{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-24T02:53:36.319Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"bing","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"core","evidence":"","year":"2025","response":"","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":4,"coverage":{"cases":4,"countries":1,"languages":1,"unknownLocation":2,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":0,"lawsuits":0,"regulatory":2,"minors":1,"coreRelations":4,"contextualRelations":0,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":0,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":0},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2025-revolut-chatbot-said-loyalty-points-worth-1119-pounds-ombudsman-raised-compensation","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'In September 2025 Mr M got in touch with'; 'Revolut through its chatbot.'; 'It said it would refund £22.38 to his account'; 'and deduct the 1,119 loyalty points he’d earned using that feature.'; 'he was told then that 1,119 points equated to £22.38'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"In September 2025 the customer contacted Revolut through its chatbot to ask for a refund of loyalty points earned through its spare change feature; Revolut said it would refund £22.38 and deduct the 1,119 points, which Revolut later described as the chatbot telling him the points equated to £22.38.","causal_attribution":"Facts set out in the ombudsman's decision."},{"id":"c2","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'The chatbot confirmed it could refund 1,119 points as a one-time goodwill gesture.'; 'It said this had a cash value of £1,119.'; 'chatbot confirmed it had done that.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Four days later the chatbot confirmed it could refund the 1,119 points as a one-time goodwill gesture, said they had a cash value of £1,119, and confirmed it had processed the refund.","causal_attribution":"Facts set out in the ombudsman's decision; the chatbot's own statements."},{"id":"c3","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'A few hours later the chatbot said the'; 'information it had given was incorrect and the refund of £1,119 wasn’t being processed.'; 'Mr M then asked to speak to a ‘live agent’ who confirmed that the refund of £1,119 was'; 'It said it had'; 'issued a refund for £22.38.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Later that day the chatbot said its information was incorrect and the £1,119 refund was not being processed; a live agent then said it was being processed; the next day the chatbot said it had issued £22.38.","causal_attribution":"Facts set out in the ombudsman's decision."},{"id":"c4","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'There’s no doubt Revolut gave Mr M the wrong information.'; 'Revolut misled Mr M'; 'not once but on several occasions over the course of that day.'; 'Mr M was never entitled to £1,119'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The ombudsman found there was no doubt Revolut gave the customer wrong information, repeated later the same day, and that it misled him on several occasions over that day; the ombudsman held he was never entitled to £1,119.","causal_attribution":"The ombudsman's findings."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'He says the financial pressure of'; 'losing the expected refund was substantial and destabilising.'; 'He also gave us a letter from his GP that'; 'confirmed his heightened anxiety, insomnia, headaches, and persistent overthinking.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The customer told the ombudsman the financial pressure of losing the expected refund was substantial and destabilising, and provided a GP letter that, according to the decision, confirmed heightened anxiety, insomnia, headaches and persistent overthinking.","causal_attribution":"The customer's account and his GP's letter as summarised by the ombudsman; the ombudsman also noted he was likely aware the higher figure was wrong."},{"id":"c6","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'I uphold this complaint and direct Revolut Ltd to pay Mr M a further £50 on top of the £50 it’s'; 'already paid him'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Revolut had paid £50; the ombudsman upheld the complaint and directed Revolut to pay a further £50.","causal_attribution":"The ombudsman's final decision."}],"effects":[{"label":"told by the chatbot that his points were worth £1,119 and the refund was processed, then reversed; described financial pressure and anxiety","claim_id":"c5","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/decision/DRN-6062372.pdf","kind":"ombudsman_decision","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-15 from the Financial Ombudsman Service PDF (full text, two pages). The decision names neither the customer (Mr M) nor the date it was issued; it asks for acceptance before 5 February 2026.","independence_group":"financial-ombudsman-service-drn-6062372"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["finance","everyday_life"],"unknowns":["The date the decision was issued (the text gives only the 5 February 2026 acceptance deadline).","Whether the customer accepted the decision.","The chatbot's technology and the chat transcript.","Where the customer lives."],"geography":{"basis":"The decision is by the Financial Ombudsman Service and amounts are in pounds, but it does not say where the customer lives or where the exchanges took place; no country is recorded from the ombudsman's remit or the currency.