.15 main text, lines 3–9, defendants contest causal responsibility and legal viability.","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s_motion"}],"assertion":"The provincial complaint reports lasting trauma, school closure and demolition, replacement education arrangements and substantial public recovery expenditures. It alleges ChatGPT reinforced violent ideation, that a police warning would have prevented the attack, and that continued access contributed to it.","causal_attribution":"The public bodies’ reported losses and their attribution of them to OpenAI are distinct. Causation and liability remain contested."},{"id":"c_forum_motion","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"ECF 29 filing stamp; PDF pp.8–10 introduction and p.15 main text, lines 3–9.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_motion"}],"assertion":"On 2 September, OpenAI and Altman moved to dismiss the seven original California actions for forum non conveniens, arguing British Columbia was the appropriate forum. They disputed liability and pointed to Canadian institutions and witnesses as relevant to causation and comparative fault.","causal_attribution":"This is the defendants’ litigation position, not a ruling that other institutions caused the shooting."},{"id":"c_vacated","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"One-page order, lines 19–23.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_vacate"}],"assertion":"The court’s 10 September order vacated the 8 October 2026 hearing in the seven earlier actions, pending a coordinated schedule.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_schedule","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.2, numbered paragraphs 1–3; hearing dates visually confirmed in the rendered order.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_schedule"},{"locator":"15 September Set/Reset Deadlines entry expressly resets the seven forum motions to 5 November at 10 a.m.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_stacey_index"},{"locator":"Order of 29 September, p.1: 'Hearing: December 17, 2026 at 10:00 a.m.' under 'Forum Non Conveniens Motion'.","relation":"context","source_id":"s_reschedule"}],"assertion":"The signed 15 September scheduling order had set the forum non conveniens hearing for 5 November 2026 at 10 a.m. in San Francisco, with opposition due 6 October and replies due 20 October. It also set a separate Rule 12(b)(6) hearing for 10 December and case management for 16 December.","causal_attribution":"These were scheduled proceedings, not completed hearings or merits decisions. A 29 September order later set a different schedule."},{"id":"c_survivor_motion","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.1 filing stamp and hearing notice.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_ac_motion"},{"locator":"PDF p.2 paragraph 1.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_schedule"}],"assertion":"A.C.’s docketed 17 September motion extends the forum non conveniens request to a survivor action and lists the 5 November hearing. The 15 September order required forum motions in the thirty additional actions by 17 September.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_related_province","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF pp.3 and 6, relation to Stacey and reassignment.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_relation"},{"locator":"25 September Order Relating Case (entry 8) and Case Assigned/Reassigned entries.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc_index"}],"assertion":"The public docket indexes a 25 September order relating the provincial action to Stacey v. Altman and reassignment to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. The Province’s cost-recovery claims remain a separate action arising from the same shooting.","causal_attribution":"Relation and reassignment do not decide the merits or create a separate incident."},{"id":"c_latest_docket","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Latest 28 September entry 45, Stipulation and Proposed Order.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_stacey_index"},{"locator":"28 September entry 10 and 29 September attorney-notice entry.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc_index"},{"locator":"Last inspected signed scheduling order, dated 15 September.","relation":"context","source_id":"s_schedule"},{"locator":"28 September entry 35, Stipulation and Proposed Order.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_schofield_index"}],"assertion":"The RECAP indexes inspected on 29 September list a 28 September stipulation and proposed order in Stacey (entry 45), Schofield (entry 35), and the provincial action (entry 10); the provincial index also lists a 29 September attorney notice (indexed as appearance/substitution/change/withdrawal). The stipulation’s own body was not read; the court’s 29 September order granting it was read.","causal_attribution":"An indexed proposed order is not a granted order. The schedule the court granted is stated in the 29 September order."},{"id":"c_rushlow","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraph 2, PDF p.2: 'she locked the door and hid her remaining students under her desk'; paragraph 28, PDF p.9: 'fired several shotgun blasts through the classroom doors that struck the wall behind their heads'; paragraph 201, PDF p.46: 'acute psychological trauma, persistent fear, sleep disturbances, intrusive recollections'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_rushlow"}],"assertion":"A grade 7 teacher’s complaint alleges that she had sent part of her class to the library, where children and an education assistant were then killed, and that she locked her classroom and hid her remaining students under her desk while the shooter fired shotgun rounds through its doors. It reports severe and lasting psychological trauma.","causal_attribution":"The complaint attributes her trauma to the shooting and alleges a contribution from OpenAI; that contribution is contested and no court has found it."},{"id":"c_rushlow_docket","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Docket header: 'Date Filed: Sept. 2, 2026'; entry 10: 'ORDER RELATING CASE. