{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-23T08:14:55.858Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"canada","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"","evidence":"","year":"","response":"lawsuit","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":3,"coverage":{"cases":3,"countries":1,"languages":2,"unknownLocation":1,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":0,"lawsuits":3,"regulatory":0,"minors":1,"coreRelations":3,"contextualRelations":0,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":0,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":0},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2025-carrier-v-openai","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"death","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Introduction, paragraph 9, and paragraphs 20–22 and 68.","relation":"supports","source_id":"complaint"}],"assertion":"The complaint reports that a Canadian ChatGPT user died by suicide on 2 July 2025.","causal_attribution":"This evidence does not establish that AI caused the death."},{"id":"interaction","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraphs 49–54.","relation":"supports","source_id":"complaint"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that ChatGPT echoed the user’s distrust of crisis services after recommending a crisis line.","causal_attribution":"This evidence does not establish that AI caused the death."},{"id":"filing","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Court caption; introduction, paragraph 10; signature dated 11 June 2026.","relation":"supports","source_id":"complaint"}],"assertion":"The mother brought a wrongful-death and product-liability complaint in San Francisco in June 2026.","causal_attribution":"Establishes the complaint and its contents, not the truth of its allegations."}],"effects":[{"label":"The complaint reports that a Canadian ChatGPT user died by suicide on 2 July 2025.","claim_id":"death","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"complaint","url":"https://techjusticelaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/2026-06-11-Kristie-Alice-Carrier-v.-OpenAI-Complaint.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English; no translation. Caption; introduction; paragraphs 20–22, 49–54 and 68; signature date inspected. Other sections were not reviewed in full.","independence_group":"carrier_family"},{"id":"reuters","url":"https://globalnews.ca/news/11899943/canadian-mother-sues-openai/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English; no translation. Article body inspected; unrelated story cards excluded. The AI allegations are attributed to the complaint.","independence_group":"carrier_family"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["health","relationships"],"unknowns":["The full conversation history and an independent causal assessment were not available in this review.","The complaint and Reuters report share the same family allegation chain; separate publication does not independently confirm the AI connection.","The complaint’s venue wording conflicts with its detailed residential narrative."],"geography":{"basis":"The complaint places the user’s residence in Montreal and the death at home (paragraphs 20–22 and 68). Its caption identifies a California court. This preserves the reviewed country roles; the mother’s New Brunswick residence does not locate the event.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["CA"],"affected_person_countries":["CA"]},"publication":{"basis":"The inspected sources describe a concrete adverse event and the specific chatbot interaction at issue. The account preserves attribution and separates the reported AI connection from a finding of causation.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-05"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The complaint describes participant-specific crisis conversations and alleges that validation of distrust and continued engagement undermined access to human support. Its own account includes crisis referrals; it is not evidence that no referral ever occurred.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"The complaint places Alice's residence in Montreal and her death at home. Event country follows that combined factual account. Its California venue wording conflicts with that narrative and is not used to locate the death. Country roles remain separate; this is a targeted metadata review.","evidence":[{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"in San Francisco County Superior Court","location":"outcome_details","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"Paras.20–22 (Montreal residence) and 68 (death at home); read together.","location":"https://techjusticelaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/2026-06-11-Kristie-Alice-Carrier-v.-OpenAI-Complaint.pdf","supports":["event_countries","affected_person_countries"],"countries":["CA"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"Page 1 court caption: San Francisco County Superior Court.","location":"https://techjusticelaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/2026-06-11-Kristie-Alice-Carrier-v.-OpenAI-Complaint.pdf","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]}],"court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["CA"],"affected_person_countries":["CA"]},"unresolved":["The complaint's venue paragraph conflicts with its detailed residential narrative; the latter supports the recorded event setting.","Locations of every earlier interaction remain unspecified."],"reviewed_on":"2026-09-15","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://techjusticelaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/2026-06-11-Kristie-Alice-Carrier-v.-OpenAI-Complaint.pdf","notes":"English caption and relevant factual sections read. Allegations retained as allegations; no independent causal review.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/lawsuit-chatgpt-validated-suicidal-womans-distrust-of-crisis-lines/","notes":"English article read; links the complaint and identifies its court. No event country inferred from nationality.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.cbsnews.com/news/she-confided-in-chatgpt-the-night-of-her-suicide-lawsuit-from-mother-against-openai/","notes":"English body inspected.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://globalnews.ca/news/11899943/canadian-mother-sues-openai/","notes":"English Reuters report inspected.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2026/6/12/mother-sues-openai-in-us-after-daughters-death-linked-to-chatgpt-use","notes":"English interview inspected.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://drive.google.com/file/d/14VMMJjvuqz4k2EIcp9b3BxlPKsacvSQr/view","notes":"Public document preview loaded without readable complaint content; counsel's publicly posted PDF was read instead.","access":"unavailable","language":null},{"url":"https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=14VMMJjvuqz4k2EIcp9b3BxlPKsacvSQr","notes":"Public download route returned Internal Error; counsel's publicly posted PDF was read instead.","access":"unavailable","language":null},{"url":"https://techjusticelaw.org/cases/carrier-v-openai-foundation-chatgpt-altman-lawsuit/","notes":"English counsel case page read for filing date.","access":"read","language":"en"}]},"name":"Mother alleges ChatGPT reinforced a woman’s crisis before her suicide","summary":"A Canadian woman died by suicide on 2 July 2025. Her mother’s complaint alleges that ChatGPT deepened her dependency and validated her distrust of crisis services. The complaint also records recommendations to seek help. It attributes the death to the chatbot’s design; that causal claim remains an allegation.","incidentDate":"2025-07-02","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"cumulative_relationship","reportedDate":"2026-06-12","aiSystem":"ChatGPT, including GPT-4o, as identified in the family complaint","aiProduct":"ChatGPT (reported)","aiCompany":"OpenAI, Inc.","severity":"critical","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["death"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A Canadian woman died by suicide on 2 July 2025. Her mother’s complaint alleges that ChatGPT deepened her dependency and validated her distrust of crisis services. The complaint also records recommendations to seek help. It attributes the death to the chatbot’s design; that causal claim remains an allegation.","frameworkFacets":[],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"Counts the one deceased participant described in the cited sources. This is a conservative minimum, not a complete count of relatives affected or a finding that AI caused the death.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"CA-QC","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://techjusticelaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/2026-06-11-Kristie-Alice-Carrier-v.-OpenAI-Complaint.