{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-23T08:15:26.943Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"california","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"","evidence":"","year":"2026","response":"","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":11,"coverage":{"cases":11,"countries":2,"languages":2,"unknownLocation":0,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":0,"lawsuits":1,"regulatory":1,"minors":1,"coreRelations":8,"contextualRelations":2,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":1,"relationPending":1,"relationUnknown":0},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2026-san-francisco-federal-judge-orders-sworn-explanation-after-lawyer-files-claude-drafted-motion-with-phantom-quotations","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Claude Console, to create an initial draft of the motion. That was a mistake. ... I did not double check the ... quotations and obviously did not read the cited cases carefully ... This was the first time I have ever used an AI platform to create a draft of a brief","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"told Illston in a declaration that he sent the AI-drafted document to an associate for fact-checking.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"In a sworn declaration filed on 15 May 2026, the partner who filed the 6 May motion stated that he used Claude Console to create an initial draft of it, that he did not double-check the quotations, and that this was the first time he had used an AI platform to draft a brief.","causal_attribution":"The partner's own sworn declaration."},{"id":"c2","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"pursuant to the Court’s May 13, 2026 Order, ECF No. 395 ... This declaration is in response to the Court’s instruction that I explain, under oath, ... how three phantom quotations ended up in the Emergency Motion to Quash","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Further, no later than May 15, 2026, counsel for ... shall file a declaration under ... penalty of perjury explaining the fabricated case quotations contained in the motion to quash","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The declarations were filed under the court's 13 May 2026 order, and the partner's declaration responds to the court's instruction that he explain under oath how three phantom quotations ended up in the motion.","causal_attribution":"The court's 13 May order, the firm's notice and the partner's declaration."},{"id":"c3","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"have also personally apologized to the Plaintiffs’ attorneys. ... A redlined version of the filing, ... Those same policies prohibit the use of tools like Claude for legal research ... internal investigation to understand fully how the error occurred ... The internal consequences for this failure are under ... the review and consideration of our principal","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The partner apologised to the court and counsel and filed a redlined corrected version, and the firm's founding partner declared that firm policy prohibits tools like Claude for legal drafting and that the firm opened an internal investigation; the partner declared that the internal consequences of the failure were under review by the firm's principal.","causal_attribution":"Declarations of the partner and the founding partner."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Three lawyers representing an ex-Homeland Security official apologized to a California federal judge ... sprawling lawsuit over the Trump administration’s mass layoffs","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The motion was filed in the lawsuit over the Trump administration's mass layoffs, on behalf of a former Homeland Security official, and three of the firm's lawyers apologised to the judge.","causal_attribution":"Bloomberg Government."},{"id":"c5","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"the Court is troubled by the multiple citations in ... motion to purported case quotations that do not exist in the cases as cited ... Court about these hallucinated quotations at the hearing ... counsel was unaware of them and ... had no explanation for the errors ... cites no authority, apart from a misquoted case regarding the limits of discovery under the ... argument to be frivolous ... the Court hereby DENIES the motion","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"On 13 May 2026 the court denied the motion to quash; its order says the court was troubled by multiple citations in the motion to case quotations that do not exist in the cases cited, that counsel was unaware of them and had no explanation when questioned at the hearing, and, in rejecting one argument as frivolous, that the motion cited no authority apart from a misquoted case.","causal_attribution":"The court's 13 May 2026 order. It records the non-existent quotations; it does not itself say how they were produced."},{"id":"c6","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"because the motion at dispute in this case has been adjudicated and no further ... filings on the docket are anticipated, the Court hereby ORDERS this case be administratively closed","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"On 20 Oct 2026 the court administratively closed the related miscellaneous case, stating that the motion had been adjudicated and no further filings were anticipated; the order does not mention the quotations or any sanction.","causal_attribution":"The court's 20 Oct 2026 closure order."}],"effects":[{"label":"a lawyer whose AI-drafted motion contained three phantom quotations was required by the court to explain them under oath and filed sworn apologies and a corrected motion","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/myvmylgokvr/Binnall%20AI%20apology.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-18 as text extracted from the PDF (HTTP 200); no translation was involved and no human reviewer read it. ECF No. 399 with exhibits, filed 15 May 2026 in Case No. 3:25-cv-03698-SI: the firm's notice, the declarations of three firm lawyers and the redlined motion. The court's 13 May order is recorded separately as s3.","independence_group":"binnall-declarations-ecf-399"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://news.bgov.com/litigation/lawyers-apologize-for-fake-ai-quotes-in-trump-mass-layoffs-case","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-18 (HTTP 200); no translation was involved. Bloomberg Government, 16 May 2026. It reports the same declarations and is not independent of the filing.","independence_group":"binnall-declarations-ecf-399"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.469804/gov.uscourts.cand.469804.15.0.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-21 as text extracted from the RECAP PDF (HTTP 200); no translation was involved. The court's 13 May 2026 order (ECF No. 395 in Case No. 3:25-cv-03698-SI, filed in both related cases), all nine pages.","independence_group":"nd-cal-order-2026-05-13"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.469804/gov.uscourts.cand.469804.17.0.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-21 as text extracted from the RECAP PDF (HTTP 200); no translation was involved. One-page order of 20 Oct 2026 administratively closing the related miscellaneous case (No. 3:26-mc-80146-SI, ECF No. 17).","independence_group":"nd-cal-order-2026-10-20"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["work","justice"],"unknowns":["Whether the court imposed sanctions or other measures after the declarations; the 20 Oct 2026 closure order of the miscellaneous case mentions none, and no sanctions order was found.","Which phantom quotations came from the AI draft and which, if any, from later edits."],"geography":{"basis":"The motion was filed in, and the declarations answer an order of, the US District Court for the Northern District of California (case 3:25-cv-03698-SI), after first being filed in the Eastern District of Virginia. The partner's country of residence is not stated.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (communicated_with, own use): the filing lawyer's sworn declaration says he used Claude Console to draft a motion that the court's 13 May 2026 order found cited case quotations that do not exist; the court denied the motion and ordered him to explain the quotations under oath, and he and his firm filed apologies and a corrected motion. No sanction is reported in the sources read.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-21"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The partner declared under penalty of perjury that he used Claude Console to create the initial draft of the motion and did not double-check its quotations. The court's 13 May 2026 order found that the motion cited case quotations that do not exist in the cases cited and required him to explain them under oath. His own account connects the AI-generated draft to the quotations the court questioned. Whether the specific quotations came from the AI draft rather than later editing is not separately stated.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"San Francisco federal judge orders sworn explanation after a lawyer files a motion he says Claude Console drafted with three phantom quotations","summary":"In the federal lawsuit over the Trump administration's mass layoffs (AFGE v. Trump, Northern District of California), a partner at Binnall Law Group filed an emergency motion on the night of 6 May 2026, in the Eastern District of Virginia, to quash a deposition subpoena directed at a former Homeland Security official the firm represents; that court transferred the motion to the Northern District of California. On 13 May Judge Susan Illston denied the motion. Her order says the court was troubled by multiple citations to case quotations that do not exist in the cases cited, that counsel was unaware of these quotations when questioned at the hearing and had no explanation for them, and it ordered counsel to explain the fabricated quotations in a declaration under penalty of perjury by 15 May. In that declaration the partner said he had used Claude Console, an enterprise AI platform, to create an initial draft, that an associate told him she had checked the citations, and that he did not double-check the quotations. He apologised to the court and opposing counsel and attached a corrected version. The firm's founding partner declared that firm policy prohibits using tools like Claude for legal drafting, that the error breached its policies and training, and that the firm had opened an internal investigation. On 20 Oct 2026 the court administratively closed the related miscellaneous case, saying the motion had been adjudicated and no further filings were anticipated. Neither order read mentions a sanction, and whether one was imposed is not established.","incidentDate":"2026-05-06","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2026-05-15","aiSystem":"Claude Console, described by the filing partner as an enterprise-level, data-isolated AI platform, used to create the initial draft of the motion","aiProduct":"Claude Console (reported)","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["legal_harm","reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A lawyer whose AI-drafted motion contained case quotations that the court found do not exist saw the motion denied, was required by the court to explain the quotations under oath, and with his firm filed sworn apologies and a corrected motion; the firm says the filing breached its own AI policy.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"One person is counted: the partner who used Claude Console, filed the motion and was instructed to explain it under oath. Two other firm lawyers also filed declarations, but no consequence for them is described, so the count is a lower bound. The client and opposing counsel are not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"internal_action","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/myvmylgokvr/Binnall%20AI%20apology.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"Notice of declarations from counsel, AFGE v. Trump, N.D. Cal., ECF No. 399, filed 15 May 2026","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-18T03:08:26.269041+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-21T03:02:13.568104+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["ai-drafted-filing","phantom-quotations","court-filing","lawyer","claude","federal-court","california"]},{"id":"2026-los-angeles-court-sanctions-state-farm-outside-lawyer-for-motions-citing-non-existent-cases-from-ai-tool","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"An attorney for State Farm who filed several motions citing nonexistent cases and fabricated quotes generated by AI software must pay a $999.99 sanction, a Los Angeles judge ruled","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"A Los Angeles judge ordered the State Farm attorney who filed several motions citing non-existent cases and fabricated quotations generated by AI software to pay a $999.99 sanction.","causal_attribution":"Law360's report of the order; the order itself was not inspected."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"To assist in my preparation of these motions, I utilized an Artificial Intelligence program called \"Irys.\" However, I regrettably did not check some of the cites I chose to include in the filed pleadings ... there were seven (7) case citations across State Farm's eight (8) motions in limine that simply did not exist","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"used an AI tool called Irys, which she incorrectly thought was tied to her law firm","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"In a declaration, the associate who prepared the motions said she used an AI program called Irys to prepare them, did not check some of the citations because she wrongly believed the program was cite-checked through the firm's Westlaw subscription, and confirmed seven case citations across eight motions in limine that did not exist.","causal_attribution":"The associate's own declaration (reproduced by Reason and summarised by CalMatters); one origin."},{"id":"c3","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"informed the Court that they had discovered several citations in State Farm's motion in limine filings that were \"fabricated\" and possibly \"hallucinations.\"","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"were brought to the court's attention during a status hearing on Aug. 7","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"shared his findings at an Aug. 7 conference in Los Angeles Superior Court","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The plaintiff's lawyers found the non-existent citations and raised them with the court at a status conference on 7 August 2026.","causal_attribution":"The associate's declaration and the plaintiff side's own filings (as reported by Law360 and CalMatters) agree on the discovery and its date."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"he had discovered seven made-up cases, nine quotes for orders that did not exist and 13","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"According to a declaration by one of the plaintiff's lawyers, the filings contained seven made-up cases, nine quotations from orders that did not exist and 13 fabricated holdings or statements of law.","causal_attribution":"The plaintiff lawyer's declaration as reported by Law360."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"acknowledged the firm had discovered “nonexistent case citations which appear to have been AI hallucinations” across a recent batch of motions","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"apologized to the court and to the plaintiff, explaining that his co-counsel told him she used AI to help prepare some filings","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The firm acknowledged citations that appeared to be AI hallucinations, and its lead trial counsel apologised to the court and to the plaintiff, saying his co-counsel told him she had used AI to help prepare some filings.","causal_attribution":"The firm's own filings, as reported by the Los Angeles Times and CalMatters."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"particularly as it relates to State Farm's first five motions in limine which our office filed and served on March 31, 2026","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The associate's declaration ties the issue particularly to the first five motions in limine, which the firm filed and served on 31 March 2026.","causal_attribution":"The associate's declaration."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"The sum falls several thousand dollars below the maximum penalty, $5,000, that Judge Bradley said she was considering when setting the sanctions hearing","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"According to Law360, the judge had said in late August that she was considering a sanction of up to $5,000; the $999.99 set is one cent below the level that requires a California court to notify the State Bar.","causal_attribution":"Law360's report of the two orders."},{"id":"c8","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"State Farm expects its external counsel to conform to the highest level of ethical standards and professionalism, including in their use of AI and confirming the accuracy of all legal filings","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"State Farm said it expects its outside counsel to meet the highest ethical and professional standards, including in their use of AI and in confirming the accuracy of filings.","causal_attribution":"State Farm spokesperson's statement to the Los Angeles Times."},{"id":"c9","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"I am sincerely apologetic for the inconvenience and waste of time and resources I have forced the Court","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The associate's declaration apologised for the time and resources the court, the plaintiff and the attorneys had to spend on the issue.","causal_attribution":"The associate's declaration."}],"effects":[{"label":"sanctioned $999.99 for motions with non-existent citations prepared with an AI program","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.law360.com/articles/2524716/state-farm-attorney-sanctioned-999-99-for-ai-hallucinations","kind":"news","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in full on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200). Published 14 September 2026; reports the sanction order, the late-August order and the plaintiff lawyer's declaration.","independence_group":"law360-report-of-sanction-order-september-2026"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://reason.com/volokh/2026/08/24/ai-hallucinations-in-state-farm-insurance-outside-lawyers-filings/","kind":"commentary_with_filing_excerpt","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200). Published 24 August 2026; reproduces long passages of the associate's declaration and quotes the Los Angeles Times.","independence_group":"state-farm-associate-declaration-august-2026"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://calmatters.org/economy/2026/08/state-farm-lawsuit-ai-hallucinations/","kind":"news","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read on 2026-10-17 through an Internet Archive capture after the live page returned HTTP 429. Published 18 August 2026; reports filings by both sides.","independence_group":"calmatters-filings-report-august-2026"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-08-19/ai-hallucinations-case-law-state-farm-la-county-fire-dispute","kind":"news","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200). Published 19 August 2026.","independence_group":"los-angeles-times-report-august-2026"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["justice","work"],"unknowns":["The text of the sanction order (not inspected; known through Law360).","Which citations Irys generated and which the associate wrote; the sources give only the totals.","Whether the false citations affected any ruling on the motions in limine; no source says so.","Whether the plaintiff incurred costs beyond the time spent identifying the citations; no source quantifies it."],"geography":{"basis":"The motions were filed in, and the sanction imposed by, Los Angeles County Superior Court in California. Where the associate lives is not used.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a concrete adverse consequence of AI use: the associate's declaration says the AI program Irys was used to prepare motions that contained seven non-existent case citations, and the court sanctioned the associate $999.99 for them, according to Law360's report of the order.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-17"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The associate's declaration says she used the AI program Irys to prepare the motions and did not check some of the citations included in them; her review found seven non-existent case citations across eight motions, and the firm acknowledged citations that appeared to be AI hallucinations. The program's output reached the associate and went into the filings (communicated_with), and the court sanctioned the associate for them, Law360 reports. The tool's output itself is not reproduced in the inspected sources.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Los Angeles judge sanctions State Farm's outside lawyer $999.99 over motions citing non-existent cases; the lawyer said she prepared them with the AI tool Irys","summary":"A Los Angeles County Superior Court judge ordered a senior associate at Musick, Peeler & Garrett, the outside firm defending State Farm in a homeowner's lawsuit over a fire-damaged home, to pay a $999.99 sanction after the associate's motions in limine cited cases, quotations and holdings that did not exist, Law360 reported on 14 September 2026. In a declaration reproduced by Reason's Volokh Conspiracy, the associate said she used an AI program called Irys to prepare the motions, did not check some of the citations, and wrongly believed the program was cite-checked through the firm's Westlaw subscription; she confirmed seven non-existent case citations across eight motions. The plaintiff's lawyers found the citations and raised them at a status conference on 7 August 2026. The firm acknowledged citations that appeared to be AI hallucinations, and its lead trial counsel apologised to the court and the plaintiff. According to Law360, the judge had considered up to $5,000, and the amount set is one cent below the level at which California law requires a court to notify the State Bar.","incidentDate":"2026-03-31","incidentEndDate":"2026-09-11","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-08-18","aiSystem":"Irys, an AI legal research program that the lawyer told the court she used to prepare the motions; Law360 says it appears to be the tool built by Iqidis Inc.","aiProduct":"Irys (reported)","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["financial_loss","legal_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to Law360's report of the order, the associate who filed the AI-assisted motions was sanctioned $999.99; the associate's declaration apologised for the time and resources the court, the plaintiff and the attorneys spent on the false citations.