{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-23T07:17:13.357Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"chatgpt","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"contextual","evidence":"","year":"unknown","response":"","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":2,"coverage":{"cases":2,"countries":1,"languages":2,"unknownLocation":1,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":2,"lawsuits":1,"regulatory":0,"minors":0,"coreRelations":2,"contextualRelations":2,"mixedRelations":2,"unknownRelations":0,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":0},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2025-ukraine-anti-corruption-court-appeals-chamber-refuses-to-consider-appeal-applicant-drafted-with-chatgpt","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Апеляційна палата Вищого антикорупційного суду України відмовила в розгляді апеляційної скарги, складеної заявницею за допомогою чатбота зі штучним інтелектом ChatGPT. Суд розцінив такий підхід як прояв неповаги до судової системи.; Апеляційну скаргу залишили без розгляду.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The Appeals Chamber of the High Anti-Corruption Court of Ukraine refused to consider an appeal that the applicant had drafted with the ChatGPT chatbot, treating this approach as a sign of disrespect for the judicial system, and left the appeal without consideration.","causal_attribution":"The ruling as reported by UkraNews from the court-decision register; the ruling itself was not inspected."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"У тексті апеляції заявниця зазначила, що звернулася до ШІ після того, як її адвокати відмовились готувати документ","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"In the appeal the applicant wrote that she had turned to AI after her lawyers declined to prepare the document.","causal_attribution":"The applicant's own statement in her appeal, as reported."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Суд наголосив, що текст скарги містив саркастичні й образливі формулювання на адресу судової системи, а використання матеріалів, згенерованих ChatGPT, — без належного правового обґрунтування — суперечить принципам судочинства.; а не емоцій чи \"інформації, згенерованої штучним інтелектом\"","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The court said the text contained sarcastic and offensive wording about the judicial system and that using ChatGPT-generated material without proper legal grounds contradicted the principles of judicial proceedings; decisions must rest on the facts and the parties' legal positions, not on emotions or AI-generated information.","causal_attribution":"The court's reasons as reported; the offensive wording and the AI use are given together, and the report does not separate their weight."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Скарга була подана на рішення слідчого судді ВАКС, який раніше відмовив у задоволенні скарги на бездіяльність представника НАБУ та прокурора САП.; Її можна оскаржити в касаційному порядку протягом трьох місяців.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The appeal was against an investigating judge's refusal of the applicant's complaint about inaction by a NABU representative and a SAPO prosecutor, and the ruling could be challenged in cassation within three months.","causal_attribution":"Procedural context as reported."}],"effects":[{"label":"appeal left without consideration after the court treated its drafting with ChatGPT as disrespect","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://ukranews.com/ua/news/1088011-ukrayinka-sklala-apelyatsiyu-za-dopomogoyu-chatgpt-ale-sud-yiyi-ne-pryjnyav-cherez-nepovagu","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"uk","translation_note":"Read in Ukrainian by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-23 from an Internet Archive web/2026id_ capture (gzip, decompressed; the live page returned HTTP 403) and translated by that agent; no human translator or reviewer read it. Report of 15 Jun 2025 based on the ruling in the court-decision register (bodies/ru-ukranews-hacc-wb.html/.txt).","independence_group":"ukranews-hacc-ruling"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["justice"],"unknowns":["The date of the ruling and the case number; the report is dated 15 June 2025.","Whether the offensive wording was ChatGPT's output or the applicant's own, and how much weight the court gave each reason.","Whether a cassation appeal was filed and with what result."],"geography":{"basis":"The recorded events are court events in Ukraine: the appeal was filed with and decided by the Appeals Chamber of Ukraine's High Anti-Corruption Court (UkraNews). The report does not say where the applicant lives, so the affected-person country is left empty.","court_countries":["UA"],"event_countries":["UA"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (communicated_with, with informed_decision_about): by the reported ruling, an applicant drafted her appeal with ChatGPT, and the court left it without consideration, citing the ChatGPT-generated material and offensive wording. One attributed report of the ruling; the ruling itself was not inspected.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-23"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"As the ruling is reported, the applicant drafted her appeal with ChatGPT and said so in the appeal, and the court left it without consideration, calling the approach disrespect and saying that ChatGPT-generated material without proper legal grounds contradicted the principles of proceedings. The court also cited sarcastic and offensive wording in the text, and the report does not say whether that wording came from ChatGPT or from her.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with","informed_decision_about"]},"name":"Ukraine's anti-corruption court appeals chamber refused to consider an appeal the applicant had drafted with ChatGPT, calling it disrespect, report says","summary":"The Appeals Chamber of Ukraine's High Anti-Corruption Court left without consideration an appeal that the applicant had drafted with the ChatGPT chatbot, treating the approach as a sign of disrespect for the judicial system, UkraNews reported on 15 June 2025 from a ruling in the court-decision register. According to the report, the applicant wrote in the appeal that she had turned to AI after her lawyers declined to prepare it, and the court said the text contained sarcastic and offensive wording about the courts and that using ChatGPT-generated material without proper legal grounds contradicted the principles of judicial proceedings. The appeal concerned an investigating judge's refusal of her complaint about inaction by anti-corruption investigators and prosecutors. The ruling could be challenged in cassation within three months; no later outcome was found.","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2025-06-15","aiSystem":"ChatGPT, which the applicant used to draft her appeal (as the court ruling is reported)","aiProduct":"ChatGPT (reported)","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["legal_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"An applicant's appeal was left without consideration after the court treated its drafting with ChatGPT as disrespect and cited offensive wording in it, according to a report of the ruling.","frameworkFacets":[],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the applicant who drafted the appeal with ChatGPT and whose appeal was not considered (UkraNews).","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"UA","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_dismissed","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://ukranews.com/ua/news/1088011-ukrayinka-sklala-apelyatsiyu-za-dopomogoyu-chatgpt-ale-sud-yiyi-ne-pryjnyav-cherez-nepovagu","primarySourceLabel":"UkraNews, 15 Jun 2025: Ukrainian woman drafted an appeal with ChatGPT, but the court rejected it for disrespect","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-23T03:24:30.472553+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-23T03:24:30.472553+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["chatgpt","court-filing","appeal-rejected","ukraine","own-use","ukrainian-language"]},{"id":"2026-norway-barnevakten-chatgpt-teen-mode-applied-to-adult","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'En av Barnevaktens medarbeidere fikk plutselig beskjed fra Chatgpt om at kontoen nå var i tenåringsmodus.'; 'Systemet skrur det på hvis oppførselen til brukeren indikerer at alderen er under 18 år.'; 'Denne gangen var det altså en voksen person som opplevde at tenåringsmodus ble slått på uten å ha bedt om det.