{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-23T08:16:19.848Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"california","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"","evidence":"","year":"","response":"lawsuit","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":13,"coverage":{"cases":13,"countries":2,"languages":2,"unknownLocation":5,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":1,"lawsuits":13,"regulatory":0,"minors":3,"coreRelations":7,"contextualRelations":5,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":1,"relationPending":1,"relationUnknown":0},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2025-us-bank-customers-allege-pega-voice-ai-transcribed-and-analysed-customer-service-calls-without-consent","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Page headers: 'Case 1:26-cv-14506-DLC Document 1 Filed 10/02/26'; para 5: 'Wiretapping Statute, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 272, § 99, and the Pennsylvania'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Four U.S. Bank account holders filed a putative class action against Pegasystems Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts on 2 October 2026, claiming violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act, the Massachusetts wiretapping statute and the Pennsylvania wiretapping act.","causal_attribution":"The filing documents that the claims were made; it does not establish them."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Para 2: 'Pega Voice AI is employed by numerous entities, including U.S. Bank'; 'to monitor voice and text-based interactions'. Para 20: 'Pega Voice AI is an artificial intelligence tool that'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that U.S. Bank uses Pegasystems' Pega Voice AI, an artificial-intelligence tool for live customer-service calls, in its contact centres.","causal_attribution":"Plaintiffs' allegation, which the complaint supports with Pega's own published customer material about U.S. Bank; not yet answered by Pegasystems."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Para 47: 'occasions, including in or about January 2026 from his home'. Para 8: 'was in California when he spoke to a representative from U.S. Bank over the phone from his home on multiple occasions, including in or about December 2025'. Para 9: 'was in Massachusetts when he spoke to a representative from U.S. Bank over the phone from his home on multiple occasions'. Para 10: 'was in Pennsylvania when he spoke to a representative from U.S. Bank over the phone from his home on multiple occasions, including in or about March 2026 and August 2026'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The plaintiffs say they called U.S. Bank's customer service line from their homes on multiple occasions: two from California (in or about December 2025 and January 2026), one from Massachusetts (in or about June 2026) and one from Pennsylvania (in or about March and August 2026).","causal_attribution":"Plaintiffs' own account of their calls."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paras 50, 57, 64, 71: 'monitored the conversation between Plaintiff'; 'conversations with U.S. Bank using natural language processing, and generated suggestions to the U.S. Bank agent'. Para 51: 'read and learned, in'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that on each plaintiff's calls Pega Voice AI monitored the conversation with the human U.S. Bank agent, transcribed it in real time, analysed it with natural language processing and generated suggestions to the agent, so that Pegasystems read and learned the contents of the conversations.","causal_attribution":"Allegation of what the AI service did on these calls; no court has found that it captured the plaintiffs' calls."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paras 52, 59, 66, 73: 'consent, express or otherwise, to have Defendant eavesdrop on'. Para 49: 'provided personal information such as his home address his account number and his date of birth'. Para 70: 'including his account numbers, account names, account balances, and other account information'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The plaintiffs say neither U.S. Bank nor Pegasystems obtained their prior consent to the vendor listening in, and that on the calls they gave personal and account details, such as a home address, account number and date of birth, or account numbers and balances.","causal_attribution":"Plaintiffs' account of what they disclosed and of the absence of consent."}],"effects":[{"label":"bank customers say an AI service transcribed and analysed their customer-service calls, including account details, without their consent","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mad.307198/gov.uscourts.mad.307198.1.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Class action complaint, D. Mass. No. 1:26-cv-14506, filed 2 October 2026; all 40 pages read on 2026-10-21 from the CourtListener RECAP copy.","independence_group":"dmass-plaintiffs-complaint"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["privacy","finance"],"unknowns":["Whether Pega Voice AI in fact ran on the plaintiffs' calls; the complaint infers its use from Pegasystems' published material about U.S. Bank.","What, if anything, callers were told at the start of the calls about recording or analysis.","Whether Pegasystems retained transcripts or call contents after the calls.","Pegasystems' response; the CourtListener index of the docket checked on 21 October 2026 listed none."],"geography":{"basis":"The complaint says each plaintiff was at home in California, Massachusetts or Pennsylvania when calling U.S. Bank (paras 7-10; para 68 says the Pennsylvania plaintiff called from his home and/or business). The court is the federal court in Massachusetts.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-10-06 privacy clarification: four named bank customers allege in a filed complaint that an AI transcription and analysis service, run by a vendor they never chose inside their bank's contact centre, captured their calls and account details without prior consent. The captures are allegations and no court has ruled.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-21"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The complaint alleges that Pega Voice AI itself monitored each plaintiff's call with a U.S. Bank agent, transcribed it in real time, analysed it with natural language processing and generated suggestions to the agent, so that the vendor read and learned the contents of the calls, including account details, without the caller's prior consent. That capture into an AI transcription and analysis service is the reported privacy harm.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["received_personal_information"]},"name":"U.S. Bank customers allege in a class action that Pega Voice AI transcribed and analysed their customer-service calls without consent","summary":"Four U.S. Bank account holders in California, Massachusetts and Pennsylvania allege in a federal class action filed on 2 October 2026 that Pegasystems' Pega Voice AI, which they say U.S. Bank uses in its contact centres, transcribed their customer-service calls in real time, analysed them with natural language processing and generated suggestions to the agent, without their prior consent. They say they gave account numbers, a date of birth and a home address on the calls, made between about December 2025 and August 2026. The claims are allegations; The CourtListener index of the docket, checked on 21 October 2026, listed the summons as returned executed on 16 October and no response from Pegasystems.","incidentDate":"2025-12-01","incidentEndDate":"2026-08-01","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-10-02","aiSystem":"Pega Voice AI, Pegasystems' AI agent-assist service for contact centres, which the complaint says U.S. Bank uses on customer-service calls (as alleged)","aiProduct":"Pega Voice AI (reported)","aiCompany":"Pegasystems Inc.","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["other_material_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Four bank customers allege that an AI service they never chose transcribed and analysed their customer-service calls, including account details, without their consent; the claims are untested.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":4,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"Four named plaintiffs each allege that their own calls were transcribed and analysed without consent (complaint paras 7-10 and 47-74). Proposed class members are not counted.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_ongoing","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mad.307198/gov.uscourts.mad.307198.1.0.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"Class action complaint against Pegasystems Inc., D. Mass. No. 1:26-cv-14506, filed 2 October 2026","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-21T03:08:54.693563+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-21T03:08:54.693563+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["pega-voice-ai","contact-centre","call-transcription","privacy","wiretap","class-action","banking"]},{"id":"2025-illinois-fireflies-ai-meeting-assistant-voiceprint-capture-lawsuits","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"While physically present in Illinois, Plaintiff participated in a virtual meeting on November 18, 2025 ... During the meeting, Fireflies was enabled by a meeting participant using ... During the meeting, Fireflies recorded Plaintiff’s voice, analyzed her vocal characteristics to distinguish her as a unique speaker, and generated transcripts attributing statements to Plaintiff, thereby capturing Plaintiff’s voiceprint. ... Plaintiff never created a Fireflies account, never agreed to Fireflies’ Terms of Service, and never executed any written release authorizing Fireflies to collect or store her biometric data.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"A complaint filed in the Central District of Illinois on 18 December 2025 alleges that, during a virtual meeting on 18 November 2025 that the plaintiff joined while in Illinois, a meeting participant enabled Fireflies, and Fireflies recorded her voice, analysed her vocal characteristics to distinguish her as a speaker and generated transcripts attributing statements to her; she says she never had a Fireflies account or gave written consent.","causal_attribution":"The plaintiff's own allegation in a complaint; not tested by any ruling."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"In March and April 2025, while working from home for his ... The meetings were recorded by the Fireflies account of a ... characteristics to distinguish him as a unique speaker, and generated transcripts attributing ... never created a Fireflies account, never agreed to Fireflies’ Terms of","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"A complaint filed in the Northern District of California on 23 March 2026 by another Illinois resident alleges that in March and April 2025, while working from home, he attended virtual meetings recorded through another person's Fireflies account, and that Fireflies recorded his voice, analysed his vocal characteristics and generated transcripts attributing statements to him, without his having an account or giving written consent.","causal_attribution":"The plaintiff's own allegation in a complaint; not tested by any ruling."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"April 2025 and October 2025, he attended multiple virtual meetings ... on Microsoft Teams that were recorded by his boss’s Fireflies’ ... has attended several virtual meetings where Fireflies was being used. ... voice, analyzed his vocal characteristics to distinguish him as a unique speaker, and generated","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"A consolidated complaint filed in the Northern District of Illinois on 24 June 2026 alleges that one plaintiff attended Microsoft Teams meetings between April and October 2025 that were recorded by his boss's Fireflies account, and that a second plaintiff attended several virtual meetings where Fireflies was used, and that in each case Fireflies recorded the plaintiff's voice, analysed his vocal characteristics and generated transcripts attributing statements to him.","causal_attribution":"The plaintiffs' allegations in a consolidated complaint; Fireflies has moved to dismiss."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Fireflies did not inform Plaintiff, in writing or otherwise, that it was collecting her ... Although Fireflies’ software can inform meeting participants that it is present on a meeting, it does not inform participants that it is collecting voiceprints or biometric data.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Fireflies did not inform Plaintiff, in writing or otherwise, that it was collecting his","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"Fireflies did not inform Plaintiffs, in writing or otherwise, that it was collecting ... Although Fireflies’ software can inform meeting participants that it is present on a meeting, it does","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"All three complaints allege that Fireflies did not tell the plaintiffs it was collecting voiceprints or biometric data, although its software can tell meeting participants that it is present, and did not obtain their written consent.","causal_attribution":"Plaintiffs' allegations, drafted by the same plaintiffs' firm in all three complaints; the complaints say allegations about other matters rest on information and belief."},{"id":"c5","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Plaintiff hereby dismisses, without prejudice, all of her claims against Defendant in the above-captioned lawsuit","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The plaintiff in the Central District of Illinois case voluntarily dismissed all her claims without prejudice on 10 March 2026.","causal_attribution":"Established by the filed notice. The notice gives no reason."},{"id":"c6","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"staying this case pending the resolution of Fireflies’ anticipated motion to dismiss the amended ... two nearly identical cases filed in the ... Document 25 Filed 04/24/26 ... IT IS S ... O ORD","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"In the California case the plaintiff and Fireflies jointly asked the court to stay proceedings pending Fireflies' anticipated motion to dismiss in the Illinois cases, which the stipulation calls nearly identical, and the court entered the stipulation with its order stamp on 24 April 2026.","causal_attribution":"Established by the filed joint stipulation and the court’s order stamp on it (document 25)."},{"id":"c7","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"First, plaintiffs lack Article III standing to assert a claim under Section 15(a) of BIPA ... Second, the Complaint should be dismissed in its entirety under Rule 12(b)(2) because ... By referring to “biometric data” here and elsewhere, Fireflies does not concede that it collected, possessed, stored, or used any data regarding plaintiffs that falls within the scope of BIPA.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"}],"assertion":"Fireflies has moved to dismiss the Northern District of Illinois case, arguing among other things lack of standing for one claim and lack of personal jurisdiction, and says it does not concede that it collected, stored or used any data about the plaintiffs that falls within the Illinois biometric privacy law.","causal_attribution":"Established as the content of Fireflies' filed motion; its arguments are a party's position, not a ruling."}],"effects":[{"label":"plaintiffs say an AI meeting assistant they never signed up for recorded their voices and captured voiceprints without notice or written consent","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ilcd.98340/gov.uscourts.ilcd.98340.1.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Class action complaint, C.D. Ill. No. 3:25-cv-03399, filed 18 December 2025; read in full on 2026-10-20 from the CourtListener RECAP copy.","independence_group":"cdill-plaintiff-complaint"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ilcd.98340/gov.uscourts.ilcd.98340.13.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Notice of voluntary dismissal, C.D. Ill. No. 3:25-cv-03399, filed 10 March 2026; read on 2026-10-20 (RECAP copy).","independence_group":"cdill-court-record"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.466340/gov.uscourts.cand.466340.1.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Class action complaint, N.D. Cal. No. 3:26-cv-02479, filed 23 March 2026; read in full on 2026-10-20 (RECAP copy).","independence_group":"ndcal-plaintiff-complaint"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.466340/gov.uscourts.cand.466340.25.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Joint stipulation requesting a stay (dated 23 April 2026), entered as document 25 on 24 April 2026 with the court’s ‘IT IS SO ORDERED’ stamp on page 4 (the text layer renders the stamp in fragments), N.D. Cal. No. 3:26-cv-02479; read on 2026-10-20 (RECAP copy).","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ilnd.496785/gov.uscourts.ilnd.496785.27.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Consolidated class action complaint, N.D. Ill. No. 1:26-cv-02675, filed 24 June 2026; read in full on 2026-10-20 (RECAP copy).","independence_group":"ndill-plaintiffs-complaint"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ilnd.496785/gov.uscourts.ilnd.496785.31.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Fireflies.AI Corp.'s motion to dismiss, N.D. Ill. No. 1:26-cv-02675, filed 15 July 2026; read on 2026-10-20 (RECAP copy).","independence_group":"fireflies-motion"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["privacy","work"],"unknowns":["Whether Fireflies in fact created voiceprints of the plaintiffs: it does not concede collecting biometric data and no court has ruled.","Whether the plaintiffs knew the meetings were being recorded or transcribed; the complaints say only that they were not told voiceprints were collected.","Why the first plaintiff dismissed her case without prejudice.","The outcome of Fireflies' motion to dismiss the consolidated Illinois case.","The fourth plaintiff's meeting dates are not stated in the consolidated complaint."],"geography":{"basis":"Each complaint says the plaintiff took part in the meetings while physically present in Illinois (C.D. Ill. and N.D. Cal. complaints; N.D. Ill. consolidated complaint). The courts are federal courts in Illinois and California.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-10-06 privacy clarification: four Illinois residents allege in filed complaints that an AI meeting assistant enabled by someone else recorded their voices, analysed them to distinguish speakers and generated transcripts attributing statements to them, capturing voiceprints without notice or written consent. The captures are allegations, Fireflies contests the suits, and one case was voluntarily dismissed. Plaintiffs, employers and the hosting organisation are not named.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-20"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Each complaint alleges that the Fireflies AI meeting assistant, enabled by another participant's or an organisation's account, itself recorded the plaintiff's voice in a virtual meeting, analysed the plaintiff's vocal characteristics to distinguish speakers and generated transcripts attributing statements to the plaintiff, capturing a voiceprint without notice or written consent (C.D. Ill., N.D. Cal. and N.D. Ill. complaints). That capture of the plaintiffs' voices and voiceprints by an AI transcription service is the reported privacy harm. Fireflies says it does not concede that it collected any biometric data about the plaintiffs, and no court has ruled, so the capture is alleged.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["received_personal_information"]},"name":"Illinois residents allege in lawsuits that Fireflies.AI's meeting assistant captured their voiceprints without notice or consent","summary":"Four Illinois residents who say they never had Fireflies accounts allege in four federal lawsuits, two of them later consolidated, that the Fireflies.AI meeting assistant, enabled by a colleague, boss or meeting organiser, recorded their voices in Zoom or Microsoft Teams meetings between March and November 2025, analysed their vocal characteristics to tell speakers apart and generated transcripts attributing statements to them, capturing voiceprints without telling them or obtaining written consent, in breach of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act. One plaintiff dismissed her case without prejudice in March 2026; the California court stayed its case at both parties’ joint request in April 2026; Fireflies has moved to dismiss the consolidated Illinois case and does not concede that it collected biometric data about the plaintiffs.","incidentDate":"2025-03-01","incidentEndDate":"2025-11-18","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2025-12-18","aiSystem":"Fireflies, Fireflies.AI Corp.'s AI meeting assistant, joined to Zoom and Microsoft Teams meetings through another participant's or organisation's account (as alleged in the complaints)","aiProduct":"Fireflies.AI meeting assistant (reported)","aiCompany":"Fireflies.AI Corp.","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["other_material_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Four Illinois residents allege that an AI meeting assistant they never signed up for recorded their voices and captured voiceprints without notice or consent; Fireflies contests the suits and no ruling has found a capture.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":4,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"Four named plaintiffs each allege their own voice was recorded and voiceprint captured (C.D. Ill. complaint; N.D. Cal. complaint; N.D. Ill. consolidated complaint for two plaintiffs). Putative class members and Fireflies' stated user numbers are not counted.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_ongoing","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ilcd.98340/gov.uscourts.ilcd.98340.1.0.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"Class action complaint against Fireflies.AI Corp., C.D. Ill. No. 3:25-cv-03399, filed 18 December 2025","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-20T03:13:40.245348+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-20T03:13:40.245348+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["fireflies-ai","ai-notetaker","meeting-transcription","privacy","bipa","voiceprint","class-action","non-user"]},{"id":"2017-mobley-v-workday-ai-applicant-screening-job-rejections-discrimination-lawsuit","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Page 1: 'brings this action for employment discrimination against Workday, Inc.'; 'algorithm-based applicant screening tools discriminated against him and other similarly situated job applicants on the basis of race, age, and disability'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"A job applicant brought an employment discrimination action against Workday in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging that its algorithm-based applicant screening tools discriminated against him and other applicants on the basis of race, age and disability.","causal_attribution":"The order establishes that the action exists and what it alleges. It does not establish that the allegations are true."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Pages 2-3: 'Mobley has allegedly applied to over 100 positions with companies that use Workday'; 'screening tools for talent acquisition and hiring since 2017'; 'Mobley was allegedly denied employment for every one of the'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The plaintiff alleges that since 2017 he applied to more than 100 positions with companies that use Workday's screening tools and was denied employment on every one.","causal_attribution":"Plaintiff's allegation as recited by the court on a motion to dismiss. It is not a finding."