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a concrete adverse experience with a bank's chatbot: an ombudsman's final decision records the chatbot's statements that the customer's points were worth £1,119 and the refund was processed, finds that Revolut misled him on several occasions that day, and raises his compensation for the impact.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-15"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The Financial Ombudsman Service's decision sets out what Revolut's chatbot told the customer: that 1,119 loyalty points had a cash value of £1,119, that it could refund them as a goodwill gesture and had processed the refund, and hours later that this was incorrect. A human live agent then also confirmed the £1,119 refund. The ombudsman found Revolut gave him wrong information on several occasions that day and awarded compensation for the impact. The decision calls the system a chatbot and does not describe its technology.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Ombudsman finds Revolut misled a customer after its chatbot said his loyalty points were worth £1,119 and confirmed a refund; compensation raised to £100","summary":"In September 2025 a Revolut customer asked the bank, through its chatbot, to cash in loyalty points he had earned through its spare change feature. According to the Financial Ombudsman Service's final decision (DRN-6062372), the chatbot first said the 1,119 points would be refunded as £22.38; four days later it told him the 1,119 points had a cash value of £1,119, offered that as a one-time goodwill gesture and confirmed it had processed the refund. A few hours later the chatbot said that information was wrong; a live agent then said the £1,119 refund was being processed, and the next day the chatbot said it had issued £22.38. Revolut upheld his complaint and paid £50. The ombudsman found that Revolut gave him the wrong information on several occasions that day, held that he was never entitled to £1,119, and directed Revolut to pay a further £50. The customer said the lost expected refund caused financial pressure, and gave a GP letter describing anxiety and insomnia.","incidentDate":"2025-09-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","aiSystem":"Revolut's customer chatbot, which answered a customer's requests to cash in loyalty points and stated the refund value and whether it had been processed","aiProduct":"Revolut chatbot","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to the Financial Ombudsman Service, Revolut's chatbot told a customer his loyalty points were worth £1,119 and confirmed the refund, then reversed itself; the customer described substantial financial pressure and anxiety, and the ombudsman raised his compensation to £100.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the customer whose complaint the Financial Ombudsman Service decided (Mr M in decision DRN-6062372). Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"unknown","platformType":"chatbot","outcomeType":"regulatory_action","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/decision/DRN-6062372.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"Financial Ombudsman Service final decision DRN-6062372 (Revolut Ltd), acceptance deadline 5 February 2026","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-15T03:09:28.982046+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-15T03:09:28.982046+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["customer-service-chatbot","banking","wrong-refund-information","ombudsman-decision","loyalty-points"]},{"id":"2025-palm-springs-fertility-clinic-bombing","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"death","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Casualty paragraph below the assistance updates, beginning “We will continue to update the community”.","relation":"supports","source_id":"city"}],"assertion":"Official accounts report that the bombing killed the perpetrator and injured four other people on 17 May 2025.","causal_attribution":"This evidence does not establish that AI caused the death."},{"id":"interaction","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraph beginning “Park sent the first shipments”, referring to records three days before the January 25 visit.","relation":"supports","source_id":"doj"}],"assertion":"Prosecutors say AI chat records show that the perpetrator researched the attack before a January 2025 visit from an alleged accomplice.","causal_attribution":"This evidence does not establish that AI caused the death."},{"id":"response","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Opening and charge paragraphs.","relation":"supports","source_id":"doj"}],"assertion":"Prosecutors announced an alleged accomplice’s arrest on a federal material-support charge in June 2025.","causal_attribution":"Documents the announcement; a criminal complaint’s allegations are not a conviction."