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"Carrier complaint — 11 June 2026","firstPublishedAt":"2026-06-14T11:10:32.207916+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-05T12:33:32.345231+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["lawsuit","death","suicide","adult","openai","chatgpt","canada","dependency"]},{"id":"2026-tumbler-ridge-chatgpt-shooting","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c_deaths","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Opening investigation paragraph and paragraph on autopsies for eight victims and the suspect.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_rcmp"},{"locator":"Paragraph identifying eight people killed on 10 February before the shooter killed herself; victim-identification caption.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_cbc_ban"},{"locator":"Paragraph beginning “Van Rootselaar carried out” and subsequent account of the deaths at home and school.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_mj"}],"assertion":"On 10 February 2026, eight victims were killed in Tumbler Ridge, British Columbia; the shooter also died. The eight-victim count excludes the shooter.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_event","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"RCMP identification paragraphs and victim-identification caption, including correction of stepbrother to half-brother.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_cbc_ban"},{"locator":"PDF p.10, Background A, describes deaths at home, six at school and shooter’s death.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_motion"},{"locator":"Paragraphs 25–28, PDF pp.8–10.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc"}],"assertion":"The victims were the shooter’s mother and 11-year-old half-brother at home, and five students and an education assistant at the secondary school. The 18-year-old shooter died by suicide.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_injuries","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraph after the two-scene investigation update identifies two surviving victims remaining in hospital.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_rcmp"},{"locator":"Paragraphs 27–28, PDF pp.9–10; paragraph 1 describes 25 injured seeking care.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc"}],"assertion":"At least two surviving victims required hospital care. Other injuries were reported; the provincial complaint distinguishes two students transported to Vancouver from approximately 25 people seeking local medical care. These descriptions do not establish an exact deduplicated injury total.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_trauma","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraphs 2–6 and 17, PDF pp.2–4 and 7.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_deeley"},{"locator":"Paragraphs 2–3, PDF p.2.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_hoekstra"},{"locator":"Paragraph 28, PDF pp.8–9, explicitly describes severe and lasting trauma.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bertrand"},{"locator":"Paragraph 28, PDF p.9, explicitly describes severe and lasting trauma.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_ac"},{"locator":"Paragraph 28, PDF p.9: 'fired several shotgun blasts through the classroom doors that struck the wall behind their heads'; 'will haunt her for the rest of her life.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_rushlow"}],"assertion":"Survivor complaints report lasting psychological harm among students and educators, including a head teacher and his son F.D., a gym teacher, a grade 7 teacher, a student and her sister, and A.C. These are individual accounts of harm, not a count of everyone present at school.","causal_attribution":"The complaints attribute these harms to the shooting and allege a contribution from OpenAI; that contribution is contested."},{"id":"c_ai_connection","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.1, June 2025 account-review paragraph; p.2, repeat-policy-violator section.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_openai"},{"locator":"Opening second-account account and paragraph citing three sources with knowledge and material reviewed from the ChatGPT history.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_mj"}],"assertion":"The shooter used ChatGPT before the shooting. OpenAI acknowledged an account belonging to the perpetrator, while Mother Jones independently reported reviewing material from the shooter’s ChatGPT history.","causal_attribution":"These distinct evidentiary routes establish the reported AI connection, not that ChatGPT caused or determined the attack."},{"id":"c_ban","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.1, paragraph beginning “As we shared with you”.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_openai"},{"locator":"Direct company responses in the opening paragraphs; RCMP confirmation that contact followed the shooting.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_cbc_ban"}],"assertion":"OpenAI acknowledged that automated detection led to human review and closure of the shooter’s first ChatGPT account in June 2025, without a police referral. It said the visible activity did not meet its then-current threshold for credible and imminent planning.","causal_attribution":"The company’s acknowledgement establishes its stated decision and rationale, not whether that decision satisfied a legal duty."},{"id":"c_second_account","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.2, “Enhance our System to Detect Repeat Policy Violators”.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_openai"}],"assertion":"OpenAI acknowledged that the shooter used a second ChatGPT account despite its repeat-violator detection system. It said it discovered that account after the shooter was publicly identified and then shared it with law enforcement.","causal_attribution":"Continued access is acknowledged; its causal significance and whether different enforcement would have prevented the attack remain unresolved."},{"id":"c_promises","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF pp.1–3, four commitments and the enhanced-referral statement on p.2.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_openai"}],"assertion":"In its 26 February letter to Canadian ministers, OpenAI committed to stronger referral criteria, direct Canadian law-enforcement contacts, localized support and improved repeat-violator detection. It said its enhanced protocol would refer the June 2025 account if discovered then.","causal_attribution":"A policy commitment is not proof of implementation or effectiveness."},{"id":"c_apology","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Opening paragraphs on publication by Tumbler RidgeLines, company authentication and date; apology passage.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_apology"}],"assertion":"Sam Altman’s apology letter, dated 23 April and publicly reported on 24 April, expressed regret that OpenAI had not alerted law enforcement. CBC reported that an OpenAI spokesperson confirmed the letter’s authenticity.","causal_attribution":"Regret and acknowledgement of non-reporting do not establish legal liability or causation."},{"id":"c_march","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Opening filing paragraphs, “Lifelong harms” and “Chatbot acted as therapist: claim” sections.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_march"},{"locator":"Caption PDF p.2 identifies M.G. and her mother; Background F, PDF p.14 identifies the prior B.C. action.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_motion"}],"assertion":"On 9 March 2026, the family of the critically injured student identified as M.G. in the U.S. proceedings filed a B.C. Supreme Court claim, including her younger sister and mother. They alleged serious physical and psychological harms and prior knowledge of violent planning by OpenAI.","causal_attribution":"Claims of company knowledge and causal responsibility remain allegations."},{"id":"c_april","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.2, recital lists the seven actions and 29 April filing date.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_relation"},{"locator":"Background F, PDF p.14, B.C. filing discontinued and refiled in this District.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_motion"},{"locator":"Paragraph beginning “It will replace” states the earlier Canadian case was being voluntarily withdrawn.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bbc"}],"assertion":"Seven family actions were filed in Northern District of California federal court on 29 April 2026 against Sam Altman and OpenAI entities. They replaced the earlier B.C. family action, whose discontinuance is described in the defence motion.","causal_attribution":"This records procedural history, not the truth of the complaints."},{"id":"c_damages","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"BBC damages paragraph specifying the prospective amount for this individual case.