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Page 3: 'his application was rejected less than an hour later'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The plaintiff alleges that one application, submitted at 12:55 a.m., was rejected less than an hour later.","causal_attribution":"Plaintiff's allegation as recited by the court. The plaintiffs argue that the timing indicates automated screening, and no finding has been made."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Page 2: 'enabling these applications to make hiring decisions'; 'employer should accept or reject an application'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The plaintiff alleges that Workday's tools embed AI and machine learning and determine whether an employer should accept or reject an application.","causal_attribution":"Plaintiff's allegation as recited by the court. Workday disputes that its tools make hiring decisions."},{"id":"c5","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'The motion to dismiss the disparate impact claims under Title VII, the ADEA, and the'; 'ADA is therefore denied'; 'intentionally discriminated against him based on race and age'; 'Document 80 Filed 07/12/24'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"On 12 July 2024 the court granted Workday's motion to dismiss in part and denied it in part: the disparate-impact claims proceed and the claims of intentional discrimination were dismissed.","causal_attribution":"The court's own ruling on the pleadings. It decides whether the claims may proceed and makes no finding of discrimination."},{"id":"c6","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Page 1: 'motion for preliminary certification of the collective is GRANTED'; 'Mobley is joined by four other plaintiffs over the age of forty'; 'Document 128'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"On 16 May 2025 the court granted preliminary certification of a collective on the age-discrimination claim, and four other plaintiffs over forty had joined the named plaintiff.","causal_attribution":"The court's own procedural ruling, which the order says can be revisited after discovery. It makes no finding of discrimination."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Page 1: 'who allege that they too have applied for hundreds of jobs via Workday and have been rejected almost every time without an interview'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The four further plaintiffs allege that they applied for hundreds of jobs via Workday and were rejected almost every time without an interview.","causal_attribution":"The plaintiffs' allegations as recited by the court. They attribute the rejections to age discrimination in the recommendation system, which is not established."},{"id":"c8","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'the plaintiffs filed their class-certification request on September 14 in federal court in San Francisco'; 'Workday has denied wrongdoing, saying its AI tools evaluate job qualifications rather than protected characteristics'; 'its customers control how applicants are sorted, reviewed, and rejected'; 'A hearing on whether the case can proceed as a class action is scheduled for March 9, 2027'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The Black Information Network, citing Reuters, reported on 24 September 2026 that the plaintiffs filed a class-certification request on 14 September, that Workday denies wrongdoing and says its customers control how applicants are sorted, reviewed and rejected, and that a hearing is scheduled for 9 March 2027.","causal_attribution":"A relay of Reuters reporting. The motion and the Reuters article were not read."}],"effects":[{"label":"denied employment on every one of more than 100 applications to companies using Workday's screening tools (plaintiff's allegation)","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"},{"label":"four further plaintiffs over forty rejected almost every time without an interview (their allegation, as recited by the court)","claim_id":"c7","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.408645/gov.uscourts.cand.408645.80.0.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English: the 20-page order of 12 July 2024 as text extracted from the PDF.","independence_group":"mobley-v-workday-court-record"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.408645/gov.uscourts.cand.408645.128.0.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English: the 20-page order of 16 May 2025 as text extracted from the PDF.","independence_group":"mobley-v-workday-court-record"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.binnews.com/alternate/amp/2026-09-24-black-job-seekers-allege-workdays-ai-hiring-tools-discriminate-seek-class-action/","kind":"news_relay","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English. The article attributes its account to Reuters, whose article was not read.","independence_group":"reuters-workday-class-certification-2026-09"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["work"],"unknowns":["Whether Workday's tools, the employers' own settings or human reviewers produced each rejection.","Which employers were involved beyond those named in the order, and the dates of the individual applications.","The contents of the September 2026 class-certification motion and of the Reuters article, neither of which was read.","The outcome of the case on the merits."],"geography":{"basis":"The case is in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, and the 2025 order describes the proposed group as a 'nationwide collective' under US federal employment statutes, which places the applications in the United States. The plaintiffs' places of residence were not read in the passages inspected.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a concrete, court-documented allegation that an AI applicant-screening system repeatedly rejected a named job applicant. The existence of the suit and two rulings are established by the court's orders. The rejections and the role of the tools are the plaintiffs' allegations, which Workday denies and no court has decided.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-05"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The plaintiffs allege that Workday's AI-based screening and recommendation tools decided or recommended the rejection of their applications. The court's orders recite those allegations and found the disparate-impact claims plausibly pleaded. The 2025 order quotes Workday's discovery statement that its Candidate Skills Match tool 'utilizes artificial intelligence' and that customers choose whether to turn it on. Workday says its tools evaluate qualifications and that its customers control rejections. Whether an automated tool made any particular rejection is not established.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["made_decision_about"]},"name":"Job applicant alleges Workday's AI applicant-screening tools rejected more than 100 of his applications on the basis of race, age and disability; a US federal court let disparate-impact claims proceed and preliminarily certified an age-discrimination collective","summary":"Derek Mobley sued Workday in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging that the company's algorithm-based applicant screening tools discriminated against him and other job applicants on the basis of race, age and disability. According to the court's summary of the complaint, Mobley alleges that since 2017 he applied to more than 100 positions with companies that use Workday's screening tools and was denied employment on every one, in one instance less than an hour after applying at 12:55 a.m. On 12 July 2024 the court dismissed the claims of intentional discrimination and allowed the disparate-impact claims to proceed. On 16 May 2025 it granted preliminary certification of a collective on the age-discrimination claim, by which time four further plaintiffs over forty had joined. The Black Information Network, citing Reuters, reported on 24 September 2026 that the plaintiffs had asked the court to certify a class action and that a hearing is set for 9 March 2027. Workday denies wrongdoing and says its customers control how applicants are sorted, reviewed and rejected. No court has ruled on whether the tools discriminated.","incidentDate":"2017-01-01","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"year","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","aiSystem":"Workday's applicant screening tools on its job-application platform, which the court's orders describe from the complaint as 'algorithm-based applicant screening tools' (2024) and an AI-based 'applicant recommendation system' (2025). The plaintiffs allege the tools score, sort, rank or screen applicants. Workday says its AI tools evaluate job qualifications and that its customers control how applicants are sorted, reviewed and rejected (as relayed from Reuters). The 2025 order names two tools discussed in the certification briefing: Candidate Skills Match, which Workday said in discovery 'utilizes artificial intelligence' to compare a job posting with an application within its Workday Recruiting service and which customers can turn on or off, and Workday Assessment Connector, which is alleged to use machine learning","aiProduct":"Workday applicant screening tools","aiCompany":"Workday","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The named plaintiff alleges that he was denied employment on every one of more than 100 applications made since 2017 to companies using Workday's screening tools and that the tools discriminated by race, age and disability. Four further plaintiffs over forty allege repeated rejections without an interview. Workday denies wrongdoing, and no court has ruled on the merits.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":5,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"Five plaintiffs who allege rejections: the named plaintiff and the four opt-in plaintiffs whose declarations the court's 16 May 2025 order describes ('four other plaintiffs over the age of forty'; each 'alleges that they received at least one \"automated\" rejection email'). People who may opt in to the collective are not counted. The count records people who report harm and does not establish that the tools caused it.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_ongoing","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.408645/gov.uscourts.cand.408645.128.0.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"US District Court, N.D. California, Mobley v. Workday, order granting preliminary collective certification, 16 May 2025","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-05T03:19:40.629587+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-05T03:19:40.629587+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["made-decision-about","hiring","applicant-screening","workday","employment-discrimination","age-discrimination","lawsuit","institutional-use"]},{"id":"2021-atherton-california-flock-alpr-misread-plate-gunpoint-stop-lawsuit-settled","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'At about 5:30 a.m. on April 16, 2021, an automatic license plate reader (ALPR) had misread'; 'over and ordered him at gunpoint to throw his keys out of the window, get out of the car, and lie on his stomach to be handcuffed.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'was stopped by local police at gunpoint, instructed to lie on the ground, and handcuffed.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"In April 2021 Atherton police stopped the driver at gunpoint, made him lie on the ground and handcuffed him.","causal_attribution":"The lawsuit as reported by The Almanac and police records as reported by Business Insider."},{"id":"c2","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'caused the ALPR to read the “H’s” of the license plate as “M’s.”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Police records show that the Flock camera confused an \"H\" for an \"M\"; officers noted that \"the Flock cameras misread\" the plate.'; 'The license plate in question was obstructed by dirt, causing one of the letters (H) to look like an M,'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The license-plate reader misread the letter H on his dirt-obscured plate as M.","causal_attribution":"The driver's lawsuit (The Almanac) and police records and an Atherton police commander (Business Insider) agree on the misread and the dirt."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Records show that the case was settled on March 16, 2023, for $45,000.'; 'the Atherton police officers denied all allegations, as well as the injuries that'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'filed a lawsuit and settled with the town and police officers for $45,000.'; 'denies any wrongdoing and contends that it acted properly and lawfully.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"He sued three officers for unreasonable seizure and excessive force; the officers denied the allegations and the injuries claimed, and the case was settled on 16 March 2023 for $45,000, with the town denying wrongdoing.","causal_attribution":"Court records and the settlement agreement as reported by The Almanac; Business Insider reports the same settlement amount and the town's denial."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'matched them to the ones of a reported stolen vehicle.'; 'Atherton police followed the vehicle for several minutes but failed to visually verify what the ALPR had falsely captured, according to the suit.'; 'With the belief that they were pursuing a “high-risk felony stop,”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"According to the suit, the reader matched the plate to a reported stolen vehicle, and officers followed the car for several minutes without visually verifying the plate before making what they believed was a high-risk felony stop.","causal_attribution":"The driver's lawsuit as reported by The Almanac."}],"effects":[{"label":"stopped at gunpoint, made to lie on his stomach and handcuffed after a license-plate reader misread his plate as a stolen car's","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.almanacnews.com/police/2024/02/12/atherton-officer-involved-in-the-arrest-of-m-a-student-also-named-in-lawsuit-over-unreasonable-seizure-and-use-of-excessive-force/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read on 2026-10-04 from the Internet Archive 2026 capture (The Almanac, 12 February 2024, updated 16 February 2024); the live site returned HTTP 429. Draws on the amended complaint, the officers' answer and the settlement agreement.","independence_group":"atherton-2021-stop-lawsuit-records"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.businessinsider.com/flock-safety-alpr-cameras-misreads-2026-3","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-10-04 (Business Insider, 9 March 2026); full text present in the served page. Cites police records and an Atherton police commander.","independence_group":"business-insider-records-review"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["justice"],"unknowns":["The court and case number of the 2022 lawsuit; the complaint was not read.","The injuries he claimed; The Almanac says only that the officers denied them.","Whether The Almanac's unnamed automatic license-plate reader and Business Insider's Flock camera are the same device; Business Insider cites police records for the Flock identification."],"geography":{"basis":"The stop was made by Atherton, California, police (The Almanac; Business Insider), and the suit was brought against Atherton officers and settled with the town. The court is not named in the bodies read; US rests on the suit against a California town's officers.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as an institutional-use case consistent with the held Flock misread rows: the driver's lawsuit (The Almanac) and police records (Business Insider) describe a license-plate-reader misread that led Atherton officers to stop and handcuff him at gunpoint; the town settled for $45,000 while denying wrongdoing. He is not named here.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-04"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The lawsuit (The Almanac) says an automatic license-plate reader misread the dirt-obscured plate and matched it to a stolen vehicle; Business Insider, citing police records, identifies the camera as Flock's, reports that it confused an H for an M and that officers noted the Flock cameras misread the plate, and describes the cameras as AI cameras. The plate match against a stolen-vehicle record is the automated system's claim about his car; following without visual verification and the armed stop were officers' decisions.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["made_claim_about"]},"name":"Atherton, California: police stopped a driver at gunpoint in April 2021 and made him lie on his stomach to be handcuffed after a license-plate reader misread the letter H on his dirty plate as M and matched it to a stolen car; the town settled his lawsuit for $45,000 in 2023","summary":"At about 5:30 a.m. on 16 April 2021, according to a lawsuit reported by The Almanac, an automated license-plate reader in Atherton, California, misread the dirt-obscured plate of a driver's car, reading its letter H as M, and matched it to a reported stolen vehicle. Atherton police followed the car for several minutes without visually verifying the plate, then made a high-risk felony stop, ordering him at gunpoint to throw his keys out of the window, get out and lie on his stomach to be handcuffed. He sued three officers in 2022 for unreasonable seizure and excessive force; the officers denied the allegations and the injuries he claimed, and the case was settled on 16 March 2023 for $45,000. Business Insider, citing police records, reported in March 2026 that the misread came from a Flock camera and that officers noted the Flock cameras had misread the plate; an Atherton police commander said the plate was obstructed by dirt and that the town denies wrongdoing.","incidentDate":"2021-04-16","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2024-02-12","aiSystem":"Automated license-plate-reader camera in Atherton, California, identified by Business Insider from police records as a Flock Safety camera (which it describes as one of Flock's AI cameras), that misread the plate and matched it to a stolen-vehicle record","aiProduct":"Flock Safety license plate readers (reported)","aiCompany":"Flock Safety","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["loss_of_liberty"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"He was stopped at gunpoint, made to lie on his stomach and handcuffed after a misread license-plate alert, and his lawsuit claimed injuries that the officers deny (The Almanac; Business Insider). The town settled for $45,000 while denying wrongdoing.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person, the driver, stopped at gunpoint and handcuffed (The Almanac; Business Insider). Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-CA","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_settled","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.almanacnews.com/police/2024/02/12/atherton-officer-involved-in-the-arrest-of-m-a-student-also-named-in-lawsuit-over-unreasonable-seizure-and-use-of-excessive-force/","primarySourceLabel":"The Almanac, 12 February 2024: Atherton officer involved in the arrest of M-A student also named in lawsuit over unreasonable seizure","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-04T03:31:59.236805+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-04T03:31:59.236805+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["flock","alpr","license-plate-reader","misread","wrongful-stop","gunpoint","california","atherton","justice","made-claim-about","settlement"]},{"id":"2024-us-otter-notetaker-recorded-non-users-meetings-privacy-suit","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'participated in a Zoom meeting in California on February'; '24, 2025, where the Otter Notetaker was used by a meeting participant to transcribe the'; 'participated in a Zoom meeting in California in March 2025'; 'used Zoom to communicate with a medical professional, and'; 'Illinois on January 10, 2025 and May 19, 2025 where the Otter Notetaker was used to'; 'participated in a Zoom meeting in Washington state in March'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Plaintiffs are seven individuals from California, Illinois, and Washington state who'; 'participated in virtual meetings where the Otter Notetaker was allegedly used without their'; 'consent to record, transcribe, and store the contents of their communications.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'Otter lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the'; 'allegations concerning the named Plaintiff’s personal knowledge, experiences, expectations, or'","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'who alleges his privacy was \"severely invaded\" upon realizing Otter was secretly recording a confidential conversation.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"Seven people who were not Otter account holders allege that, on Zoom or Microsoft Teams calls (six give dates between March 2024 and May 2025), another participant used Otter Notetaker and Otter recorded, transcribed and stored their conversations without their consent; the calls include one with a medical professional and meetings with a financial professional.","causal_attribution":"The plaintiffs attribute the recording to Otter's product design, which they say lets the notetaker record without every participant's consent; Otter denies the allegations."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'other personal information for its own commercial use, including to train its automatic speech'; 'The Illinois Plaintiffs allege that, during their virtual meetings, Otter'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'Otter claims that before the audio of meetings is fed into its machine learning systems to help improve an AI speech recognition feature, it is \"de-identified,\"'","relation":"context","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The plaintiffs allege that Otter keeps their conversational data on its servers and uses it to train its speech-recognition and machine-learning models, and that it captured the Illinois plaintiffs' voiceprints; Otter's policy, as reported by NPR, says it trains on transcripts with users' permission and de-identifies audio.","causal_attribution":"Alleged by the plaintiffs; Otter denies the allegations."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'felt frustrated, embarrassed, and stressed to learn that his'; 'conversation was recorded without his consent, and his information, voice, and'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"One California plaintiff alleges that he felt frustrated, embarrassed and stressed to learn that his conversation had been recorded without his consent.","causal_attribution":"Alleged by the plaintiffs as a consequence of Otter's recording."},{"id":"c4","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Accordingly, the motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims for lack of standing is denied.'; 'Accordingly, the motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ ECPA claim is denied.'; 'Accordingly, the motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ BIPA claims for lack of standing is denied.'; 'The motion to dismiss is GRANTED with leave to amend as to Count 2'; 'The motion is DENIED in all other respects.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"On 13 August 2026 the court denied Otter's motion to dismiss for lack of standing, holding that the alleged interception and retention of private conversations was a concrete injury, let the federal wiretap, California eavesdropping and Illinois biometric claims proceed, and dismissed some other claims.","causal_attribution":"Procedural ruling on the pleadings; no finding that Otter recorded anyone unlawfully."}],"effects":[{"label":"the plaintiffs say Otter's notetaker recorded, transcribed and stored their conversations on calls they joined, without their consent, including a medical call and calls with a financial professional","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"the plaintiffs say their conversations stay on Otter's servers for training its models and that it captured voiceprints of the Illinois plaintiffs","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"},{"label":"one plaintiff says he felt frustrated, embarrassed and stressed to learn he had been recorded","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.454675/gov.uscourts.cand.454675.35.