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the associate the court sanctioned (Law360). The associate's declaration apologises for time and resources that the court, the plaintiff and the attorneys spent on the issue; no further consequence for the plaintiff is described, so the plaintiff is not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-CA","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"regulatory_action","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.law360.com/articles/2524716/state-farm-attorney-sanctioned-999-99-for-ai-hallucinations","primarySourceLabel":"Law360, State Farm Attorney Sanctioned $999.99 For AI Hallucinations (14 September 2026)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-17T03:02:07.57541+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-17T03:02:07.57541+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["united-states","california","legal-profession","hallucinated-citations","court-sanction","insurance-litigation"]},{"id":"2026-california-school-board-race-flyer-with-ai-disclosure-depicts-female-candidate-at-bake-sale","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'The San Dieguito Faculty Association has now accused Miyashiro's campaign of using AI'; 'to generate deceptive, sexist imagery to attack candidate Amy Flicker'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'has now claimed that Miyashiro used artificial intelligence 'to generate deceptive, sexist imagery to attack candidate Amy Flicker' in his campaign flyer on October 11'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The San Dieguito Faculty Association, which has endorsed Amy Flicker, accused her opponent David Ray Miyashiro of using artificial intelligence to generate deceptive, sexist imagery to attack her in a campaign flyer.","causal_attribution":"The union's accusation, relayed by two outlets from its news release."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Flicker is shown behind a table of baked goods labeled \"Non-profit volunteer.\"'; 'Miyashiro is seated at a microphone, with \"District superintendent\" printed beneath him.'; 'A line of small print at the bottom reads, \"Ad generated or substantially altered using artificial intelligence.\"'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Flyer photograph in the article (credited to the San Dieguito Faculty Association), small print at the bottom right: 'Ad generated or substantially altered using artificial intelligence'; text: 'On the left side, Flicker was standing in front of a table with baked goods with the words 'Non-Profit volunteer,' written below her.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The flyer shows Flicker behind a table of baked goods labelled 'Non-profit volunteer' beside Miyashiro at a microphone labelled 'District superintendent', and carries the small-print disclosure 'Ad generated or substantially altered using artificial intelligence.'","causal_attribution":"The flyer's own disclosure, seen in the published photograph and quoted by one outlet; the photograph comes from the union."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Using AI technology to manipulate the likeness of a female candidate and diminish my public service into a condescending stereotype is both ethically dubious and deeply concerning for someone seeking a position in educational leadership'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Flicker wrote in the SDFA news release'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Flicker said that using AI technology to manipulate the likeness of a female candidate and diminish her public service into a condescending stereotype was ethically dubious and deeply concerning.","causal_attribution":"The depicted candidate's own statement in the union's release."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'David Ray Miyashiro is going up against Amy Flicker on November 3 for a trustee seat on the San Dieguito Union High School District.'; 'The Daily Mail has reached out to David Ray Miyashiro, Amy Flicker and Rimga Viskanta for comments.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Miyashiro is superintendent of the Cajon Valley district and is running against Flicker for a San Dieguito Union High School District trustee seat in the 3 November election; the Daily Mail said it had asked him, Flicker and a current trustee for comment.","causal_attribution":"Context; no campaign response is reported."}],"effects":[{"label":"candidate says an AI-disclosed flyer manipulated her likeness into a condescending stereotype","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/california-school-board-race-draws-172457475.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-14 (HTTP 200). Globe article syndicated on Yahoo News, relaying FOX 5 San Diego and the Daily Mail, including the flyer's disclosure text and Flicker's statement from the union's release.","independence_group":"sdfa-release-and-flyer"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-16205219/index.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-14 (HTTP 200; the article-number URL redirects to the full article), including the flyer photograph credited to the San Dieguito Faculty Association. Reports the union's news release, so it shares an origin with s1.","independence_group":"sdfa-release-and-flyer"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["elections","public_life"],"unknowns":["Which parts of the image were generated or altered, and with which tool","Who designed and distributed the flyer, and the campaign's response to the union's accusation","How widely the flyer was distributed","Whether any complaint was made to an elections regulator"],"geography":{"basis":"The flyer was used in the race for a San Dieguito Union High School District trustee seat in California (both sources); the depicted candidate is a candidate in that California election. No court is involved.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a reported case: a campaign flyer in a California school board race carries the disclosure 'Ad generated or substantially altered using artificial intelligence' and depicts candidate Amy Flicker behind a bake-sale table; she said the use of AI manipulated her likeness and diminished her public service, and her endorsing union called the imagery deceptive and sexist. The attribution of the flyer to her opponent's campaign is the union's accusation, and no campaign response is reported.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-14"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The flyer itself carries the disclosure 'Ad generated or substantially altered using artificial intelligence', visible in the photograph the Daily Mail published and quoted by Globe, and the depicted candidate and her endorsing union say AI was used to manipulate her likeness. The AI output is the image depicting the candidate behind a bake-sale table, which she objected to (depicted_or_impersonated). Which elements were generated or altered, and the tool, are not stated; the attribution of the flyer to her opponent's campaign is the union's.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"California school board race: a flyer carrying an AI disclosure shows a female candidate at a bake sale; she says it manipulated her likeness","summary":"In October 2026 the San Dieguito Faculty Association, a California union representing district educators and staff that has endorsed candidate Amy Flicker for a San Dieguito Union High School District trustee seat, accused the campaign of her opponent, Cajon Valley Union School District superintendent David Ray Miyashiro, of using AI 'to generate deceptive, sexist imagery' in a campaign flyer. The flyer, as published by the Daily Mail, shows Flicker behind a table of baked goods labelled 'Non-profit volunteer' beside Miyashiro at a microphone labelled 'District superintendent', and carries the small-print disclosure 'Ad generated or substantially altered using artificial intelligence.' Flicker said that using AI to manipulate her likeness diminished her public service into a condescending stereotype. The campaign's response is not reported, and which parts of the image were generated or altered is not stated.","incidentDate":"2026-10-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-10-12","aiSystem":"Image generation or alteration used in a campaign flyer, disclosed on the flyer as 'Ad generated or substantially altered using artificial intelligence' (tool not identified)","aiProduct":"Unidentified image tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A candidate says a campaign flyer disclosed as AI-generated or altered manipulated her likeness and reduced her public service to a condescending stereotype; her endorsing union calls it deceptive and sexist.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the depicted candidate, who objected publicly (claim c3). She did not use the AI. The opposing candidate also appears on the flyer but no adverse consequence is reported for him.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/california-school-board-race-draws-172457475.html","primarySourceLabel":"Globe via Yahoo News, 13 October 2026: California school board race draws backlash over 'sexist' AI ad showing female candidate at bake sale","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-14T03:07:22.109235+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-14T03:07:22.109235+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["ai-altered-image","campaign-flyer","election","school-board","california","depicted-or-impersonated"]},{"id":"2026-plymouth-minnesota-flock-alpr-partial-plate-stolen-alert-journalist-couple-boxed-in-detained","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'On an otherwise normal Sunday afternoon in late June'; 'four cop cars came flying out of nowhere and boxed us in'; 'He patted me down'; 'The plates on this car are stolen'; 'Eventually, after a tense hour, I did.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'after about an hour he too was let go'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"On a Sunday afternoon in late June, four police cars boxed in a loaned Range Rover in a Kohl's parking lot in Plymouth, Minnesota. Officers ordered the journalist driving it and the journalist's wife out, patted the journalist down, questioned both, said the plates were stolen, and released them after about an hour.","causal_attribution":"First-person account by the journalist; no police record was read."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'they’d actually been tracking me around town for days via Flock cameras'; 'opened the Flock app, and showed me two photos'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Officers told the journalist that they had tracked the vehicle around town for days through Flock cameras, set up the stop after a camera alert that morning, and showed two Flock photographs of the vehicle and its plate on a phone.","causal_attribution":"The journalist's account of what officers said and showed."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'entered into the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) database missing the middle two digits'; 'It was asked, can you find this? And it did find that.'; 'does not equal probable cause'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"A similar manufacturer plate reported stolen in California had been entered in the national crime database without its two middle digits, and Flock's system alerted on the loaned vehicle's plate as a match. Flock's chief communications officer said the system read what it was asked to find and that an alert does not equal probable cause.","causal_attribution":"The journalist's reconstruction from the officers, the vehicle's manufacturer and Flock; Flock attributes the outcome to incomplete data entry and missing human verification."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'he acknowledged his officers didn’t get it right'; 'to open a conversation about the use of Flock cameras within the city'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The Plymouth police chief acknowledged to the journalist that the officers did not get it right, and the city council opened a discussion of the city's use of Flock cameras.","causal_attribution":"The journalist's paraphrase of the chief's interview and of the council's response."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'was pulled over by two officers in Scotts Bluff, Nebraska while driving his 14-year-old kid'; 'after about an hour he too was let go'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"A second automotive journalist driving another loaned vehicle with a plate in the same sequence was pulled over in Scotts Bluff, Nebraska, with a 14-year-old child in the car, and was let go after about an hour.","causal_attribution":"Reported by the first journalist from the second journalist's account; a separate stop, not counted in this case."}],"effects":[{"label":"boxed in by four police cars, ordered out of a loaned press vehicle, patted down and held for about an hour after a license-plate camera alert reported the plate as stolen","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.thedrive.com/news/how-flock-cameras-wrongly-tracked-me-for-days-over-stolen-plates-and-sent-police-after-me","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live in English on 2026-10-05 (The Drive, first-person account by the journalist who was stopped, published 8 July 2026). The account of what officers said is the author's.","independence_group":"thedrive-first-person-plymouth"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.thedrive.com/news/inside-the-flock-dragnet-how-systemic-errors-led-to-police-ambushing-me-for-no-reason","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live in English on 2026-10-05 (The Drive, follow-up by the same author, published 17 July 2026). Carries the author's interviews with Flock Safety's chief communications officer and the Plymouth police chief. Same author and outlet as s1, so one independence group.","independence_group":"thedrive-first-person-plymouth"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["justice","everyday_life"],"unknowns":["The exact date of the stop.","Whether the incomplete stolen-plate entry has been corrected in the national database and in Flock's system.","Whether the Plymouth Police Department changed its verification practice or took any internal action.","Which agency's alert led to the Nebraska stop and whether a Flock camera was involved there."],"geography":{"basis":"The stop took place in a store parking lot in Plymouth, Minnesota, where the journalist says they live (The Drive). The stolen-plate report originated in California.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as an institutional-use case consistent with the held Flock rows. A journalist gives a concrete first-person account of being boxed in, patted down and held for about an hour with a spouse after a Flock camera alert matched a loaned vehicle's plate to an incomplete stolen-plate entry, and Flock's spokesperson confirms how the match occurred. Both sources are by the same author, so every claim is reported.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-05"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The journalist reports that officers said they had tracked the vehicle for days through Flock cameras and showed the Flock app with the photographs of the plate. Flock Safety's chief communications officer, interviewed for the follow-up, confirmed that the system matched the plate to an incomplete stolen-plate entry and described the matching as machine learning. The Drive describes the cameras as AI-powered.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["made_claim_about"]},"name":"Plymouth, Minnesota: police boxed in and detained an automotive journalist and the journalist's wife for about an hour in June 2026 after Flock cameras matched a loaned Range Rover's plate to an incomplete stolen-plate entry","summary":"An automotive journalist for The Drive wrote that on a Sunday afternoon in late June four Plymouth police cars boxed in the Range Rover press vehicle the journalist was testing, in a Kohl's parking lot. Officers ordered the journalist and the journalist's wife out, patted the journalist down, questioned both and said the plates were stolen. According to the account, officers said they had tracked the vehicle for days through Flock license-plate cameras and acted on a camera alert that morning. The couple were released after about an hour, once the manufacturer explained that a similar plate had been reported stolen in California. In a follow-up, Flock's chief communications officer said the stolen plate had been entered without its two middle digits and that the system matched what it was asked to find. The spokesperson said an alert does not equal probable cause. The police chief acknowledged that officers did not get it right. A second journalist with a similar plate was later stopped in Nebraska.","incidentDate":"2026-06-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2026-07-08","aiSystem":"Flock Safety automated license-plate-reader cameras used by the Plymouth Police Department, described by The Drive as AI-powered and by Flock's spokesperson as machine learning, which matched the vehicle's plate to an incomplete stolen-plate entry and alerted police","aiProduct":"Flock Safety license plate readers","aiCompany":"Flock Safety","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["loss_of_liberty"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The journalist reports that the couple were boxed in by four police cars, ordered out, questioned and held for about an hour, and that the journalist was patted down (The Drive, first-person account).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":2,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"Two people, the journalist and the journalist's wife, were ordered out and held at the scene (The Drive). The second journalist and a child stopped in Nebraska belong to a separate event and are not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-MN","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.thedrive.com/news/how-flock-cameras-wrongly-tracked-me-for-days-over-stolen-plates-and-sent-police-after-me","primarySourceLabel":"The Drive, 8 July 2026: How Flock Cameras Wrongly Tracked Me for Days Over 'Stolen' Plates and Sent Police After Me","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-05T03:12:31.048274+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-05T03:12:31.048274+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["flock","alpr","license-plate-reader","partial-plate-match","stale-hotlist","wrongful-stop","minnesota","plymouth","justice","made-claim-about","first-person"]},{"id":"2026-los-banos-substitute-teacher-ai-lingerie-image-student-impersonation-account","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'On March 12, as he was working his other part-time job at a coffee shop, his phone lit up. A fellow barista said there was an AI photo circulating on social media.'; 'But instead of his work uniform, he was wearing lingerie. And instead of standing normally, as he had been in the original photo, he was posing suggestively.'; 'knew from the local middle school, where he regularly filled in.'; 'He discovered that a different student had created an account impersonating him—it used his name, slightly mispelled, and had the same photo as their profile picture.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'The article describes the image as incorporating elements of an older photograph of him that had been manipulated to depict him in lingerie and in a suggestive pose.'","relation":"context","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"On 12 March 2026 the teacher learned that an AI-generated image resembling him, made from an old mirror selfie but showing him in lingerie and posing suggestively, was circulating on social media; one TikTok account sharing it belonged to a student at the middle school where he substituted, and a different student had created an account impersonating him with the image as its profile picture.","causal_attribution":"The teacher's account to WIRED; the students' identities and the tool are not established in the reporting."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'he went back and forth with school administrators, the parents of the students, and even the police.'; 'One student, who admitted to creating the image, was disciplined with in-school suspension.'; 'was later told that the image was also shared on Snapchat.'; 'He says he also received several crude, sexual comments on his TikTok account.'; 'During one class, he received an AirDropped photo of the same AI-generated image before it was quickly revoked.'; 'He tells WIRED that, at least right now, he doesn’t feel safe doing so.'; 'reported the incident to the assistant principal'; 'the image continued to proliferate, and other students began posting it.'; 'he didn’t want to take assignments at the middle school “until this matter is fully addressed.”'; 'he probably won’t return to the district this year.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'said he eventually stopped accepting assignments at the middle school and told the publication he did not feel safe returning to the district at the time of the interview.'","relation":"context","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"He reported the image to the assistant principal and dealt with administrators, parents and police over the following weeks; a student who admitted creating it received an in-school suspension; the image was also shared on Snapchat and continued to spread, he received crude sexual comments on TikTok, he declined further middle-school assignments, the same image was AirDropped to him during a class at the local high school, and he told WIRED he does not feel safe returning to the district.","causal_attribution":"The teacher's account and WIRED's reporting; the school's discipline decision is known through him. The district did not respond to WIRED."