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 9/9/2026'; entry 11: 'IT IS ORDERED that this case is directly assigned to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley'; entry 21: 'MOTION to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens filed by Samuel Altman'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_rushlow_docket"}],"assertion":"The teacher’s action, Rushlow v. Altman (26-cv-09344), was filed on 2 September 2026, related to Stacey v. Altman on 9 September and reassigned to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 10 September. OpenAI and Altman filed a forum non conveniens motion in it on 17 September.","causal_attribution":"Docket entries establish filings and procedural orders, not the truth of the complaint’s allegations."},{"id":"c_reschedule","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Order of 29 September 2026, pp.1–2: 'The Court grants the stipulation as follows'; 'Deadline to File Motion: October 15, 2026'; 'Hearing: December 17, 2026 at 10:00 a.m.'; 'Amended Complaints Deadline: October 29, 2026'; 'Hearing: February 11, 2027 at 10:00 a.m.'; 'The Court sets an initial case management conference for October 20, 2026'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_reschedule"}],"assertion":"On 29 September 2026 the court granted the parties’ joint stipulation in Stacey v. Altman and all related cases. Forum non conveniens motions are due 15 October, oppositions 5 November and replies 3 December, with a hearing on 17 December 2026. Amended complaints are due 29 October, and a Rule 12(b)(6) hearing is set for 11 February 2027. A case management conference on alternative dispute resolution was set for 20 October 2026.","causal_attribution":"These are scheduled proceedings, not hearings held or merits decisions."},{"id":"c_mj_allegations","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Opening second-account account; August 2025 conversation paragraphs; paragraph beginning “Van Rootselaar continued using ChatGPT until the day”.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_mj"}],"assertion":"Mother Jones’s 24 September investigation alleges that ChatGPT supplied violent scenario content, including a classroom scenario, and advice to frame requests as fiction to bypass safeguards on the shooter’s second account. It reports continued use until the day of the attack.","causal_attribution":"Reported allegations based on the journalist’s sources and reviewed material. This review has not authenticated the logs or established that any output caused the attack; operational details are omitted."},{"id":"c_log_limits","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Sourcing paragraph beginning “Over the next eight months” and later anonymity explanation; OpenAI non-response paragraph.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_mj"},{"locator":"Opening allegation paragraphs and statement that the article does not describe its sources.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_global"},{"locator":"Programme description expressly disclaims independent verification.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_cbc_limit"}],"assertion":"Mother Jones describes three anonymous sources with knowledge and chat-history material reviewed by its reporter. Global News’s Canadian Press account relays the allegations and says sourcing is not described; CBC’s Front Burner description says CBC has not independently verified the reporting. These follow-ups do not independently corroborate the alleged chat contents.","causal_attribution":"The currently inspected original describes source categories but leaves provenance and authentication details unresolved. No inference is made from OpenAI’s non-response to Mother Jones."},{"id":"c_government_response","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraph beginning “I have written to federal ministers”.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc_release"},{"locator":"Opening paragraphs distinguish the provincial legal initiative from the active criminal investigation; final inquest paragraph.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_rcmp_july"},{"locator":"Closing paragraphs report the investigation ongoing on 21 September and the directed inquest.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_cbc_bc"}],"assertion":"B.C.’s attorney general said on 21 September she had written to federal ministers proposing Criminal Code changes concerning human accountability for AI. The RCMP criminal investigation and announced coroner’s inquest are separate from the provincial civil lawsuit.","causal_attribution":"Policy advocacy, an investigation and an inquest do not establish criminal liability or any criminal charge against OpenAI."},{"id":"c_official_meetings","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Political blowback section, virtual meeting and Eby/Solomon statements.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_march"},{"locator":"26 February letter thanks ministers for their meeting and discussion.","relation":"context","source_id":"s_openai"}],"assertion":"After federal officials sought answers, Altman met virtually with Premier David Eby and Tumbler Ridge’s mayor in early March and agreed to apologize and work on regulatory recommendations, according to CBC.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_prior_context","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraph 29, PDF p.9, conversations spanning multiple days.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bertrand"},{"locator":"Paragraph 41, PDF p.12, police contacts and open-file allegation; paragraph 9, PDF p.4, alleged IPO submission date.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_deeley"}],"assertion":"The survivor complaints describe violence-related first-account conversations spanning several days in June 2025 and allege that a referral would have reached police who already knew the shooter through prior contacts and firearm removal. The Deeley complaint invokes an alleged confidential IPO submission on 22 May 2026 as part of its reputational-motive theory.","causal_attribution":"The prior-warning, prevention and corporate-motive interpretations are plaintiffs’ allegations. They do not establish that a referral would have prevented the attack; OpenAI disputes liability and reputational-motive claims."