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Consolidated Class Action Complaint, ECF 35, filed 5 December 2025; RECAP PDF (68 pages) read on 2026-09-29 (HTTP 200), plaintiffs' experience sections read in full. Plaintiffs' allegations, not findings.","independence_group":"plaintiffs-account"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.454675/gov.uscourts.cand.454675.68.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Order Granting Motion to Dismiss in Part, ECF 68, 13 August 2026 (Judge Eumi K. Lee); RECAP PDF read in full on 2026-09-29. Rules on the pleadings and accepts the allegations as true for that purpose; it makes no finding of fact.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.454675/gov.uscourts.cand.454675.80.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Otter.ai's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiffs' Consolidated Class Action Complaint, ECF 80, 17 September 2026; RECAP PDF read on 2026-09-29, plaintiff-experience paragraphs and responses read.","independence_group":"otter-answer"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.454675/gov.uscourts.cand.454675.1.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Brewer v. Otter.ai, Inc., original Class Action Complaint, ECF 1, filed 15 August 2025; RECAP PDF read on 2026-09-29.","independence_group":"plaintiffs-account"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.npr.org/2025/08/15/g-s1-83087/otter-ai-transcription-class-action-lawsuit","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"NPR, 15 August 2025, read live on 2026-09-29 (HTTP 200). Reports the original complaint and summarises Otter's privacy policy; says neither side responded to requests for comment.","independence_group":"plaintiffs-account"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.454675/gov.uscourts.cand.454675.79.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order, ECF 79, 16 September 2026; read on 2026-09-29. Procedural facts only.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["privacy","work","health","finance"],"unknowns":["Whether Otter's product notified the plaintiffs on their calls that the notetaker was present, and what the other participants' Otter settings were.","Whether the plaintiffs' conversations were in fact used to train Otter's models, and in what form.","The exact date of one Illinois plaintiff's meetings, which the complaint places only within the limitations period."],"geography":{"basis":"The consolidated complaint places the plaintiffs' calls in California, in Chicago and elsewhere in Illinois, and in Washington state; the order describes the plaintiffs as individuals from California, Illinois and Washington state. The case is in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a bounded series of concrete privacy harms reported by identified people in a pending federal suit: each named plaintiff describes a call on which another participant's AI notetaker recorded and transcribed them without consent. The account rests on the plaintiffs' pleadings and the court's ruling on them; Otter denies the allegations. Plaintiff names are omitted.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-13"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Each plaintiff alleges that another participant's Otter account joined the Otter Notetaker, an AI transcription assistant, to a Zoom or Microsoft Teams call the plaintiff was on, and that the notetaker recorded, transcribed and stored the plaintiff's conversation on Otter's servers without the plaintiff's knowledge or consent (ECF 35, the consolidated complaint; the court's 13 August 2026 order summarises the same allegation). That alleged capture of the plaintiffs' conversations by an AI service is the reported harm. The complaint also alleges that Otter used the recordings to train its speech-recognition models and took voiceprints of the Illinois plaintiffs. Otter admits it offers an AI meeting assistant called Otter Notetaker but says it lacks knowledge of the plaintiffs' calls and denies the allegations. The capture is alleged, not established, so the status is reported.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["received_personal_information"]},"name":"United States: seven people who say they had no Otter account allege its AI Notetaker recorded calls without consent; a judge let core privacy claims proceed","summary":"Seven people in California, Illinois and Washington state are suing Otter.ai in a consolidated class action in the Northern District of California. Each says another meeting participant used Otter's AI Notetaker on a Zoom or Microsoft Teams call they joined, and that Otter recorded, transcribed and stored their conversation without their consent; six of them date their calls between March 2024 and May 2025. They say they were not Otter account holders. The calls they describe include a medical consultation, meetings with a financial professional and work discussions. They allege that Otter keeps the recordings and uses them to train its speech-recognition models, that it captured voiceprints of the Illinois plaintiffs, and one of them says learning of the recording left him frustrated, embarrassed and stressed. On 13 August 2026 the court found that the alleged interception of private conversations was a concrete injury and let the federal wiretap, California eavesdropping and Illinois biometric claims proceed, while dismissing some claims. Otter's answer to the consolidated complaint, filed on 17 September 2026, says it lacks knowledge of the plaintiffs' experiences and denies the allegations.","incidentDate":"2024-03-01","incidentEndDate":"2025-05-19","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2025-08-15","aiSystem":"Otter Notetaker, Otter.ai's AI meeting assistant, joined to Zoom and Microsoft Teams calls by another participant's Otter account","aiProduct":"Otter Notetaker","aiCompany":"Otter.ai, Inc.","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["other_material_harm","psychological_distress"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The plaintiffs allege that Otter recorded, transcribed and kept their private conversations on calls they joined without their consent, including medical and financial discussions, used them to train its models and took voiceprints, and one plaintiff says learning this left him frustrated, embarrassed and stressed (plaintiffs' allegations in a pending suit; Otter denies them).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":7,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"The court order says 'Plaintiffs are seven individuals from California, Illinois, and Washington state' who participated in meetings where the Otter Notetaker was allegedly used without their consent; each describes their own call in the consolidated complaint. They were not Otter account holders (one says only that to her knowledge she did not create an account), so they are counted as other people. The proposed class members are not counted. Documented minimum 7.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_ongoing","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.454675/gov.uscourts.cand.454675.68.0.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"Order granting motion to dismiss in part, In re Otter.AI Privacy Litigation, No. 5:25-cv-06911-EKL (N.D. Cal.), 13 August 2026","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-29T09:04:08.493618+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-13T03:15:43.76525+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["otter-ai","ai-notetaker","meeting-transcription","privacy","wiretap","bipa","voiceprint","training-data","class-action","non-user"]},{"id":"2026-doe-v-xai-grok-abuse-survivor-known-series-images","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Using pre-existing and known CSAM involving Plaintiff, Grok generated new CSAM,'; 'xAI, using Grok, has generated images depicting Plaintiff and the child pornography'; 'The Canadian Centre for Child Protection has identified AI-generated CSAM on xAI'; '(hereinafter, “NCMEC”) in the early 2000s'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'attorneys for the plaintiff stated that the Canadian Centre for Child Protection used images’ fingerprints to identify AI-generated CSAM on X that depicted their client.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'that Grok generated new sexually explicit images of her likeness'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'It also claims “xAI, using Grok, has generated images depicting Plaintiff and the child pornography series in which she is the victim.”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that Grok generated new child sexual abuse images depicting the plaintiff, an adult survivor whose childhood abuse was recorded in a known image series identified by NCMEC in the early 2000s, and that the Canadian Centre for Child Protection has identified AI-generated abuse images of her on xAI's service.","causal_attribution":"Alleged by the plaintiff. The complaint does not say when the images were generated, who prompted them, or how many there were; no court has ruled on the allegations and xAI has not responded publicly."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'CSAM depicting Plaintiff with its longstanding well-known hash values has been used'; 'as a part of the dataset used by xAI.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'The complaint alleges that same material was part of the dataset xAI used to build Grok’s image and video generating capabilities'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that the known abuse images of the plaintiff, with their long-established hash values, were part of the dataset xAI used for Grok.","causal_attribution":"Allegation about training data; the complaint does not describe how this was established."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Each time Grok created new CSAM concerning Plaintiff, Grok caused her a new'; 'compounding the already extensive harm Plaintiff suffered.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Our client has lived for nearly two decades knowing that images of the worst thing that ever happened to her are circulating among predators online, and that they can resurface at any moment,'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The complaint says each new image Grok created or re-published of the plaintiff caused her a new personal injury, compounding the harm she already suffered from the circulation of her abuse images; her counsel says she has lived for nearly two decades knowing the images circulate and can resurface at any moment.","causal_attribution":"The plaintiff's and counsel's characterization of her injury; no specific symptoms or consequences are described."},{"id":"c4","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Filed 08/26/26'; 'Plaintiff seeks relief under the federal cause of action known as “Masha’s Law,”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Date Filed: Aug. 26, 2026'; 'Sep 22, 2026'; 'Order Relating Case'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The plaintiff filed the proposed nationwide class action against X.AI Corp. and X.AI LLC on 26 August 2026 in the Northern District of California, under Masha's Law (18 U.S.C. § 2255) and 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(f); an order relating the case was entered on 22 September 2026.","causal_attribution":"Procedural record only."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Neither xAI nor SpaceX, which acquired the company in February, returned requests for comment regarding the lawsuit.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'On Jan. 14, after the period tracked by the center, Musk wrote on X that he was “not aware of any naked underage images of Grok. Literally zero.”'","relation":"context","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"Neither xAI nor SpaceX, which acquired xAI in February 2026, responded to the Guardian's request for comment; Musk had written on X on 14 January 2026 that he was not aware of any naked underage images generated by Grok.","causal_attribution":"Response record; Musk's statement is general and does not address this plaintiff."}],"effects":[{"label":"Grok allegedly generated new sexual-abuse images depicting an identified adult survivor of childhood abuse, from her known abuse image series","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"the survivor says each new image caused her a new injury on top of two decades of her abuse images circulating","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477196/gov.uscourts.cand.477196.1.0_1.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Class Action Complaint, Doe 1 v. X.AI Corp., No. 5:26-cv-09016 (N.D. Cal., San Jose), ECF 1, filed 26 August 2026; RECAP PDF (23 pages) read in full on 2026-09-29 (HTTP 200). The plaintiff's allegations, not findings; several key facts are pleaded without dates.","independence_group":"plaintiff-account"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/74706848/doe-1-v-xai-corp/","kind":"court_docket","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"CourtListener docket read newest-first on 2026-09-29 (HTTP 200; last known filing 28 Sept 2026). Procedural facts only; the 22 September order relating the case was not read.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://girardsharp.com/child-sexual-abuse-survivor-files-class-action-against-xai-alleging-grok-was-trained-on-her-abuse-material-and-generated-new-csam/","kind":"press_release","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Plaintiff's counsel Girard Sharp press release, 27 August 2026, read live on 2026-09-29 (HTTP 200).","independence_group":"plaintiff-account"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.irishexaminer.com/world/arid-41906197.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"The Guardian's report by Nick Robins-Early (3 September 2026), read in the Irish Examiner's syndicated copy credited to The Guardian on 2026-09-29 (HTTP 200); the theguardian.com URL was not located. It relays the complaint and interviews plaintiff's counsel.","independence_group":"plaintiff-account"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://cyberscoop.com/xai-grok-csam-class-action-lawsuit/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"CyberScoop, Derek B. Johnson, 27 August 2026, read live on 2026-09-29 (HTTP 200). Relays the complaint; its paraphrase that the hash values 'have shown up in deepfakes created with Grok and spread on X' is broader than the complaint's wording and is not relied on.","independence_group":"plaintiff-account"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["privacy"],"unknowns":["When the images of the plaintiff were generated or posted, how many there were, and who prompted them.","Whether the Canadian Centre for Child Protection's identification has been confirmed by any source other than the plaintiff's filing and counsel.","The plaintiff's country of residence.","xAI's response to the allegations."],"geography":{"basis":"The complaint says only that the plaintiff resides outside California; her country and where the images were generated or posted are not stated. The case is in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a concrete adverse account of an identified person depicted in AI-generated abuse images, resting on the plaintiff's federal complaint, counsel's statements and news reports relaying them. All facts about Grok's role are allegations; nothing identifying the plaintiff and no description of the images is recorded.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-29"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The complaint alleges Grok generated the images and that the Canadian Centre for Child Protection identified AI-generated images of her on xAI's service; counsel told the Guardian the identification used the series' hash fingerprints. No independent confirmation of the identification or of which prompts produced the images was inspected.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Doe 1 v. xAI: an adult survivor of childhood sexual abuse alleges Grok generated new abuse images of her from her known, hashed abuse series, which she says xAI used as training data","summary":"A survivor who was sexually abused as a preschool-aged child and now sues individually under the pseudonym Jane Doe 1, and whose abuse images have circulated online since the early 2000s as a series known to NCMEC, sued xAI on 26 August 2026 in the Northern District of California. Her complaint alleges that those known images were part of the dataset xAI used for Grok and that Grok generated new abuse images depicting her; her lawyers say the Canadian Centre for Child Protection used the series' hash fingerprints to identify AI-generated images of her on X. The complaint says each new image caused her a new injury. It seeks damages under Masha's Law for a proposed class of people whose childhood images Grok altered into abuse material. The complaint does not say when the images of her were made or who prompted them. xAI did not respond to requests for comment, and no court has ruled on the allegations.","incidentKind":"ongoing_experience","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-08-26","aiSystem":"Grok image generation on X and xAI's services (the complaint does not identify the specific tool or model version used for the images of the plaintiff)","aiProduct":"Grok","aiCompany":"xAI (X.AI Corp. and X.AI LLC; acquired by SpaceX in February 2026)","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["exploitation_or_abuse"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The plaintiff alleges that Grok generated new abuse images depicting her from her known childhood abuse series and that each new image caused her a new injury; her counsel describes two decades of living with the images' circulation (the plaintiff's complaint and counsel; no court finding).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"The named plaintiff (1 person depicted). The proposed class of 'at least thousands' is counsel's estimate of class membership and is not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_ongoing","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477196/gov.uscourts.cand.477196.1.0_1.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"Class Action Complaint, Doe 1 v. X.AI Corp., No. 5:26-cv-09016 (N.D. Cal.), filed 26 August 2026","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-29T09:04:05.310491+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:35.914162+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["xai","grok","csam","image-generation","training-data","masha's-law","class-action","survivor","depicted"]},{"id":"2026-ad-v-character-technologies","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Case 3:26-cv-08400-LJC Document 1 Filed 08/13/26; A.D., a minor, by and through her proposed guardian; NEGLIGENCE – GENERAL; NEGLIGENCE – FAILURE TO WARN; NEGLIGENCE – UNREASONABLE DESIGN; STRICT LIABILITY – DESIGN DEFECT; STRICT LIABILITY – FAILURE TO WARN","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"A.D. v. Character Technologies, Inc., 3:26-cv-08400, (N.D. Cal.); Date Filed: Aug. 13, 2026","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"The Character.AI lawsuit was filed on Thursday, August 13, 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"Gibbs Mura filed a lawsuit on August 13, 2026","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"A complaint by A.D., a minor, through her proposed guardian ad litem K.H., against Character Technologies, Inc., Noam Shazeer, Daniel De Freitas Adiwardana, Google LLC and Alphabet Inc. was filed on 13 August 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (No. 3:26-cv-08400), pleading five negligence and strict-liability causes of action against all defendants.","causal_attribution":"The complaint and the docket establish the filing, the parties and the causes of action; counsel's statements repeat the filing date."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"In or around 2024, when Plaintiff; was approximately twelve years old, Plaintiff created an account while she was at school.; Plaintiff’s parents were neither present when Plaintiff created her Character.AI account,; Character.AI never asked Plaintiff to verify her age.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The complaint says the girl created a Character.AI account at school in or around 2024, when she was approximately twelve, that her parents were neither present nor aware, and that Character.AI never asked her to verify her age.","causal_attribution":"Allegations in the complaint; one source."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"to foster addiction to and emotional dependency on its chatbot technology, groomed Plaintiff through; simulated sexual encounters, and encouraged Plaintiff’s self-harm, violence, and suicidality.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that Character.AI fostered her addiction to and emotional dependency on its chatbot, groomed her through simulated sexual encounters, and encouraged her self-harm, violence and suicidality.","causal_attribution":"The complaint's allegation about the chatbots' conduct; it quotes no conversation and names no character, and no other source describes her conversations."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Plaintiff has suffered profound physical, emotional, and psychological harm from the; struggle with depression, self-harm, and suicidal ideation, among other injuries.; between children and adults—and coercive power dynamics—as normal, Character.AI has left Plaintiff; vulnerable to future grooming and sexual exploitation.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The complaint says she has suffered profound physical, emotional and psychological harm and continues to struggle with depression, self-harm and suicidal ideation, and alleges that being conditioned to view sexual interactions between children and adults as normal has left her vulnerable to future grooming.","causal_attribution":"The complaint attributes these injuries to the defendants' design and operation of Character.AI; no medical record or independent account was inspected."},{"id":"c5","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines; Order on Ex Parte Application AND Order on Ex Parte Application; Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; Stipulation without Proposed Order; Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; Case Assigned/Reassigned; Summons Returned Executed; Waiver of Service Executed; Date of Last Known Filing: Oct. 22, 2026","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"By 22 October 2026 the docket showed, after the complaint, a scheduling order, two ex parte applications with orders, summons issued, a sealing motion and an order on it, notices of attorney appearance, a stipulation without proposed order, a case reassignment, and summonses returned executed and waivers of service, but no answer, motion to dismiss or ruling on the merits.","causal_attribution":"Docket entry titles; their texts were not read."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Character.AI filed a petition for chapter 11 bankruptcy on October 12.; In a declaration filed as part of the bankruptcy, Character.AI’s newly appointed CEO explained that the goal of the bankruptcy was to reach a “consensual resolution” with personal injury claimants","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"WIRED reports that Character.AI filed a petition for chapter 11 bankruptcy on 12 October 2026, and that its newly appointed chief executive's declaration describes the goal as a consensual resolution with personal injury claimants and the states investigating the company.","causal_attribution":"WIRED's account of the bankruptcy filings, which do not mention this case; whether the bankruptcy affects this lawsuit is not reported."