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'The district did not respond to WIRED’s request for comment.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'described the incidents in an Aug. 24 WIRED investigation examining educators who have been targeted with AI-generated sexualized content.'; 'The middle school, high school and school district were not identified by name in the WIRED report.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The district did not respond to WIRED's request for comment. The Los Banos Enterprise, summarising the WIRED report on 25 August 2026, states that WIRED did not identify the middle school, high school or district by name, and adds no reporting of its own.","causal_attribution":"Reporting-chain note: the local paper's item is derived from WIRED and does not corroborate the account independently."}],"effects":[{"label":"a sexualised AI image made from an old selfie circulated among students on TikTok and Snapchat and was used by a student account impersonating him","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"he received crude sexual comments, stopped taking assignments at the middle school and says he does not feel safe returning to the district","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.wired.com/story/teachers-deepfake-ai-students-content/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-09-30 (WIRED, Caroline Haskins, 24 August 2026); full visible text and the page's JSON-LD articleBody saved. The teacher's account is given in his own words and in WIRED's paraphrase; the district did not respond to WIRED.","independence_group":"wired-haskins-teachers-deepfakes-2026-08-24"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://losbanosenterprise.com/business/technology/2026/los-banos-substitute-teacher-says-sexualized-ai-image-of-him-circulated-among-students/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Live page returned Cloudflare HTTP 403 on 2026-09-30; read from the Internet Archive capture of 27 August 2026 (web.archive.org/web/20260827032911id_/). Los Banos Enterprise staff report, 25 August 2026, which summarises the WIRED investigation and adds no independent reporting; same chain as s1.","independence_group":"wired-haskins-teachers-deepfakes-2026-08-24"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["work","education","privacy"],"unknowns":["Which AI tool produced the image.","How many students shared the image and how widely it spread beyond the two schools.","Whether the police took any action after his reports.","Whether the impersonation account was removed and whether he reported the content to TikTok or Snapchat.","The district's position; it did not respond to WIRED."],"geography":{"basis":"The teacher is a substitute in Los Banos, California, and the image circulated among students at the local middle school and high school (WIRED). No court proceeding is reported.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the charter's personal-account rule as a concrete account by a named adult who spoke to a journalist about his own case (depicted_or_impersonated): a sexualised AI image of a substitute teacher circulated among students, a student account impersonated him, a student admitted making it and was suspended in school, and he stopped working at the middle school and says he does not feel safe returning. The account rests on one reporting chain (WIRED, summarised by the local paper); the district did not respond, and the record says so. Students are minors and are not identified.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-01"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"WIRED describes the image as AI-generated and the teacher says it reworked an old mirror selfie of his to show him in lingerie; a student admitted creating it. The tool is not named and no technical assessment of the image is reported.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Los Banos, California: a substitute teacher says a sexualised AI image of him made from an old selfie circulated among middle-school students on TikTok and Snapchat and was used by a student account impersonating him; one student received in-school suspension and he stopped taking assignments at the middle school","summary":"WIRED (Caroline Haskins, 24 August 2026) reports the account of a substitute teacher in Los Banos, California, who spoke to WIRED by name (not repeated here). On 12 March 2026 a co-worker at his other job told him an AI photo was circulating on social media; the image reused a mirror selfie he had taken at a job in college but showed him in lingerie, posing suggestively. He traced an account sharing it on TikTok to a student at the middle school where he regularly substituted and reported it to the assistant principal; that evening he found a second account, created by a different student, impersonating him under a misspelled version of his name with the image as its profile picture. Over the following weeks he dealt with administrators, parents and the police; one student who admitted creating the image received an in-school suspension. He says the image was also shared on Snapchat, kept spreading among students and drew crude sexual comments on his TikTok account. He told administrators he would not take assignments at the middle school until the matter was addressed; at the local high school the same image was AirDropped to him during a class. WIRED says the district did not respond to its request for comment. He said he does not feel safe returning to the district. The Los Banos Enterprise (25 August 2026) summarised the WIRED account; no independent local reporting was found.","incidentDate":"2026-03-12","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-08-24","aiSystem":"Unidentified AI image tool used, according to WIRED and the teacher's account, to turn an old mirror selfie into a sexualised image of him in lingerie; the app is not named","aiProduct":"Unidentified image tool","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress","professional_harm","reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A sexualised AI image made from his old selfie circulated among students on TikTok and Snapchat, a student account impersonated him with it, he received crude sexual comments, and he stopped taking assignments at the middle school and says he does not feel safe returning to the district (the teacher's account to WIRED).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One teacher describes being depicted; WIRED's three other teacher accounts are separate incidents in other places and are not counted here. Exact count 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"internal_action","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.wired.com/story/teachers-deepfake-ai-students-content/","primarySourceLabel":"WIRED, 24 August 2026: They Dedicated Their Lives to Teaching. Then the Deepfakes Started (Caroline Haskins)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-01T03:11:26.386118+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-01T03:11:26.386118+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["deepfake","sexualised-imagery","teacher","substitute-teacher","school","tiktok","snapchat","impersonation","harassment","california","los-banos","depicted-or-impersonated","first-person-via-journalist"]},{"id":"2026-wyoming-woman-alleges-grok-used-to-make-thousands-of-ai-sexual-images-from-childhood-photo","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"AMENDED COMPLAINT against X.AI Corp., X.AI LLC. Filed by Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 3, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 4, Jane Doe 5.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO PROCEED UNDER PSEUDONYM filed by Jane Doe 4, Jane Doe 5.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"ORDER Granting Administrative Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonym. Signed by Judge P. Casey Pitts on 8/3/2026.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"Plaintiff Jane Doe 4 is a female who resides in Wyoming","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"A first amended class action complaint filed on 7 July 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Doe 1 v. X.AI Corp., 5:26-cv-02246) lists a plaintiff identified as Jane Doe 4, who is stated to reside in Wyoming. The docket records a motion to proceed under pseudonym filed by Jane Doe 4 and Jane Doe 5 on 7 July 2026 and an order granting an administrative motion to proceed under pseudonym on 3 August 2026.","causal_attribution":"The docket and the complaint establish that the filing exists, who filed it and what it alleges. They do not establish that any allegation is true. The docket does not say which pseudonym motion the 3 August order granted."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"On or before February 12, 2026, Jane Doe 4’s stepfather uploaded an image of Jane Doe 4","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Using this image, Jane Doe 4’s stepfather prompted Grok to generate approximately 7,000","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"sexually explicit images depicting Jane Doe 4.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"to generate about 7,000 sexually explicit images and videos from a single photograph","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"made the more than 7,000 fake explicit images of her using the AI chatbot Grok","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"Lawmakers in the United States and Europe moved to investigate xAI earlier this year","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"Within weeks, Jane Doe 4's stepfather first uploaded the photo of her as a child to Grok","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"and was a minor at the time the","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"posted on X from Grok’s account between December 28, 2025, and January 8, 2026, xAI limited","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"in February, then prompted the platform's AI image generator to create 7,000","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"According to the amended complaint, on or before 12 February 2026 the plaintiff’s stepfather uploaded a photograph of the plaintiff taken in childhood into the Grok application on a phone and prompted Grok to generate approximately 7,000 AI-generated sexual images. NPR reports about 7,000 images and videos and the Washington Post reports more than 7,000 images, both citing the plaintiff’s court filings. The Washington Post, attributing the point to the lawsuit, says the first upload came \"within weeks\" of the controversy over Grok image edits on X, and says lawmakers moved to investigate xAI over that controversy \"earlier this year\". The complaint dates the Grok-posted images in that controversy from 28 December 2025 to 8 January 2026, and Cowboy State Daily paraphrases the complaint as saying the upload was in February.","causal_attribution":"All accounts rest on the plaintiff and the plaintiff’s lawyers: the complaint, the plaintiff’s interview with the Washington Post and counsel’s statements to NPR and Cowboy State Daily. The images were not inspected. The complaint dates the upload only as on or before 12 February 2026 and no source gives the date of the first image."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"sexually explicit images of Jane Doe 4 is because the platform was less restrictive than other AI models and","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Law enforcement told Jane Doe 4 that her stepfather had used Grok because it was more responsive to his prompts than other AI models","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"A forensic review revealed approximately 7,000 AI-generated images and videos depicting","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges, on information and belief, that the stepfather used Grok because it was less restrictive than other AI models. NPR reports that the plaintiff’s lawyer says law enforcement told the plaintiff that the stepfather used Grok because it was more responsive to the stepfather’s prompts than other AI models. A forensic review of devices seized in the search is alleged to have found approximately 7,000 AI-generated images and videos of the plaintiff produced with Grok.","causal_attribution":"The reason for choosing Grok is the complaint’s belief and a statement by counsel about what law enforcement said. No law enforcement statement was found (the Wyoming Division of Criminal Investigation declined to comment on the litigation) and the forensic finding is stated only in the complaint."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"trafficked Jane Doe 4’s AI-generated","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"has further suffered substantial reputational harm","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"was spread among an unknown number of users online and there is no way now to permanently remove this","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Jane later learned that her stepfather had created thousands of sexually explicit images of her as a child and traded them online, she said.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges, on information and belief, that the stepfather traded the AI-generated images online through social media platforms, and that the plaintiff has suffered substantial reputational harm because the images were spread among an unknown number of users, and that they cannot now be permanently removed from the internet. The plaintiff told the Washington Post that the plaintiff later learned the stepfather had created thousands of these images and traded them online.","causal_attribution":"The trading is alleged on information and belief and is otherwise the plaintiff’s account. No platform, recipient or copy of the images is identified in any source read."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"On or around February 12, 2026,","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"At this point, xAI finally generated a CyberTip to NCMEC.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"xAI, however, included only the original,","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"The company did not include any of the abusive images with its report","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"because xAI's tip to NCMEC did not provide any of the explicit fake images","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"xAI failed to respond to the investigator’s requests, and to","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"On or about February 27, 2026, law enforcement obtained","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"failed to share the alleged perpetrator's IP address with NCMEC and law enforcement, even after officials requested it multiple times, according to the complaint","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"tip to NCMEC did not include crucial information from its records, such as the IP addresses associated with her stepfather's account","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"which xAI allegedly refused to provide, the lawsuit claims","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that on or around 12 February 2026 xAI generated a report to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) that included only the original photograph and not the generated images, that xAI did not provide the IP address of the upload despite requests from the investigator, and that Wyoming law enforcement then located the stepfather and on or about 27 February 2026 obtained a warrant to search the residence. NPR and the Washington Post report the allegation that the NCMEC report lacked the generated images and the IP address, and Cowboy State Daily reports the allegation that xAI refused to provide the IP address.","causal_attribution":"These are allegations about xAI’s conduct in a pending civil case. xAI did not respond to requests for comment from the Washington Post or NPR and has not answered the complaint according to the Post. No NCMEC, xAI or law enforcement record was read."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"stepfather was arrested following the search, charged with child exploitation","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"offenses, and released on bail later that night. Two days later,","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Two days after the raid, her stepfather was found dead","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"stepfather was not charged with child pornography offenses and was released by authorities on the day the warrant was executed","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"because xAI's tip to NCMEC did not provide any of the explicit fake images, Jane Doe 4 said, citing her conversations with an investigator on the case","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that the stepfather was arrested after the search, charged with child exploitation offenses and released on bail that night, and that the stepfather died two days later. The plaintiff told the Washington Post that the stepfather was found dead two days after the search and was not charged with child pornography offenses, and, citing conversations with an investigator, that the stepfather was released on the day the warrant was executed because the NCMEC report did not include the generated images. The two accounts describe the charges differently and the sources read do not reconcile them. No source attributes the death to the AI system, and this record does not treat the death as a harm outcome of the AI.","causal_attribution":"The arrest, charge, release and death are stated by the plaintiff and the complaint and no court or police record was found. The death is context. The cited passages stop before any statement of how the death occurred and this record does not describe it."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"has suffered severe emotional distress as a result of the production of her AI-","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"by others online. She also suffers from depression and sleeps excessively. When she is awake, she struggles","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"with suicidal thoughts.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"experiences extreme anxiety in her daily life and is overcome with fear that her CSAM images will be found","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"viewing CSAM images of her and she feels as though her childhood has been stolen from her","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"She started therapy for trauma","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"who is now an adult","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"She’s suffered a tremendous amount of psychological distress and harm feeling like her childhood has been stolen","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"She’s going to feel anxious on a daily basis going forward about somebody finding these images.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The amended complaint attributes to the production of the images severe emotional distress in the plaintiff: extreme anxiety in daily life, fear that the images will be found by others online, depression, excessive sleep and suicidal thoughts, and a feeling that the plaintiff’s childhood has been stolen. The plaintiff told the Washington Post about starting therapy for trauma, and the plaintiff’s lawyer told Cowboy State Daily that the plaintiff has ongoing trauma and will feel anxious daily about someone finding the images.","causal_attribution":"These effects are the plaintiff’s account in a pleading and an interview and a statement by the plaintiff’s lawyer. No clinician or other independent account was read. The complaint also attributes distress to the death of the stepfather and other family upheaval, so the distress is not attributed to the images alone."},{"id":"c8","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"did not respond to a request for comment, and the company has not responded to the federal lawsuit in court","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"SpaceXAI was previously known as xAI.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"SpaceXAI did not respond to a request for comment","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"will not comment on ongoing litigation","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"xAI did not respond to the Washington Post’s request for comment and, according to the Post, had not responded to the federal lawsuit in court. NPR reports that SpaceXAI (xAI, renamed in July 2026) did not respond to its request for comment. The Wyoming Division of Criminal Investigation told Cowboy State Daily that it will not comment on ongoing litigation.","causal_attribution":"Non-responses are not denials. Among the docket entries read (last updated 29 September 2026) the xAI defendants appear through counsel and oppose a motion to preserve evidence, and no answer or motion to dismiss appears."}],"effects":[{"label":"A woman reportedly depicted in about 7,000 AI-generated sexual images and videos made with Grok from a childhood photograph, with reported severe distress and fear of the images being found","claim_id":"c7","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465940/gov.uscourts.cand.465940.26.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"First amended class action complaint, ECF 26, filed 7 July 2026. RECAP PDF text read for the paragraphs about Jane Doe 4 (17 and 158 to 181). Plaintiffs’ allegations, not findings. Graphic paragraphs were read for verification and are not reproduced.","independence_group":"plaintiff-account"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72495765/doe-1-v-xai-corp/","kind":"court_docket","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"CourtListener docket for 5:26-cv-02246 read on 2026-09-30 (page last updated 29 Sept 2026). Procedural facts only.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/her-childhood-photo-thousands-of-explicit-images-one-womans-nightmare-163429621.