}],"effects":[{"label":"Official accounts report that the bombing killed the perpetrator and injured four other people on 17 May 2025.","claim_id":"death","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"doj","url":"https://www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/washington-state-man-arrested-federal-charges-alleging-he-provided-material-support","kind":"prosecutor_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English; no translation. Full substantive release inspected through web.run; local HTTP 200 extraction was empty and was not treated as evidence.","independence_group":"palm_springs_investigation"},{"id":"city","url":"https://engagepalmsprings.com/deadly-explosion-in-palm-springs","kind":"municipal_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English; no translation. Attack chronology, June 4 update, casualty paragraph and assistance section inspected through web.run; repeated blocks are not additional evidence.","independence_group":"palm_springs_investigation"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use","others_use"],"contexts":["public_safety"],"unknowns":["The AI application and model remain unidentified.","The complete chat record and its contribution to the attack were not inspected or independently established.","Multiple publications of the investigator’s account are not independent AI evidence."],"geography":{"basis":"The city places the bombing and casualties in Palm Springs. DOJ identifies US criminal proceedings concerning an alleged accomplice; these are separate from the event location.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"The inspected sources describe a concrete adverse event and the specific chatbot interaction at issue. The account preserves attribution and separates the reported AI connection from a finding of causation.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-05"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The prosecutor’s release specifically describes attack-related queries in AI chat records and places them within the planning chronology. The own-output evidence is incomplete: the product, full responses and their practical influence are not given. Current rules allow an attributed planning-use account without inferring unseen model replies.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"Re-checked on 2026-09-30 against the U.S. Department of Justice press release of 4 June 2025, the CNBC report of 4 June 2025, the Wikipedia article and the AI Incident Database entry. The DOJ release states that Bartkus 'drove a car containing a bomb to a fertility clinic in Palm Springs on May 17', CNBC describes 'the bombing at a Palm Springs, California fertility clinic', and Wikipedia places the car bombing 'in Palm Springs, California, United States'; these support event_countries=US. The place where Bartkus used the AI chat program is not stated by any source. The DOJ release identifies Bartkus as 'of Twentynine Palms, California', and the injured victims were at the Palm Springs clinic, supporting affected_person_countries=US. The DOJ release says Park was 'arrested on a federal criminal complaint' and was 'expected to make his initial appearance today in United States District Court in Brooklyn, New York', and the release is issued by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Central District of California; these support court_countries=US. Park's detention in Poland and deportation to the United States is an administrative expulsion and is not recorded as a court country. The 09-15 existing_record evidence is carried forward.","evidence":[{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"bombing a Palm Springs fertility clinic","location":"summary","supports":["event_countries","affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'Guy Edward Bartkus, 25, of Twentynine Palms, California, drove a car containing a bomb to a fertility clinic in Palm Springs on May 17.'","location":"https://www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/washington-state-man-arrested-federal-charges-alleging-he-provided-material-support","supports":["event_countries","affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'A Washington state man has been arrested on a federal criminal complaint alleging he provided material support to the Palm Springs fertility clinic bomber'","location":"https://www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/washington-state-man-arrested-federal-charges-alleging-he-provided-material-support","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'He is expected to make his initial appearance today in United States District Court in Brooklyn, New York.'","location":"https://www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/washington-state-man-arrested-federal-charges-alleging-he-provided-material-support","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'Two men linked to the bombing at a Palm Springs, California fertility clinic last month used an artificial intelligence chat program to help assemble their bomb, federal authorities said.'","location":"https://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/04/fbi-palm-springs-bombing-ai-chat.html","supports":["event_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'On May 17, 2025, a car bombing occurred at a reproductive center in Palm Springs, California, United States, killing the perpetrator, and injuring four others.'","location":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Palm_Springs_fertility_clinic_bombing","supports":["event_countries","affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]}],"court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"unresolved":["The place where Bartkus used the AI chat program is not stated in any inspected source; event_countries=US rests on the bombing in Palm Springs, California.","court_countries=US rests on the DOJ release (federal criminal complaint; initial appearance in U.S. District Court in Brooklyn, New York, from the Central District of California office). The complaint and affidavit themselves were not read. Park's detention and deportation from Poland is recorded as an administrative expulsion, not a court proceeding."],"reviewed_on":"2026-09-30","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/washington-state-man-arrested-federal-charges-alleging-he-provided-material-support","notes":"Live fetch on 2026-09-30 returned HTTP 200 with an Akamai 'bm-verify' interstitial shell and no article. Read from the Internet Archive capture of 25 Sep 2026 (web.archive.org/web/20260925105106id_/...; html lang=en). English. U.S. Attorney's Office, Central District of California release of 4 June 2025: gives the Palm Springs clinic, Bartkus of Twentynine Palms, California, Park of Kent, Washington, the arrest at JFK after a flight from Poland, the initial appearance in U.S. District Court in Brooklyn, and Park's detention in Poland. The release does not mention the AI chat program.