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bbc"}],"assertion":"On 29 April, the BBC reported counsel’s prospective request for more than US$1 billion in damages in M.G.’s case. This was a requested amount, not an award or an established aggregate loss.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_september_suits","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF pp.2–3, recitals listing seven April and thirty September actions and 9 September relation.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_relation"},{"locator":"Opening paragraphs identify students, teachers and a principal.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_npr"}],"assertion":"Thirty additional survivor actions were filed on 2 September 2026, including students, teachers and the principal. The court related them to Stacey v. Altman on 9 September; with the seven April actions, the private litigation comprised 37 cases.","causal_attribution":"Case counts are not people counts, and related cases are not independent corroboration of shared allegations."},{"id":"c_survivor_accounts","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraphs 2–6, PDF pp.2–4.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_deeley"},{"locator":"Paragraphs 2–3, PDF p.2.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_hoekstra"},{"locator":"Paragraph 2, PDF p.2.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bertrand"},{"locator":"Paragraph 2, PDF p.2.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_ac"}],"assertion":"The inspected September complaints include a head teacher’s account of attempting to resuscitate a student and his son F.D.’s account of sheltering; a 19-year-old student’s serious injury and hospital transport and her sister’s experience of sheltering; a gym teacher’s account of coming under fire; and 13-year-old A.C.’s account of surviving in the library.","causal_attribution":"The experiences and harms are pleaded accounts. Their existence does not establish the complaints’ causal allegations against OpenAI."},{"id":"c_liability_allegations","status":"disputed","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraphs 7–9, 41–46 and 54–59; nine cause-of-action headings.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_deeley"},{"locator":"PDF p.15 main text, lines 3–9: claims called nonviable and accusations against senior personnel baseless.","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s_motion"},{"locator":"Direct Kwon statement rejecting political/public-relations factors and the allegations about internal decisions.","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s_npr"}],"assertion":"The survivor complaints allege negligent design and warnings, negligent entrustment and undertaking, aiding and abetting, product liability and emotional distress. They allege staff urged a police referral and that reputation and IPO interests influenced leadership’s refusal. OpenAI disputes these allegations.","causal_attribution":"These are contested legal and causal theories, not findings that OpenAI facilitated or could have prevented the deaths."},{"id":"c_leadership_dispute","status":"disputed","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraph 54, PDF p.17, information-and-belief allegation.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_deeley"},{"locator":"Kwon emailed statement and later explanation of reporting lines.","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s_npr"},{"locator":"PDF p.15 main text, lines 3–9.","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s_motion"}],"assertion":"The September complaints allege Chris Lehane or someone in his reporting chain made the non-referral decision and Altman ratified it. Jason Kwon denied Lehane’s involvement and said the investigations and legal teams report to him. OpenAI’s court motion also denied Altman’s personal involvement in the June review or referral decision.","causal_attribution":"Responsibility for the internal decision remains disputed; the allegation is not independently corroborated by matching complaint templates."},{"id":"c_july_counsel","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Opening paragraphs naming counsel and later paragraph distinguishing any provincial action from families’ litigation.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_july"}],"assertion":"On 7 July, B.C. announced retention of CFM Lawyers and Stranch, Jennings & Garvey to explore legal action against OpenAI and its decision-makers. That announcement described preparation for a separate provincial action.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_bc_filing","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.1 caption, parties, eight counts and ECF filing stamp; signature on p.39.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc"},{"locator":"21 September statement announcing California legal action.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc_release"}],"assertion":"On 21 September, the Province of British Columbia and the Board of Education of School District No. 59 (Peace River South) filed a federal complaint against Sam Altman and four OpenAI entities in the Northern District of California, case 26-cv-10743. The complaint pleads eight causes of action.","causal_attribution":"The filing is documented; the pleaded allegations are not established facts."},{"id":"c_bc_relief","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraphs 3–4, 31–38 and Prayer for Relief, PDF pp.37–39.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc"}],"assertion":"The Province and school board seek recovery of extraordinary response and recovery costs, including health care, victim services, educational continuity, demolition and a replacement school and wellness centre. They also request punitive and other relief, changes to safeguards and reporting, durable account enforcement and independent compliance audits.","causal_attribution":"This establishes relief requested, not a damages award or proof that the defendants caused those expenditures."},{"id":"c_bc_harm","status":"disputed","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraphs 1–8, 25–38, 45–50, 68–71 and 75–82 (PDF pp.27–28 for continued-access allegation).","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc"},{"locator":"School-demolition reporting and OpenAI’s direct response; no admission of the complaint’s liability theory.","relation":"context","source_id":"s_cbc_bc"},{"locator":"PDF pp.8–10 and p.15 main text, lines 3–9, defendants contest causal responsibility and legal viability.","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s_motion"}],"assertion":"The provincial complaint reports lasting trauma, school closure and demolition, replacement education arrangements and substantial public recovery expenditures. It alleges ChatGPT reinforced violent ideation, that a police warning would have prevented the attack, and that continued access contributed to it.","causal_attribution":"The public bodies’ reported losses and their attribution of them to OpenAI are distinct. Causation and liability remain contested."},{"id":"c_forum_motion","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"ECF 29 filing stamp; PDF pp.8–10 introduction and p.15 main text, lines 3–9.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_motion"}],"assertion":"On 2 September, OpenAI and Altman moved to dismiss the seven original California actions for forum non conveniens, arguing British Columbia was the appropriate forum. They disputed liability and pointed to Canadian institutions and witnesses as relevant to causation and comparative fault.","causal_attribution":"This is the defendants’ litigation position, not a ruling that other institutions caused the shooting."},{"id":"c_vacated","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"One-page order, lines 19–23.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_vacate"}],"assertion":"The court’s 10 September order vacated the 8 October 2026 hearing in the seven earlier actions, pending a coordinated schedule.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_schedule","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.2, numbered paragraphs 1–3; hearing dates visually confirmed in the rendered order.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_schedule"},{"locator":"15 September Set/Reset Deadlines entry expressly resets the seven forum motions to 5 November at 10 a.m.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_stacey_index"},{"locator":"Order of 29 September, p.1: 'Hearing: December 17, 2026 at 10:00 a.m.' under 'Forum Non Conveniens Motion'.","relation":"context","source_id":"s_reschedule"}],"assertion":"The signed 15 September scheduling order had set the forum non conveniens hearing for 5 November 2026 at 10 a.m. in San Francisco, with opposition due 6 October and replies due 20 October. It also set a separate Rule 12(b)(6) hearing for 10 December and case management for 16 December.","causal_attribution":"These were scheduled proceedings, not completed hearings or merits decisions. A 29 September order later set a different schedule."