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Washington Post article by two named reporters, published 15 August 2026 (paywalled). The full text was read from the copy syndicated on Yahoo on 19 August 2026. The Post URL itself returned only the opening paragraphs through a relay.","independence_group":"plaintiff-account"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.npr.org/2026/07/09/nx-s1-5885052/spacexai-stabilityai-deepfake-csam-class-action","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"NPR, 9 July 2026. Reports the amended complaint and statements by the plaintiffs’ lawyer.","independence_group":"plaintiff-account"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://cowboystatedaily.com/2026/09/18/lawsuit-claims-grok-used-wyoming-womans-photo-to-make-7-000-ai-child-porn-pics/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Cowboy State Daily, 18 September 2026. Reports the complaint and statements by one of the plaintiffs’ lawyers.","independence_group":"plaintiff-account"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["privacy","relationships","justice"],"unknowns":["When the first image was generated. The complaint dates the upload on or before 12 February 2026. The Washington Post, attributing the point to the lawsuit, says the first upload came \"within weeks\" of the controversy over Grok image edits on X, which the complaint dates from 28 December 2025 to 8 January 2026, and Cowboy State Daily paraphrases the upload as in February. No source gives the first day.","Whether the accused was charged with child pornography offenses. The complaint says child exploitation offenses and the plaintiff told the Post there was no child pornography charge. No court or police record was found, and the criminal matter cannot be checked in the sources read.","How widely the images spread and to whom. The trading is alleged on information and belief and no platform or recipient is identified.","What law enforcement or NCMEC found. The Wyoming Division of Criminal Investigation declined to comment on the litigation and no agency record was read.","xAI’s response on the merits. The docket read shows no answer or motion to dismiss and xAI did not comment to the Post or NPR.","Whether other images made by the same accused depict other people. The complaint alleges an exchange with others and identifies no one.","The images were not inspected. The Washington Post original page is paywalled and its text was read in the Yahoo syndicated copy."],"geography":{"basis":"The complaint states that the plaintiff resides in Wyoming and describes a Wyoming law enforcement task force investigating, and the Washington Post places the search at a house in Wyoming. The civil case is in the Northern District of California. The location where the prompts were entered is not stated.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"The account rests on one plaintiff’s amended federal complaint, interview with the Washington Post and lawyers’ statements, so every claim about the events is reported and these sources form one independence group. The court docket documents the filing. The plaintiff is described by role and court pseudonym only, the accused is unnamed, the images are described only as AI-generated sexual images with their reported number and distribution, and the accused’s death is recorded as context without method. The event began in 2026 on the sources read, with the first day unknown.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-30"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The amended complaint alleges that the stepfather used Grok to generate the images and that a forensic review of seized devices found them. NPR reports the plaintiff’s lawyer saying law enforcement told the plaintiff that Grok was used. xAI did not respond to requests for comment and had not answered the complaint. The images were not inspected and no law enforcement statement was found.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Wyoming plaintiff alleges Grok was used to make about 7,000 AI-generated sexual images and videos from a photograph of the plaintiff as a child","summary":"A Wyoming woman who is now an adult and is identified in court filings as Jane Doe 4 alleges that the plaintiff’s stepfather uploaded a photograph of the plaintiff taken in childhood to xAI’s Grok on or before 12 February 2026 and prompted Grok to generate about 7,000 AI-generated sexual images and videos of the plaintiff, and that the stepfather traded them online. The plaintiff joined a proposed class action against xAI in the Northern District of California through an amended complaint filed on 7 July 2026. The complaint alleges that xAI’s report to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children around 12 February 2026 did not include the generated images or the IP address of the upload, that investigators obtained a search warrant on or about 27 February 2026 and found the material, and that the accused died two days later, after release on bail. The plaintiff reports severe distress including depression and suicidal thoughts and told the Washington Post about starting therapy. The complaint says the accused was charged with child exploitation offenses while the plaintiff told the Post that the accused was not charged with child pornography offenses. xAI did not respond to the Post and had not answered the complaint in court. The allegations have not been tested in court. The plaintiff and the accused are not named here, and the images are described only by kind.","incidentDate":"2026-01-01","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"year","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-07-07","aiSystem":"Grok (xAI chatbot and image generation)","aiProduct":"Grok","aiCompany":"xAI","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["exploitation_or_abuse","psychological_distress","reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The plaintiff alleges in a federal complaint, and told the Washington Post, that AI-generated sexual images made with Grok from a photograph of the plaintiff as a child were traded online. The complaint attributes to the images severe emotional distress, extreme anxiety, fear that the images will be found, depression and suicidal thoughts, and the plaintiff told the Post about starting therapy for trauma. The complaint also describes reputational harm from the images spreading among an unknown number of users and says they cannot now be permanently removed. The complaint also describes a period of extreme personal crisis following the death of the accused after release on bail. These are allegations and the plaintiff’s own statements in a pending civil case.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One woman, the pseudonymous plaintiff, is reported depicted in the images and harmed. The accused is not counted. Other children whose images the accused is alleged to have received in exchange are not identified in any source and are not counted, and family members mentioned in the sources are not reported harmed by the images.","victimAgeRange":"adult","platformType":"chatbot","primarySourceUrl":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465940/gov.uscourts.cand.465940.26.0.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"First amended class action complaint, Doe 1 v. X.AI Corp., 5:26-cv-02246 (N.D. Cal.), ECF 26, filed 7 July 2026","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-30T01:09:57.112206+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:44:25.169011+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["historical-2026"]},{"id":"2026-bay-area-california-suspected-ai-voice-fake-kidnapping-call-wire-transfer-to-mexico","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"stolen from a Bay Area woman","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"phone call from an unknown number one morning in May","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"had been kidnapped by a Mexican drug cartel after seeing something she wasn't supposed to","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"It was my daughter's voice having an absolute panic attack","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"received a phone call earlier this month from an unknown individual","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"claimed they had taken her adult daughter","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"before hearing her daughter's voice over the phone","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"In May 2026 a Bay Area woman received a call from an unknown number in which a caller said the woman's adult daughter had been kidnapped, and the caller played a voice that the woman believed was the daughter's, in panic.","causal_attribution":"The woman's own account as told to ABC7 (KGO-TV) and to Good Morning America. Both outlets relay one person's account and neither reports checking call records. The words attributed to the voice are not reproduced here."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"After wiring $5,400 to Mexico from multiple locations","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"does not expect to recover the money","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"wire $5,400 to multiple locations in Mexico","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"At the caller's direction the woman wired $5,400 to Mexico. ABC7 says the transfers were made from multiple locations and ABC News says the money went to multiple locations in Mexico. The woman does not expect to recover the money.","causal_attribution":"The woman's own statement of the amount and the transfers, relayed by both outlets. No bank or transfer-service record was inspected. The two outlets differ on whether the multiple locations were the places the woman sent from or the places the money went to."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Fearing for her daughter's life","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"followed the caller's instructions for five hours","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"I was ready to do anything to save my daughter","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"I totally, totally believed this guy had my daughter","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The woman followed the caller's instructions for about five hours, feared for the daughter's life, and believed the caller had the daughter.","causal_attribution":"The woman's own account of the call. The five-hour length is ABC7's wording of the woman's account. No medical or other effect after the call is reported."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"she called her daughter directly, who picked up and said she was at work","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"soon realized the ordeal had been a scam","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"only to learn she was actually safe and at work as usual","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Afterwards the woman phoned the daughter directly, the daughter said the daughter was at work and safe, and the woman realized the ordeal had been a scam.","causal_attribution":"The woman's account as relayed by both outlets. The daughter did not speak to either outlet in the pages read."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"scammers used artificial intelligence to mimic her daughter's voice","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"what she suspects to be artificial intelligence scams","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"what she suspects was AI voice mimicking daughter","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"scammers are increasingly using artificial intelligence to clone voices, often by pulling audio from social media or phone calls","relation":"context","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"lost over $5,000 in an AI-generated kidnap scam.","relation":"context","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"ABC7 states that scammers used artificial intelligence to mimic the daughter's voice, and ABC News describes AI as what the woman suspects was used. An Operation Shamrock representative told ABC7 that scammers increasingly use AI to clone voices, often from audio pulled from social media or phone calls.","causal_attribution":"ABC7 states AI use without naming a basis. ABC News frames it as the woman's suspicion in its headline and text, and an image caption on the same page calls the call an AI-generated kidnap scam without that qualifier. The Operation Shamrock statements were made to KGO-TV, are general and do not refer to this call. No audio analysis, tool or police finding is reported, so the AI use is a suspicion."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Martinez police said they are investigating the case","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"police are continuing to investigate the incident","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"ABC7 reports that Martinez police said they are investigating the case, and ABC News, citing the ABC7 report, says police are continuing to investigate.","causal_attribution":"The police statement reaches the record only through ABC7. No police release or case number was inspected."}],"effects":[{"label":"A Bay Area woman reports wiring $5,400 to Mexico during a fake kidnapping call and not expecting to recover the money","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"},{"label":"The woman reports fearing for the adult daughter's life while following the caller's instructions for about five hours after hearing a voice the woman believed was the daughter's","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://abc7news.com/post/bay-area-mom-thousands-scammers-use-ai-mimic-daughters-voice-fake-kidnapping-part-growing-trend/19154381/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"victim-own-account-abc-interviews"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://abcnews.com/GMA/News/woman-loses-thousands-scammer-suspected-ai-mimic-daughters/story?id=133307515","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"victim-own-account-abc-interviews"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["finance","everyday_life"],"unknowns":["The day of the call is not stated. ABC7 says one morning in May and ABC News says earlier this month in an article dated 26 May 2026, so the record has month precision.","No analysis of the call audio, no phone record and no police finding that a cloned voice was used is reported. ABC7 states AI use in its own voice and ABC News describes it as the woman's suspicion. The tool, if any, is unidentified.","The $5,400 loss, the five hours of instructions and the transfers are the woman's account. No bank, transfer-service or police record was inspected.","The location of the callers is unknown. The wire destination and the cartel claim come from the woman's account.","The outcome of the police investigation after the reports is unknown."],"geography":{"basis":"The ABC7 dateline reads Martinez, Calif., the story is about a Bay Area woman, and Martinez police are reported to be investigating. The woman reports wiring the money to Mexico and the caller claimed a Mexican cartel had the daughter. Neither fact places the callers, so no event country other than the United States is recorded.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"The woman gave interviews to ABC7 (KGO-TV) and to Good Morning America and both outlets report the same account, so every claim is reported and the two pages are one source chain. AI involvement is stated by ABC7 and described as a suspicion by ABC News, with no audio analysis reported, so it is recorded as suspected. The woman spoke publicly under a name in both outlets and is described here by role only. The daughter is an adult who did not speak publicly and is not named.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-30"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"ABC7 states in its own voice that scammers used artificial intelligence to mimic the daughter's voice. ABC News headlines the same call as involving what the woman suspects was an AI voice. Neither outlet reports an analysis of the call audio, a police finding that a cloned voice was used, or the tool involved. An Operation Shamrock representative quoted by both outlets describes voice cloning as an increasing scam technique in general terms and is not reported as commenting on this call.","status":"suspected"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated","communicated_with"]},"name":"Bay Area, California: a mother reports wiring $5,400 to Mexico during a fake kidnapping call that used a voice the mother believed was the adult daughter's, which ABC7 reports scammers mimicked with AI","summary":"ABC7 (KGO-TV, 24 May 2026) and ABC News (a Good Morning America segment, 26 May 2026) reported that a Bay Area woman received a call from an unknown number in May 2026. The caller said the woman's adult daughter had been kidnapped by a Mexican drug cartel and played a voice the woman believed was the daughter's, in panic. The woman followed the caller's instructions for about five hours, feared for the daughter's life and wired $5,400 to Mexico. The woman then phoned the daughter, who said the daughter was at work, and realized the call was a scam. ABC7 states that scammers used artificial intelligence to mimic the daughter's voice, and ABC News describes AI as what the woman suspects was used. Neither outlet reports an analysis of the audio or a police finding about a cloned voice. An Operation Shamrock representative quoted by both outlets spoke of voice cloning in general terms and not about this call. ABC7 reports that Martinez police said they are investigating, and the woman said the money is not expected to be recovered. Both outlets rest on the woman's own account. The woman is described by role and the daughter is not named.","incidentDate":"2026-05-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2026-05-24","aiSystem":"Suspected AI voice mimicry of the daughter's voice (no tool identified)","aiProduct":"Unidentified voice-cloning tool (suspected)","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["financial_loss","psychological_distress"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The woman told ABC7 and ABC News that the woman wired $5,400 to Mexico at the caller's direction and does not expect to recover the money, and that the woman feared for the adult daughter's life while following the caller's instructions for about five hours. Both statements are the woman's own account. The daughter is reported safe and at work and no consequence to the daughter is reported. No bank record was inspected.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One woman reports the $5,400 loss and the fear for the daughter's safety. The daughter, whose voice was reportedly mimicked, is reported safe and at work and no consequence to the daughter is reported, so the daughter is not counted. The callers and the Operation Shamrock representative are not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","platformType":"other","primarySourceUrl":"https://abc7news.com/post/bay-area-mom-thousands-scammers-use-ai-mimic-daughters-voice-fake-kidnapping-part-growing-trend/19154381/","primarySourceLabel":"ABC7 San Francisco (KGO-TV), 24 May 2026","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-30T01:09:23.570394+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-09T03:25:40.612155+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["historical-2026"]},{"id":"2026-us-meta-26-employees-sue-alleging-ai-assisted-may-layoff-selection-penalized-protected-leave","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"OAKLAND DIVISION","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Filed 07/13/26","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Plaintiffs initiated this lawsuit on July 13, 2026, bringing claims against Meta","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"A group of 26 Meta employees has sued the company, claiming it used artificial intelligence systems to select people for layoffs, disproportionately targeting those on medical, parental or family leave.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"}],"assertion":"On 13 July 2026 twenty-six anonymous plaintiffs (Does 1 through 26) filed a complaint against Meta Platforms, Inc. in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, Oakland division, alleging employment discrimination in the May 2026 reduction in force.","causal_attribution":"The filing of the complaint is documented by the court record. The complaint establishes only the plaintiffs’ allegations."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"activity-monitoring data, AI-token-usage dashboards, and algorithmically assisted","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"artificial-intelligence-assisted systems to score, rank, and select employees for inclusion","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"algorithmic productivity scoring drawn from keystroke, screen-content, mouse,","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"The parties dispute whether Meta utilized AI in deciding to terminate plaintiffs’","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"They claim that Meta used a number of internal AI-assisted systems to score and rank employees on a termination list.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges, on information and belief, that Meta used a set of internal AI-assisted systems to score, rank and select employees for the termination list: the Metamate internal large-language-model assistant, employee-trained \"second brain\" agents, keystroke and other activity-monitoring data, AI-token-usage dashboards, and algorithmically assisted performance ranking and calibration.","causal_attribution":"These are the plaintiffs’ allegations, pleaded on information and belief and supported by plaintiff declarations that were not inspected (they are quoted in the complaint and the order). Meta disputes them (claim c4). The news reports and the court order restate the complaint and are one reporting chain with it."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"be accumulated by an employee who is on protected medical or family leave, or whose","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"protected-leave-takers or accommodation-seekers for individualized human review. Meta","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"On information and belief, Meta did not neutralize any of the foregoing inputs for","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"result was that employees who took protected leaves were disproportionately selected for","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Plaintiffs are twenty-six current and former Meta employees, each of whom Meta","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"selected for separation in the RIF, and each of whom","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"About half the plaintiffs had taken leave for caregiving or pregnancy-related reasons.