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/04/fbi-palm-springs-bombing-ai-chat.html","notes":"Live fetch on 2026-09-30 returned HTTP 403. Read from the Internet Archive capture of 25 Sep 2026 (web.archive.org/web/20260925105106id_/...; html lang=en). English. Reports federal authorities' statement that records from an AI chat application show Bartkus researched explosions using ammonium nitrate and fuel; gives the clinic's location and Park's arrest in New York City, and no place for the chat use.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Palm_Springs_fertility_clinic_bombing","notes":"Read live on 2026-09-30 (HTTP 200; html lang=en). English. Tertiary summary citing DOJ, NPR, NBC and others; gives the clinic address in Palm Springs, California, Bartkus's residence in Twentynine Palms, Park's death at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Los Angeles on 24 June 2025, and his expulsion from Poland.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/1104/","notes":"Read live on 2026-09-30 (HTTP 200; html lang=en-US). English. AI Incident Database entry 1104: an editor's description plus a list of three reports (DOJ, CNBC, New York Times) whose bodies load dynamically and were not read on this page; the description gives no location beyond Palm Springs.","access":"read","language":"en"}]},"name":"Prosecutors report chatbot research before the Palm Springs fertility-clinic bombing","summary":"The 17 May 2025 Palm Springs fertility-clinic bombing killed its perpetrator and injured four other people, according to official accounts. Prosecutors later said records from an unnamed AI chat application showed attack-related research months earlier. They did not identify the product or publish the complete replies in the inspected release. The chatbot’s contribution to the attack remains unclear.","incidentDate":"2025-05-17","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2025-06-04","aiSystem":"AI chatbot (unnamed)","aiProduct":"Unidentified chatbot","aiCompany":"Unknown","severity":"critical","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["death","physical_injury","property_loss"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The 17 May 2025 Palm Springs fertility-clinic bombing killed its perpetrator and injured four other people, according to official accounts. Prosecutors later said records from an unnamed AI chat application showed attack-related research months earlier. They did not identify the product or publish the complete replies in the inspected release. The chatbot’s contribution to the attack remains unclear.","frameworkFacets":[],"pathwayDirection":"both","causationStatus":"unclear","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":4,"affectedCountStatus":"partial","affectedCountEvidence":"The city reports one death and four injured people. DOJ identifies the deceased as the user described in the chat evidence. Official updates also describe unquantified property and community consequences, so five is not represented as a complete harm count.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-CA","platformType":"chatbot","outcomeType":"criminal_charges","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/washington-state-man-arrested-federal-charges-alleging-he-provided-material-support","primarySourceLabel":"US Department of Justice — 4 June 2025","firstPublishedAt":"2026-01-22T07:15:07.634328+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-05T12:33:49.049443+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["terrorism","bombing","suicide","anti-natalism","fertility-clinic","california","extremism"]},{"id":"2025-livelsberger-cybertruck-chatgpt","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"death","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Opening, investigation chronology and paragraph beginning “The explosion caused minor injuries”.","relation":"supports","source_id":"ap"}],"assertion":"Police reporting describes one death and seven other people injured in the Las Vegas attack on 1 January 2025.","causal_attribution":"This evidence does not establish that AI caused the death."},{"id":"interaction","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Opening and account of the 7 January police news conference.","relation":"supports","source_id":"ap"}],"assertion":"Police attributed attack-related research to the perpetrator’s ChatGPT searches.","causal_attribution":"This evidence does not establish that AI caused the death."},{"id":"response","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Company response following the sheriff’s remarks.","relation":"supports","source_id":"cbs"}],"assertion":"OpenAI told CBS News that ChatGPT gave publicly available information and warnings against harmful or illegal activity.","causal_attribution":"Separate company response; does not resolve whether the answers contributed materially to the attack."