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"One of Barnevakten's staff members, an adult, was suddenly told by ChatGPT that their account was now in teen mode, which the system switches on when a user's behaviour indicates an age under 18 and which reduces sensitive content; the switch happened without a request because age is estimated afterwards from conversation topics and times of use.","causal_attribution":"Organisation's own account of a colleague's experience; the age-estimation mechanism is the organisation's description of the provider's pages."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Hvis voksne opplever å havne i tenåringsmodus som de ikke ønsker, kan de gå gjennom en alderskontroll for å bevise at de er over 18 år.'; 'Chatgpt benytter selskapet Persona til å bekrefte alderen din.'; 'Opp til tre år nevnes som en mulighet.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The described way out of teen mode is an age check run by Persona that, depending on the country, asks for a real-time selfie and a government-issued ID; Barnevakten considers the process's privacy protections unclear, noting Persona's terms mention retention of up to three years.","causal_attribution":"Organisation's account and assessment; Persona's terms were not inspected."}],"effects":[{"label":"an adult's ChatGPT account was switched into teen mode by an automated age estimate, restricting content, with an identity check through a third-party verifier as the described way out","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.barnevakten.no/chatgpt-skrudde-pa-tenaringsfilter-for-en-voksen-person/","kind":"other","access":"read","language":"nb-NO","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-09-24 (Barnevakten, published 23 September 2026, categories Alderskontroll, KI, Sosial på nett; html lang=nb-NO). Norwegian; passages quoted in the original and paraphrased in English by the reviewer.","independence_group":"barnevakten"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["everyday_life","privacy"],"unknowns":["Whether the staff member completed the identity check or remained in teen mode, and for how long.","What the account holder had discussed that triggered the estimate.","Whether the switch caused any concrete loss beyond the content restriction.","Where the staff member lives or was when the account was switched (not stated; the organisation's country is not used).","When the account was switched into teen mode; the article of 23 September 2026 gives no date."],"geography":{"basis":"Unknown after review. The account is published by Barnevakten, a Norwegian organisation, about one of its own staff members, but the article states neither where the staff member lives nor where they were when the account was switched. The organisation's country is not used as the event or residence location. No proceeding.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a low-severity everyday-assistance case in which an AI product made a decision about a person: an automated age estimate placed an adult in a restricted mode and the route out required an identity check. Single organisational source (the publisher's own account of its staff member), claims recorded as reported; the staff member is not named.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-24"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The account reports ChatGPT's own message that the account was now in teen mode, and describes the provider's stated behaviour-based age estimation; the message and the mode are the product's own actions as described by the account holder's organisation.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["made_decision_about","communicated_with"]},"name":"A Norwegian child-safety organisation reports that ChatGPT's behaviour-based age estimation switched an adult staff member's account into teen mode without a request, restricting content and offering an identity check through a third-party verifier as the way out (Barnevakten, 23 September 2026)","summary":"Barnevakten, a Norwegian child-safety organisation, reported on 23 September 2026 that one of its staff members was suddenly told by ChatGPT that their account was now in teen mode. ChatGPT's own pages, as described by Barnevakten, say the system turns the filter on when a user's behaviour indicates an age under 18, reducing sensitive or potentially harmful content (graphic violence, viral challenges, sexual or violent role-play, extreme beauty ideals) and offering parental controls and a study mode. Because there is no age check at sign-up, the system estimates age afterwards from conversation topics and times of use, and Barnevakten notes that such guesses can be wrong. An adult who wants out of teen mode can go through an age check run by the company Persona, which depending on the country asks for a real-time selfie and a government ID; Barnevakten questions whether that process is privacy-safe (Persona's terms mention retention of up to three years) and advises using only age checks one trusts. The account's own experience is limited to the unexpected switch and the verification route; no further consequence is described.","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-09-23","aiSystem":"ChatGPT: behaviour-based age estimation and teen-mode content restrictions; age verification through Persona","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["other_material_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"An adult's ChatGPT account was placed in a restricted teen mode by an automated age estimate the account holder had not asked for, and the described route back to full access was an identity check with a third-party verifier which, depending on the country, asks for a real-time selfie and a government ID, whose data-retention terms the organisation considers unclear. The account describes no further consequence.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: 'En av Barnevaktens medarbeidere' (one of Barnevakten's staff members). Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"unknown","platformType":"chatbot","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.barnevakten.no/chatgpt-skrudde-pa-tenaringsfilter-for-en-voksen-person/","primarySourceLabel":"Barnevakten, 23 September 2026: Chatgpt skrudde på tenåringsfilter for en voksen person","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-24T03:50:32.226789+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:47.10961+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["chatgpt","age-verification","teen-mode","norway","automated-decision","privacy","persona"]}]}