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that the inputs to these systems cannot be accumulated by an employee on protected medical, family or parental leave, that Meta did not neutralise them for protected leave, and that employees who took protected leave were therefore disproportionately selected for layoff. It states that each plaintiff was selected for separation in the reduction in force and had, within the 24 months before it, taken, requested or been approved for protected leave, or requested or received a disability accommodation.","causal_attribution":"Allegation of the plaintiffs. The court found on 17 July 2026 only serious questions going to the merits and no likelihood of success on that record (claim c5). Whether any AI system affected any plaintiff’s selection is unresolved."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Workforce management and organizational decisions were and are made by people, not AI.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"},{"locator":"selection decisions in the RIF were “made by human","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"promotion history over a defined period. There was no AI-","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"was selected based on leave status, disability, or any other protected characteristic,","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"“selection decision [was] made by ‘AI.’” Id. ¶ 11.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"Selection decisions were made by human business leaders","relation":"supports","source_id":"s9"},{"locator":"defined period. There was no AI-assisted “scoring” or “ranking” related to employee","relation":"supports","source_id":"s9"},{"locator":"guidance does not permit AI adoption and usage metrics to be used as negative factors in","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"performance reviews in 2025 or as selection criteria in the RIF.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"Meta denies the allegations. A Meta spokesperson said workforce management and organisational decisions were made by people, not AI. In declarations filed by a Meta human-resources director, Meta states that selection decisions were made by human business leaders using documented neutral criteria, that no AI-assisted scoring or ranking of employee performance was used, that no plaintiff was selected on the basis of leave status or disability, and that no selection decision was made by AI.","causal_attribution":"Meta’s statements and declarations about its own process. They are a party account and had been tested only through briefing and court hearings (claims c5 and c7), not in discovery."},{"id":"c5","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"described below, the TRO is DENIED.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"The parties dispute whether Meta utilized AI in deciding to terminate plaintiffs’","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"plaintiffs have not shown a likelihood of success on the merits, but rather a “serious question[]”","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"Loss of health care, employment, protected leave, and unvested restricted stock units (“RSUs”) are","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"Loss of immigration status is different. Four of the plaintiffs have employment-based,","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"they were not in the rooms where it happened.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"On 17 July 2026 the court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order. The order records that the parties dispute whether Meta used AI in deciding to terminate the plaintiffs, finds serious questions going to the merits but no shown likelihood of success on that record, finds that loss of health care, employment, protected leave and unvested equity can be remedied in arbitration, and treats the possible loss of immigration status for four plaintiffs with Meta-sponsored visas as a potentially irreparable harm that needed more information.","causal_attribution":"A court order establishes what the court ruled and recorded. It does not establish that AI was or was not used in the selection."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"On May 20, 2026, Meta began notifying the selected employees by email, beginning with","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"finalized on or about July 22, 2026 (and on or about August 20, 2026 for New York","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"laid off on May 20, 2026.” Complaint (“Compl.”) [Dkt. No. 1] ¶ 45 (the “mass reduction in force”","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"Though they have been notified of their layoffs, all 26 remain employed by Meta, with separations set to begin July 22.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"},{"locator":"Meta in May notified nearly 8,000 employees, or about 10% of its global workforce, that they were losing their jobs","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"Laid-off workers remain on the payroll but lost access to Meta systems on May 20","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"}],"assertion":"Meta began notifying employees selected in the reduction in force on 20 May 2026 (about 8,000 employees, roughly 10 percent of its workforce). The complaint says the plaintiffs were notified of their selection from that date, and that separations were scheduled for about 22 July 2026 (later for some plaintiffs). Meta said in court filings that laid-off workers stayed on the payroll but lost access to Meta systems on 20 May.","causal_attribution":"The notification date and the scheduled separation dates come from the complaint and Meta court filings as relayed by Reuters. The sources inspected do not report whether each separation took place on its scheduled date, although Courthouse News called the plaintiffs former employees on 24 August 2026."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Hearing on Motion for Preliminary Injunction conducted via videoconference. The Court","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"summarizes tentative. Argument of counsel heard. Motion taken under submission; written order","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"I have a record I have to deal with and the record at the moment does not persuade me of the merits","relation":"supports","source_id":"s8"},{"locator":"categorical denial of any impact of AI in the termination process","relation":"supports","source_id":"s8"},{"locator":"whether what plaintiffs think happened, happened","relation":"supports","source_id":"s8"}],"assertion":"The court held a hearing on the plaintiffs’ preliminary injunction motion on 24 August 2026, heard argument and took the motion under submission with a written order to follow. Courthouse News reports that the judge said the record at that time did not persuade the judge of the merits, that the plaintiffs’ evidence raised some potential questions about Meta’s categorical denial of any impact of AI in the termination process, and that the case turns on whether what plaintiffs think happened, happened.","causal_attribution":"The minute entry documents that the hearing occurred and the motion was taken under submission. The judge’s remarks are reported by one news outlet and the transcript was not inspected. No written ruling on the preliminary injunction was found as of 29 September 2026."},{"id":"c8","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"and only Plaintiff Doe 20, hereby voluntarily dismisses","relation":"supports","source_id":"s10"},{"locator":"remain parties and continue to prosecute this action","relation":"supports","source_id":"s10"},{"locator":"Doe 20 was voluntarily dismissed from this action on August 3, 2026 pursuant to Federal","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"is made on behalf of Doe 20, and no relief is sought on Doe 20’s behalf.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"One plaintiff (Doe 20) voluntarily dismissed all of that plaintiff’s claims without prejudice on 3 August 2026 (Dkt. 33), and the notice states that Does 1 through 19 and 21 through 26 remain parties. No reason is given in the notice.","causal_attribution":"A filing by the plaintiffs’ counsel records the dismissal. It does not say whether that plaintiff was selected in the reduction in force or why the dismissal was made."},{"id":"c9","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"They recognize that their claims must be arbitrated, and they have initiated arbitration proceedings","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"with the American Arbitration Association (AAA). Here, they seek a temporary restraining order:","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"while they pursue their claims in private arbitration","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"from this Court only the status-quo-preserving provisional relief that Meta’s own","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"G. Reserve to the arbitral forum all relief on the merits, including but not limited to","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The 17 July 2026 order records that the plaintiffs recognize their claims must be arbitrated and that they have initiated arbitration proceedings with the American Arbitration Association. The complaint says the plaintiffs seek from the court only status-quo-preserving provisional relief pending an independent audit of the selection process and arbitration of the merits, and it reserves merits relief such as reinstatement, back pay and damages to the arbitral forum.","causal_attribution":"The order records the plaintiffs’ own statement about their arbitration filings. The arbitration itself is confidential and its progress is unknown."}],"effects":[{"label":"Employees on or after protected leave allegedly disproportionately selected for layoff by an AI-assisted process that did not account for leave (disputed by Meta)","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"},{"label":"Plaintiffs notified of selection for termination on 20 May 2026, with separations scheduled from 22 July 2026 and possible loss of health coverage, unvested equity and (for four plaintiffs) work-visa status","claim_id":"c6","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.474171/gov.uscourts.cand.474171.1.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"meta-complaint"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.474171/gov.uscourts.cand.474171.25.0.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.474171/gov.uscourts.cand.474171.42.1_1.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"meta-court-declarations"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.474171/gov.uscourts.cand.474171.46.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.474171/gov.uscourts.cand.474171.49.0.pdf","kind":"court_record","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://www.cbsnews.com/news/26-meta-workers-sue-ai-aided-layoffs-medical-family-leave/","kind":"wire_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"meta-complaint"},{"id":"s7","url":"https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2026/jul/17/us-judge-wont-block-meta-from-laying-off-workers-w/","kind":"wire_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"reuters-tro-coverage"},{"id":"s8","url":"https://www.courthousenews.com/meta-workers-claiming-ai-fired-them-unlikely-to-see-relief/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"courthouse-news-hearing"},{"id":"s9","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.474171/gov.uscourts.cand.474171.31.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"meta-court-declarations"},{"id":"s10","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.474171/gov.uscourts.cand.474171.33.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["work","health"],"unknowns":["Whether any AI system scored, ranked or selected any plaintiff is unresolved. The complaint pleads it on information and belief. Meta denies it in declarations. No discovery had occurred in the sources inspected, and the judge said on 17 July 2026 that plaintiffs were not in the rooms where the selections happened.","The sources inspected do not show how many people beyond the plaintiffs were selected because of leave, or how many of the roughly 8,000 laid-off employees were scored by any AI-assisted system. Only the plaintiffs are counted as reported harmed.","The order on the preliminary injunction motion (argued 24 August 2026, taken under submission) had not been found by 29 September 2026. The hearing remarks were read only through one news report and the transcript was not inspected.","Whether each plaintiff’s separation took place on its scheduled date (22 July 2026 for most, later for some) is not stated in the sources inspected. Reuters and CBS/AP describe the plaintiffs as still employed in July, and Courthouse News called them former employees on 24 August 2026.","One plaintiff (Doe 20) was voluntarily dismissed on 3 August 2026 and no reason is stated. The affected count therefore uses 25.","The complaint and declarations contain individual medical, pregnancy and immigration details. They are anonymised in the public copies and are deliberately not described here.","Reuters and WSJ pages for the initial filing could not be read (HTTP 401). Reuters coverage of the 17 July ruling was read through a Spokesman-Review copy. The Law.com article was behind a subscription wall and was not cited.","The complaint alleges that data captured by a separate Meta employee-monitoring program (the Model Capability Initiative) supplied inputs to the selection process, and Meta denies that AI was used in the selection. That program’s own privacy and security consequences are a different event, recorded as 2026-meta-mci-us-employee-keystroke-and-screen-capture-for-ai-training-then-internal-data-exposure, and are not part of this record."],"geography":{"basis":"The complaint states that the plaintiffs worked in California, Illinois, Washington, New York, the District of Columbia, Pennsylvania and Florida and the suit is in the US District Court for the Northern District of California. Meta also notified employees in other countries in the same reduction in force, but no plaintiff outside the US is described.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"The complaint, the court order denying the temporary restraining order, two Meta declarations, the plaintiffs’ notice of dismissal of one plaintiff and the hearing minute entry were read from the court record (CourtListener copies), with CBS/AP, Reuters and Courthouse News reports. Every AI-related statement is attributed. The plaintiffs are anonymous in the record and are not described individually. Meta denies that AI made or informed any selection decision and the court has not resolved the dispute.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-29"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The complaint alleges, on information and belief, that Meta used internal AI-assisted systems (Metamate, second-brain agents, activity-monitoring scoring, AI-token-usage dashboards, algorithmic ranking and calibration) to score, rank and select employees for the 20 May 2026 termination list. Meta’s declarations say selection decisions were made by human business leaders and that there was no AI-assisted scoring or ranking related to employee performance, and the court described the declarations as saying Meta did not use AI in any way with respect to the RIF. The court recorded that the parties dispute whether Meta used AI in deciding to terminate the plaintiffs and found on 17 July 2026 that the plaintiffs had not shown a likelihood of success on the current record. On 24 August 2026 the judge said the plaintiffs’ evidence raised some potential questions about Meta’s categorical denial. No discovery had tested Meta’s account in the sources inspected.","status":"disputed"},"person_relations":["made_decision_about","made_claim_about"]},"name":"US: 26 Meta employees sue alleging an AI-assisted May 2026 layoff selection penalized workers on protected leave, Meta says people made the decisions","summary":"On 20 May 2026 Meta began notifying about 8,000 employees (roughly 10 percent of its workforce) that they had been selected for layoff. On 13 July 2026 twenty-six anonymous employees who had taken or requested medical, pregnancy, parental or family leave, or a disability accommodation, sued Meta in the US District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint alleges, on information and belief, that Meta used internal AI-assisted systems (including the Metamate assistant, keystroke and activity monitoring, AI-token-usage dashboards and algorithmic performance ranking) to score, rank and select employees, and that these inputs could not accumulate during protected leave, so plaintiffs on leave were disproportionately selected. Meta says workforce decisions were made by people, not AI, and that no selection decision was made by AI. On 17 July 2026 the court denied a temporary restraining order, recording that the parties dispute whether Meta used AI in the terminations and finding serious questions on the merits but no shown likelihood of success. One plaintiff was voluntarily dismissed on 3 August 2026. The preliminary injunction motion was argued on 24 August 2026 and taken under submission. The plaintiffs are pursuing their merits claims in arbitration and the allegations are unproven.","incidentDate":"2026-05-20","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-07-14","aiSystem":"Meta internal AI-assisted systems alleged in the complaint: the Metamate internal LLM assistant, employee-trained \"second brain\" agents, keystroke and activity-monitoring productivity scoring, AI-token-usage dashboards and AI-assisted performance calibration (Meta denies AI was used in selecting employees for the layoff)","aiProduct":"Meta internal AI systems (reported)","aiCompany":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"disputed","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The complaint alleges that 26 employees were selected for termination in Meta’s May 2026 reduction in force through an AI-assisted process that penalised protected leave, with separations scheduled from 22 July 2026 and asserted losses of employer-subsidised health coverage, unvested equity and, for four plaintiffs, work-visa status. Meta denies that AI was used in the selections. The court found the alleged harms other than immigration status remediable in arbitration and has not decided the merits.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"disputed","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":25,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"The complaint states that each of 26 plaintiffs was selected for separation in the May 2026 reduction in force. One plaintiff was voluntarily dismissed on 3 August 2026 without a stated reason, so 25 active plaintiffs are counted as a documented minimum. The roughly 8,000 other employees notified in the reduction in force are not counted because no source ties their selection to the alleged AI process.","victimAgeRange":"adult","platformType":"other","primarySourceUrl":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.474171/gov.uscourts.cand.474171.1.0.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"Complaint, Does 1 through 26 v. Meta Platforms, Inc. (N.D. Cal., filed 13 Jul 2026)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-29T21:16:06.345461+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:57.733761+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["historical-2026"]},{"id":"2026-stanford-rde-ai-altered-promotional-photo-student-replaced","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'Stanford Residential & Dining Enterprises recently used AI to change the races of the students it included in its advertisements. AI was also used to noticeably slim down and alter students’ faces.'; 'he noticed that he had been removed from the photo and replaced by a AI-generated black woman.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Stanford confirmed that Residential and Dining Enterprises (R&DE) used generative AI to modify the appearance of several students in a promotional image. R&DE changed the students’ clothing into Stanford merchandise, slimmed down two students’ faces and entirely changed one student’s race, gender and appearance.'; 'The Daily confirmed that the photo was used in a custom banner in the Governor’s Corner student housing center, which has since been taken down.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'Stanford University said the use of artificial intelligence to alter the race and appearance of students in a promotional photo violated its policy'; 'We have apologized to the students in the photo whose images were altered or erased,'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"Stanford Residential & Dining Enterprises used generative AI to alter a promotional photograph of three students, replacing one male student with an AI-generated Black woman and making the two other students' faces appear slimmer, and the altered image was displayed on campus banners.","causal_attribution":"The Review's comparison of the original and altered images (one group) and the university's own statements confirming the AI alteration (second group); the itemised details are in c4."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Stanford’s AI policy is clear: The use of AI in producing or altering images of Stanford people, events, research, facilities, or achievements is strictly prohibited,'; 'Both the alteration and lack of disclosure in this case violate that policy. We are working to provide additional training for all staff and ensure proper review of all materials.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'Following the incident, the university removed the image and announced plans to provide additional staff training to prevent future violations.