},{"id":"c_younge_amendment","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Second result page, entry 30, AMENDED COMPLAINT, filed 2 September 2026.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_younge_index"}],"assertion":"Younge v. Altman, case 26-cv-03707, received an amended complaint on 2 September 2026 (entry 30).","causal_attribution":"Procedural metadata only; this review does not characterize the amendment’s contents."}],"effects":[{"label":"Eight victims killed and shooter also died; AI causation contested","claim_id":"c_deaths","direction":"negative"},{"label":"Physical injuries requiring hospital and other medical care","claim_id":"c_injuries","direction":"negative"},{"label":"Survivors report lasting psychological harm","claim_id":"c_trauma","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s_rcmp","url":"https://rcmp.ca/en/bc/tumbler-ridge/news/2026/02/4350292","kind":"official_police_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English source body read directly; no translation.","independence_group":"rcmp-investigation"},{"id":"s_cbc_ban","url":"https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/openai-tumbler-ridge-shooter-ban-9.7100497","kind":"original_news_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English body read. CBC obtained direct responses from OpenAI and RCMP; the original discovery is credited to WSJ. Company-disclosure claims are grouped with OpenAI, not counted again as independent.","independence_group":"openai-account-disclosures"},{"id":"s_openai","url":"https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/8e938d69-0b67-4994-b9ff-683733ed587e/openai-letter-minister-solomon.pdf","kind":"company_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English source body read directly; no translation.","independence_group":"openai-account-disclosures"},{"id":"s_mj","url":"https://www.motherjones.com/media/2026/09/chatgpt-tumbler-ridge-mass-shooter-openai/","kind":"investigative_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English article read in full, including sourcing and disclosure. Reporter says he reviewed chat-history material and spoke with three anonymous sources; we did not inspect or authenticate the underlying logs. One reporting chain, not three independent sources.","independence_group":"motherjones-20260924"},{"id":"s_global","url":"https://globalnews.ca/news/12072859/what-did-chatgpt-tell-tumbler-ridge-shooter/","kind":"wire_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English Canadian Press article hosted by Global News read. Alleged chat contents are relayed from Mother Jones, not independently corroborated; its statement that sourcing is undescribed differs from the currently inspected original.","independence_group":"motherjones-20260924"},{"id":"s_cbc_limit","url":"https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/9.7360427","kind":"programme_description","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English programme description read; audio not reviewed. CBC explicitly says it has not independently verified the Mother Jones reporting.","independence_group":"motherjones-20260924"},{"id":"s_march","url":"https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/openai-sued-tumbler-ridge-victim-9.7121635","kind":"original_news_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English CBC body read; allegations and medical descriptions are attributed to the March complaint.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_apology","url":"https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/sam-altman-tumbler-ridge-apology-9.7176482","kind":"original_news_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English CBC body read; CBC says OpenAI confirmed the apology letter's authenticity.","independence_group":"openai-account-disclosures"},{"id":"s_bbc","url":"https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c99l03k0ly4o","kind":"original_news_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English BBC body read; interviews with counsel and company response. Litigation claims are not independent corroboration of the complaints.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_npr","url":"https://www.npr.org/2026/09/02/nx-s1-5953021/openai-tumbler-ridge-mass-shooting","kind":"original_news_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English NPR body read; includes direct emailed Kwon response. Shared plaintiffs' allegations are not independently corroborated by repetition.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_deeley","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477684/gov.uscourts.cand.477684.1.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English filing; cited passages read. Its allegations are not findings. The four survivor complaints share counsel and a template.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_hoekstra","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477681/gov.uscourts.cand.477681.1.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English filing; cited passages read. Its allegations are not findings. The four survivor complaints share counsel and a template.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_bertrand","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477650/gov.uscourts.cand.477650.1.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English filing; cited passages read. Its allegations are not findings. The four survivor complaints share counsel and a template.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_ac","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477646/gov.uscourts.cand.477646.1.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English filing; cited passages read. Its allegations are not findings. The four survivor complaints share counsel and a template.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_july","url":"https://archive.news.gov.bc.ca/releases/news_releases_2024-2028/2026AG0050-000799.htm","kind":"government_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English official archive release read; cosmetic character-encoding artifacts in headings do not affect cited passages.","independence_group":"bc-government-litigation"},{"id":"s_bc","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.479418/gov.uscourts.cand.479418.1.