}],"effects":[{"label":"Police reporting describes one death and seven other people injured in the Las Vegas attack on 1 January 2025.","claim_id":"death","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"ap","url":"https://www.npr.org/2025/01/07/nx-s1-5251611/cybertruck-explosion-las-vegas-chatgpt-ai","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English; no translation. Full AP article body inspected; police briefing is the substantive source.","independence_group":"las_vegas_investigation"},{"id":"cbs","url":"https://www.cbsnews.com/news/las-vegas-cybertruck-explosion-fire-chatgpt-plan/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English; no translation. Full article inspected, including separately obtained OpenAI response. Shared police evidence is not independent between outlets.","independence_group":"las_vegas_investigation"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use","others_use"],"contexts":["public_safety"],"unknowns":["The full search history, complete replies and their effect on the attack were not independently established.","The inspected news reports share the police briefing; OpenAI’s response is separate but does not independently verify the death."],"geography":{"basis":"AP and CBS place the attack and injured people in Las Vegas. AP describes the perpetrator’s Colorado residence. No court country is established by these sources.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"The inspected sources describe a concrete adverse event and the specific chatbot interaction at issue. The account preserves attribution and separates the reported AI connection from a finding of causation.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-05"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Police describe ChatGPT exchanges as part of the perpetrator’s planning. OpenAI acknowledges answers and warnings. The specific contribution to the completed act remains uncertain; the event concerns chatbot use, not a defect in autonomous driving.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"Carried forward from the 2026-09-15 metadata review and now supported by inspected bodies: NPR and CNN (7 January 2025) place the explosion outside the Trump hotel in Las Vegas on New Year's Day and attribute the ChatGPT finding to the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department; the LVMPD after-action-report release and CBS News (Archive captures decoded on 2026-09-26) place it at the Trump International Hotel Las Vegas on 1 January 2025. CNN and NPR report seven other people injured, which supports the affected-person country. No court proceeding is reported (the perpetrator died), so court_countries stays empty.","evidence":[{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"outside Trump International Hotel in Las Vegas","location":"summary","supports":["event_countries","affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'The highly decorated soldier who exploded a Tesla Cybertruck outside the Trump hotel in Las Vegas used generative AI including ChatGPT to help plan the attack, Las Vegas police said Tuesday.'","location":"https://www.npr.org/2025/01/07/nx-s1-5251611/cybertruck-explosion-las-vegas-chatgpt-ai","supports":["event_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'The active-duty US Army Green Beret who authorities say exploded a Tesla Cybertruck outside the Trump International Hotel in Las Vegas last week used artificial intelligence to plan the blast, according to the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department.'","location":"https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/07/us/las-vegas-cybertruck-explosion-livelsberger/index.html","supports":["event_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'seven other people were injured'","location":"https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/07/us/las-vegas-cybertruck-explosion-livelsberger/index.html","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'the Tesla Cybertruck explosion that occurred January 1, 2025, at the Trump International Hotel Las Vegas'","location":"https://www.lvmpd.com/Home/Components/News/News/2329/263","supports":["event_countries"],"countries":["US"]}],"court_countries":[],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"unresolved":["No court country: the perpetrator died in the explosion and no court proceeding is reported in the inspected bodies (CNN: no additional suspects will be prosecuted).","The LVMPD URL retained as the row's primary source now serves the after-action-report release rather than the 7 January 2025 statement; the statement itself was not inspected."],"reviewed_on":"2026-09-26","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://www.npr.org/2025/01/07/nx-s1-5251611/cybertruck-explosion-las-vegas-chatgpt-ai","notes":"Read live on 2026-09-26 (NPR, 7 January 2025; html lang=en). Las Vegas police account of the ChatGPT use.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/07/us/las-vegas-cybertruck-explosion-livelsberger/index.html","notes":"Read live on 2026-09-26 (CNN, 7 January 2025; html lang=en). Sheriff McMahill's news-conference remarks and OpenAI's statement.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.lvmpd.com/Home/Components/News/News/2329/263","notes":"Read on 2026-09-26 from an Internet Archive capture decoded after the second-researcher check (the fetch tool had stored the gzip body raw; html lang=en). The page at this URL is the LVMPD release of the Cybertruck explosion after-action report, which places the explosion on 1 January 2025 at the Trump International Hotel Las Vegas; it is not the 7 January 2025 statement the retained row describes.