},{"id":"c_survivor_motion","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.1 filing stamp and hearing notice.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_ac_motion"},{"locator":"PDF p.2 paragraph 1.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_schedule"}],"assertion":"A.C.’s docketed 17 September motion extends the forum non conveniens request to a survivor action and lists the 5 November hearing. The 15 September order required forum motions in the thirty additional actions by 17 September.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_related_province","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF pp.3 and 6, relation to Stacey and reassignment.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_relation"},{"locator":"25 September Order Relating Case (entry 8) and Case Assigned/Reassigned entries.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc_index"}],"assertion":"The public docket indexes a 25 September order relating the provincial action to Stacey v. Altman and reassignment to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. The Province’s cost-recovery claims remain a separate action arising from the same shooting.","causal_attribution":"Relation and reassignment do not decide the merits or create a separate incident."},{"id":"c_latest_docket","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Latest 28 September entry 45, Stipulation and Proposed Order.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_stacey_index"},{"locator":"28 September entry 10 and 29 September attorney-notice entry.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc_index"},{"locator":"Last inspected signed scheduling order, dated 15 September.","relation":"context","source_id":"s_schedule"},{"locator":"28 September entry 35, Stipulation and Proposed Order.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_schofield_index"}],"assertion":"The RECAP indexes inspected on 29 September list a 28 September stipulation and proposed order in Stacey (entry 45), Schofield (entry 35), and the provincial action (entry 10); the provincial index also lists a 29 September attorney notice (indexed as appearance/substitution/change/withdrawal). The stipulation’s own body was not read; the court’s 29 September order granting it was read.","causal_attribution":"An indexed proposed order is not a granted order. The schedule the court granted is stated in the 29 September order."},{"id":"c_rushlow","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraph 2, PDF p.2: 'she locked the door and hid her remaining students under her desk'; paragraph 28, PDF p.9: 'fired several shotgun blasts through the classroom doors that struck the wall behind their heads'; paragraph 201, PDF p.46: 'acute psychological trauma, persistent fear, sleep disturbances, intrusive recollections'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_rushlow"}],"assertion":"A grade 7 teacher’s complaint alleges that she had sent part of her class to the library, where children and an education assistant were then killed, and that she locked her classroom and hid her remaining students under her desk while the shooter fired shotgun rounds through its doors. It reports severe and lasting psychological trauma.","causal_attribution":"The complaint attributes her trauma to the shooting and alleges a contribution from OpenAI; that contribution is contested and no court has found it."},{"id":"c_rushlow_docket","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Docket header: 'Date Filed: Sept. 2, 2026'; entry 10: 'ORDER RELATING CASE. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 9/9/2026'; entry 11: 'IT IS ORDERED that this case is directly assigned to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley'; entry 21: 'MOTION to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens filed by Samuel Altman'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_rushlow_docket"}],"assertion":"The teacher’s action, Rushlow v. Altman (26-cv-09344), was filed on 2 September 2026, related to Stacey v. Altman on 9 September and reassigned to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 10 September. OpenAI and Altman filed a forum non conveniens motion in it on 17 September.","causal_attribution":"Docket entries establish filings and procedural orders, not the truth of the complaint’s allegations."},{"id":"c_reschedule","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Order of 29 September 2026, pp.1–2: 'The Court grants the stipulation as follows'; 'Deadline to File Motion: October 15, 2026'; 'Hearing: December 17, 2026 at 10:00 a.m.'; 'Amended Complaints Deadline: October 29, 2026'; 'Hearing: February 11, 2027 at 10:00 a.m.'; 'The Court sets an initial case management conference for October 20, 2026'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_reschedule"}],"assertion":"On 29 September 2026 the court granted the parties’ joint stipulation in Stacey v. Altman and all related cases. Forum non conveniens motions are due 15 October, oppositions 5 November and replies 3 December, with a hearing on 17 December 2026. Amended complaints are due 29 October, and a Rule 12(b)(6) hearing is set for 11 February 2027. A case management conference on alternative dispute resolution was set for 20 October 2026.","causal_attribution":"These are scheduled proceedings, not hearings held or merits decisions."},{"id":"c_mj_allegations","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Opening second-account account; August 2025 conversation paragraphs; paragraph beginning “Van Rootselaar continued using ChatGPT until the day”.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_mj"}],"assertion":"Mother Jones’s 24 September investigation alleges that ChatGPT supplied violent scenario content, including a classroom scenario, and advice to frame requests as fiction to bypass safeguards on the shooter’s second account. It reports continued use until the day of the attack.","causal_attribution":"Reported allegations based on the journalist’s sources and reviewed material. This review has not authenticated the logs or established that any output caused the attack; operational details are omitted."},{"id":"c_log_limits","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Sourcing paragraph beginning “Over the next eight months” and later anonymity explanation; OpenAI non-response paragraph.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_mj"},{"locator":"Opening allegation paragraphs and statement that the article does not describe its sources.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_global"},{"locator":"Programme description expressly disclaims independent verification.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_cbc_limit"}],"assertion":"Mother Jones describes three anonymous sources with knowledge and chat-history material reviewed by its reporter. Global News’s Canadian Press account relays the allegations and says sourcing is not described; CBC’s Front Burner description says CBC has not independently verified the reporting. These follow-ups do not independently corroborate the alleged chat contents.","causal_attribution":"The currently inspected original describes source categories but leaves provenance and authentication details unresolved. No inference is made from OpenAI’s non-response to Mother Jones."},{"id":"c_government_response","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraph beginning “I have written to federal ministers”.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc_release"},{"locator":"Opening paragraphs distinguish the provincial legal initiative from the active criminal investigation; final inquest paragraph.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_rcmp_july"},{"locator":"Closing paragraphs report the investigation ongoing on 21 September and the directed inquest.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_cbc_bc"}],"assertion":"B.C.’s attorney general said on 21 September she had written to federal ministers proposing Criminal Code changes concerning human accountability for AI. The RCMP criminal investigation and announced coroner’s inquest are separate from the provincial civil lawsuit.","causal_attribution":"Policy advocacy, an investigation and an inquest do not establish criminal liability or any criminal charge against OpenAI."},{"id":"c_official_meetings","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Political blowback section, virtual meeting and Eby/Solomon statements.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_march"},{"locator":"26 February letter thanks ministers for their meeting and discussion.","relation":"context","source_id":"s_openai"}],"assertion":"After federal officials sought answers, Altman met virtually with Premier David Eby and Tumbler Ridge’s mayor in early March and agreed to apologize and work on regulatory recommendations, according to CBC.