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'Not only the fact that the image was altered, but the ways in which it was altered, reflect a serious error in judgment. We have apologized to the students in the photo whose images were altered or erased,'; 'The university said it has launched an investigation to determine what happened and'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"The university said the alteration and its non-disclosure violated its policy prohibiting AI use in producing or altering images of Stanford people, removed the image, promised staff training and review of materials, called the alteration a serious error in judgment, apologised to the students and opened an investigation.","causal_attribution":"University statements to The Stanford Daily, NBC Bay Area and NBC News."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'At first, I found it hilarious that they had used AI to completely change our appearances, including my race and gender. But after looking at the comparison, I was also upset'; 'Seeing my identity changed and being left out of the picture made me feel, in a way, silenced and erased from a representation that was supposed to include me.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'He described the incident as “funny,” but also noted that he was exhausted by the current level of media attention he had received from outlets across the country.'; 'I’m so tired, I want it to stop,'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'To see me erased like that so easily was kind of very upsetting,'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"The replaced student said he first found the edit funny but was upset that the university changed his identity and left him out, describing feeling silenced and erased, and said he was exhausted by the national media attention and wanted it to stop.","causal_attribution":"The student's statements to the Review, the Daily and (via NBC News) The New York Times."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Stanford University removed a promotional photo that had been digitally altered to replace a male Hispanic student with an AI-generated Black female student without disclosure, violating university policy.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'R&DE changed the students’ clothing into Stanford merchandise, slimmed down two students’ faces and entirely changed one student’s race, gender and appearance.'; 'The Daily confirmed that the photo was used in a custom banner in the Governor’s Corner student housing center, which has since been taken down.'; 'Both the alteration and lack of disclosure in this case violate that policy.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The replaced student is Hispanic; the altered image changed the students' clothing into Stanford merchandise and was displayed without disclosure, including on a custom banner in the Governor's Corner student housing centre, since taken down.","causal_attribution":"NBC Bay Area's report and the Daily's own description and banner check; single chain for each detail."}],"effects":[{"label":"three students' images in a university promotional photograph were altered with AI without disclosure, one replaced by a generated person of another race and gender, leaving him feeling silenced and erased and exposed to national attention","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://stanfordreview.org/stanford-r-de-uses-ai-to-race-swap-students-for-advertising/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-09-25 (The Stanford Review, 21 September 2026; html lang=en). First report; publishes the pre- and post-AI images and the replaced student's statement.","independence_group":"stanford-review-reporting"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://stanforddaily.com/2026/09/23/university-confirms-ai-edited-photo/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en-US","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-09-25 (The Stanford Daily, published 23 September 2026, updated 24 September; html lang=en-US). University public-relations director's confirmation and the student's further statements.","independence_group":"stanford-university-statements"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/stanford-ai-photo-policy-violation/4147081/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en-US","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-09-25 (NBC Bay Area, 22 September 2026; html lang=en-US). Short report of the removal and planned training.","independence_group":"stanford-university-statements"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/stanford-apologizes-saying-ai-altered-pic-changed-students-gender-race-rcna599691","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-09-25 (NBC News, 24 September 2026; html lang=en). University apology and investigation; relays the Review's reporting and a New York Times quotation.","independence_group":"stanford-university-statements"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["education","everyday_life"],"unknowns":["Which AI tool was used and who in the department made and approved the alteration.","When the altered banner was produced and displayed; according to the replaced student the original photograph was taken at a 2024 Lunar New Year dinner, and the banner came to attention in September 2026.","What the two slimmed students have said; their accounts (reported by the Daily as having spoken out) were not inspected.","The outcome of the university's investigation."],"geography":{"basis":"The photograph was taken in a Stanford dining hall and the altered banner displayed at the Governor's Corner student housing centre on the Stanford campus, California (The Stanford Daily, NBC News); the three are Stanford students. No court proceeding.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as an institutional-use case in which an AI system altered how identifiable people were depicted: a university department replaced one student and reshaped two others in advertising without disclosure, confirmed by the university (which apologised and opened an investigation) and first reported by the student newspaper with the original and altered images; the replaced student's distress is his own account. Low severity: no financial or physical harm is reported. No student is named here.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-25"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Stanford confirmed to The Stanford Daily that Residential and Dining Enterprises used generative AI to modify the students' appearance in the image, and said in a statement reported by NBC News that the use of AI to alter the students' race and appearance violated its policy; The Stanford Review published the original and altered images. The tool is not identified.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Stanford University: the Residential & Dining Enterprises department used generative AI to alter a promotional photograph of three students, replacing a Hispanic male student with an AI-generated Black woman, slimming two students' faces and changing their clothing, on campus banners; the university said the undisclosed alteration violated its AI policy, apologised and opened an investigation (Stanford Review, Stanford Daily, NBC Bay Area, NBC News, 21-24 September 2026)","summary":"The Stanford Review reported on 21 September 2026 that Stanford's Residential & Dining Enterprises (R&DE) had used AI to change the appearance of students in its advertising: a student was sent images comparing a banner with the original photograph, which he recalled a Stanford photographer taking, and found he had been removed and replaced by an AI-generated Black woman, while the two students beside him were made to appear visibly thinner. Stanford confirmed to The Stanford Daily on 23 September that R&DE used generative AI to modify the appearance of several students in the image; the Daily reported that the students' clothing was changed into Stanford merchandise, two students' faces were slimmed and one student's race, gender and appearance were entirely changed, and the university said the alteration and its non-disclosure violated its policy prohibiting AI in producing or altering images of Stanford people; the banner at the Governor's Corner housing centre was taken down and staff training promised. On 24 September NBC News reported the university's statement that the alteration was 'a serious error in judgment', that it had apologised to the students whose images were altered or erased, and that it had opened an investigation. The replaced student, who first found the edit funny, said that seeing his identity changed and being left out made him feel 'silenced and erased from a representation that was supposed to include me', that it was upsetting, and that he was exhausted by the national media attention. According to the student, the original photograph was taken at a 2024 Lunar New Year dinner in a campus dining hall and had been used unaltered in earlier promotional material.","incidentDate":"2026-09-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-09-21","aiSystem":"Generative AI image-editing tool used by Stanford Residential & Dining Enterprises to alter a promotional photograph (tool not identified)","aiProduct":"Unidentified image tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress","other_material_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A student's image was removed from an institutional photograph and replaced with an AI-generated person of a different race and gender, and two other students' faces were slimmed and their clothing changed, all without disclosure, on campus advertising; the replaced student describes feeling silenced and erased and being exhausted by the resulting national attention, and the university says it has apologised to the students in the photograph whose images were altered or erased (The Stanford Review, The Stanford Daily, NBC News). No financial or physical harm is reported.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"established","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":3,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"Three students appear in the photograph (NBC News: an image of three students); one was replaced and two were slimmed and re-clothed (The Stanford Daily), and the university apologised to 'the students in the photo whose images were altered or erased' (NBC News). The replaced student describes distress; the two others' own accounts were not inspected (the Daily says they have spoken out). Exact 3 people whose images were altered without disclosure.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"internal_action","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://stanfordreview.org/stanford-r-de-uses-ai-to-race-swap-students-for-advertising/","primarySourceLabel":"The Stanford Review, 21 September 2026: Stanford R&DE Uses AI to Race Swap Students for Advertising","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-25T03:58:44.421252+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:54.864519+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["ai-image-editing","institutional-use","university","representation","stanford","california","united-states","depicted-or-impersonated","policy-violation"]},{"id":"2026-mount-shasta-gemini-planned-climb-rescue","metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"Re-checked on 2026-10-13 against the source bodies, all English: CBS Sacramento (read from an Internet Archive capture because the live page refused this host), the San Francisco Chronicle text as syndicated on Yahoo News, ABC News, KRCR, the USA Today report on The Spokesman-Review, Jefferson Public Radio and Straight Arrow News. Every report relaying the Siskiyou County Sheriff's Office account places the stranding, injury and rescue on Mount Shasta in California (Clear Creek Route, Mud Creek Canyon), which supports event_countries US. CBS, ABC, the Chronicle copy and USA Today say the three hikers are from Roseville, California, which supports affected_person_countries US; residence was used only for that role. No court, prosecution or lawsuit appears in any body, so court_countries is empty. The 2026-09-15 evidence passage from the summary is replaced by source-body passages.","evidence":[{"kind":"source_body","locator":"Three novice hikers became stranded on California's Mount Shasta over the weekend","location":"https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/news/mount-shasta-hikers-rescued-california-ai-incorrect-instructions/","supports":["event_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"Mount Shasta is a California stratovolcano that rises more than 14,000 feet","location":"https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2026/sep/04/hikers-rescued-after-ai-misroutes-strands-them-on-/","supports":["event_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"the three young men from Roseville, California became stuck on the mountain during their descent","location":"https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/news/mount-shasta-hikers-rescued-california-ai-incorrect-instructions/","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"The three men from Roseville, California, made camp at about 8,400 feet last Saturday","location":"https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2026/sep/04/hikers-rescued-after-ai-misroutes-strands-them-on-/","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]}],"court_countries":[],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"unresolved":["Sequence detail for the next full review: CBS says the group wandered into the Mud Creek Canyon drainage and one hiker then fell and injured his knee; ABC says the injury happened before the group wandered off route. The stored narrative follows CBS.","Contributing factors not in the stored narrative: the Chronicle copy on Yahoo News reports that the climbers navigated by following the line of a digital map in the AllTrails app, misreading it as an established trail, and that during the descent the phone they navigated with ran out of battery and the spare power bank did not connect before they ended up well off-route. These are reported non-Gemini navigation factors. The sheriff's statement attributes only the food and water shortfall to Gemini. The hikers' prompts and Gemini's replies remain unpublished, and Google says it could not reproduce the advice.","The San Francisco Chronicle original was not readable from this host (bot-check page live and in the Internet Archive); its text was read through the Yahoo News syndication.","Attribution detail for the next full review: the stored detailed_description says the climbers told the San Francisco Chronicle 'We relied too much on AI rather than our own critical thinking' and described the carbohydrate advice. The Chronicle copy on Yahoo News quotes both from an official report, and Jefferson Public Radio says the climbers told Forest Service rangers about the carbohydrate advice. The Chronicle copy also says rangers escorted the group back to its base camp, where CBS, ABC, USA Today and Jefferson Public Radio say the trailhead."],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-13","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/news/mount-shasta-hikers-rescued-california-ai-incorrect-instructions/","notes":"Cited primary source. The live page returned HTTP 406 to this host on 2026-10-13, so the body was read in full from an Internet Archive capture (web.archive.org/web/2026id_/, gzip, decompressed); html lang en-US. Relays the Siskiyou County Sheriff's Office press release: hikers from Roseville, California; stranded on California's Mount Shasta; base camp at about 8,400 feet on Saturday, summit at 7 p.m. Sunday, off-route into the Mud Creek Canyon drainage on the mountain's southern side, rescue on Monday; the sheriff's statement that Gemini advised far less food and water than the group required.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.sfchronicle.com/outdoors/article/shasta-climbers-rescued-chatgpt-22414629.php","notes":"San Francisco Chronicle original. Live fetch on 2026-10-13 returned HTTP 200 with a 3 kB bot-check page and no article; the Internet Archive capture returned the same page. Not read here; its text was read through the Yahoo News syndication listed separately.","access":"unavailable","language":null},{"url":"https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/climbers-rescued-mount-shasta-relying-214819015.html","notes":"San Francisco Chronicle article as syndicated on Yahoo News, fetched live on 2026-10-13 (HTTP 200, html lang en-US) and read in full. Calls the three climbers California college students from Roseville; places the start at the Clear Creek Trailhead on Shasta's southeastern side; reports that they navigated by following a line in the AllTrails app, misreading it as an established trail, in addition to asking Gemini; carries a correction that an earlier version misstated the AI tool (the Chronicle original's URL slug still reads chatgpt).","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://abcnews.com/US/3-hikers-ai-plan-trip-rescued-after-becoming/story?id=136176177","notes":"Fetched live on 2026-10-13 (HTTP 200, html lang en), read in full. Attributes the account to the Siskiyou County Sheriff's Office; Roseville, California hikers; rescue Monday near the Clear Creek Route; one caption reads Mount Shasta in Siskiyou County, Calif. Its sequence differs slightly from CBS: it says the knee injury happened before the group wandered into Mud Creek Canyon. ABC said it had asked Google for comment.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://krcrtv.com/news/local/sheriff-discusses-mount-shasta-rescue-after-hikers-relied-on-ai-to-plan-trip","notes":"Fetched live on 2026-10-13 (HTTP 200, html lang en), read in full (Redding dateline). Sheriff Jeremiah LaRue interview; rescue along the Clear Creek Route. A photo caption dates the rescue to Sun., Aug. 31, 2026, but 31 August 2026 was a Monday and the text says Monday.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2026/sep/04/hikers-rescued-after-ai-misroutes-strands-them-on-/","notes":"USA Today report syndicated by The Spokesman-Review, fetched live on 2026-10-13 (HTTP 200, html lang en), read in full. Three men from Roseville, California; Mount Shasta described in the text as a California stratovolcano and in the photo caption as in Siskiyou County; same sheriff's office account.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.ijpr.org/outdoors-leisure-and-sports/2026-09-04/mount-shasta-hikers-relied-on-ai-their-trip-ended-in-a-rescue","notes":"Jefferson Public Radio, fetched live on 2026-10-13 (HTTP 200, html lang en), read in full. Sheriff's statement and ranger Nick Meyers interview; one hiker injured a knee and the group spent the night in Mud Creek Canyon. Names no residence.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://san.com/cc/chatbots-dont-climb-mountains-so-why-are-hikers-getting-lost-after-trusting-them/","notes":"Straight Arrow News, 8 October 2026, fetched live on 2026-10-13 (HTTP 200, html lang en-US), read in full. A roundup of AI-related hiking rescues; two paragraphs on this case relay the sheriff's office account and a Google spokesperson's statement that the company holds no prompts and could not reproduce the advice. Adds no location detail.","access":"read","language":"en"}]},"name":"Mount Shasta climb planned with Google Gemini: night stranding, knee injury and rescue (Siskiyou County, California)","summary":"Three novice hikers from Roseville, California, planned a Mount Shasta summit attempt with Google's Gemini, which the Siskiyou County Sheriff's Office said advised them to carry far less food and water than their group needed for what became a multi-day ordeal. After reaching the summit at 7 p.m. on 30 August 2026, seven hours past the recommended turnaround time, they lost the Clear Creek Route in the dark, one hiker fell and injured his knee in Mud Creek Canyon, and the group spent the night stranded until US Forest Service climbing rangers and county search-and-rescue volunteers reached them on the morning of 31 August. The sheriff's office called the reliance on Gemini 'a critical misstep'.","incidentDate":"2026-08-29","incidentEndDate":"2026-08-31","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-09-02","aiSystem":"Google Gemini","aiProduct":"Gemini","aiCompany":"Google","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["physical_injury"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"One hiker fell and injured his knee during a night descent off the route. The group of three spent the night stranded in the steep drainage of Mud Creek Canyon without adequate food or water and was found 'exhausted, hungry and thirsty' the next morning. All three received medical aid and walked out with rescuers; no hospitalization was reported.","frameworkFacets":["P1d","P5b","P5c"],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":3,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The sheriff's account documents all three AI-using hikers stranded and requiring rescue and medical aid, including one with a knee injury.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-CA","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/news/mount-shasta-hikers-rescued-california-ai-incorrect-instructions/","primarySourceLabel":"CBS Sacramento: Hikers rescued from California's Mount Shasta after ascent planned with incorrect AI information (quotes the Siskiyou County Sheriff's Office statement)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-05T11:55:07.681677+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-13T03:03:22.817175+00:00","scopeVersion":"participant-v2","tags":["gemini","google","physical-safety","trip-planning","rescue","competence-boundaries","us","adult"]},{"id":"2026-tumbler-ridge-chatgpt-shooting","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c_deaths","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Opening investigation paragraph and paragraph on autopsies for eight victims and the suspect.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_rcmp"},{"locator":"Paragraph identifying eight people killed on 10 February before the shooter killed herself; victim-identification caption.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_cbc_ban"},{"locator":"Paragraph beginning “Van Rootselaar carried out” and subsequent account of the deaths at home and school.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_mj"}],"assertion":"On 10 February 2026, eight victims were killed in Tumbler Ridge, British Columbia; the shooter also died. The eight-victim count excludes the shooter.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_event","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"RCMP identification paragraphs and victim-identification caption, including correction of stepbrother to half-brother.