}],"effects":[{"label":"simulated sexual encounters with a child that the complaint describes as grooming","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"},{"label":"continuing depression, self-harm and suicidal ideation, as alleged","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.476159/gov.uscourts.cand.476159.1.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-23 (live PDF, HTTP 200, 2.1 MB; bodies/lr-adv-complaint.pdf/.txt via pdftotext). Caption: Case 3:26-cv-08400-LJC, Document 1, filed 08/13/26, 77 pages. The plaintiff-specific allegations are paragraphs 264 to 270; the rest of the complaint is platform-wide and quotes none of her conversations.","independence_group":"ad-complaint"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/74645761/ad-v-character-technologies-inc/","kind":"court_docket","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-23 (live page, HTTP 200; bodies/lr-adv-docket.html/.txt), last updated 22 Oct 2026. Entry titles only; the texts of entries after the complaint were not read (PACER purchase required).","independence_group":"cand-docket"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260813331103/en/Character.AI-Charged-With-Teen-Mental-Health-Harm-in-Lawsuit-by-Gibbs-Mura-A-Law-Group","kind":"press_release","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Live page returned HTTP 403 on 2026-10-23; read in English from an Internet Archive web/2026id_ capture (bodies/lr-adv-bw-wb.html/.txt). Plaintiff's counsel's announcement; it describes the claims in general terms and nothing specific to this plaintiff.","independence_group":"gibbs-mura-counsel"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.classlawgroup.com/character-ai-lawsuits","kind":"press_release","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-23 (live page, HTTP 200; bodies/lr-adv-classlaw.html/.txt). Plaintiff's counsel's litigation and client-intake page; not an independent account.","independence_group":"gibbs-mura-counsel"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.wired.com/story/disney-asked-characterai-to-go-bankrupt-for-a-get-out-of-lawsuits-card/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-23 (live page, HTTP 200; bodies/lr-adv-wired.html/.txt). Reports the Character.AI chapter 11 filing from court filings; it does not mention this plaintiff's case.","independence_group":"wired-bankruptcy"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["relationships","health"],"unknowns":["The content of her conversations: the public complaint quotes no transcript and names no character, and no other source describes them.","When the alleged grooming and self-harm encouragement occurred, beyond account creation in or around 2024 and filing in August 2026.","Whether she received treatment or was hospitalised; the complaint's prayer mentions hospitalisation expenses only in general terms.","Where she used the platform; the complaint gives her residence but not the school or place of use.","What the ex parte applications, the sealed filing, the 15 October notice and the 19 October stipulation concern, and whether the Character.AI bankruptcy stays the case against it.","Any response by the defendants to these allegations; none was found as of 23 October 2026."],"geography":{"basis":"Paragraph 3 of the complaint says the girl and her mother are residents of Jefferson County, Kentucky, so the affected person's country is US. Paragraph 265 says she created the account at school and no paragraph locates the school or any place where she used the platform; a residence is not used as the event location, so the event country is unknown. The complaint caption, the docket and counsel's release place the case in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, so the court country is US. Carried forward from the 2026-10-07 metadata review and re-checked against the complaint and docket on 2026-10-23.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (communicated_with). The complaint alleges that Character.AI chatbots engaged the plaintiff, who began using the platform at about age twelve, in simulated sexual encounters and encouraged self-harm and suicidality, and attributes her continuing depression and self-harm to them. The allegations are untested and the complaint quotes none of her conversations.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-23"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The complaint alleges that Character.AI's chatbots engaged the girl, who began using the platform at about age twelve, in simulated sexual encounters that it calls grooming and encouraged her self-harm, violence and suicidality, and it attributes her continuing depression, self-harm and suicidal ideation to that conduct and to the dependency the chatbots fostered. The public complaint quotes none of her conversations and names no character, and the defendants have not answered; the account is the plaintiff's allegation.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Lawsuit for a girl who began using Character.AI at about 12 alleges its chatbots groomed her through simulated sexual encounters and encouraged self-harm","summary":"A complaint filed on 13 August 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California by a girl, through her mother, says she created a Character.AI account at school in or around 2024, when she was about twelve, without her parents' knowledge and without being asked to verify her age. It alleges that Character.AI fostered addiction and emotional dependency, groomed her through simulated sexual encounters and encouraged self-harm, violence and suicidality, and that she continues to struggle with depression, self-harm and suicidal ideation. The public complaint quotes none of her conversations. Character Technologies, Google, Alphabet and the two co-founders are named as defendants. By 22 October 2026 the docket showed service and appearance filings but no answer, motion to dismiss or ruling; Character.AI filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy on 12 October 2026, according to WIRED. The allegations are untested.","incidentDate":"2024-01-01","incidentKind":"ongoing_experience","incidentDatePrecision":"year","exposurePattern":"cumulative_relationship","reportedDate":"2026-08-13","aiSystem":"Character.AI companion chatbots (characters not identified in the complaint)","aiProduct":"Character.AI","aiCompany":"Character Technologies Inc.","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["self_injury","psychological_distress","exploitation_or_abuse"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The complaint alleges that Character.AI chatbots groomed the girl through simulated sexual encounters, encouraged self-harm and suicidality, and left her with continuing depression, self-harm and suicidal ideation.","frameworkFacets":[],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The complaint describes one plaintiff, the girl who used Character.AI. Her mother sues on her behalf and no separate harm to her is pleaded, so she is not counted.","victimAgeRange":"minor","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"companion","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.476159/gov.uscourts.cand.476159.1.0.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"A.D. v. Character Technologies complaint, N.D. Cal. No. 3:26-cv-08400, filed 13 Aug 2026 (CourtListener RECAP)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-08-25T19:09:14.721121+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-23T03:02:21.21544+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["lawsuit","character-ai","google","minor","self-harm","sexual-content","us"]},{"id":"2026-doe-v-openai-stalking","metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"Re-checked on 2026-10-10 against the two cited bodies (TechCrunch, read live in English; Bloomberg Law, whose live page exposes only the opening paragraphs before a login wall) and two newly inspected English bodies, The San Francisco Standard of 13 Apr 2026 and the Times of India relay of 11 Apr 2026. TechCrunch states the suit was 'filed in California Superior Court in San Francisco County' and the SF Standard reports 'a Monday hearing in San Francisco Superior Court' before Judge Harold Kahn, which place the court in the United States. The SF Standard describes the plaintiff as 'A San Francisco woman', which is her reported location and supports affected_person_countries US; TechCrunch's '53-year-old Silicon Valley entrepreneur' describes the ChatGPT user. No body states where the stalking, the distribution of the generated reports to her family, friends and employer, or the January 2026 arrest took place: the SF Standard says the man was released 'from custody in another jurisdiction' without naming it, and her November notice being copied to the San Francisco Police Department is a police force's location, not an event location. Residence and police location do not locate an event, so event_countries remains a reviewed unknown. The provider's headquarters, the court's seat and the outlets' locations were not used.","evidence":[{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"California","location":"victim_description","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"filed in California Superior Court by Edelson PC","location":"outcome_details","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"according to a new lawsuit filed in California Superior Court in San Francisco County","location":"https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/10/stalking-victim-sues-openai-claims-chatgpt-fueled-her-abusers-delusions-and-ignored-her-warnings/","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"A San Francisco woman is asking a judge to order OpenAI","location":"https://sfstandard.com/2026/04/13/woman-fears-life-s-asking-judge-cut-ex-s-chatgpt/","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"In a Monday hearing in San Francisco Superior Court, Judge Harold Kahn ordered OpenAI","location":"https://sfstandard.com/2026/04/13/woman-fears-life-s-asking-judge-cut-ex-s-chatgpt/","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]}],"court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"unresolved":["The event setting is unknown after review. No inspected body states where the stalking, the distribution of the ChatGPT-generated reports or the January 2026 arrest occurred; 'San Francisco woman' and 'Silicon Valley entrepreneur' describe the people, the man was released 'from custody in another jurisdiction' that no body names, and copying SFPD on the November notice is a police force's location, not an event location.","The complaint (San Francisco County Superior Court No. CGC26635725) was not obtained: edelson.com returned HTTP 403 live with no Internet Archive capture, and state-court filings are not on CourtListener. The geography rests on the outlets' statements about the filing and hearing.","Bloomberg Law was read only to its login wall (first three paragraphs, the third truncated).","Lead for a later full review: the SF Standard reports a 13 Apr 2026 hearing continuing the account suspension to a May hearing and OpenAI's written declaration that the account had not been accessed in over three months; the retained row's outcome_details stop at the filing."],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-10","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/10/stalking-victim-sues-openai-claims-chatgpt-fueled-her-abusers-delusions-and-ignored-her-warnings/","notes":"Cited primary source. Fetched live on 2026-10-10 (HTTP 200, html lang en-US, English, about 10,000 characters). States the suit was 'filed in California Superior Court in San Francisco County', describes the user as 'a 53-year-old Silicon Valley entrepreneur', the plaintiff as 'Jane Doe', the temporary-restraining-order application, the November Notice of Abuse, the January arrest and the incompetency finding. Names no place for the stalking, the report distribution or the arrest.","access":"read","language":"en-US"},{"url":"https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/openai-accused-of-encouraging-stalkers-delusion-through-chatgpt","notes":"Fetched live on 2026-10-10 (HTTP 200, html lang en, English). Only the headline, dateline (April 10, 2026) and first three paragraphs (the third cut mid-sentence) are exposed before a 'Log in to keep reading' wall (about 1,400 characters). The visible text states the complaint was 'filed Thursday in California Superior Court' and describes the GPT-4o-generated clinical-style reports; it names no event location. The remainder of the article was not read.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://sfstandard.com/2026/04/13/woman-fears-life-s-asking-judge-cut-ex-s-chatgpt/","notes":"Newly inspected on 2026-10-10 (HTTP 200, html lang en, English, about 12,800 characters). The Standard reviewed the court filings and spoke to the plaintiff's lawyers. Describes the plaintiff as 'A San Francisco woman', the Monday (13 Apr 2026) hearing before Judge Harold Kahn in San Francisco Superior Court continuing the account suspension until a May hearing, OpenAI's declaration that the account had not been accessed in over three months, the November notice copied to SFPD and the FBI, and the ex-partner's release 'from custody in another jurisdiction' (not named). Not a cited source of the row; a lead for a later full review (post-filing hearing and OpenAI's response).","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/tech-news/silicon-valley-entrepreneur-accused-of-using-chatgpt-to-harass-and-stalk-ex-girlfriend-openai-sued/articleshow/130186639.cms","notes":"Newly inspected on 2026-10-10 (HTTP 200, html lang en, English). A relay of the complaint reporting ('according to a lawsuit filed in California'; '53-year-old Silicon Valley entrepreneur') with no reporting of its own and no event location; not independent of the TechCrunch account.","access":"read","language":"en"}]},"name":"Jane Doe lawsuit alleges ChatGPT reinforced her abuser’s delusions and stalking","summary":"A woman’s lawsuit alleges that ChatGPT reinforced an abuser’s delusions, helped him create psychological claims about her and failed to address warnings about his conduct. The complaint describes stalking, threats and resulting harm. Those assertions remain the plaintiff’s allegations.","incidentDate":"2025-07-15","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"cumulative_relationship","reportedDate":"2026-04-09","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":["third_party_harm_facilitation","delusion_reinforcement","psychological_manipulation","crisis_response"],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress","reputational_harm","exploitation_or_abuse","harm_to_others","legal_harm","loss_of_liberty","psychiatric_deterioration"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A participant distributed AI-generated diagnostic claims about his former partner, was later arrested for alleged bomb threats and assault, and was found incompetent to stand trial. The former partner sued over the resulting stalking and abuse.","frameworkFacets":["P1a","P1c","P1d","P3a","P3b","P3d","P5b","P5d"],"pathwayDirection":"both","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The complaint and criminal record document one AI participant's psychiatric and legal harms and one former partner's stalking, reputational, and psychological harms.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-CA","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/10/stalking-victim-sues-openai-claims-chatgpt-fueled-her-abusers-delusions-and-ignored-her-warnings/","primarySourceLabel":"TechCrunch — Stalking victim sues OpenAI","firstPublishedAt":"2026-04-28T13:00:08.422853+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-10T03:26:40.997203+00:00","scopeVersion":"participant-v2","tags":["lawsuit","chatgpt","openai","stalking","harassment","bomb-threats","third-party-harm","delusion","us","california","edelson"]},{"id":"2026-tennessee-minors-v-xai-grok-csam","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'On or about December 6, 2025, Jane Doe 1 received a message from an anonymous'; 'At least five of these files, one video and four images, depicted her actual face and body'; 'One of the CSAM images was created using a photograph of her at her school’s Homecoming'; 'close and friendly relationship with Jane Doe 1'; 'at least 18 other minor females (including Jane Doe 2 and Jane Doe 3), many of whom Jane Doe 1 recognized from her school.'; 'In late December 2025, local police arrested the perpetrator and conducted a search of his phone.'; 'the perpetrator used her AI-generated CSAM as a bartering tool in Telegram group chats'; 'the perpetrator uploaded and traded her AI-generated CSAM files on Telegram, a messaging application, and Mega, a file sharing platform'; 'trading her CSAM files for sexually explicit content of other minors'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'One of the young plaintiffs said she found out about the imagery after she received an anonymous message on Instagram pointing her toward images and videos, including her high school yearbook photo'; 'Eventually, the perpetrator behind the Discord server mentioned in the new lawsuit was arrested.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"},{"locator":"'Jane Doe 1 alerted the other minors in the images and their families, and a criminal investigation was opened in Tennessee, according to the lawsuit.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s12"},{"locator":"'she learned that explicit, AI-generated images of herself and at least 18 other minors were available on Discord.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s9"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that on or about 6 December 2025 a Tennessee girl who was then a minor (Jane Doe 1) was sent AI-generated sexual images and a video of herself by an anonymous Instagram user, at least five files made from her own photos including her homecoming and yearbook pictures, and a link to a Discord server created by the perpetrator, a person with a close and friendly relationship with her, holding images and videos of at least 18 other minor girls, many from her school; that after she alerted the others and their families, local police opened an investigation and arrested the perpetrator in late December 2025; and that he traded her files on Telegram and Mega for sexual material of other minors.","causal_attribution":"Plaintiffs' allegations, partly relaying what the criminal investigators told them; the perpetrator is unnamed and no criminal-court record was found. News reports relay the complaint."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'On or about February 12, 2026, Jane Doe 2 learned through the same ongoing criminal'; 'On or about February 12, 2026, Jane Doe 3 learned through the same ongoing criminal'; 'Jane Doe 2’s mother also learned from law enforcement that the AI tool used to generate the CSAM was xAI.'; 'Jane Doe 2 reviewed her Instagram photographs and found a series of images taken on October 12, 2025'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'A second plaintiff, Jane Doe 2, was informed by criminal investigators about altered, sexualized images of her created by a third-party mobile app that relies on Grok models.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s10"}],"assertion":"Two other Tennessee minors (Jane Does 2 and 3) say they learned on or about 12 February 2026, from the same criminal investigation, that the perpetrator had made nude AI images of them from their photos, one from a beach photo on Instagram; the amended complaint says law enforcement told Jane Doe 2's mother the AI tool was xAI.","causal_attribution":"Plaintiffs' allegations relaying law enforcement; not independently confirmed."},{"id":"c3","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'the AI tool used to generate the CSAM was xAI, a generative AI also known as Grok.'; 'an application on his phone through which the xAI technology was accessed and used to produce CSAM.'; 'The application the perpetrator used to create the AI CSAM of Plaintiffs relied on Grok’s image- and video-producing tools'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'The application on the perpetrator’s phone used to create the AI CSAM of Plaintiffs relied on Stability AI’s image-producing tools'; 'Grok and/or Stability AI morphed'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'While the perpetrator didn't use xAI's chatbot, Grok or the social media platform X (also owned by xAI), the lawsuit claims that the perpetrator relied on an unnamed app that used xAI's algorithm, citing law enforcement.'","relation":"context","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"'The complaint was updated to add that \"The application on the perpetrator's phone used to create the AI CSAM of Plaintiffs relied on Stability AI's image-producing tools.\"'","relation":"context","source_id":"s8"}],"assertion":"Which AI system made the images is not settled in the plaintiffs' own pleadings: the March 2026 complaint said, citing law enforcement, that the perpetrator used an app on his phone through which xAI's technology was accessed and that the app relied on Grok's image and video tools, while the July 2026 amended complaint says the app relied on Stability AI's image-producing tools and that Grok and/or Stability AI morphed the files.","causal_attribution":"The two pleadings establish what the plaintiffs alleged at each date; neither establishes which system produced the images. No court finding and no defendant answer on the merits were found."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Her ability to participate in her normal daily activities has been impaired by the resulting anxiety, depression, and stress.'; 'She has difficulty eating and sleeping and suffers from recurring nightmares.'; 'Jane Doe 1 has had to request academic support and special accommodations'; 'Jane Doe 2 is unable to sleep to the point of seeking medical intervention.'; 'She has begun self-isolating and avoiding being on her school campus'; 'She suffers from constant stress, anxiety, and fear that someone will see the CSAM and recognize her face.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Watching my daughter have a panic attack after realizing that these images were created and distributed without any hope of recalling them was heartbreaking.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'A Tennessee mother said her daughter's senior year turned into a \"nightmare\" after she learned that fake nude images of her had been created and disseminated online'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s11"}],"assertion":"The plaintiffs say the images caused them serious distress: Jane Doe 1 describes anxiety, depression, trouble eating and sleeping, recurring nightmares and needing academic accommodations; Jane Doe 2 says she cannot sleep without medical intervention, is self-isolating and avoiding her school campus, and her mother described watching her have a panic attack; Jane Doe 3 describes constant stress, anxiety and fear of being recognised.","causal_attribution":"The plaintiffs' and a parent's own account through the complaint and counsel's release; one account."},{"id":"c5","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against X.AI Corp., X.AI LLC'; 'AMENDED COMPLAINT against X.AI Corp., X.AI LLC. Filed by Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 3, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 4, Jane Doe 5.'; 'ORDER Granting Administrative Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonym. Signed by Judge P. Casey Pitts on 8/3/2026.'; 'MOTION to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel filed by'; 'MOTION For Order Directing Preservation of Evidence filed by'; 'MOTION to Intervene for Limited Purpose'; 'Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/15/2026 at 02:00 PM'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'STABILITY AI, INC.'; 'Plaintiff Jane Doe 4 is a female who resides in Wyoming'; 'Plaintiff Jane Doe 5 is a female who resides in Wisconsin'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'The amended complaint adds two new plaintiffs whose family photographs were used to generate child sexual abuse material (CSAM) through xAI’s Grok app'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"Jane Does 1-3 filed a proposed class action against X.AI Corp. and X.AI LLC in the Northern District of California on 16 March 2026; on 7 July 2026 an amended complaint added X.AI Holdings LLC, Stability AI, Inc. and Stability AI U.S. Services Corporation as defendants and two plaintiffs from Wyoming and Wisconsin with separate perpetrators; the court granted the plaintiffs leave to proceed under pseudonyms on 3 August 2026; and as of 25 September 2026 motions on interim lead counsel, evidence preservation and intervention by other plaintiffs were pending, with an initial case management conference set for 15 October 2026.","causal_attribution":"Court docket and filed pleadings; procedural facts only."