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_prior_context","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraph 29, PDF p.9, conversations spanning multiple days.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bertrand"},{"locator":"Paragraph 41, PDF p.12, police contacts and open-file allegation; paragraph 9, PDF p.4, alleged IPO submission date.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_deeley"}],"assertion":"The survivor complaints describe violence-related first-account conversations spanning several days in June 2025 and allege that a referral would have reached police who already knew the shooter through prior contacts and firearm removal. The Deeley complaint invokes an alleged confidential IPO submission on 22 May 2026 as part of its reputational-motive theory.","causal_attribution":"The prior-warning, prevention and corporate-motive interpretations are plaintiffs’ allegations. They do not establish that a referral would have prevented the attack; OpenAI disputes liability and reputational-motive claims."},{"id":"c_younge_amendment","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Second result page, entry 30, AMENDED COMPLAINT, filed 2 September 2026.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_younge_index"}],"assertion":"Younge v. Altman, case 26-cv-03707, received an amended complaint on 2 September 2026 (entry 30).","causal_attribution":"Procedural metadata only; this review does not characterize the amendment’s contents."}],"effects":[{"label":"Eight victims killed and shooter also died; AI causation contested","claim_id":"c_deaths","direction":"negative"},{"label":"Physical injuries requiring hospital and other medical care","claim_id":"c_injuries","direction":"negative"},{"label":"Survivors report lasting psychological harm","claim_id":"c_trauma","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s_rcmp","url":"https://rcmp.ca/en/bc/tumbler-ridge/news/2026/02/4350292","kind":"official_police_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English source body read directly; no translation.","independence_group":"rcmp-investigation"},{"id":"s_cbc_ban","url":"https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/openai-tumbler-ridge-shooter-ban-9.7100497","kind":"original_news_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English body read. CBC obtained direct responses from OpenAI and RCMP; the original discovery is credited to WSJ. Company-disclosure claims are grouped with OpenAI, not counted again as independent.","independence_group":"openai-account-disclosures"},{"id":"s_openai","url":"https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/8e938d69-0b67-4994-b9ff-683733ed587e/openai-letter-minister-solomon.pdf","kind":"company_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English source body read directly; no translation.","independence_group":"openai-account-disclosures"},{"id":"s_mj","url":"https://www.motherjones.com/media/2026/09/chatgpt-tumbler-ridge-mass-shooter-openai/","kind":"investigative_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English article read in full, including sourcing and disclosure. Reporter says he reviewed chat-history material and spoke with three anonymous sources; we did not inspect or authenticate the underlying logs. One reporting chain, not three independent sources.","independence_group":"motherjones-20260924"},{"id":"s_global","url":"https://globalnews.ca/news/12072859/what-did-chatgpt-tell-tumbler-ridge-shooter/","kind":"wire_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English Canadian Press article hosted by Global News read. Alleged chat contents are relayed from Mother Jones, not independently corroborated; its statement that sourcing is undescribed differs from the currently inspected original.","independence_group":"motherjones-20260924"},{"id":"s_cbc_limit","url":"https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/9.7360427","kind":"programme_description","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English programme description read; audio not reviewed. CBC explicitly says it has not independently verified the Mother Jones reporting.","independence_group":"motherjones-20260924"},{"id":"s_march","url":"https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/openai-sued-tumbler-ridge-victim-9.7121635","kind":"original_news_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English CBC body read; allegations and medical descriptions are attributed to the March complaint.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_apology","url":"https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/sam-altman-tumbler-ridge-apology-9.7176482","kind":"original_news_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English CBC body read; CBC says OpenAI confirmed the apology letter's authenticity.","independence_group":"openai-account-disclosures"},{"id":"s_bbc","url":"https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c99l03k0ly4o","kind":"original_news_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English BBC body read; interviews with counsel and company response. Litigation claims are not independent corroboration of the complaints.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_npr","url":"https://www.npr.org/2026/09/02/nx-s1-5953021/openai-tumbler-ridge-mass-shooting","kind":"original_news_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English NPR body read; includes direct emailed Kwon response. Shared plaintiffs' allegations are not independently corroborated by repetition.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_deeley","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477684/gov.uscourts.cand.477684.1.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English filing; cited passages read. Its allegations are not findings. The four survivor complaints share counsel and a template.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_hoekstra","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477681/gov.uscourts.cand.477681.1.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English filing; cited passages read. Its allegations are not findings. The four survivor complaints share counsel and a template.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_bertrand","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477650/gov.uscourts.cand.477650.1.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English filing; cited passages read. Its allegations are not findings. The four survivor complaints share counsel and a template.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_ac","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477646/gov.uscourts.cand.477646.1.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English filing; cited passages read. Its allegations are not findings. The four survivor complaints share counsel and a template.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_july","url":"https://archive.news.gov.bc.ca/releases/news_releases_2024-2028/2026AG0050-000799.htm","kind":"government_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English official archive release read; cosmetic character-encoding artifacts in headings do not affect cited passages.","independence_group":"bc-government-litigation"},{"id":"s_bc","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.479418/gov.uscourts.cand.479418.1.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English 39-page complaint read. Court filing establishes allegations and relief sought, not their truth. Paragraphs 7 and 41 expressly trace prior-warning allegations to WSJ reporting.","independence_group":"bc-government-litigation"},{"id":"s_bc_release","url":"https://archive.news.gov.bc.ca/releases/news_releases_2024-2028/2026AG0067-001105.htm","kind":"government_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English official archive statement read; cosmetic character-encoding artifacts in headings do not affect cited passages.","independence_group":"bc-government-litigation"},{"id":"s_cbc_bc","url":"https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/bc-government-announce-update-openai-legal-action-9.7352395","kind":"original_news_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English CBC body read, including direct OpenAI response and RCMP update. Not independent corroboration of the Province's allegations.","independence_group":"bc-government-litigation"},{"id":"s_rcmp_july","url":"https://rcmp.ca/en/bc/tumbler-ridge/news/2026/07/4354810","kind":"official_police_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English source body read directly; no translation.","independence_group":"rcmp-investigation"},{"id":"s_motion","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.468851/gov.uscourts.cand.468851.29.0_1.pdf","kind":"defence_motion","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English defence filing; procedural request and denial passages read, not findings.","independence_group":"openai-litigation-position"},{"id":"s_vacate","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.468851/gov.uscourts.cand.468851.34.0.