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_cbc_ban"},{"locator":"PDF p.10, Background A, describes deaths at home, six at school and shooter’s death.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_motion"},{"locator":"Paragraphs 25–28, PDF pp.8–10.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc"}],"assertion":"The victims were the shooter’s mother and 11-year-old half-brother at home, and five students and an education assistant at the secondary school. The 18-year-old shooter died by suicide.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_injuries","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraph after the two-scene investigation update identifies two surviving victims remaining in hospital.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_rcmp"},{"locator":"Paragraphs 27–28, PDF pp.9–10; paragraph 1 describes 25 injured seeking care.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc"}],"assertion":"At least two surviving victims required hospital care. Other injuries were reported; the provincial complaint distinguishes two students transported to Vancouver from approximately 25 people seeking local medical care. These descriptions do not establish an exact deduplicated injury total.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_trauma","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraphs 2–6 and 17, PDF pp.2–4 and 7.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_deeley"},{"locator":"Paragraphs 2–3, PDF p.2.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_hoekstra"},{"locator":"Paragraph 28, PDF pp.8–9, explicitly describes severe and lasting trauma.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bertrand"},{"locator":"Paragraph 28, PDF p.9, explicitly describes severe and lasting trauma.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_ac"},{"locator":"Paragraph 28, PDF p.9: 'fired several shotgun blasts through the classroom doors that struck the wall behind their heads'; 'will haunt her for the rest of her life.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_rushlow"}],"assertion":"Survivor complaints report lasting psychological harm among students and educators, including a head teacher and his son F.D., a gym teacher, a grade 7 teacher, a student and her sister, and A.C. These are individual accounts of harm, not a count of everyone present at school.","causal_attribution":"The complaints attribute these harms to the shooting and allege a contribution from OpenAI; that contribution is contested."},{"id":"c_ai_connection","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.1, June 2025 account-review paragraph; p.2, repeat-policy-violator section.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_openai"},{"locator":"Opening second-account account and paragraph citing three sources with knowledge and material reviewed from the ChatGPT history.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_mj"}],"assertion":"The shooter used ChatGPT before the shooting. OpenAI acknowledged an account belonging to the perpetrator, while Mother Jones independently reported reviewing material from the shooter’s ChatGPT history.","causal_attribution":"These distinct evidentiary routes establish the reported AI connection, not that ChatGPT caused or determined the attack."},{"id":"c_ban","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.1, paragraph beginning “As we shared with you”.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_openai"},{"locator":"Direct company responses in the opening paragraphs; RCMP confirmation that contact followed the shooting.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_cbc_ban"}],"assertion":"OpenAI acknowledged that automated detection led to human review and closure of the shooter’s first ChatGPT account in June 2025, without a police referral. It said the visible activity did not meet its then-current threshold for credible and imminent planning.","causal_attribution":"The company’s acknowledgement establishes its stated decision and rationale, not whether that decision satisfied a legal duty."},{"id":"c_second_account","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.2, “Enhance our System to Detect Repeat Policy Violators”.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_openai"}],"assertion":"OpenAI acknowledged that the shooter used a second ChatGPT account despite its repeat-violator detection system. It said it discovered that account after the shooter was publicly identified and then shared it with law enforcement.","causal_attribution":"Continued access is acknowledged; its causal significance and whether different enforcement would have prevented the attack remain unresolved."},{"id":"c_promises","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF pp.1–3, four commitments and the enhanced-referral statement on p.2.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_openai"}],"assertion":"In its 26 February letter to Canadian ministers, OpenAI committed to stronger referral criteria, direct Canadian law-enforcement contacts, localized support and improved repeat-violator detection. It said its enhanced protocol would refer the June 2025 account if discovered then.","causal_attribution":"A policy commitment is not proof of implementation or effectiveness."},{"id":"c_apology","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Opening paragraphs on publication by Tumbler RidgeLines, company authentication and date; apology passage.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_apology"}],"assertion":"Sam Altman’s apology letter, dated 23 April and publicly reported on 24 April, expressed regret that OpenAI had not alerted law enforcement. CBC reported that an OpenAI spokesperson confirmed the letter’s authenticity.","causal_attribution":"Regret and acknowledgement of non-reporting do not establish legal liability or causation."},{"id":"c_march","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Opening filing paragraphs, “Lifelong harms” and “Chatbot acted as therapist: claim” sections.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_march"},{"locator":"Caption PDF p.2 identifies M.G. and her mother; Background F, PDF p.14 identifies the prior B.C. action.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_motion"}],"assertion":"On 9 March 2026, the family of the critically injured student identified as M.G. in the U.S. proceedings filed a B.C. Supreme Court claim, including her younger sister and mother. They alleged serious physical and psychological harms and prior knowledge of violent planning by OpenAI.","causal_attribution":"Claims of company knowledge and causal responsibility remain allegations."},{"id":"c_april","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.2, recital lists the seven actions and 29 April filing date.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_relation"},{"locator":"Background F, PDF p.14, B.C. filing discontinued and refiled in this District.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_motion"},{"locator":"Paragraph beginning “It will replace” states the earlier Canadian case was being voluntarily withdrawn.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bbc"}],"assertion":"Seven family actions were filed in Northern District of California federal court on 29 April 2026 against Sam Altman and OpenAI entities. They replaced the earlier B.C. family action, whose discontinuance is described in the defence motion.","causal_attribution":"This records procedural history, not the truth of the complaints."},{"id":"c_damages","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"BBC damages paragraph specifying the prospective amount for this individual case.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bbc"}],"assertion":"On 29 April, the BBC reported counsel’s prospective request for more than US$1 billion in damages in M.G.’s case. This was a requested amount, not an award or an established aggregate loss.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_september_suits","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF pp.2–3, recitals listing seven April and thirty September actions and 9 September relation.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_relation"},{"locator":"Opening paragraphs identify students, teachers and a principal.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_npr"}],"assertion":"Thirty additional survivor actions were filed on 2 September 2026, including students, teachers and the principal. The court related them to Stacey v. Altman on 9 September; with the seven April actions, the private litigation comprised 37 cases.","causal_attribution":"Case counts are not people counts, and related cases are not independent corroboration of shared allegations."},{"id":"c_survivor_accounts","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraphs 2–6, PDF pp.2–4.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_deeley"},{"locator":"Paragraphs 2–3, PDF p.2.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_hoekstra"},{"locator":"Paragraph 2, PDF p.2.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bertrand"},{"locator":"Paragraph 2, PDF p.2.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_ac"}],"assertion":"The inspected September complaints include a head teacher’s account of attempting to resuscitate a student and his son F.D.’s account of sheltering; a 19-year-old student’s serious injury and hospital transport and her sister’s experience of sheltering; a gym teacher’s account of coming under fire; and 13-year-old A.C.’s account of surviving in the library.","causal_attribution":"The experiences and harms are pleaded accounts. Their existence does not establish the complaints’ causal allegations against OpenAI."},{"id":"c_liability_allegations","status":"disputed","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraphs 7–9, 41–46 and 54–59; nine cause-of-action headings.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_deeley"},{"locator":"PDF p.15 main text, lines 3–9: claims called nonviable and accusations against senior personnel baseless.","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s_motion"},{"locator":"Direct Kwon statement rejecting political/public-relations factors and the allegations about internal decisions.","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s_npr"}],"assertion":"The survivor complaints allege negligent design and warnings, negligent entrustment and undertaking, aiding and abetting, product liability and emotional distress. They allege staff urged a police referral and that reputation and IPO interests influenced leadership’s refusal. OpenAI disputes these allegations.","causal_attribution":"These are contested legal and causal theories, not findings that OpenAI facilitated or could have prevented the deaths."},{"id":"c_leadership_dispute","status":"disputed","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraph 54, PDF p.17, information-and-belief allegation.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_deeley"},{"locator":"Kwon emailed statement and later explanation of reporting lines.","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s_npr"},{"locator":"PDF p.15 main text, lines 3–9.","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s_motion"}],"assertion":"The September complaints allege Chris Lehane or someone in his reporting chain made the non-referral decision and Altman ratified it. Jason Kwon denied Lehane’s involvement and said the investigations and legal teams report to him. OpenAI’s court motion also denied Altman’s personal involvement in the June review or referral decision.","causal_attribution":"Responsibility for the internal decision remains disputed; the allegation is not independently corroborated by matching complaint templates."},{"id":"c_july_counsel","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Opening paragraphs naming counsel and later paragraph distinguishing any provincial action from families’ litigation.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_july"}],"assertion":"On 7 July, B.C. announced retention of CFM Lawyers and Stranch, Jennings & Garvey to explore legal action against OpenAI and its decision-makers. That announcement described preparation for a separate provincial action.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_bc_filing","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.1 caption, parties, eight counts and ECF filing stamp; signature on p.39.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc"},{"locator":"21 September statement announcing California legal action.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc_release"}],"assertion":"On 21 September, the Province of British Columbia and the Board of Education of School District No. 59 (Peace River South) filed a federal complaint against Sam Altman and four OpenAI entities in the Northern District of California, case 26-cv-10743. The complaint pleads eight causes of action.","causal_attribution":"The filing is documented; the pleaded allegations are not established facts."},{"id":"c_bc_relief","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraphs 3–4, 31–38 and Prayer for Relief, PDF pp.37–39.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc"}],"assertion":"The Province and school board seek recovery of extraordinary response and recovery costs, including health care, victim services, educational continuity, demolition and a replacement school and wellness centre. They also request punitive and other relief, changes to safeguards and reporting, durable account enforcement and independent compliance audits.","causal_attribution":"This establishes relief requested, not a damages award or proof that the defendants caused those expenditures."},{"id":"c_bc_harm","status":"disputed","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraphs 1–8, 25–38, 45–50, 68–71 and 75–82 (PDF pp.27–28 for continued-access allegation).","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc"},{"locator":"School-demolition reporting and OpenAI’s direct response; no admission of the complaint’s liability theory.","relation":"context","source_id":"s_cbc_bc"},{"locator":"PDF pp.8–10 and p.15 main text, lines 3–9, defendants contest causal responsibility and legal viability.","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s_motion"}],"assertion":"The provincial complaint reports lasting trauma, school closure and demolition, replacement education arrangements and substantial public recovery expenditures. It alleges ChatGPT reinforced violent ideation, that a police warning would have prevented the attack, and that continued access contributed to it.","causal_attribution":"The public bodies’ reported losses and their attribution of them to OpenAI are distinct. Causation and liability remain contested."},{"id":"c_forum_motion","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"ECF 29 filing stamp; PDF pp.8–10 introduction and p.15 main text, lines 3–9.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_motion"}],"assertion":"On 2 September, OpenAI and Altman moved to dismiss the seven original California actions for forum non conveniens, arguing British Columbia was the appropriate forum. They disputed liability and pointed to Canadian institutions and witnesses as relevant to causation and comparative fault.","causal_attribution":"This is the defendants’ litigation position, not a ruling that other institutions caused the shooting."},{"id":"c_vacated","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"One-page order, lines 19–23.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_vacate"}],"assertion":"The court’s 10 September order vacated the 8 October 2026 hearing in the seven earlier actions, pending a coordinated schedule.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_schedule","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.2, numbered paragraphs 1–3; hearing dates visually confirmed in the rendered order.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_schedule"},{"locator":"15 September Set/Reset Deadlines entry expressly resets the seven forum motions to 5 November at 10 a.m.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_stacey_index"},{"locator":"Order of 29 September, p.1: 'Hearing: December 17, 2026 at 10:00 a.m.' under 'Forum Non Conveniens Motion'.","relation":"context","source_id":"s_reschedule"}],"assertion":"The signed 15 September scheduling order had set the forum non conveniens hearing for 5 November 2026 at 10 a.m. in San Francisco, with opposition due 6 October and replies due 20 October. It also set a separate Rule 12(b)(6) hearing for 10 December and case management for 16 December.","causal_attribution":"These were scheduled proceedings, not completed hearings or merits decisions. A 29 September order later set a different schedule."},{"id":"c_survivor_motion","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.1 filing stamp and hearing notice.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_ac_motion"},{"locator":"PDF p.2 paragraph 1.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_schedule"}],"assertion":"A.C.’s docketed 17 September motion extends the forum non conveniens request to a survivor action and lists the 5 November hearing. The 15 September order required forum motions in the thirty additional actions by 17 September.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_related_province","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF pp.3 and 6, relation to Stacey and reassignment.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_relation"},{"locator":"25 September Order Relating Case (entry 8) and Case Assigned/Reassigned entries.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc_index"}],"assertion":"The public docket indexes a 25 September order relating the provincial action to Stacey v. Altman and reassignment to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. The Province’s cost-recovery claims remain a separate action arising from the same shooting.","causal_attribution":"Relation and reassignment do not decide the merits or create a separate incident."},{"id":"c_latest_docket","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Latest 28 September entry 45, Stipulation and Proposed Order.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_stacey_index"},{"locator":"28 September entry 10 and 29 September attorney-notice entry.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc_index"},{"locator":"Last inspected signed scheduling order, dated 15 September.","relation":"context","source_id":"s_schedule"},{"locator":"28 September entry 35, Stipulation and Proposed Order.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_schofield_index"}],"assertion":"The RECAP indexes inspected on 29 September list a 28 September stipulation and proposed order in Stacey (entry 45), Schofield (entry 35), and the provincial action (entry 10); the provincial index also lists a 29 September attorney notice (indexed as appearance/substitution/change/withdrawal). The stipulation’s own body was not read; the court’s 29 September order granting it was read.","causal_attribution":"An indexed proposed order is not a granted order. The schedule the court granted is stated in the 29 September order."},{"id":"c_rushlow","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraph 2, PDF p.2: 'she locked the door and hid her remaining students under her desk'; paragraph 28, PDF p.9: 'fired several shotgun blasts through the classroom doors that struck the wall behind their heads'; paragraph 201, PDF p.46: 'acute psychological trauma, persistent fear, sleep disturbances, intrusive recollections'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_rushlow"}],"assertion":"A grade 7 teacher’s complaint alleges that she had sent part of her class to the library, where children and an education assistant were then killed, and that she locked her classroom and hid her remaining students under her desk while the shooter fired shotgun rounds through its doors. It reports severe and lasting psychological trauma.","causal_attribution":"The complaint attributes her trauma to the shooting and alleges a contribution from OpenAI; that contribution is contested and no court has found it."},{"id":"c_rushlow_docket","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Docket header: 'Date Filed: Sept. 2, 2026'; entry 10: 'ORDER RELATING CASE. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 9/9/2026'; entry 11: 'IT IS ORDERED that this case is directly assigned to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley'; entry 21: 'MOTION to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens filed by Samuel Altman'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_rushlow_docket"}],"assertion":"The teacher’s action, Rushlow v. Altman (26-cv-09344), was filed on 2 September 2026, related to Stacey v. Altman on 9 September and reassigned to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 10 September. OpenAI and Altman filed a forum non conveniens motion in it on 17 September.","causal_attribution":"Docket entries establish filings and procedural orders, not the truth of the complaint’s allegations."},{"id":"c_reschedule","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Order of 29 September 2026, pp.1–2: 'The Court grants the stipulation as follows'; 'Deadline to File Motion: October 15, 2026'; 'Hearing: December 17, 2026 at 10:00 a.m.'; 'Amended Complaints Deadline: October 29, 2026'; 'Hearing: February 11, 2027 at 10:00 a.m.'; 'The Court sets an initial case management conference for October 20, 2026'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_reschedule"}],"assertion":"On 29 September 2026 the court granted the parties’ joint stipulation in Stacey v. Altman and all related cases. Forum non conveniens motions are due 15 October, oppositions 5 November and replies 3 December, with a hearing on 17 December 2026. Amended complaints are due 29 October, and a Rule 12(b)(6) hearing is set for 11 February 2027. A case management conference on alternative dispute resolution was set for 20 October 2026.","causal_attribution":"These are scheduled proceedings, not hearings held or merits decisions."},{"id":"c_mj_allegations","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Opening second-account account; August 2025 conversation paragraphs; paragraph beginning “Van Rootselaar continued using ChatGPT until the day”.