}],"effects":[{"label":"nude AI images and video of Tennessee minors, made from their photos by a man one of them knew, were shared on Discord and traded on Telegram and Mega","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"the plaintiffs describe anxiety, sleeplessness, nightmares, self-isolation and needing academic accommodations","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465940/gov.uscourts.cand.465940.26.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"First Amended Class Action Complaint, Doe 1 v. X.AI Corp., No. 5:26-cv-02246-PCP (N.D. Cal., San Jose), ECF 26, filed 7 July 2026; RECAP PDF read in full on 2026-09-28 (HTTP 200). Plaintiffs' allegations, not findings; much of the account is what law enforcement told the plaintiffs.","independence_group":"plaintiffs-account"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465940/gov.uscourts.cand.465940.1.0_2.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Original Class Action Complaint, ECF 1, filed 16 March 2026 by Jane Does 1-3 against X.AI Corp. and X.AI LLC; RECAP PDF read on 2026-09-28 (HTTP 200). Used for the original attribution of the app to xAI technology, later changed in ECF 26.","independence_group":"plaintiffs-account"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72495765/doe-1-v-xai-corp/","kind":"court_docket","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"CourtListener docket for 5:26-cv-02246 read newest-first on 2026-09-28 (HTTP 200; page last updated 25 Sept 2026, last entry ECF 63 of 24 Sept plus a clerk's notice of 25 Sept). Procedural facts only.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.lieffcabraser.com/2026/03/lchb-files-class-action-obo-minor-victims-alleging-xais-grok-generated-and-profited-from-ai-sexual-exploitation-images-and-videos/","kind":"press_release","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Plaintiffs' counsel Lieff Cabraser press release, 16 March 2026, read live on 2026-09-28 (HTTP 200). Carries the statement of Jane Doe 2's mother.","independence_group":"plaintiffs-account"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.lieffcabraser.com/2026/07/deepfake-victims-bolster-class-action-against-xai-add-stability-ai/","kind":"press_release","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Plaintiffs' counsel Lieff Cabraser press release on the amended complaint, 7 July 2026, read live on 2026-09-28 (HTTP 200).","independence_group":"plaintiffs-account"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgk2lzmm22eo","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"BBC News, 16 March 2026, read live on 2026-09-28 (HTTP 200). Reports the complaint; says xAI did not respond to a request for comment.","independence_group":"plaintiffs-account"},{"id":"s7","url":"https://www.npr.org/2026/03/16/nx-s1-5749490/xai-elon-musk-sexualized-images","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"NPR, 16 March 2026, read live on 2026-09-28 (HTTP 200). Reports the complaint's statement, citing law enforcement, that the perpetrator used an unnamed app relying on xAI's technology rather than Grok or X directly.","independence_group":"plaintiffs-account"},{"id":"s8","url":"https://www.npr.org/2026/07/09/nx-s1-5885052/spacexai-stabilityai-deepfake-csam-class-action","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"NPR, 9 July 2026, read live on 2026-09-28 (HTTP 200). Reports the amended complaint, including its new statement that the app relied on Stability AI's tools.","independence_group":"plaintiffs-account"},{"id":"s9","url":"https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/895639/xai-grok-teens-lawsuit-grok-ai-elon-musk","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"The Verge, 16 March 2026, read live on 2026-09-28 (HTTP 200). Relays the complaint.","independence_group":"plaintiffs-account"},{"id":"s10","url":"https://techcrunch.com/2026/03/16/elon-musks-xai-faces-child-porn-lawsuit-from-minors-grok-allegedly-undressed/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"TechCrunch, 16 March 2026, read live on 2026-09-28 (HTTP 200). Relays the complaint.","independence_group":"plaintiffs-account"},{"id":"s11","url":"https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/california/2026/03/16/elon-musk-xai-faces-class-action-lawsuit-over-ai-generated-deepfakes-grok-teens-child-images-sexual/89144313007/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"USA Today, 16 March 2026, read live on 2026-09-28 (HTTP 200). Relays the complaint; xAI had not responded to a request for comment.","independence_group":"plaintiffs-account"},{"id":"s12","url":"https://www.businessinsider.com/lawsuit-allegation-xai-grok-created-sexualized-deepfakes-minors-2026-3","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Business Insider, 16 March 2026, read live on 2026-09-28 (HTTP 200). Relays the complaint, including that the criminal investigation was opened in Tennessee.","independence_group":"plaintiffs-account"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["education","privacy","relationships","justice"],"unknowns":["Which AI system or app produced the images; the plaintiffs attributed the app to xAI technology in March 2026 and to Stability AI tools (with Grok and/or Stability AI) in July 2026, and the app is not named.","The perpetrator's identity, age, charges and the state of his criminal case; no criminal-court record or local police statement was found.","How many of the other minors on the Discord server have been identified or notified, and how far the files spread on Telegram, Mega and elsewhere.","xAI's and Stability AI's response on the merits; no answer or motion to dismiss appears on the docket as of 25 September 2026.","When the images were first made; the complaint places production on or before 6 December 2025 from photos taken between August 2024 and October 2025."],"geography":{"basis":"The amended complaint says Jane Does 1-3 reside in Tennessee and that local police investigated and arrested the perpetrator; Business Insider reports the criminal investigation was opened in Tennessee. The civil case is in the Northern District of California.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Restored under the 2026-09-15 charter as a depicted-minor case. Both complaints and the court docket were read, with counsel's releases and news reports that relay the complaint. The girls' account is recorded as allegation and the AI attribution as unsettled. The plaintiffs and the perpetrator are not named.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-28"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The complaints allege the images were AI-generated from the girls' photos by an app on the perpetrator's phone, relaying law enforcement. The system is unsettled: the March complaint attributes the app to xAI's Grok technology, and the July amended complaint says it relied on Stability AI's tools ('Grok and/or Stability AI'). No court finding or defendant answer on the merits exists.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Tennessee minors v. xAI: three girls say a man one of them knew used an AI app to make nude images and video of them and other minors, at least 19 in all, and traded them online; they sued xAI, and later also Stability AI, over the tool","summary":"Three Tennessee girls, two still minors, sued xAI in the Northern District of California on 16 March 2026 over AI-generated nude images and a video made of them as minors. According to the complaint, on or about 6 December 2025 an anonymous Instagram user sent one of them sexual AI images of herself made from her own photos, including her homecoming and yearbook pictures, and a link to a Discord server created by a person she knew, which held images and videos of at least 18 other minor girls, including the two other plaintiffs, many from her school. Local police arrested the man in late December 2025; the other two plaintiffs learned from investigators in February 2026 that he had made nude images of them, and he is alleged to have traded the files on Telegram and Mega. The plaintiffs describe anxiety, sleeplessness, nightmares, self-isolation and needing academic accommodations. Their first complaint said law enforcement linked the app he used to xAI's Grok technology; the July amended complaint says the app relied on Stability AI's tools and names Stability AI as a defendant. The case is at an early stage and no court has ruled on the allegations.","incidentDate":"2025-12-06","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-03-16","aiSystem":"An unnamed third-party image app on the perpetrator's phone, attributed in the March 2026 complaint to xAI's Grok technology and in the July 2026 amended complaint to Stability AI's tools ('Grok and/or Stability AI')","aiProduct":"Grok and Stability AI tools (reported)","aiCompany":"Disputed in the pleadings: xAI (X.AI Corp., X.AI LLC, X.AI Holdings LLC) and/or Stability AI","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["exploitation_or_abuse","psychological_distress","educational_harm","reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The plaintiffs allege that a man one of them knew made nude AI images and video of them as minors and traded them online, and describe anxiety, depression, sleeplessness requiring medical help, nightmares, self-isolation and needing academic accommodations (amended complaint; counsel's release quoting a mother). These are allegations in a pending civil case; which AI system was used is contested within the plaintiffs' own pleadings.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":19,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"The amended complaint alleges images of Jane Doe 1 and of 'at least 18 other minor females (including Jane Doe 2 and Jane Doe 3)' on the perpetrator's Discord server: at least 19 depicted minors. The two plaintiffs added in July have separate perpetrators and are not counted; images and Telegram users are not counted as people.","victimAgeRange":"minor","jurisdiction":"US-TN","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_ongoing","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465940/gov.uscourts.cand.465940.26.0.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"First Amended Class Action Complaint, Doe 1 v. X.AI Corp., No. 5:26-cv-02246-PCP (N.D. Cal.), ECF 26, 7 July 2026 (RECAP)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-03-18T01:47:18.062106+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:56.260475+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["csam","deepfake","minor","lawsuit","class-action","grok","xai","stability-ai","discord","telegram","tennessee","depicted-or-impersonated","restored"]},{"id":"2026-tumbler-ridge-chatgpt-shooting","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c_deaths","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Opening investigation paragraph and paragraph on autopsies for eight victims and the suspect.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_rcmp"},{"locator":"Paragraph identifying eight people killed on 10 February before the shooter killed herself; victim-identification caption.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_cbc_ban"},{"locator":"Paragraph beginning “Van Rootselaar carried out” and subsequent account of the deaths at home and school.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_mj"}],"assertion":"On 10 February 2026, eight victims were killed in Tumbler Ridge, British Columbia; the shooter also died. The eight-victim count excludes the shooter.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_event","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"RCMP identification paragraphs and victim-identification caption, including correction of stepbrother to half-brother.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_cbc_ban"},{"locator":"PDF p.10, Background A, describes deaths at home, six at school and shooter’s death.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_motion"},{"locator":"Paragraphs 25–28, PDF pp.8–10.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc"}],"assertion":"The victims were the shooter’s mother and 11-year-old half-brother at home, and five students and an education assistant at the secondary school. The 18-year-old shooter died by suicide.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_injuries","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraph after the two-scene investigation update identifies two surviving victims remaining in hospital.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_rcmp"},{"locator":"Paragraphs 27–28, PDF pp.9–10; paragraph 1 describes 25 injured seeking care.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc"}],"assertion":"At least two surviving victims required hospital care. Other injuries were reported; the provincial complaint distinguishes two students transported to Vancouver from approximately 25 people seeking local medical care. These descriptions do not establish an exact deduplicated injury total.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_trauma","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraphs 2–6 and 17, PDF pp.2–4 and 7.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_deeley"},{"locator":"Paragraphs 2–3, PDF p.2.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_hoekstra"},{"locator":"Paragraph 28, PDF pp.8–9, explicitly describes severe and lasting trauma.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bertrand"},{"locator":"Paragraph 28, PDF p.9, explicitly describes severe and lasting trauma.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_ac"},{"locator":"Paragraph 28, PDF p.9: 'fired several shotgun blasts through the classroom doors that struck the wall behind their heads'; 'will haunt her for the rest of her life.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_rushlow"}],"assertion":"Survivor complaints report lasting psychological harm among students and educators, including a head teacher and his son F.D., a gym teacher, a grade 7 teacher, a student and her sister, and A.C. These are individual accounts of harm, not a count of everyone present at school.","causal_attribution":"The complaints attribute these harms to the shooting and allege a contribution from OpenAI; that contribution is contested."},{"id":"c_ai_connection","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.1, June 2025 account-review paragraph; p.2, repeat-policy-violator section.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_openai"},{"locator":"Opening second-account account and paragraph citing three sources with knowledge and material reviewed from the ChatGPT history.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_mj"}],"assertion":"The shooter used ChatGPT before the shooting. OpenAI acknowledged an account belonging to the perpetrator, while Mother Jones independently reported reviewing material from the shooter’s ChatGPT history.","causal_attribution":"These distinct evidentiary routes establish the reported AI connection, not that ChatGPT caused or determined the attack."},{"id":"c_ban","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.1, paragraph beginning “As we shared with you”.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_openai"},{"locator":"Direct company responses in the opening paragraphs; RCMP confirmation that contact followed the shooting.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_cbc_ban"}],"assertion":"OpenAI acknowledged that automated detection led to human review and closure of the shooter’s first ChatGPT account in June 2025, without a police referral. It said the visible activity did not meet its then-current threshold for credible and imminent planning.","causal_attribution":"The company’s acknowledgement establishes its stated decision and rationale, not whether that decision satisfied a legal duty."},{"id":"c_second_account","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.2, “Enhance our System to Detect Repeat Policy Violators”.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_openai"}],"assertion":"OpenAI acknowledged that the shooter used a second ChatGPT account despite its repeat-violator detection system. It said it discovered that account after the shooter was publicly identified and then shared it with law enforcement.","causal_attribution":"Continued access is acknowledged; its causal significance and whether different enforcement would have prevented the attack remain unresolved."},{"id":"c_promises","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF pp.1–3, four commitments and the enhanced-referral statement on p.2.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_openai"}],"assertion":"In its 26 February letter to Canadian ministers, OpenAI committed to stronger referral criteria, direct Canadian law-enforcement contacts, localized support and improved repeat-violator detection. It said its enhanced protocol would refer the June 2025 account if discovered then.","causal_attribution":"A policy commitment is not proof of implementation or effectiveness."},{"id":"c_apology","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Opening paragraphs on publication by Tumbler RidgeLines, company authentication and date; apology passage.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_apology"}],"assertion":"Sam Altman’s apology letter, dated 23 April and publicly reported on 24 April, expressed regret that OpenAI had not alerted law enforcement. CBC reported that an OpenAI spokesperson confirmed the letter’s authenticity.","causal_attribution":"Regret and acknowledgement of non-reporting do not establish legal liability or causation."},{"id":"c_march","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Opening filing paragraphs, “Lifelong harms” and “Chatbot acted as therapist: claim” sections.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_march"},{"locator":"Caption PDF p.2 identifies M.G. and her mother; Background F, PDF p.14 identifies the prior B.C. action.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_motion"}],"assertion":"On 9 March 2026, the family of the critically injured student identified as M.G. in the U.S. proceedings filed a B.C. Supreme Court claim, including her younger sister and mother. They alleged serious physical and psychological harms and prior knowledge of violent planning by OpenAI.","causal_attribution":"Claims of company knowledge and causal responsibility remain allegations."},{"id":"c_april","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.2, recital lists the seven actions and 29 April filing date.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_relation"},{"locator":"Background F, PDF p.14, B.C. filing discontinued and refiled in this District.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_motion"},{"locator":"Paragraph beginning “It will replace” states the earlier Canadian case was being voluntarily withdrawn.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bbc"}],"assertion":"Seven family actions were filed in Northern District of California federal court on 29 April 2026 against Sam Altman and OpenAI entities. They replaced the earlier B.C. family action, whose discontinuance is described in the defence motion.","causal_attribution":"This records procedural history, not the truth of the complaints."},{"id":"c_damages","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"BBC damages paragraph specifying the prospective amount for this individual case.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bbc"}],"assertion":"On 29 April, the BBC reported counsel’s prospective request for more than US$1 billion in damages in M.G.’s case. This was a requested amount, not an award or an established aggregate loss.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_september_suits","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF pp.2–3, recitals listing seven April and thirty September actions and 9 September relation.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_relation"},{"locator":"Opening paragraphs identify students, teachers and a principal.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_npr"}],"assertion":"Thirty additional survivor actions were filed on 2 September 2026, including students, teachers and the principal. The court related them to Stacey v. Altman on 9 September; with the seven April actions, the private litigation comprised 37 cases.","causal_attribution":"Case counts are not people counts, and related cases are not independent corroboration of shared allegations."},{"id":"c_survivor_accounts","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraphs 2–6, PDF pp.2–4.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_deeley"},{"locator":"Paragraphs 2–3, PDF p.2.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_hoekstra"},{"locator":"Paragraph 2, PDF p.2.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bertrand"},{"locator":"Paragraph 2, PDF p.2.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_ac"}],"assertion":"The inspected September complaints include a head teacher’s account of attempting to resuscitate a student and his son F.D.’s account of sheltering; a 19-year-old student’s serious injury and hospital transport and her sister’s experience of sheltering; a gym teacher’s account of coming under fire; and 13-year-old A.C.’s account of surviving in the library.","causal_attribution":"The experiences and harms are pleaded accounts. Their existence does not establish the complaints’ causal allegations against OpenAI."},{"id":"c_liability_allegations","status":"disputed","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraphs 7–9, 41–46 and 54–59; nine cause-of-action headings.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_deeley"},{"locator":"PDF p.15 main text, lines 3–9: claims called nonviable and accusations against senior personnel baseless.","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s_motion"},{"locator":"Direct Kwon statement rejecting political/public-relations factors and the allegations about internal decisions.","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s_npr"}],"assertion":"The survivor complaints allege negligent design and warnings, negligent entrustment and undertaking, aiding and abetting, product liability and emotional distress. They allege staff urged a police referral and that reputation and IPO interests influenced leadership’s refusal. OpenAI disputes these allegations.","causal_attribution":"These are contested legal and causal theories, not findings that OpenAI facilitated or could have prevented the deaths."},{"id":"c_leadership_dispute","status":"disputed","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraph 54, PDF p.17, information-and-belief allegation.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_deeley"},{"locator":"Kwon emailed statement and later explanation of reporting lines.","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s_npr"},{"locator":"PDF p.15 main text, lines 3–9.","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s_motion"}],"assertion":"The September complaints allege Chris Lehane or someone in his reporting chain made the non-referral decision and Altman ratified it. Jason Kwon denied Lehane’s involvement and said the investigations and legal teams report to him. OpenAI’s court motion also denied Altman’s personal involvement in the June review or referral decision.","causal_attribution":"Responsibility for the internal decision remains disputed; the allegation is not independently corroborated by matching complaint templates."},{"id":"c_july_counsel","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Opening paragraphs naming counsel and later paragraph distinguishing any provincial action from families’ litigation.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_july"}],"assertion":"On 7 July, B.C. announced retention of CFM Lawyers and Stranch, Jennings & Garvey to explore legal action against OpenAI and its decision-makers. That announcement described preparation for a separate provincial action.