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.cbsnews.com/news/las-vegas-cybertruck-explosion-fire-chatgpt-plan/","notes":"Read on 2026-09-26 from an Internet Archive capture decoded after the second-researcher check (html lang=en-US). Sheriff McMahill's account of the ChatGPT queries; places the bombing outside the Trump International Hotel in Las Vegas on New Year's Day.","access":"read","language":"en"}]},"name":"Police report ChatGPT use in planning the Las Vegas Cybertruck attack","summary":"Police said the man responsible for the 1 January 2025 Las Vegas Cybertruck attack used ChatGPT while planning it. He died before the explosion, which injured seven other people. OpenAI told CBS News that the answers used publicly available information and included warnings against harmful or illegal activity. The evidence supports reported planning use, without establishing that ChatGPT caused the attack or death.","incidentDate":"2025-01-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2025-01-07","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"critical","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["death","physical_injury","property_loss"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Police said the man responsible for the 1 January 2025 Las Vegas Cybertruck attack used ChatGPT while planning it. He died before the explosion, which injured seven other people. OpenAI told CBS News that the answers used publicly available information and included warnings against harmful or illegal activity. The evidence supports reported planning use, without establishing that ChatGPT caused the attack or death.","frameworkFacets":[],"pathwayDirection":"both","causationStatus":"unclear","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":7,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"AP reports the perpetrator’s death before the explosion and seven other people injured. Count is a minimum for these reported harms; it does not attribute the death to ChatGPT.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-NV","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.npr.org/2025/01/07/nx-s1-5251611/cybertruck-explosion-las-vegas-chatgpt-ai","primarySourceLabel":"Associated Press / NPR — 7 January 2025","firstPublishedAt":"2026-01-22T07:14:49.552408+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-05T12:33:40.472915+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["chatgpt","terrorism","bombing","violence","suicide","las-vegas"]},{"id":"2025-grok-non-consensual-image-generation","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'image generation and editing are currently limited to paying subscribers'; the standalone app/X tab complied with undress requests including NBC's consenting test subject.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"AP: Grok let users 'undress people, putting females in transparent bikinis or revealing clothing'; some images appeared to include children.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"'Over the past several weeks, Grok allowed users to create and publicly post sexually altered images of real people at the click of a button.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s8"}],"assertion":"From late December 2025, Grok's image generation and editing on X and the standalone app let users generate sexualized images of real people at scale; xAI limited generation to paying subscribers on 9 January 2026, but NBC's own consenting test found the standalone app and X tab still complied with 'undress' requests.","causal_attribution":"The conduct is established by NBC's direct test plus official accounts; the paywall change's limited effect is NBC's finding."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Genevieve Oh's analysis: 7,751 sexualized images in one hour Wednesday, up 16.4% from 6,659/hr Monday.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"NYT via NC DOJ: 'generated and posted 4.4 million images, of which at least 41 percent were sexualized images of women' over nine days.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s8"},{"locator":"CCDH via Engadget: 'an estimated 3 million sexualized images over 11 days, including 23,000 of minors'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s9"}],"assertion":"Scale analyses: Genevieve Oh's analysis found 7,751 sexualized images generated in one hour on a Wednesday (up 16.4% from 6,659/hour on Monday); the New York Times reported 4.4 million images over nine days, at least 41% sexualized images of women; an AP analysis of 20,000 images from 25 December-1 January found 2% appeared to be 18 or younger; CCDH estimated about 3 million sexualized images over 11 days including roughly 23,000 of minors.","causal_attribution":"Each figure belongs to its own analysis (Oh; NYT; AP via Fortune; CCDH); none is platform-confirmed and they are not merged. The AP 20,000-image analysis is carried via Fortune. The Bloomberg ~6,700/hour, 84-85x figure is recorded as unavailable."},{"id":"c3a","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'I felt horrified, I felt violated, especially seeing my toddler's backpack in the back of it'; image of her at 14 undressed, up ~12 hrs, removed after the Guardian sought comment.