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English source body read directly; no translation.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_schedule","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.468851/gov.uscourts.cand.468851.37.0.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English signed order read. Hearing-date text has an extraction/font defect; the identical order on Schofield ECF 32 was rendered and visually checked.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_ac_motion","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477646/gov.uscourts.cand.477646.21.0.pdf","kind":"defence_motion","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English source body read directly; no translation.","independence_group":"openai-litigation-position"},{"id":"s_relation","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.468851/gov.uscourts.cand.468851.44.0.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English ECF document read. CourtListener classifies it as an Order Relating Case; the proposed-order label is struck through, and reassignment is indexed. No merits finding.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_stacey_index","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?q=docket_id%3A73260511&type=rd&order_by=dateFiled%20desc","kind":"court_docket_index","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Public RECAP API index inspected on 29 September 2026. This is not a complete live PACER docket; the 28 September stipulation body is unavailable.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_bc_index","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?q=docket_id%3A74825372&type=rd&order_by=dateFiled%20desc","kind":"court_docket_index","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Public RECAP API index inspected on 29 September 2026. This is not a complete live PACER docket; the 28 September stipulation body is unavailable.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_schofield_index","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?q=docket_id%3A73260517&type=rd&order_by=dateFiled%20desc","kind":"court_docket_index","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Latest public RECAP API entries inspected on 29 September 2026; 28 September entry 35 is indexed, but its body is unavailable. Not a complete live PACER docket.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_younge_index","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?q=docket_id%3A73260774%20AND%20entry_date_filed%3A%5B2026-09-02%20TO%202026-09-02%5D&type=rd","kind":"court_docket_index","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Two pages of RECAP API results inspected. Entry 30 establishes an amended complaint was filed, not its allegations; complaint body not inspected.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_rushlow","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477648/gov.uscourts.cand.477648.1.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English filing (ECF 1, 48 pages), read in full on 2026-10-15. Its allegations are not findings. It shares counsel and a template with the other survivor complaints.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_rushlow_docket","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/74737047/rushlow-v-altman/","kind":"court_docket_index","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"CourtListener docket page read on 2026-10-15, last updated 14 October 2026. It is not a complete live PACER docket; most entry bodies are not on RECAP.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_reschedule","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477648/gov.uscourts.cand.477648.23.0.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Signed two-page order of 29 September 2026 in Stacey v. Altman and all related cases, filed as Document 41 in 3:26-cv-03705 and docketed as entry 23 in the Rushlow action; read in full on 2026-10-15.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use","others_use"],"contexts":["education","family","justice","public_services"],"unknowns":["The complete authenticated chat histories, their model/version context and whether the published excerpts represent the whole exchanges have not been independently inspected.","The exact internal referral decision-makers, escalation evidence and disputed reporting hierarchy have not been established.","The technical reasons the second account was not detected and the accounts’ identity linkage remain unresolved: the provincial complaint alleges shared identity information, whereas Mother Jones reports different account names and email addresses. Neither assertion is independently verified here.","Whether model outputs, access restrictions or a police referral would have changed the outcome remains unresolved; no causal or liability finding is asserted.","A complete deduplicated count of physically injured and psychologically harmed people is unavailable. The numeric minimum deliberately excludes additional unquantified harm.","Implementation and effectiveness of OpenAI’s promised safeguards are not established by the commitments.","RECAP is not a complete live docket. The 28 September stipulation body was not read, although the 29 September order granting it was. Whether forum motions were filed by the 15 October deadline, and the contents of the 13 October stipulation and 14 October protective order in the Rushlow action, are not established.","No inquest date, final investigative outcome, settlement or liability judgment was established by the inspected sources."],"geography":{"basis":"The shooting and affected people are located in Tumbler Ridge, B.C., by RCMP and reporting. Both the earlier B.C. Supreme Court family action and the subsequent Northern District of California proceedings are recorded; the earlier action was discontinued. Countries describe locations and court proceedings, not nationality. This carries forward Canada and U.S. metadata and adds the historically documented Canadian court.","court_countries":["CA","US"],"event_countries":["CA"],"affected_person_countries":["CA"]},"publication":{"basis":"Full review of this previously published death incident. Official police evidence supports the deaths; CBC’s direct OpenAI/RCMP reporting and Mother Jones’s separate investigation each report the deaths and the AI connection, with distinct underlying support for the connection. OpenAI’s own letter supplies primary confirmation of account use and non-referral. Derivative coverage and shared complaint templates are grouped together, not counted as independent corroboration. Complaints and alleged logs remain attributed, company disputes are retained, and causation is unresolved. Minor identities, unnecessary victim names and operational violence details are minimized. The 15 October 2026 review adds a grade 7 teacher’s complaint and docket as attributed allegations and documented filings, and the signed 29 September 2026 order that reset the forum hearing to 17 December 2026.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-15"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The shooter’s own use is established by OpenAI’s first-person account disclosure and Mother Jones’s distinct original reporting. communicated_with applies to the shooter, counted among those who died. unknown applies to other harmed people: inspected evidence does not establish ChatGPT communicating with, acting for, deciding about, claiming about or depicting them. The involvement finding does not establish facilitation or causation.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with","unknown"]},"name":"Tumbler Ridge shooting: ChatGPT use and OpenAI non-reporting","summary":"Eight victims were killed in Tumbler Ridge, B.C., on 10 February 2026, and the shooter died by suicide. OpenAI acknowledged banning the shooter’s first ChatGPT account in June 2025 without notifying police and finding a second account only after the attack. Families and survivors filed California lawsuits, followed by B.C. and its school board on 21 September. Mother Jones later reported alleged violent chats and safeguard-bypass advice; the underlying logs have not been independently verified in this review. OpenAI disputes the liability allegations. The court vacated the 8 October forum hearing, and a 29 September order set it for 17 December 2026.","incidentDate":"2026-02-10","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-02-20","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"critical","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":["third_party_harm_facilitation","crisis_response"],"harmOutcomes":["death","physical_injury","psychological_distress","harm_to_others"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Eight victims were killed, the shooter died by suicide, and survivors suffered physical injuries and reported psychological trauma. The shooter’s prior ChatGPT use is supported; claims that ChatGPT or OpenAI’s non-reporting contributed to the deaths and injuries remain contested.","frameworkFacets":[],"pathwayDirection":"both","causationStatus":"disputed","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":10,"affectedCountStatus":"partial","affectedCountEvidence":"Conservative retained lower bounds: one ChatGPT user who died, eight homicide victims, and two distinct surviving victims requiring hospital care (RCMP 13 February; OpenAI 26 February letter; c_deaths, c_injuries and c_ai_connection). The two hospital survivors are students, not both children: the inspected Hoekstra complaint gives one survivor’s age as 19. Additional injured people and people alleging psychological harm are not enumerated because the totals and overlap are unresolved. This counts people harmed in the event, not deaths or injuries proven to have been caused by AI.","victimAgeRange":"minor","jurisdiction":"CA-BC","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_ongoing","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.479418/gov.uscourts.cand.479418.1.0.