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_mj"}],"assertion":"Mother Jones’s 24 September investigation alleges that ChatGPT supplied violent scenario content, including a classroom scenario, and advice to frame requests as fiction to bypass safeguards on the shooter’s second account. It reports continued use until the day of the attack.","causal_attribution":"Reported allegations based on the journalist’s sources and reviewed material. This review has not authenticated the logs or established that any output caused the attack; operational details are omitted."},{"id":"c_log_limits","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Sourcing paragraph beginning “Over the next eight months” and later anonymity explanation; OpenAI non-response paragraph.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_mj"},{"locator":"Opening allegation paragraphs and statement that the article does not describe its sources.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_global"},{"locator":"Programme description expressly disclaims independent verification.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_cbc_limit"}],"assertion":"Mother Jones describes three anonymous sources with knowledge and chat-history material reviewed by its reporter. Global News’s Canadian Press account relays the allegations and says sourcing is not described; CBC’s Front Burner description says CBC has not independently verified the reporting. These follow-ups do not independently corroborate the alleged chat contents.","causal_attribution":"The currently inspected original describes source categories but leaves provenance and authentication details unresolved. No inference is made from OpenAI’s non-response to Mother Jones."},{"id":"c_government_response","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraph beginning “I have written to federal ministers”.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc_release"},{"locator":"Opening paragraphs distinguish the provincial legal initiative from the active criminal investigation; final inquest paragraph.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_rcmp_july"},{"locator":"Closing paragraphs report the investigation ongoing on 21 September and the directed inquest.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_cbc_bc"}],"assertion":"B.C.’s attorney general said on 21 September she had written to federal ministers proposing Criminal Code changes concerning human accountability for AI. The RCMP criminal investigation and announced coroner’s inquest are separate from the provincial civil lawsuit.","causal_attribution":"Policy advocacy, an investigation and an inquest do not establish criminal liability or any criminal charge against OpenAI."},{"id":"c_official_meetings","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Political blowback section, virtual meeting and Eby/Solomon statements.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_march"},{"locator":"26 February letter thanks ministers for their meeting and discussion.","relation":"context","source_id":"s_openai"}],"assertion":"After federal officials sought answers, Altman met virtually with Premier David Eby and Tumbler Ridge’s mayor in early March and agreed to apologize and work on regulatory recommendations, according to CBC.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_prior_context","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraph 29, PDF p.9, conversations spanning multiple days.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bertrand"},{"locator":"Paragraph 41, PDF p.12, police contacts and open-file allegation; paragraph 9, PDF p.4, alleged IPO submission date.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_deeley"}],"assertion":"The survivor complaints describe violence-related first-account conversations spanning several days in June 2025 and allege that a referral would have reached police who already knew the shooter through prior contacts and firearm removal. The Deeley complaint invokes an alleged confidential IPO submission on 22 May 2026 as part of its reputational-motive theory.","causal_attribution":"The prior-warning, prevention and corporate-motive interpretations are plaintiffs’ allegations. They do not establish that a referral would have prevented the attack; OpenAI disputes liability and reputational-motive claims."},{"id":"c_younge_amendment","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Second result page, entry 30, AMENDED COMPLAINT, filed 2 September 2026.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_younge_index"}],"assertion":"Younge v. Altman, case 26-cv-03707, received an amended complaint on 2 September 2026 (entry 30).","causal_attribution":"Procedural metadata only; this review does not characterize the amendment’s contents."}],"effects":[{"label":"Eight victims killed and shooter also died; AI causation contested","claim_id":"c_deaths","direction":"negative"},{"label":"Physical injuries requiring hospital and other medical care","claim_id":"c_injuries","direction":"negative"},{"label":"Survivors report lasting psychological harm","claim_id":"c_trauma","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s_rcmp","url":"https://rcmp.ca/en/bc/tumbler-ridge/news/2026/02/4350292","kind":"official_police_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English source body read directly; no translation.","independence_group":"rcmp-investigation"},{"id":"s_cbc_ban","url":"https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/openai-tumbler-ridge-shooter-ban-9.7100497","kind":"original_news_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English body read. CBC obtained direct responses from OpenAI and RCMP; the original discovery is credited to WSJ. Company-disclosure claims are grouped with OpenAI, not counted again as independent.","independence_group":"openai-account-disclosures"},{"id":"s_openai","url":"https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/8e938d69-0b67-4994-b9ff-683733ed587e/openai-letter-minister-solomon.pdf","kind":"company_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English source body read directly; no translation.","independence_group":"openai-account-disclosures"},{"id":"s_mj","url":"https://www.motherjones.com/media/2026/09/chatgpt-tumbler-ridge-mass-shooter-openai/","kind":"investigative_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English article read in full, including sourcing and disclosure. Reporter says he reviewed chat-history material and spoke with three anonymous sources; we did not inspect or authenticate the underlying logs. One reporting chain, not three independent sources.","independence_group":"motherjones-20260924"},{"id":"s_global","url":"https://globalnews.ca/news/12072859/what-did-chatgpt-tell-tumbler-ridge-shooter/","kind":"wire_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English Canadian Press article hosted by Global News read. Alleged chat contents are relayed from Mother Jones, not independently corroborated; its statement that sourcing is undescribed differs from the currently inspected original.","independence_group":"motherjones-20260924"},{"id":"s_cbc_limit","url":"https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/9.7360427","kind":"programme_description","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English programme description read; audio not reviewed. CBC explicitly says it has not independently verified the Mother Jones reporting.","independence_group":"motherjones-20260924"},{"id":"s_march","url":"https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/openai-sued-tumbler-ridge-victim-9.7121635","kind":"original_news_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English CBC body read; allegations and medical descriptions are attributed to the March complaint.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_apology","url":"https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/sam-altman-tumbler-ridge-apology-9.7176482","kind":"original_news_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English CBC body read; CBC says OpenAI confirmed the apology letter's authenticity.","independence_group":"openai-account-disclosures"},{"id":"s_bbc","url":"https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c99l03k0ly4o","kind":"original_news_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English BBC body read; interviews with counsel and company response. Litigation claims are not independent corroboration of the complaints.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_npr","url":"https://www.npr.org/2026/09/02/nx-s1-5953021/openai-tumbler-ridge-mass-shooting","kind":"original_news_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English NPR body read; includes direct emailed Kwon response. Shared plaintiffs' allegations are not independently corroborated by repetition.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_deeley","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477684/gov.uscourts.cand.477684.1.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English filing; cited passages read. Its allegations are not findings. The four survivor complaints share counsel and a template.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_hoekstra","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477681/gov.uscourts.cand.477681.1.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English filing; cited passages read. Its allegations are not findings. The four survivor complaints share counsel and a template.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_bertrand","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477650/gov.uscourts.cand.477650.1.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English filing; cited passages read. Its allegations are not findings. The four survivor complaints share counsel and a template.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_ac","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477646/gov.uscourts.cand.477646.1.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English filing; cited passages read. Its allegations are not findings. The four survivor complaints share counsel and a template.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_july","url":"https://archive.news.gov.bc.ca/releases/news_releases_2024-2028/2026AG0050-000799.htm","kind":"government_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English official archive release read; cosmetic character-encoding artifacts in headings do not affect cited passages.","independence_group":"bc-government-litigation"},{"id":"s_bc","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.479418/gov.uscourts.cand.479418.1.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English 39-page complaint read. Court filing establishes allegations and relief sought, not their truth. Paragraphs 7 and 41 expressly trace prior-warning allegations to WSJ reporting.","independence_group":"bc-government-litigation"},{"id":"s_bc_release","url":"https://archive.news.gov.bc.ca/releases/news_releases_2024-2028/2026AG0067-001105.htm","kind":"government_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English official archive statement read; cosmetic character-encoding artifacts in headings do not affect cited passages.","independence_group":"bc-government-litigation"},{"id":"s_cbc_bc","url":"https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/bc-government-announce-update-openai-legal-action-9.7352395","kind":"original_news_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English CBC body read, including direct OpenAI response and RCMP update. Not independent corroboration of the Province's allegations.","independence_group":"bc-government-litigation"},{"id":"s_rcmp_july","url":"https://rcmp.ca/en/bc/tumbler-ridge/news/2026/07/4354810","kind":"official_police_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English source body read directly; no translation.","independence_group":"rcmp-investigation"},{"id":"s_motion","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.468851/gov.uscourts.cand.468851.29.0_1.pdf","kind":"defence_motion","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English defence filing; procedural request and denial passages read, not findings.","independence_group":"openai-litigation-position"},{"id":"s_vacate","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.468851/gov.uscourts.cand.468851.34.0.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English source body read directly; no translation.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_schedule","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.468851/gov.uscourts.cand.468851.37.0.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English signed order read. Hearing-date text has an extraction/font defect; the identical order on Schofield ECF 32 was rendered and visually checked.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_ac_motion","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477646/gov.uscourts.cand.477646.21.0.pdf","kind":"defence_motion","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English source body read directly; no translation.","independence_group":"openai-litigation-position"},{"id":"s_relation","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.468851/gov.uscourts.cand.468851.44.0.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English ECF document read. CourtListener classifies it as an Order Relating Case; the proposed-order label is struck through, and reassignment is indexed. No merits finding.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_stacey_index","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?q=docket_id%3A73260511&type=rd&order_by=dateFiled%20desc","kind":"court_docket_index","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Public RECAP API index inspected on 29 September 2026. This is not a complete live PACER docket; the 28 September stipulation body is unavailable.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_bc_index","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?q=docket_id%3A74825372&type=rd&order_by=dateFiled%20desc","kind":"court_docket_index","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Public RECAP API index inspected on 29 September 2026. This is not a complete live PACER docket; the 28 September stipulation body is unavailable.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_schofield_index","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?q=docket_id%3A73260517&type=rd&order_by=dateFiled%20desc","kind":"court_docket_index","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Latest public RECAP API entries inspected on 29 September 2026; 28 September entry 35 is indexed, but its body is unavailable. Not a complete live PACER docket.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_younge_index","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?q=docket_id%3A73260774%20AND%20entry_date_filed%3A%5B2026-09-02%20TO%202026-09-02%5D&type=rd","kind":"court_docket_index","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Two pages of RECAP API results inspected. Entry 30 establishes an amended complaint was filed, not its allegations; complaint body not inspected.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_rushlow","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477648/gov.uscourts.cand.477648.1.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English filing (ECF 1, 48 pages), read in full on 2026-10-15. Its allegations are not findings. It shares counsel and a template with the other survivor complaints.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_rushlow_docket","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/74737047/rushlow-v-altman/","kind":"court_docket_index","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"CourtListener docket page read on 2026-10-15, last updated 14 October 2026. It is not a complete live PACER docket; most entry bodies are not on RECAP.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_reschedule","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477648/gov.uscourts.cand.477648.23.0.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Signed two-page order of 29 September 2026 in Stacey v. Altman and all related cases, filed as Document 41 in 3:26-cv-03705 and docketed as entry 23 in the Rushlow action; read in full on 2026-10-15.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use","others_use"],"contexts":["education","family","justice","public_services"],"unknowns":["The complete authenticated chat histories, their model/version context and whether the published excerpts represent the whole exchanges have not been independently inspected.","The exact internal referral decision-makers, escalation evidence and disputed reporting hierarchy have not been established.","The technical reasons the second account was not detected and the accounts’ identity linkage remain unresolved: the provincial complaint alleges shared identity information, whereas Mother Jones reports different account names and email addresses. Neither assertion is independently verified here.","Whether model outputs, access restrictions or a police referral would have changed the outcome remains unresolved; no causal or liability finding is asserted.","A complete deduplicated count of physically injured and psychologically harmed people is unavailable. The numeric minimum deliberately excludes additional unquantified harm.","Implementation and effectiveness of OpenAI’s promised safeguards are not established by the commitments.","RECAP is not a complete live docket. The 28 September stipulation body was not read, although the 29 September order granting it was. Whether forum motions were filed by the 15 October deadline, and the contents of the 13 October stipulation and 14 October protective order in the Rushlow action, are not established.","No inquest date, final investigative outcome, settlement or liability judgment was established by the inspected sources."],"geography":{"basis":"The shooting and affected people are located in Tumbler Ridge, B.C., by RCMP and reporting. Both the earlier B.C. Supreme Court family action and the subsequent Northern District of California proceedings are recorded; the earlier action was discontinued. Countries describe locations and court proceedings, not nationality. This carries forward Canada and U.S. metadata and adds the historically documented Canadian court.","court_countries":["CA","US"],"event_countries":["CA"],"affected_person_countries":["CA"]},"publication":{"basis":"Full review of this previously published death incident. Official police evidence supports the deaths; CBC’s direct OpenAI/RCMP reporting and Mother Jones’s separate investigation each report the deaths and the AI connection, with distinct underlying support for the connection. OpenAI’s own letter supplies primary confirmation of account use and non-referral. Derivative coverage and shared complaint templates are grouped together, not counted as independent corroboration. Complaints and alleged logs remain attributed, company disputes are retained, and causation is unresolved. Minor identities, unnecessary victim names and operational violence details are minimized. The 15 October 2026 review adds a grade 7 teacher’s complaint and docket as attributed allegations and documented filings, and the signed 29 September 2026 order that reset the forum hearing to 17 December 2026.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-15"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The shooter’s own use is established by OpenAI’s first-person account disclosure and Mother Jones’s distinct original reporting. communicated_with applies to the shooter, counted among those who died. unknown applies to other harmed people: inspected evidence does not establish ChatGPT communicating with, acting for, deciding about, claiming about or depicting them. The involvement finding does not establish facilitation or causation.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with","unknown"]},"name":"Tumbler Ridge shooting: ChatGPT use and OpenAI non-reporting","summary":"Eight victims were killed in Tumbler Ridge, B.C., on 10 February 2026, and the shooter died by suicide. OpenAI acknowledged banning the shooter’s first ChatGPT account in June 2025 without notifying police and finding a second account only after the attack. Families and survivors filed California lawsuits, followed by B.C. and its school board on 21 September. Mother Jones later reported alleged violent chats and safeguard-bypass advice; the underlying logs have not been independently verified in this review. OpenAI disputes the liability allegations. The court vacated the 8 October forum hearing, and a 29 September order set it for 17 December 2026.","incidentDate":"2026-02-10","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-02-20","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"critical","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":["third_party_harm_facilitation","crisis_response"],"harmOutcomes":["death","physical_injury","psychological_distress","harm_to_others"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Eight victims were killed, the shooter died by suicide, and survivors suffered physical injuries and reported psychological trauma. The shooter’s prior ChatGPT use is supported; claims that ChatGPT or OpenAI’s non-reporting contributed to the deaths and injuries remain contested.","frameworkFacets":[],"pathwayDirection":"both","causationStatus":"disputed","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":10,"affectedCountStatus":"partial","affectedCountEvidence":"Conservative retained lower bounds: one ChatGPT user who died, eight homicide victims, and two distinct surviving victims requiring hospital care (RCMP 13 February; OpenAI 26 February letter; c_deaths, c_injuries and c_ai_connection). The two hospital survivors are students, not both children: the inspected Hoekstra complaint gives one survivor’s age as 19. Additional injured people and people alleging psychological harm are not enumerated because the totals and overlap are unresolved. This counts people harmed in the event, not deaths or injuries proven to have been caused by AI.","victimAgeRange":"minor","jurisdiction":"CA-BC","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_ongoing","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.479418/gov.uscourts.cand.479418.1.0.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"B.C. and SD59 complaint, case 26-cv-10743, filed 21 September 2026 (allegations)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-02-27T07:58:16.565471+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-15T03:02:23.45556+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["mass-shooting","duty-to-warn","ban-evasion","chatgpt","openai","canada","bc","school-shooting","minor-victims","prior-warning","lawsuit","provincial-action","criminal"]}]}