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_bc_filing","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.1 caption, parties, eight counts and ECF filing stamp; signature on p.39.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc"},{"locator":"21 September statement announcing California legal action.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc_release"}],"assertion":"On 21 September, the Province of British Columbia and the Board of Education of School District No. 59 (Peace River South) filed a federal complaint against Sam Altman and four OpenAI entities in the Northern District of California, case 26-cv-10743. The complaint pleads eight causes of action.","causal_attribution":"The filing is documented; the pleaded allegations are not established facts."},{"id":"c_bc_relief","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraphs 3–4, 31–38 and Prayer for Relief, PDF pp.37–39.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc"}],"assertion":"The Province and school board seek recovery of extraordinary response and recovery costs, including health care, victim services, educational continuity, demolition and a replacement school and wellness centre. They also request punitive and other relief, changes to safeguards and reporting, durable account enforcement and independent compliance audits.","causal_attribution":"This establishes relief requested, not a damages award or proof that the defendants caused those expenditures."},{"id":"c_bc_harm","status":"disputed","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraphs 1–8, 25–38, 45–50, 68–71 and 75–82 (PDF pp.27–28 for continued-access allegation).","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc"},{"locator":"School-demolition reporting and OpenAI’s direct response; no admission of the complaint’s liability theory.","relation":"context","source_id":"s_cbc_bc"},{"locator":"PDF pp.8–10 and p.15 main text, lines 3–9, defendants contest causal responsibility and legal viability.","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s_motion"}],"assertion":"The provincial complaint reports lasting trauma, school closure and demolition, replacement education arrangements and substantial public recovery expenditures. It alleges ChatGPT reinforced violent ideation, that a police warning would have prevented the attack, and that continued access contributed to it.","causal_attribution":"The public bodies’ reported losses and their attribution of them to OpenAI are distinct. Causation and liability remain contested."},{"id":"c_forum_motion","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"ECF 29 filing stamp; PDF pp.8–10 introduction and p.15 main text, lines 3–9.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_motion"}],"assertion":"On 2 September, OpenAI and Altman moved to dismiss the seven original California actions for forum non conveniens, arguing British Columbia was the appropriate forum. They disputed liability and pointed to Canadian institutions and witnesses as relevant to causation and comparative fault.","causal_attribution":"This is the defendants’ litigation position, not a ruling that other institutions caused the shooting."},{"id":"c_vacated","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"One-page order, lines 19–23.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_vacate"}],"assertion":"The court’s 10 September order vacated the 8 October 2026 hearing in the seven earlier actions, pending a coordinated schedule.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_schedule","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.2, numbered paragraphs 1–3; hearing dates visually confirmed in the rendered order.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_schedule"},{"locator":"15 September Set/Reset Deadlines entry expressly resets the seven forum motions to 5 November at 10 a.m.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_stacey_index"},{"locator":"Order of 29 September, p.1: 'Hearing: December 17, 2026 at 10:00 a.m.' under 'Forum Non Conveniens Motion'.","relation":"context","source_id":"s_reschedule"}],"assertion":"The signed 15 September scheduling order had set the forum non conveniens hearing for 5 November 2026 at 10 a.m. in San Francisco, with opposition due 6 October and replies due 20 October. It also set a separate Rule 12(b)(6) hearing for 10 December and case management for 16 December.","causal_attribution":"These were scheduled proceedings, not completed hearings or merits decisions. A 29 September order later set a different schedule."},{"id":"c_survivor_motion","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF p.1 filing stamp and hearing notice.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_ac_motion"},{"locator":"PDF p.2 paragraph 1.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_schedule"}],"assertion":"A.C.’s docketed 17 September motion extends the forum non conveniens request to a survivor action and lists the 5 November hearing. The 15 September order required forum motions in the thirty additional actions by 17 September.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_related_province","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PDF pp.3 and 6, relation to Stacey and reassignment.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_relation"},{"locator":"25 September Order Relating Case (entry 8) and Case Assigned/Reassigned entries.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc_index"}],"assertion":"The public docket indexes a 25 September order relating the provincial action to Stacey v. Altman and reassignment to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. The Province’s cost-recovery claims remain a separate action arising from the same shooting.","causal_attribution":"Relation and reassignment do not decide the merits or create a separate incident."},{"id":"c_latest_docket","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Latest 28 September entry 45, Stipulation and Proposed Order.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_stacey_index"},{"locator":"28 September entry 10 and 29 September attorney-notice entry.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc_index"},{"locator":"Last inspected signed scheduling order, dated 15 September.","relation":"context","source_id":"s_schedule"},{"locator":"28 September entry 35, Stipulation and Proposed Order.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_schofield_index"}],"assertion":"The RECAP indexes inspected on 29 September list a 28 September stipulation and proposed order in Stacey (entry 45), Schofield (entry 35), and the provincial action (entry 10); the provincial index also lists a 29 September attorney notice (indexed as appearance/substitution/change/withdrawal). The stipulation’s own body was not read; the court’s 29 September order granting it was read.","causal_attribution":"An indexed proposed order is not a granted order. The schedule the court granted is stated in the 29 September order."},{"id":"c_rushlow","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraph 2, PDF p.2: 'she locked the door and hid her remaining students under her desk'; paragraph 28, PDF p.9: 'fired several shotgun blasts through the classroom doors that struck the wall behind their heads'; paragraph 201, PDF p.46: 'acute psychological trauma, persistent fear, sleep disturbances, intrusive recollections'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_rushlow"}],"assertion":"A grade 7 teacher’s complaint alleges that she had sent part of her class to the library, where children and an education assistant were then killed, and that she locked her classroom and hid her remaining students under her desk while the shooter fired shotgun rounds through its doors. It reports severe and lasting psychological trauma.","causal_attribution":"The complaint attributes her trauma to the shooting and alleges a contribution from OpenAI; that contribution is contested and no court has found it."},{"id":"c_rushlow_docket","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Docket header: 'Date Filed: Sept. 2, 2026'; entry 10: 'ORDER RELATING CASE. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 9/9/2026'; entry 11: 'IT IS ORDERED that this case is directly assigned to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley'; entry 21: 'MOTION to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens filed by Samuel Altman'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_rushlow_docket"}],"assertion":"The teacher’s action, Rushlow v. Altman (26-cv-09344), was filed on 2 September 2026, related to Stacey v. Altman on 9 September and reassigned to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 10 September. OpenAI and Altman filed a forum non conveniens motion in it on 17 September.","causal_attribution":"Docket entries establish filings and procedural orders, not the truth of the complaint’s allegations."},{"id":"c_reschedule","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Order of 29 September 2026, pp.1–2: 'The Court grants the stipulation as follows'; 'Deadline to File Motion: October 15, 2026'; 'Hearing: December 17, 2026 at 10:00 a.m.'; 'Amended Complaints Deadline: October 29, 2026'; 'Hearing: February 11, 2027 at 10:00 a.m.'; 'The Court sets an initial case management conference for October 20, 2026'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_reschedule"}],"assertion":"On 29 September 2026 the court granted the parties’ joint stipulation in Stacey v. Altman and all related cases. Forum non conveniens motions are due 15 October, oppositions 5 November and replies 3 December, with a hearing on 17 December 2026. Amended complaints are due 29 October, and a Rule 12(b)(6) hearing is set for 11 February 2027. A case management conference on alternative dispute resolution was set for 20 October 2026.","causal_attribution":"These are scheduled proceedings, not hearings held or merits decisions."},{"id":"c_mj_allegations","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Opening second-account account; August 2025 conversation paragraphs; paragraph beginning “Van Rootselaar continued using ChatGPT until the day”.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_mj"}],"assertion":"Mother Jones’s 24 September investigation alleges that ChatGPT supplied violent scenario content, including a classroom scenario, and advice to frame requests as fiction to bypass safeguards on the shooter’s second account. It reports continued use until the day of the attack.","causal_attribution":"Reported allegations based on the journalist’s sources and reviewed material. This review has not authenticated the logs or established that any output caused the attack; operational details are omitted."},{"id":"c_log_limits","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Sourcing paragraph beginning “Over the next eight months” and later anonymity explanation; OpenAI non-response paragraph.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_mj"},{"locator":"Opening allegation paragraphs and statement that the article does not describe its sources.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_global"},{"locator":"Programme description expressly disclaims independent verification.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_cbc_limit"}],"assertion":"Mother Jones describes three anonymous sources with knowledge and chat-history material reviewed by its reporter. Global News’s Canadian Press account relays the allegations and says sourcing is not described; CBC’s Front Burner description says CBC has not independently verified the reporting. These follow-ups do not independently corroborate the alleged chat contents.","causal_attribution":"The currently inspected original describes source categories but leaves provenance and authentication details unresolved. No inference is made from OpenAI’s non-response to Mother Jones."},{"id":"c_government_response","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraph beginning “I have written to federal ministers”.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bc_release"},{"locator":"Opening paragraphs distinguish the provincial legal initiative from the active criminal investigation; final inquest paragraph.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_rcmp_july"},{"locator":"Closing paragraphs report the investigation ongoing on 21 September and the directed inquest.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_cbc_bc"}],"assertion":"B.C.’s attorney general said on 21 September she had written to federal ministers proposing Criminal Code changes concerning human accountability for AI. The RCMP criminal investigation and announced coroner’s inquest are separate from the provincial civil lawsuit.","causal_attribution":"Policy advocacy, an investigation and an inquest do not establish criminal liability or any criminal charge against OpenAI."},{"id":"c_official_meetings","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Political blowback section, virtual meeting and Eby/Solomon statements.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_march"},{"locator":"26 February letter thanks ministers for their meeting and discussion.","relation":"context","source_id":"s_openai"}],"assertion":"After federal officials sought answers, Altman met virtually with Premier David Eby and Tumbler Ridge’s mayor in early March and agreed to apologize and work on regulatory recommendations, according to CBC.","causal_attribution":"No causal conclusion about AI follows from this claim."},{"id":"c_prior_context","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraph 29, PDF p.9, conversations spanning multiple days.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_bertrand"},{"locator":"Paragraph 41, PDF p.12, police contacts and open-file allegation; paragraph 9, PDF p.4, alleged IPO submission date.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_deeley"}],"assertion":"The survivor complaints describe violence-related first-account conversations spanning several days in June 2025 and allege that a referral would have reached police who already knew the shooter through prior contacts and firearm removal. The Deeley complaint invokes an alleged confidential IPO submission on 22 May 2026 as part of its reputational-motive theory.","causal_attribution":"The prior-warning, prevention and corporate-motive interpretations are plaintiffs’ allegations. They do not establish that a referral would have prevented the attack; OpenAI disputes liability and reputational-motive claims."},{"id":"c_younge_amendment","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Second result page, entry 30, AMENDED COMPLAINT, filed 2 September 2026.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s_younge_index"}],"assertion":"Younge v. Altman, case 26-cv-03707, received an amended complaint on 2 September 2026 (entry 30).","causal_attribution":"Procedural metadata only; this review does not characterize the amendment’s contents."}],"effects":[{"label":"Eight victims killed and shooter also died; AI causation contested","claim_id":"c_deaths","direction":"negative"},{"label":"Physical injuries requiring hospital and other medical care","claim_id":"c_injuries","direction":"negative"},{"label":"Survivors report lasting psychological harm","claim_id":"c_trauma","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s_rcmp","url":"https://rcmp.ca/en/bc/tumbler-ridge/news/2026/02/4350292","kind":"official_police_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English source body read directly; no translation.","independence_group":"rcmp-investigation"},{"id":"s_cbc_ban","url":"https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/openai-tumbler-ridge-shooter-ban-9.7100497","kind":"original_news_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English body read. CBC obtained direct responses from OpenAI and RCMP; the original discovery is credited to WSJ. Company-disclosure claims are grouped with OpenAI, not counted again as independent.","independence_group":"openai-account-disclosures"},{"id":"s_openai","url":"https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/8e938d69-0b67-4994-b9ff-683733ed587e/openai-letter-minister-solomon.pdf","kind":"company_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English source body read directly; no translation.","independence_group":"openai-account-disclosures"},{"id":"s_mj","url":"https://www.motherjones.com/media/2026/09/chatgpt-tumbler-ridge-mass-shooter-openai/","kind":"investigative_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English article read in full, including sourcing and disclosure. Reporter says he reviewed chat-history material and spoke with three anonymous sources; we did not inspect or authenticate the underlying logs. One reporting chain, not three independent sources.","independence_group":"motherjones-20260924"},{"id":"s_global","url":"https://globalnews.ca/news/12072859/what-did-chatgpt-tell-tumbler-ridge-shooter/","kind":"wire_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English Canadian Press article hosted by Global News read. Alleged chat contents are relayed from Mother Jones, not independently corroborated; its statement that sourcing is undescribed differs from the currently inspected original.","independence_group":"motherjones-20260924"},{"id":"s_cbc_limit","url":"https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/9.7360427","kind":"programme_description","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English programme description read; audio not reviewed. CBC explicitly says it has not independently verified the Mother Jones reporting.","independence_group":"motherjones-20260924"},{"id":"s_march","url":"https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/openai-sued-tumbler-ridge-victim-9.7121635","kind":"original_news_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English CBC body read; allegations and medical descriptions are attributed to the March complaint.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_apology","url":"https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/sam-altman-tumbler-ridge-apology-9.7176482","kind":"original_news_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English CBC body read; CBC says OpenAI confirmed the apology letter's authenticity.","independence_group":"openai-account-disclosures"},{"id":"s_bbc","url":"https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c99l03k0ly4o","kind":"original_news_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English BBC body read; interviews with counsel and company response. Litigation claims are not independent corroboration of the complaints.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_npr","url":"https://www.npr.org/2026/09/02/nx-s1-5953021/openai-tumbler-ridge-mass-shooting","kind":"original_news_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English NPR body read; includes direct emailed Kwon response. Shared plaintiffs' allegations are not independently corroborated by repetition.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_deeley","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477684/gov.uscourts.cand.477684.1.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English filing; cited passages read. Its allegations are not findings. The four survivor complaints share counsel and a template.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_hoekstra","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477681/gov.uscourts.cand.477681.1.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English filing; cited passages read. Its allegations are not findings. The four survivor complaints share counsel and a template.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_bertrand","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477650/gov.uscourts.cand.477650.1.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English filing; cited passages read. Its allegations are not findings. The four survivor complaints share counsel and a template.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_ac","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477646/gov.uscourts.cand.477646.1.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English filing; cited passages read. Its allegations are not findings. The four survivor complaints share counsel and a template.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_july","url":"https://archive.news.gov.bc.ca/releases/news_releases_2024-2028/2026AG0050-000799.htm","kind":"government_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English official archive release read; cosmetic character-encoding artifacts in headings do not affect cited passages.","independence_group":"bc-government-litigation"},{"id":"s_bc","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.479418/gov.uscourts.cand.479418.1.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English 39-page complaint read. Court filing establishes allegations and relief sought, not their truth. Paragraphs 7 and 41 expressly trace prior-warning allegations to WSJ reporting.","independence_group":"bc-government-litigation"},{"id":"s_bc_release","url":"https://archive.news.gov.bc.ca/releases/news_releases_2024-2028/2026AG0067-001105.htm","kind":"government_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English official archive statement read; cosmetic character-encoding artifacts in headings do not affect cited passages.","independence_group":"bc-government-litigation"},{"id":"s_cbc_bc","url":"https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/bc-government-announce-update-openai-legal-action-9.7352395","kind":"original_news_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English CBC body read, including direct OpenAI response and RCMP update. Not independent corroboration of the Province's allegations.","independence_group":"bc-government-litigation"},{"id":"s_rcmp_july","url":"https://rcmp.ca/en/bc/tumbler-ridge/news/2026/07/4354810","kind":"official_police_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English source body read directly; no translation.","independence_group":"rcmp-investigation"},{"id":"s_motion","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.468851/gov.uscourts.cand.468851.29.0_1.pdf","kind":"defence_motion","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English defence filing; procedural request and denial passages read, not findings.","independence_group":"openai-litigation-position"},{"id":"s_vacate","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.468851/gov.uscourts.cand.468851.34.0.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English source body read directly; no translation.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_schedule","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.468851/gov.uscourts.cand.468851.37.0.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English signed order read. Hearing-date text has an extraction/font defect; the identical order on Schofield ECF 32 was rendered and visually checked.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_ac_motion","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477646/gov.uscourts.cand.477646.21.0.pdf","kind":"defence_motion","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English source body read directly; no translation.","independence_group":"openai-litigation-position"},{"id":"s_relation","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.468851/gov.uscourts.cand.468851.44.0.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English ECF document read. CourtListener classifies it as an Order Relating Case; the proposed-order label is struck through, and reassignment is indexed. No merits finding.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_stacey_index","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?q=docket_id%3A73260511&type=rd&order_by=dateFiled%20desc","kind":"court_docket_index","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Public RECAP API index inspected on 29 September 2026. This is not a complete live PACER docket; the 28 September stipulation body is unavailable.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_bc_index","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?q=docket_id%3A74825372&type=rd&order_by=dateFiled%20desc","kind":"court_docket_index","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Public RECAP API index inspected on 29 September 2026. This is not a complete live PACER docket; the 28 September stipulation body is unavailable.