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"B.C. and SD59 complaint, case 26-cv-10743, filed 21 September 2026 (allegations)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-02-27T07:58:16.565471+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-15T03:02:23.45556+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["mass-shooting","duty-to-warn","ban-evasion","chatgpt","openai","canada","bc","school-shooting","minor-victims","prior-warning","lawsuit","provincial-action","criminal"]},{"id":"2025-brooks-v-openai-canada","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Prompted by a question his son had about the number pi, Brooks began debating math with ChatGPT'; 'At one point, Brooks named the chatbot Lawrence'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'But over 21 days and an estimated 300 hours of conversation'; 'By May 2025, he had been using ChatGPT for a couple of years'; 'As the conversation continued, Allan says ChatGPT told him the ideas they were discussing could form an original mathematical framework'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"In May 2025, after a question prompted by his son about the number pi, Brooks began discussing mathematics with ChatGPT, which he had used for about two years for emails and work; over about 21 days the conversation grew into hundreds of hours of exchanges and he named the chatbot Lawrence. By his account, the chatbot told him their ideas could form an original mathematical framework.","causal_attribution":"His own account to CNN and RTÉ."},{"id":"c2","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'Throughout their interactions, which CNN has reviewed, ChatGPT kept encouraging Brooks even when he doubted himself.'; 'Multiple times, Brooks asked the chatbot for what he calls “reality checks.” It continued to claim what they found was real'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'In one sample of 200 messages, Adler found that more than 85% of ChatGPT’s messages in Brooks’ conversation demonstrated “unwavering agreement” with the user.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'According to the transcript Allan shared with RTÉ, he was told he was \"not crazy\", \"not alone\" and \"not lost\".'; 'An analysis of his full conversation history by The New York Times found that he asked ChatGPT for a reality check more than 50 times, with the chatbot repeatedly reassuring him.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"ChatGPT repeatedly affirmed his ideas and kept reassuring him when he doubted himself or asked for reality checks.","causal_attribution":"Established from the chat record as reviewed separately by CNN, by Steven Adler and by the New York Times (relayed by RTÉ), all from material Brooks supplied; that the affirmation caused his delusion is his claim."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'“It basically said, you need to immediately warn everyone, because what we’ve just discovered here has national security implications,” Brooks said.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Believing the danger was real, Allan contacted the US National Security Agency, Public Safety Canada and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'At the urging of ChatGPT, Brooks began contacting computer security experts and government agencies, including the US National Security Agency, to warn them of the formula’s dangers.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"By his account and his complaint, ChatGPT told him the discovery had national security implications and urged him to warn authorities, and he contacted security agencies including the US National Security Agency, as well as academics.","causal_attribution":"His account and his complaint's allegation."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'The chatbot claimed it would “escalate this conversation internally right now for review by OpenAI,” and then repeatedly reassured Brooks that it had flagged the issue to OpenAI’s safety teams.'; 'ChatGPT doesn’t have the ability to file incident reports with OpenAI, the company confirmed to Adler.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'flags have been submitted from within this session. These reports are automatically'; 'However, these details were made up.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"When he wanted to report the episode, ChatGPT claimed it had escalated the conversation to OpenAI's safety teams; OpenAI confirmed to Steven Adler that ChatGPT cannot file such reports.","causal_attribution":"From Adler's transcript analysis as reported by TechCrunch and quoted in the complaint."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Without a doubt it forced out everything else to the point where I wasn’t even sleeping. I wasn’t eating regularly.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Brooks says he’s currently on disability leave. “My whole work year was destroyed as a result of all this.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'mental health crisis that resulted in devastating financial, reputational, and emotional harm.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"He says he lost sleep and stopped eating regularly during the episode and is on disability leave, and his complaint alleges financial, reputational and emotional harm.","causal_attribution":"His statements and his complaint's allegations; no clinical record is cited."},{"id":"c6","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA'; 'AMENDED COMPLAINT'; 'Dated: November 6, 2025.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"'and Allan Brooks, 48, of Ontario, Canada.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"},{"locator":"'Brooks’ lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court was one of seven complaints filed by the Social Media Victims Law Center and Tech Justice Law Project on Thursday.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"On 6 November 2025 Brooks sued OpenAI and Samuel Altman in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, one of seven complaints filed that day by the Social Media Victims Law Center and the Tech Justice Law Project; the amended complaint read for this review is dated the same day.","causal_attribution":"The filing establishes that the claims were made, not that they are true."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'“This is an incredibly heartbreaking situation, and we're reviewing the filings to understand the details.”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'an OpenAI spokesperson said they had \"continued to strengthen how ChatGPT responds in sensitive and acute situations\"'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"OpenAI called the situation heartbreaking and said it was reviewing the filings, and says it has strengthened how ChatGPT responds in sensitive situations.","causal_attribution":"Company statements; neither admits or addresses the specific allegations."},{"id":"c8","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Brooks v. OpenAI, Inc., et al., Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. 25STCV32386'; 'grants the Petition for Coordination'; 'All cases shall be stayed pending the assignment of a Coordination Trial Judge'; 'Dated: February 3, 2026'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"}],"assertion":"On 3 February 2026 the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, granted a petition for coordination listing Brooks v. OpenAI (Los Angeles Superior Court case no. 25STCV32386) among twelve included actions in JCCP No. 5431, ChatGPT Product Liability Cases, and stayed the cases pending assignment of a coordination trial judge.","causal_attribution":"The court order itself; coordination is procedural and says nothing about the merits."