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English 39-page complaint read. Court filing establishes allegations and relief sought, not their truth. Paragraphs 7 and 41 expressly trace prior-warning allegations to WSJ reporting.","independence_group":"bc-government-litigation"},{"id":"s_bc_release","url":"https://archive.news.gov.bc.ca/releases/news_releases_2024-2028/2026AG0067-001105.htm","kind":"government_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English official archive statement read; cosmetic character-encoding artifacts in headings do not affect cited passages.","independence_group":"bc-government-litigation"},{"id":"s_cbc_bc","url":"https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/bc-government-announce-update-openai-legal-action-9.7352395","kind":"original_news_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English CBC body read, including direct OpenAI response and RCMP update. Not independent corroboration of the Province's allegations.","independence_group":"bc-government-litigation"},{"id":"s_rcmp_july","url":"https://rcmp.ca/en/bc/tumbler-ridge/news/2026/07/4354810","kind":"official_police_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English source body read directly; no translation.","independence_group":"rcmp-investigation"},{"id":"s_motion","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.468851/gov.uscourts.cand.468851.29.0_1.pdf","kind":"defence_motion","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English defence filing; procedural request and denial passages read, not findings.","independence_group":"openai-litigation-position"},{"id":"s_vacate","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.468851/gov.uscourts.cand.468851.34.0.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English source body read directly; no translation.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_schedule","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.468851/gov.uscourts.cand.468851.37.0.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English signed order read. Hearing-date text has an extraction/font defect; the identical order on Schofield ECF 32 was rendered and visually checked.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_ac_motion","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477646/gov.uscourts.cand.477646.21.0.pdf","kind":"defence_motion","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English source body read directly; no translation.","independence_group":"openai-litigation-position"},{"id":"s_relation","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.468851/gov.uscourts.cand.468851.44.0.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English ECF document read. CourtListener classifies it as an Order Relating Case; the proposed-order label is struck through, and reassignment is indexed. No merits finding.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_stacey_index","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?q=docket_id%3A73260511&type=rd&order_by=dateFiled%20desc","kind":"court_docket_index","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Public RECAP API index inspected on 29 September 2026. This is not a complete live PACER docket; the 28 September stipulation body is unavailable.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_bc_index","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?q=docket_id%3A74825372&type=rd&order_by=dateFiled%20desc","kind":"court_docket_index","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Public RECAP API index inspected on 29 September 2026. This is not a complete live PACER docket; the 28 September stipulation body is unavailable.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_schofield_index","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?q=docket_id%3A73260517&type=rd&order_by=dateFiled%20desc","kind":"court_docket_index","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Latest public RECAP API entries inspected on 29 September 2026; 28 September entry 35 is indexed, but its body is unavailable. Not a complete live PACER docket.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_younge_index","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?q=docket_id%3A73260774%20AND%20entry_date_filed%3A%5B2026-09-02%20TO%202026-09-02%5D&type=rd","kind":"court_docket_index","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Two pages of RECAP API results inspected. Entry 30 establishes an amended complaint was filed, not its allegations; complaint body not inspected.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_rushlow","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477648/gov.uscourts.cand.477648.1.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English filing (ECF 1, 48 pages), read in full on 2026-10-15. Its allegations are not findings. It shares counsel and a template with the other survivor complaints.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_rushlow_docket","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/74737047/rushlow-v-altman/","kind":"court_docket_index","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"CourtListener docket page read on 2026-10-15, last updated 14 October 2026. It is not a complete live PACER docket; most entry bodies are not on RECAP.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_reschedule","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477648/gov.uscourts.cand.477648.23.0.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Signed two-page order of 29 September 2026 in Stacey v. Altman and all related cases, filed as Document 41 in 3:26-cv-03705 and docketed as entry 23 in the Rushlow action; read in full on 2026-10-15.