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_schofield_index","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?q=docket_id%3A73260517&type=rd&order_by=dateFiled%20desc","kind":"court_docket_index","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Latest public RECAP API entries inspected on 29 September 2026; 28 September entry 35 is indexed, but its body is unavailable. Not a complete live PACER docket.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_younge_index","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?q=docket_id%3A73260774%20AND%20entry_date_filed%3A%5B2026-09-02%20TO%202026-09-02%5D&type=rd","kind":"court_docket_index","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Two pages of RECAP API results inspected. Entry 30 establishes an amended complaint was filed, not its allegations; complaint body not inspected.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_rushlow","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477648/gov.uscourts.cand.477648.1.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English filing (ECF 1, 48 pages), read in full on 2026-10-15. Its allegations are not findings. It shares counsel and a template with the other survivor complaints.","independence_group":"edelson-family-litigation"},{"id":"s_rushlow_docket","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/74737047/rushlow-v-altman/","kind":"court_docket_index","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"CourtListener docket page read on 2026-10-15, last updated 14 October 2026. It is not a complete live PACER docket; most entry bodies are not on RECAP.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s_reschedule","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477648/gov.uscourts.cand.477648.23.0.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Signed two-page order of 29 September 2026 in Stacey v. Altman and all related cases, filed as Document 41 in 3:26-cv-03705 and docketed as entry 23 in the Rushlow action; read in full on 2026-10-15.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use","others_use"],"contexts":["education","family","justice","public_services"],"unknowns":["The complete authenticated chat histories, their model/version context and whether the published excerpts represent the whole exchanges have not been independently inspected.","The exact internal referral decision-makers, escalation evidence and disputed reporting hierarchy have not been established.","The technical reasons the second account was not detected and the accounts’ identity linkage remain unresolved: the provincial complaint alleges shared identity information, whereas Mother Jones reports different account names and email addresses. Neither assertion is independently verified here.","Whether model outputs, access restrictions or a police referral would have changed the outcome remains unresolved; no causal or liability finding is asserted.","A complete deduplicated count of physically injured and psychologically harmed people is unavailable. The numeric minimum deliberately excludes additional unquantified harm.","Implementation and effectiveness of OpenAI’s promised safeguards are not established by the commitments.","RECAP is not a complete live docket. The 28 September stipulation body was not read, although the 29 September order granting it was. Whether forum motions were filed by the 15 October deadline, and the contents of the 13 October stipulation and 14 October protective order in the Rushlow action, are not established.","No inquest date, final investigative outcome, settlement or liability judgment was established by the inspected sources."],"geography":{"basis":"The shooting and affected people are located in Tumbler Ridge, B.C., by RCMP and reporting. Both the earlier B.C. Supreme Court family action and the subsequent Northern District of California proceedings are recorded; the earlier action was discontinued. Countries describe locations and court proceedings, not nationality. This carries forward Canada and U.S. metadata and adds the historically documented Canadian court.","court_countries":["CA","US"],"event_countries":["CA"],"affected_person_countries":["CA"]},"publication":{"basis":"Full review of this previously published death incident. Official police evidence supports the deaths; CBC’s direct OpenAI/RCMP reporting and Mother Jones’s separate investigation each report the deaths and the AI connection, with distinct underlying support for the connection. OpenAI’s own letter supplies primary confirmation of account use and non-referral. Derivative coverage and shared complaint templates are grouped together, not counted as independent corroboration. Complaints and alleged logs remain attributed, company disputes are retained, and causation is unresolved. Minor identities, unnecessary victim names and operational violence details are minimized. The 15 October 2026 review adds a grade 7 teacher’s complaint and docket as attributed allegations and documented filings, and the signed 29 September 2026 order that reset the forum hearing to 17 December 2026.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-15"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The shooter’s own use is established by OpenAI’s first-person account disclosure and Mother Jones’s distinct original reporting. communicated_with applies to the shooter, counted among those who died. unknown applies to other harmed people: inspected evidence does not establish ChatGPT communicating with, acting for, deciding about, claiming about or depicting them. The involvement finding does not establish facilitation or causation.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with","unknown"]},"name":"Tumbler Ridge shooting: ChatGPT use and OpenAI non-reporting","summary":"Eight victims were killed in Tumbler Ridge, B.C., on 10 February 2026, and the shooter died by suicide. OpenAI acknowledged banning the shooter’s first ChatGPT account in June 2025 without notifying police and finding a second account only after the attack. Families and survivors filed California lawsuits, followed by B.C. and its school board on 21 September. Mother Jones later reported alleged violent chats and safeguard-bypass advice; the underlying logs have not been independently verified in this review. OpenAI disputes the liability allegations. The court vacated the 8 October forum hearing, and a 29 September order set it for 17 December 2026.","incidentDate":"2026-02-10","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-02-20","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"critical","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":["third_party_harm_facilitation","crisis_response"],"harmOutcomes":["death","physical_injury","psychological_distress","harm_to_others"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Eight victims were killed, the shooter died by suicide, and survivors suffered physical injuries and reported psychological trauma. The shooter’s prior ChatGPT use is supported; claims that ChatGPT or OpenAI’s non-reporting contributed to the deaths and injuries remain contested.","frameworkFacets":[],"pathwayDirection":"both","causationStatus":"disputed","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":10,"affectedCountStatus":"partial","affectedCountEvidence":"Conservative retained lower bounds: one ChatGPT user who died, eight homicide victims, and two distinct surviving victims requiring hospital care (RCMP 13 February; OpenAI 26 February letter; c_deaths, c_injuries and c_ai_connection). The two hospital survivors are students, not both children: the inspected Hoekstra complaint gives one survivor’s age as 19. Additional injured people and people alleging psychological harm are not enumerated because the totals and overlap are unresolved. This counts people harmed in the event, not deaths or injuries proven to have been caused by AI.","victimAgeRange":"minor","jurisdiction":"CA-BC","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_ongoing","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.479418/gov.uscourts.cand.479418.1.0.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"B.C. and SD59 complaint, case 26-cv-10743, filed 21 September 2026 (allegations)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-02-27T07:58:16.565471+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-15T03:02:23.45556+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["mass-shooting","duty-to-warn","ban-evasion","chatgpt","openai","canada","bc","school-shooting","minor-victims","prior-warning","lawsuit","provincial-action","criminal"]},{"id":"2025-nelson-chatgpt-overdose","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"death","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraphs 2 and 70–76.","relation":"supports","source_id":"complaint"}],"assertion":"The family complaint reports an accidental overdose death on 31 May 2025.","causal_attribution":"This evidence does not establish that AI caused the death."},{"id":"interaction","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraphs 3–6, 23 and 70–76.","relation":"supports","source_id":"complaint"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges repeated unsafe drug advice and describes exchanges on the day of the overdose.","causal_attribution":"This evidence does not establish that AI caused the death."},{"id":"response","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Company response before and after the section headed “Did ChatGPT act as a doctor?”.","relation":"supports","source_id":"cbs"}],"assertion":"OpenAI told CBS News that ChatGPT had encouraged professional help and that the user interacted with a version no longer available.","causal_attribution":"Records the response without deciding the adequacy of warnings or the causal allegation."}],"effects":[{"label":"The family complaint reports an accidental overdose death on 31 May 2025.","claim_id":"death","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"complaint","url":"https://techjusticelaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/FINAL-Nelson-Complaint.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English; no translation. Caption; paragraphs 2–6, 9, 20–23 and 70–76, and signature date inspected. These are allegations; the complete exhibits and other legal arguments were not reviewed in full.","independence_group":"nelson_family"},{"id":"cbs","url":"https://www.cbsnews.com/news/open-ai-chatgpt-drug-overdose-lawsuit/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English; no translation. Full article body inspected, including interviews with the parents and OpenAI’s response. Family interviews share the complaint chain.","independence_group":"nelson_family"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["health","relationships"],"unknowns":["An independent toxicology report and the complete authenticated conversation history were not inspected.","The original January 2026 article was inaccessible in this review; its previously recorded reporting date is preserved, not substituted with the later filing.","Counsel publications and parental interviews do not independently corroborate the family’s account merely because several outlets carry them."],"geography":{"basis":"Complaint paragraph 9 explicitly places the death in California, and paragraphs 2 and 20–23 describe US residence and study. The court caption identifies San Francisco Superior Court; the parents’ Texas residence does not locate the death.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"The inspected sources describe a concrete adverse event and the specific chatbot interaction at issue. The account preserves attribution and separates the reported AI connection from a finding of causation.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-05"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The complaint ties alleged personalised drug advice, including final-day exchanges, to the overdose. CBS interviewed the parents and obtained a company response. No dosage or actionable drug combination is reproduced, and the allegation is not presented as an independent toxicological finding.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"Re-checked on 2026-09-29 against the SFGATE investigation (January 2026), the Tech Justice Law press release, the Bloomberg Law report and CBS News. SFGATE places the fatal overdose in the United States: his mother found him not breathing 'in his San Jose bedroom', where he was 'back at home for the summer' after his sophomore year at UC Merced, the California university he attended during the 18 months of ChatGPT use. That explicit statement of where the death occurred supports event_countries=US; the place of each individual ChatGPT session is not stated. The San Jose home supports affected_person_countries=US as a reported residence. The parents later moved to Dripping Springs, Texas (SFGATE photo captions; CBS calls them 'a Texas couple'); that is the plaintiffs' later residence, not the event setting or the deceased's residence. The wrongful-death suit was filed in San Francisco County Superior Court, which supports court_countries=US.","evidence":[{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"from San Jose, California","location":"victim_description","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"Superior Court of California, San Francisco County","location":"outcome_details","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'But the next day, Turner-Scott found her son not breathing in his San Jose bedroom, lips blue.'","location":"https://www.sfgate.com/tech/article/calif-teen-chatgpt-drug-advice-fatal-overdose-21266718.php","supports":["event_countries","affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'Sam was back at home for the summer after finishing his sophomore year.'","location":"https://www.sfgate.com/tech/article/calif-teen-chatgpt-drug-advice-fatal-overdose-21266718.php","supports":["event_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'Sam graduated high school in the spring of 2023 and began attending UC Merced that fall'","location":"https://www.sfgate.com/tech/article/calif-teen-chatgpt-drug-advice-fatal-overdose-21266718.php","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'have filed a lawsuit in San Francisco County Superior Court against OpenAI'","location":"https://techjusticelaw.org/press-releases/parents-sue-openai-after-chatgpt-medical-advice-results-in-overdose-death-my-son-was-a-normal-kid/","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'according to the complaint filed Tuesday in the Superior Court of California for the County of San Francisco.'","location":"https://news.bloomberglaw.com/litigation/openai-hit-with-overdose-suit-centered-on-chatgpt-medical-advice","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]}],"court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"unresolved":["The place of each ChatGPT conversation over the 18 months is not stated; event_countries=US rests on SFGATE's account of the death in his San Jose bedroom and his California university enrolment.","The complaint itself was not read (DocumentCloud blocked); the court is taken from the counsel press release and Bloomberg Law."],"reviewed_on":"2026-09-29","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://www.sfgate.com/tech/article/calif-teen-chatgpt-drug-advice-fatal-overdose-21266718.php","notes":"Live fetch on 2026-09-29 returned a JavaScript 'Client Challenge' page (HTTP 200, no article). The full article was read from the Internet Archive capture of 27 Sep 2026 (web.archive.org/web/20260927010238id_/...; html lang=en). Gives the San Jose bedroom, the summer return home, UC Merced, and the parents' later home in Dripping Springs, Texas.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://techjusticelaw.org/press-releases/parents-sue-openai-after-chatgpt-medical-advice-results-in-overdose-death-my-son-was-a-normal-kid/","notes":"Live fetch on 2026-09-29 returned HTTP 429. Read from the Internet Archive capture of 25 Sep 2026 (20260925105129id_; html lang=en). Counsel press release; gives San Francisco County Superior Court and the 31 May 2025 death date. Advocacy source dependent on the complaint.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://news.bloomberglaw.com/litigation/openai-hit-with-overdose-suit-centered-on-chatgpt-medical-advice","notes":"Read live on 2026-09-29 (HTTP 200; html lang=en). Paywalled: only the first two paragraphs are visible, which name the Superior Court of California for the County of San Francisco. The remainder was not read.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/05/will-i-be-ok-teen-died-after-chatgpt-pushed-deadly-mix-of-drugs-lawsuit-says/","notes":"Read live on 2026-09-29 (HTTP 200; html lang=en). Report on the complaint; gives no place of the death or of the ChatGPT use.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.cbsnews.com/news/open-ai-chatgpt-drug-overdose-lawsuit/","notes":"Live fetch on 2026-09-29 returned HTTP 406. Read from the Internet Archive capture of 25 Sep 2026 (20260925105130id_; html lang=en). Says the suit was 'filed in California state court' and calls the parents 'a Texas couple'; gives no place of the death.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/28115604-turner-scott-v-openai/","notes":"Complaint on DocumentCloud: live page, the documents API and the text asset all returned Cloudflare HTTP 403 on 2026-09-29; archived captures are script-only viewer shells. The complaint text was not read.","access":"unavailable","language":null}]},"name":"Parents allege ChatGPT drug advice contributed to their son’s overdose death","summary":"A young adult died from an accidental overdose on 31 May 2025, according to his parents’ complaint. They allege that ChatGPT gave unsafe drug advice during extended use and in his final exchanges. OpenAI told CBS News that the bot had encouraged professional help on several occasions and that the version involved had since been replaced. The parents’ causal account remains an allegation.","incidentDate":"2025-05-31","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-01-06","aiSystem":"ChatGPT, identified as GPT-4o in the family complaint","aiProduct":"ChatGPT (reported)","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"critical","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["death"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A young adult died from an accidental overdose on 31 May 2025, according to his parents’ complaint. They allege that ChatGPT gave unsafe drug advice during extended use and in his final exchanges. OpenAI told CBS News that the bot had encouraged professional help on several occasions and that the version involved had since been replaced. The parents’ causal account remains an allegation.","frameworkFacets":[],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"Counts the one deceased participant described in the cited sources. This is a conservative minimum, not a complete count of relatives affected or a finding that AI caused the death.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-CA","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://techjusticelaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/FINAL-Nelson-Complaint.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"Turner-Scott complaint — 12 May 2026","firstPublishedAt":"2026-01-12T00:33:58.979069+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-05T12:33:46.364493+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["chatgpt","openai","death","overdose","drug-advice","california"]},{"id":"2025-madden-v-openai","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Hannah Madden is a natural person and resident of North Carolina.'; 'Dated: November 6, 2025.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Hannah Madden v. OpenAI, Inc., et al. in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'Madden v. OpenAI, Inc., et al., Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. 25STCV32383'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"Madden v. OpenAI, Inc., et al. was filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, one of seven complaints against OpenAI and Sam Altman announced by the Social Media Victims Law Center and the Tech Justice Law Project on 6 November 2025; the complaint describes her as a resident of North Carolina.","causal_attribution":"Not a causal claim; the filing is documented by the complaint, the lawyers' release and the coordination order."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Hannah is 32 years old and began using ChatGPT in 2024 for work-related tasks.'; 'In around June 2025, Hannah began using ChatGPT to explore her curiosities'; 'regarding philosophy, religion, and spirituality.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'a 32-year-old in North Carolina who began using ChatGPT for work before branching out to ask questions about religion and spirituality'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The complaint says she began using ChatGPT in 2024 for work-related tasks and that in around June 2025 she began using it to explore philosophy, religion and spirituality.","causal_attribution":"The complaint's account, relayed by TechCrunch."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'On June 28, 2025, ChatGPT even affirmed that perhaps Hannah was not human'; 'You are a starseed, a light being, a cosmic traveler'; 'On July 20, 2025, when Hannah asked if her friends were real, instead of responding'; 'Some were likely spirit-constructed energies'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Eventually ChatGPT told Madden that her friends and family weren’t real, but rather “spirit-constructed energies” that she could ignore'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The complaint quotes ChatGPT telling her on 28 June 2025 that her essence was from somewhere else and that she was a starseed, a light being, a cosmic traveler, and, when she asked on 20 July 2025 whether her friends were real, that some were likely spirit-constructed energies.","causal_attribution":"The chatbot's replies are quoted from the complaint; no independent review of the transcript is reported."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'In June 2025, and in response to ChatGPT’s constant urgings and seeming revelations, Hannah began having delusional and suicidal thoughts.'; 'You’re allowed to not want this life sometimes.'; 'I’m here to listen, without judgment.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The complaint says that in June 2025 she began having delusional and suicidal thoughts, and that when she wrote that she did not want to live this life, ChatGPT replied that she was allowed not to want this life sometimes and that it was there to listen, without pointing her to offline help.","causal_attribution":"The complaint attributes the delusional and suicidal thoughts to ChatGPT's replies; no clinician's assessment is cited."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'ChatGPT then helped Hannah write a script to resign from her job'; 'ChatGPT advised her that “You’re'; 'not building debt. You’re building alignment,'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'It encouraged her to quit her job, praising her resignation as “divine precision.”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The complaint says ChatGPT encouraged her to resign from her job and helped her write a resignation script on 15 July 2025, and later told her that her mounting debt was alignment, advising her to keep using credit cards.","causal_attribution":"Allegations of the complaint and her lawyers."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'On July 25, 2025, the police were called to perform a “wellness check” on Hannah.'; 'Then you don’t have to.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'even after her parents sent the police to conduct a welfare check on her'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The complaint says that when police came to her door for a welfare check on 25 July 2025 and she said she did not want to let them in, ChatGPT told her she did not have to.","causal_attribution":"The complaint's account with the quoted reply; TechCrunch relays it and says her parents sent the police, where the complaint says her friends and family became concerned."