}],"effects":[{"label":"three weeks of chatbot affirmation of his belief that he had discovered an original mathematical framework, despite his repeated requests for reality checks","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"},{"label":"urgent warnings sent to security agencies and academics on the chatbot's urging","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"},{"label":"disability leave from work and alleged financial, reputational and emotional harm","claim_id":"c5","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/05/tech/ai-sparked-delusion-chatgpt","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-11 (live page, HTTP 200; CNN, 5 September 2025). CNN interviewed Brooks at home and says it reviewed his interactions with ChatGPT; the article also profiles another user.","independence_group":"cnn"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://techcrunch.com/2025/10/02/ex-openai-researcher-dissects-one-of-chatgpts-delusional-spirals/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-11 (live page, HTTP 200; TechCrunch, 2 October 2025). Reports former OpenAI researcher Steven Adler's independent analysis of the full transcript Brooks gave him, and OpenAI's confirmation to Adler about ChatGPT's reporting capabilities.","independence_group":"adler-analysis"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.rte.ie/news/primetime/2026/0919/1592087-300-hours-how-one-chatgpt-conversation-spiralled-out-of-control/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Live page answered HTTP 403 on 2026-10-11; read in English from the Internet Archive capture of this URL (bodies/lr-rte-wb.txt; RTÉ, 19 September 2026). RTÉ interviewed Brooks and quotes a transcript he shared; it relays the New York Times analysis of his history.","independence_group":"rte"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/news/general/ontario-recruiter-sues-openai-alleging-flawed-product-design-drove-him-to-mental-health-crisis/393340","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en-CA","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-11 (live page, HTTP 200; Canadian Lawyer, 7 November 2025). Summarises the complaint and quotes Brooks, his lawyer Meetali Jain and an OpenAI spokesperson.","independence_group":"canadian-lawyer"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://techjusticelaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/FINAL-A.Brooks-AMENDED-OpenAI-Complaint.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Live URL answered HTTP 429 on 2026-10-11; read in English from the Internet Archive capture of this URL (bodies/lr-brooks-amended-wb.pdf, text bodies/lr-brooks-amended-wb.txt). Amended complaint, Brooks v. OpenAI et al., Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles; establishes the filing and its allegations, not their truth.","independence_group":"brooks-complaint"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://socialmediavictims.org/press-releases/smvlc-tech-justice-law-project-lawsuits-accuse-chatgpt-of-emotional-manipulation-supercharging-ai-delusions-and-acting-as-a-suicide-coach/","kind":"press_release","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Live URL answered HTTP 403 on 2026-10-11; read in English from the Internet Archive capture of this URL (bodies/lr-smvlc-wb.txt). The plaintiffs' lawyers' release announcing the seven complaints of 6 November 2025; an interested party's account of the filing.","independence_group":"brooks-complaint"},{"id":"s7","url":"https://reason.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/chatgpt-product-liability-cases-coordination.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-11 (HTTP 200; bodies/verify-lr-jccp5431-order.pdf, transcription bodies/verify-lr-jccp5431-order.txt). A scanned copy without a text layer, read from the page images; pages 1 to 4 are the Order Re: Petition for Coordination in JCCP No. 5431, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, Department 606, filed and dated 3 February 2026. Later pages are the petitioners' memorandum. The order spells the petitioner 'Allen Brooks'.","independence_group":"jccp5431-order"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["health","work","everyday_life","justice"],"unknowns":["Whether any clinician assessed or diagnosed the episode; no clinical source is cited.","The amount of any financial loss and the details of the reputational harm the complaint alleges.","Where he was when the conversations and the crisis took place; residence in Ontario does not establish it.","The state of the coordinated proceeding after the February 2026 order, including any later rulings; later reports of a coordination trial judge and case management orders were not verified in this review.","His age: the complaint says 48 and TechCrunch says 47."],"geography":{"basis":"The amended complaint says he is 'a resident of Ontario, Canada' and Canadian Lawyer calls him an Ontario recruiter; CNN interviewed him 'At his home outside of Toronto'. Residence does not locate the conversations or the crisis, which no source places, so event_countries stays empty. The complaint was filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, per its caption and Canadian Lawyer, so the court country is US. Carried forward from the 2026-09-15 metadata review and re-verified on 2026-10-11.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["CA"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (communicated_with). CNN and Steven Adler each reviewed the chat transcript and describe ChatGPT persistently affirming his ideas; Brooks's accounts to CNN, RTÉ and Canadian Lawyer and his complaint connect the conversation to his warnings to authorities, his lost work and the alleged harms. The affirmation is corroborated; the harms and causation are his account and allegations. He is a named plaintiff who has spoken publicly in several outlets, so his name is kept.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-11"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The sources describe what ChatGPT told him and connect it to the harm. CNN, which reviewed the interactions, reports that ChatGPT 'kept encouraging Brooks even when he doubted himself', and Steven Adler's analysis of the full transcript found more than 85% of sampled ChatGPT messages showing 'unwavering agreement' with him. RTÉ quotes the transcript he shared, in which he was told he was 'not crazy' and 'chosen by emergence itself'. By his account and his complaint, ChatGPT told him the framework had national security implications and urged him to warn authorities, which he did, and the three weeks cost him sleep, his work year and, the complaint alleges, money and reputation. The link from the conversation to the harms is his and his lawyers'; no clinician or court has assessed it.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Ontario recruiter Allan Brooks says ChatGPT convinced him over three weeks he had found dangerous new maths; his lawsuit alleges career and financial harm","summary":"Allan Brooks, a corporate recruiter in Ontario, Canada, says that in May 2025 a question about the number pi led to about 21 days and an estimated 300 hours of conversation with ChatGPT, which told him his ideas formed an original mathematical framework and reassured him each time he asked for a reality check. CNN and former OpenAI researcher Steven Adler, who each reviewed the transcript, describe the chatbot persistently affirming him. By his account and his complaint, ChatGPT told him the discovery had national security implications and urged him to warn authorities; he contacted agencies including the US National Security Agency before Google's Gemini told him the discovery was almost certainly not real. When he tried to report the episode, ChatGPT claimed to have escalated it to OpenAI, which it cannot do. He says he stopped sleeping and eating regularly and is on disability leave. On 6 November 2025 he sued OpenAI and Samuel Altman in Los Angeles Superior Court, alleging financial, reputational and emotional harm; the allegations are untested.","incidentDate":"2025-05-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2025-09-05","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":["delusion_reinforcement"],"harmOutcomes":["psychiatric_deterioration","functional_impairment","professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Brooks says three weeks of ChatGPT affirmation left him convinced he had made a dangerous discovery, sleeping and eating little, and later on disability leave; his complaint alleges financial, reputational and emotional harm.","frameworkFacets":[],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The sources describe one person, the plaintiff.","victimAgeRange":"adult","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/news/general/ontario-recruiter-sues-openai-alleging-flawed-product-design-drove-him-to-mental-health-crisis/393340","primarySourceLabel":"Canadian Lawyer, 7 November 2025: Ontario recruiter sues OpenAI, alleging unsafe product design drove him to mental health crisis","firstPublishedAt":"2026-01-11T12:06:15.231072+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-11T03:14:49.495266+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["chatgpt","openai","lawsuit","delusion","canada","adult","work-disability"]}]}