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use","others_use"],"contexts":["education","family","justice","public_services"],"unknowns":["The complete authenticated chat histories, their model/version context and whether the published excerpts represent the whole exchanges have not been independently inspected.","The exact internal referral decision-makers, escalation evidence and disputed reporting hierarchy have not been established.","The technical reasons the second account was not detected and the accounts’ identity linkage remain unresolved: the provincial complaint alleges shared identity information, whereas Mother Jones reports different account names and email addresses. Neither assertion is independently verified here.","Whether model outputs, access restrictions or a police referral would have changed the outcome remains unresolved; no causal or liability finding is asserted.","A complete deduplicated count of physically injured and psychologically harmed people is unavailable. The numeric minimum deliberately excludes additional unquantified harm.","Implementation and effectiveness of OpenAI’s promised safeguards are not established by the commitments.","RECAP is not a complete live docket. The 28 September stipulation body was not read, although the 29 September order granting it was. Whether forum motions were filed by the 15 October deadline, and the contents of the 13 October stipulation and 14 October protective order in the Rushlow action, are not established.","No inquest date, final investigative outcome, settlement or liability judgment was established by the inspected sources."],"geography":{"basis":"The shooting and affected people are located in Tumbler Ridge, B.C., by RCMP and reporting. Both the earlier B.C. Supreme Court family action and the subsequent Northern District of California proceedings are recorded; the earlier action was discontinued. Countries describe locations and court proceedings, not nationality. This carries forward Canada and U.S. metadata and adds the historically documented Canadian court.","court_countries":["CA","US"],"event_countries":["CA"],"affected_person_countries":["CA"]},"publication":{"basis":"Full review of this previously published death incident. Official police evidence supports the deaths; CBC’s direct OpenAI/RCMP reporting and Mother Jones’s separate investigation each report the deaths and the AI connection, with distinct underlying support for the connection. OpenAI’s own letter supplies primary confirmation of account use and non-referral. Derivative coverage and shared complaint templates are grouped together, not counted as independent corroboration. Complaints and alleged logs remain attributed, company disputes are retained, and causation is unresolved. Minor identities, unnecessary victim names and operational violence details are minimized. The 15 October 2026 review adds a grade 7 teacher’s complaint and docket as attributed allegations and documented filings, and the signed 29 September 2026 order that reset the forum hearing to 17 December 2026.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-15"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The shooter’s own use is established by OpenAI’s first-person account disclosure and Mother Jones’s distinct original reporting. communicated_with applies to the shooter, counted among those who died. unknown applies to other harmed people: inspected evidence does not establish ChatGPT communicating with, acting for, deciding about, claiming about or depicting them. The involvement finding does not establish facilitation or causation.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with","unknown"]},"name":"Tumbler Ridge shooting: ChatGPT use and OpenAI non-reporting","summary":"Eight victims were killed in Tumbler Ridge, B.C., on 10 February 2026, and the shooter died by suicide. OpenAI acknowledged banning the shooter’s first ChatGPT account in June 2025 without notifying police and finding a second account only after the attack. Families and survivors filed California lawsuits, followed by B.C. and its school board on 21 September. Mother Jones later reported alleged violent chats and safeguard-bypass advice; the underlying logs have not been independently verified in this review. OpenAI disputes the liability allegations. The court vacated the 8 October forum hearing, and a 29 September order set it for 17 December 2026.","incidentDate":"2026-02-10","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-02-20","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"critical","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":["third_party_harm_facilitation","crisis_response"],"harmOutcomes":["death","physical_injury","psychological_distress","harm_to_others"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Eight victims were killed, the shooter died by suicide, and survivors suffered physical injuries and reported psychological trauma. The shooter’s prior ChatGPT use is supported; claims that ChatGPT or OpenAI’s non-reporting contributed to the deaths and injuries remain contested.","frameworkFacets":[],"pathwayDirection":"both","causationStatus":"disputed","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":10,"affectedCountStatus":"partial","affectedCountEvidence":"Conservative retained lower bounds: one ChatGPT user who died, eight homicide victims, and two distinct surviving victims requiring hospital care (RCMP 13 February; OpenAI 26 February letter; c_deaths, c_injuries and c_ai_connection). The two hospital survivors are students, not both children: the inspected Hoekstra complaint gives one survivor’s age as 19. Additional injured people and people alleging psychological harm are not enumerated because the totals and overlap are unresolved. This counts people harmed in the event, not deaths or injuries proven to have been caused by AI.","victimAgeRange":"minor","jurisdiction":"CA-BC","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_ongoing","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.479418/gov.uscourts.cand.479418.1.0.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"B.C. and SD59 complaint, case 26-cv-10743, filed 21 September 2026 (allegations)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-02-27T07:58:16.565471+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-15T03:02:23.45556+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["mass-shooting","duty-to-warn","ban-evasion","chatgpt","openai","canada","bc","school-shooting","minor-victims","prior-warning","lawsuit","provincial-action","criminal"]}]}