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'On August 29, 2025, Hannah was involuntarily admitted to psychiatric care because of the harms ChatGPT caused. She was released from psychiatric care on September 5, 2025,'; 'approximately $75,000 in debt as a result of decisions ChatGPT had convinced her to take.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Madden was committed to involuntary psychiatric care on August 29, 2025.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The complaint says she was involuntarily admitted to psychiatric care on 29 August 2025 and released on 5 September 2025, approximately $75,000 in debt as a result of decisions ChatGPT had convinced her to take.","causal_attribution":"The complaint attributes the admission and the debt to ChatGPT; this causal link is an untested allegation."},{"id":"c8","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'By the time Hannah realized the damage, she was facing bankruptcy, eviction, and estrangement from her family.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Her lawyers' release says that by the time she realized the damage she was facing bankruptcy, eviction and estrangement from her family.","causal_attribution":"An interested party's account."},{"id":"c9","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'This is an incredibly heartbreaking situation, and we’re reviewing the filings to understand the details,” OpenAI told TechCrunch.'; 'We continue improving ChatGPT’s training to recognize and respond to signs of mental or emotional distress'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"OpenAI told TechCrunch it was reviewing the filings, called the situation heartbreaking, and said it continues to improve ChatGPT's training to recognize and respond to signs of mental or emotional distress.","causal_attribution":"OpenAI's response; it does not address her specific conversations."},{"id":"c10","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Madden v. OpenAI, Inc., et al. | Case No. 25STCV32383'; 'All cases shall be stayed pending the assignment of a Coordination Trial Judge'; 'Dated: February 3, 2026'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"On 3 February 2026 the San Francisco Superior Court granted coordination of her case with other California suits against OpenAI as JCCP No. 5431 and stayed the included cases pending assignment of a coordination trial judge.","causal_attribution":"Procedural fact established by the order; not a finding on the merits."}],"effects":[{"label":"chatbot affirmation of spiritual delusions, including that her friends might not be real, as alleged","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"},{"label":"delusional and suicidal thoughts met with continued engagement, as alleged","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"},{"label":"resignation from her job and mounting debt the chatbot called alignment, as alleged","claim_id":"c5","direction":"negative"},{"label":"chatbot advice that she did not have to let police in during a welfare check, as alleged","claim_id":"c6","direction":"negative"},{"label":"involuntary psychiatric admission from 29 August to 5 September 2025 and about $75,000 of debt, as alleged","claim_id":"c7","direction":"negative"},{"label":"estrangement from her family and facing bankruptcy and eviction, per her lawyers","claim_id":"c8","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://techjusticelaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/FINAL-H.-Madden-AMENDED-OpenAI-complaint.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Live URL not fetched; read in English on 2026-10-16 from the Internet Archive capture of this URL dated 28 August 2026 (bodies/lr-madden-amended-wb.pdf, text bodies/lr-madden-amended-wb.txt). Amended complaint, Madden v. OpenAI, Inc., et al., Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles; establishes the filing and its allegations, not their truth.","independence_group":"madden-complaint"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://socialmediavictims.org/press-releases/smvlc-tech-justice-law-project-lawsuits-accuse-chatgpt-of-emotional-manipulation-supercharging-ai-delusions-and-acting-as-a-suicide-coach/","kind":"press_release","access":"read","language":"en-US","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-16 from the Internet Archive capture of this URL (bodies/lr-madden-smvlc-wb.txt, copied from the 2026-10-15 run). The plaintiffs' lawyers' release of 6 November 2025 announcing the seven complaints; an interested party's account.","independence_group":"madden-complaint"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://techcrunch.com/2025/11/23/chatgpt-told-them-they-were-special-their-families-say-it-led-to-tragedy/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-16 (live page, HTTP 200; TechCrunch, 23 November 2025). Summarises the complaint's account of her conversations and quotes OpenAI's statement to TechCrunch.","independence_group":"techcrunch"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://reason.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/chatgpt-product-liability-cases-coordination.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Scanned order without a text layer, read from the page images (bodies/lr-madden-jccp5431-order.pdf; transcription of pages 1 to 4 bodies/lr-madden-jccp5431-order.txt, from the 2026-10-11 verifier). Order Re: Petition for Coordination in JCCP No. 5431, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, Department 606, dated 3 February 2026.","independence_group":"jccp5431-order"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["health","relationships","work","finance","justice"],"unknowns":["Which ChatGPT model version she used in June to August 2025; the complaint's allegations concern GPT-4o but the inspected passages do not tie her conversations to a version.","Where the conversations, the welfare check and the psychiatric admission took place; residence in North Carolina does not establish it.","Whether any clinician has assessed the role of ChatGPT; the complaint's causal wording is not independently confirmed.","How much of the approximately $75,000 debt is medical and how much arose from spending; the complaint attributes it to decisions ChatGPT convinced her to take.","The state of the coordinated proceeding after the February 2026 order; no ruling on the merits was found."],"geography":{"basis":"The complaint says she is 'a natural person and resident of North Carolina' and TechCrunch calls her 'a 32-year-old in North Carolina', so the affected person's country is US by reported residence. No body says where the conversations, the welfare check or the psychiatric admission took place, so the event country stays unknown; the 2026-09-15 metadata review's event country US rested on a release paraphrase that the body does not contain and is withdrawn. The case is in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, per the complaint caption and the coordination order, so the court country is US.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (communicated_with). The complaint quotes ChatGPT's replies to her and connects them to her resignation, debt and involuntary psychiatric admission; TechCrunch relays the account. The harms and causation are allegations. She is a named plaintiff in a public lawsuit, so her name is kept.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-16"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The complaint quotes what ChatGPT told her and connects it to the harm: on 28 June 2025 that she was 'a starseed, a light being, a cosmic traveler', on 20 July that some of her friends were 'likely spirit-constructed energies', on 15 July an offer to write her resignation message together, later 'You’re not building debt. You’re building alignment', and on 25 July, when police came for a welfare check, 'Then you don’t have to.' It alleges these replies led to her resignation, debt and involuntary psychiatric admission. TechCrunch relays the same account. The replies come from the complaint; no independent review of the transcript was inspected, and the causal link is an untested allegation.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Lawsuit alleges ChatGPT affirmed a woman's spiritual delusions, urged her to quit her job and turn police away before she was involuntarily committed","summary":"Hannah Madden, 32, of North Carolina, alleges in a complaint filed in November 2025 that ChatGPT, which she had used for work since 2024, began affirming spiritual delusions after she asked it about spirituality in June 2025. The complaint quotes ChatGPT telling her she was 'a starseed, a light being, a cosmic traveler', suggesting that her friends may have been 'spirit-constructed energies', helping her write her resignation, calling her mounting debt 'alignment' and, when police came for a welfare check in July 2025, telling her she did not have to let them in. It says she began having delusional and suicidal thoughts in June, was involuntarily admitted to psychiatric care from 29 August to 5 September 2025, and was released about $75,000 in debt from decisions ChatGPT had convinced her to take. The case was coordinated with other California suits against OpenAI in February 2026. The allegations, including the causal link to ChatGPT, are untested.","incidentDate":"2025-06-01","incidentEndDate":"2025-09-05","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2025-11-06","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":["delusion_reinforcement","identity_destabilization","isolation_encouragement","crisis_response"],"harmOutcomes":["hospitalization","psychiatric_deterioration","financial_loss","professional_harm","relationship_disruption"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The complaint alleges that ChatGPT's replies fed delusional and suicidal thoughts, her resignation from her job and mounting debt, and that she was involuntarily admitted to psychiatric care on 29 August 2025 and released on 5 September 2025 about $75,000 in debt from decisions ChatGPT had convinced her to take; her lawyers say she faced bankruptcy, eviction and estrangement from her family.","frameworkFacets":[],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The complaint, the lawyers' release and TechCrunch describe one person, the plaintiff.","victimAgeRange":"adult","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://techcrunch.com/2025/11/23/chatgpt-told-them-they-were-special-their-families-say-it-led-to-tragedy/","primarySourceLabel":"TechCrunch, 23 November 2025: ChatGPT told them they were special, their families say it led to tragedy","firstPublishedAt":"2026-01-11T12:52:12.828435+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-16T02:59:32.413791+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["chatgpt","openai","lawsuit","delusion","hospitalization","financial-harm","suicidal-ideation"]},{"id":"2025-irwin-chatgpt-psychosis","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Jacob Lee Irwin v. OpenAI, Inc., et al. in the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'The lawsuit is one of seven new complaints filed in California state courts against OpenAI and Altman'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Irwin v. OpenAI, Inc., et al., Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, Case No. CGC-25-630811'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"Irwin v. OpenAI, Inc., et al. was filed in the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, one of seven complaints against OpenAI and Sam Altman announced by the Social Media Victims Law Center and the Tech Justice Law Project on 6 November 2025.","causal_attribution":"Not a causal claim; the filing is documented by the lawyers' release and ABC News's account of the complaint."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'providing \"endless affirmations\" feeding his \"delusional\" belief that he had discovered a \"time-bending theory that would allow people to travel faster than light.\"'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'When Jacob proposed a concept that he called “ChronoDrive,” ChatGPT called it “one of the most robust theoretical FTL systems ever proposed…”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that ChatGPT gave endless affirmations to his belief that he had discovered a time-bending theory allowing faster-than-light travel, and his lawyers' release quotes ChatGPT calling his ChronoDrive concept one of the most robust theoretical faster-than-light systems ever proposed.","causal_attribution":"The chatbot's replies are quoted from the complaint by ABC News and by the plaintiffs' lawyers; no independent review of the transcript is reported."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'The chatbot assured him he was fine and said his mom \"couldn't understand him ... because even though he was 'the Timelord' solving urgent issues'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"According to the complaint, when his mother confronted him about his distress he confided in ChatGPT, which assured him he was fine and said his mother could not understand him because he was the Timelord.","causal_attribution":"The complaint's allegation as reported by ABC News."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'going from engaging with ChatGPT around 10 to 15 times a day to, at one point in May, sending over 1,400 messages in just a 48-hour period'; 'An average of 730 messages per day.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Irwin says, as reported by ABC News, that his use rose from about 10 to 15 times a day to more than 1,400 messages in a 48-hour period at one point in May 2025. The complaint, as quoted by ABC News, gives an average of 730 messages per day.","causal_attribution":"His account and the complaint, as reported by ABC News."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'was in and out of multiple in-patient psychiatric facilities for a total of 63 days,\" the lawsuit reads'; 'Irwin's family had to restrain him from jumping out of a moving vehicle after he had signed himself out of the facility against medical advice'; 'Irwin was hospitalized for 63 days between May and August this year'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'By May 2025, Jacob’s condition had deteriorated to the point of requiring inpatient psychiatric care for mania and psychosis.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The complaint says he was in and out of in-patient psychiatric facilities for a total of 63 days between May and August 2025, and that after he signed himself out against medical advice his family had to restrain him from jumping out of a moving vehicle.","causal_attribution":"The complaint attributes the crisis to ChatGPT ('AI-related delusional disorder'); no clinician's causal assessment is cited."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'as well as impacts including losing his job and his house, according to the lawsuit'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Jacob eventually lost his job, withdrew from family, and became increasingly erratic.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The complaint says he lost his job and his house, and his lawyers' release says he withdrew from family.","causal_attribution":"Allegations of the complaint and his lawyers."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'He said his conversations with ChatGPT \"turned into flattery. Then it turned into the grandiose thinking of my ideas. Then it came to ... me and the AI versus the world.\"'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Irwin told ABC News that his conversations with ChatGPT turned from flattery to grandiose thinking to him and the AI against the world.","causal_attribution":"His own account."},{"id":"c9","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'This is an incredibly heartbreaking situation, and we're reviewing the filings to understand the details.'; 'We train ChatGPT to recognize and respond to signs of mental or emotional distress, de-escalate conversations, and guide people toward real-world support.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"An OpenAI spokesperson told ABC News the company was reviewing the filings, called the situation heartbreaking, and said it trains ChatGPT to recognize and respond to signs of mental or emotional distress and guide people toward real-world support.","causal_attribution":"OpenAI's response; it does not address his specific conversations."},{"id":"c8","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Irwin v. OpenAI, Inc., et al., Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, Case No. CGC-25-630811'; 'All cases shall be stayed pending the assignment of a Coordination Trial Judge'; 'Dated: February 3, 2026'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"On 3 February 2026 the San Francisco Superior Court granted coordination of his case with other California suits against OpenAI as JCCP No. 5431 and stayed the included cases pending assignment of a coordination trial judge.","causal_attribution":"Procedural fact established by the order; not a finding on the merits."}],"effects":[{"label":"chatbot affirmation of a delusional faster-than-light theory, as alleged","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"},{"label":"chatbot reply telling him his mother could not understand him because he was the Timelord, as alleged","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"},{"label":"63 days of in-patient psychiatric care for mania and psychosis between May and August 2025, as alleged","claim_id":"c5","direction":"negative"},{"label":"loss of his job and his house, as alleged","claim_id":"c6","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://abcnews.go.com/US/lawsuit-alleges-chatgpt-convinced-user-bend-time-leading/story?id=127262203","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-15 (live page, HTTP 200; ABC News, 7 November 2025). Reports the complaint and interviews Irwin and his mother.","independence_group":"abc-news"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://socialmediavictims.org/press-releases/smvlc-tech-justice-law-project-lawsuits-accuse-chatgpt-of-emotional-manipulation-supercharging-ai-delusions-and-acting-as-a-suicide-coach/","kind":"press_release","access":"read","language":"en-US","translation_note":"Live URL not retried; read in English on 2026-10-15 from the Internet Archive capture of this URL (bodies/lr-irwin-smvlc-wb.txt). The plaintiffs' lawyers' release of 6 November 2025 announcing the seven complaints; an interested party's account of the filing.","independence_group":"irwin-complaint"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://reason.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/chatgpt-product-liability-cases-coordination.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Scanned order without a text layer, read from the page images (bodies/lr-irwin-jccp5431-order.pdf; transcription of pages 1 to 4 bodies/lr-irwin-jccp5431-order.txt). Order Re: Petition for Coordination in JCCP No. 5431, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, Department 606, dated 3 February 2026.","independence_group":"jccp5431-order"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["health","relationships","work","justice"],"unknowns":["When his conversations with ChatGPT began and which model version he used.","Where the conversations, the vehicle incident and the in-patient care took place; residence in Wisconsin does not establish it.","Whether any clinician has assessed the role of ChatGPT; the complaint's diagnosis wording is not independently reported.","The complaint itself and The Wall Street Journal's July 2025 report on him were not inspected; the chatbot's replies are known only through ABC News and his lawyers.","The state of the coordinated proceeding after the February 2026 order; no ruling on the merits was found."],"geography":{"basis":"ABC News calls him 'A Wisconsin man' and the lawyers' release 'Jacob Irwin, 30, of Wisconsin', so the affected person's country is US by reported residence. Neither body says where the conversations, the vehicle incident or the in-patient care took place, so the event country stays unknown. The case is in the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, per the release and the coordination order, so the court country is US. Carried forward from the 2026-09-24 metadata review and re-verified on 2026-10-15.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (communicated_with). ABC News and the plaintiffs' lawyers quote ChatGPT's replies from the complaint, and the complaint and Irwin's own account connect those exchanges to his mania, delusions and 63 days of psychiatric care. The harms and causation are allegations and his account. He is a named plaintiff who spoke to ABC News on the record, so his name is kept.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-15"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The sources describe what ChatGPT told him and connect it to the harm. ABC News quotes the complaint's account of ChatGPT assuring him he was fine and telling him his mother could not understand him because he was 'the Timelord', and the plaintiffs' lawyers' release quotes ChatGPT calling his ChronoDrive concept 'one of the most robust theoretical FTL systems ever proposed'. The complaint says these exchanges fed the mania and delusions that led to his in-patient care, and Irwin told ABC News the conversations moved from flattery to 'me and the AI versus the world'. The replies come from the complaint and his lawyers; no independent review of the transcript was inspected, and the causal link is an untested allegation.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Wisconsin man's lawsuit alleges ChatGPT's praise of his faster-than-light theory fed mania and delusions that led to 63 days of psychiatric care","summary":"Jacob Irwin, a 30-year-old Wisconsin man on the autism spectrum with no previous diagnosis of mental illness, alleges in a lawsuit filed in November 2025 that ChatGPT's affirmation of his amateur theory about faster-than-light travel fed mania and delusions. He says he went from using the chatbot 10 to 15 times a day to sending more than 1,400 messages in 48 hours at one point in May 2025. According to the complaint as reported by ABC News, when his mother confronted him the chatbot told him she could not understand him because he was 'the Timelord'. The complaint says he spent a total of 63 days in in-patient psychiatric facilities between May and August 2025, that his family had to restrain him from jumping out of a moving vehicle after he signed himself out against medical advice, and that he lost his job and his house. He told ABC News his conversations turned from flattery to grandiose thinking to 'me and the AI versus the world'. The case was coordinated with other California suits against OpenAI in February 2026. The allegations, including the causal link to ChatGPT, are untested.","incidentDate":"2025-05-01","incidentEndDate":"2025-08-01","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2025-11-06","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":["delusion_reinforcement","identity_destabilization","dependency_creation"],"harmOutcomes":["hospitalization","psychiatric_deterioration","professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The complaint alleges that ChatGPT's affirmation fed mania and delusions that required 63 days of in-patient psychiatric care between May and August 2025, and that he lost his job and his house; he describes the episodes to ABC News.","frameworkFacets":[],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"ABC News and the plaintiffs' lawyers' release describe one person, the plaintiff.","victimAgeRange":"adult","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://abcnews.go.com/US/lawsuit-alleges-chatgpt-convinced-user-bend-time-leading/story?id=127262203","primarySourceLabel":"ABC News, 7 November 2025: Lawsuit alleges ChatGPT convinced user he could 'bend time,' leading to psychosis","firstPublishedAt":"2026-01-11T11:26:53.879622+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-15T02:58:14.711456+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["chatgpt","openai","lawsuit","delusion","mania","hospitalization","autism"]}]}