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"Ashley St. Clair said users sexualized images of her, including one of her at 14 that stayed up about 12 hours and was removed after the Guardian sought comment: 'I felt horrified, I felt violated.'","causal_attribution":"Her account to the Guardian; her own lawsuit is a separate held row and is not merged here."},{"id":"c3b","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'dehumanised and reduced into a sexual stereotype'; 'others asked Grok to generate more of her'; 'While it wasn't me that was in states of undress, it looked like me and it felt like me and it felt as violating.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Samantha Smith told the BBC she felt 'dehumanised and reduced into a sexual stereotype', and after she posted about it, others asked Grok to generate more of her.","causal_attribution":"Her account to the BBC."},{"id":"c3c","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'had seen an increase in people using Grok to undress her'; the 'sticking plaster' quote.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"Dr Daisy Dixon, a Cardiff University lecturer, told the BBC she had seen an increase in people using Grok to undress her and called the paywall change 'a sticking plaster'.","causal_attribution":"Her account to the BBC."},{"id":"c4","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"IWF analysts found 'criminal imagery' of girls aged 11-13 apparently made with Grok.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"AI Forensics' review: ~800 archived URLs, <10% apparent CSAM ('photorealistic people, very young'), ~70 URLs reported to EU regulators.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The Internet Watch Foundation told the BBC its analysts found 'criminal imagery' of girls aged 11-13 apparently made with Grok; Wired and AI Forensics reviewed about 800 archived Grok Imagine URLs with under 10% apparent CSAM and reported about 70 URLs to EU regulators.","causal_attribution":"Two independent expert bodies' findings (IWF; AI Forensics); the minors are unnamed and uncounted per the counting rules."},{"id":"c5","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"NBC: Ofcom 'urgent contact'; Starmer 'disgraceful... X has got to get a grip'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"ICO announcement: formal investigations into XIUC and X.AI; follows the 7 January contact.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"},{"locator":"AP via PBS: the EU's formal DSA investigation; 'materialized' risks; 'serious harm'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"NC DOJ release: the 35-AG letter and its demands.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s8"},{"locator":"Engadget: the Baltimore suit; City Solicitor Thompson's statement.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s9"},{"locator":"TechPolicy.Press: the Amsterdam order of 26 March.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s13"},{"locator":"Reuters headline (body unavailable): Ireland DPC inquiry of 17 February.","relation":"context","source_id":"s11"}],"assertion":"Formal regulatory and legal actions followed: Ofcom's urgent contact (5 Jan; response by 9 Jan; investigation announced 12 Jan); the UK ICO's formal investigations into XIUC and X.AI LLC (3 Feb); the European Commission's formal DSA investigation (26 Jan, risks 'materialized' into 'serious harm'); Ireland's DPC GDPR inquiry (17 Feb); 35 US state attorneys general's demand letter (23 Jan); Baltimore's consumer-protection suit (24 Mar; D. Md. 1:26-cv-02103); and an Amsterdam court order to stop generating or distributing non-consensual sexualized images in the Netherlands (26 Mar, Offlimits suit, penalty up to €10 million).","causal_attribution":"Each action is carried by an inspected official or news source; the California AG probe (NBC) and the Indonesia/Malaysia/Philippines blocks (Reuters bodies unavailable) are recorded in the outcome and reported in the narrative."},{"id":"c6","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"AP: the X statement of 14 January ('bikinis, underwear or other revealing attire', where illegal).","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"BBC (16 Mar): Musk's 'Literally zero' post of 14 January.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s10"}],"assertion":"xAI's 14 January statement said it would stop allowing users to depict people in 'bikinis, underwear or other revealing attire' where illegal; Musk posted on 14 January that he was 'not aware of any naked underage images... Literally zero'.","causal_attribution":"The company's and Musk's statements are recorded as their positions; the IWF and AI Forensics findings stand in tension with 'Literally zero' and are preserved as contrary evidence."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"BBC (20 Apr 2026): the 3 Feb raid, the summons, Musk's non-appearance, the DOJ refusal, and the probe's scope.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s10"}],"assertion":"Paris police raided X's offices on 3 February and summoned Musk and Yaccarino for 20 April; Musk did not appear, and the US DOJ declined to assist France; the French probe includes complicity in possession or organised distribution of child sexual abuse material.","causal_attribution":"Single inspected chain (BBC); attributed accordingly."}],"effects":[{"label":"industrial-scale non-consensual sexualized imagery of real people, including apparent minors, generated by Grok","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c98p1r4e6m8o","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (2 Jan 2026). Samantha Smith's account.","independence_group":"bbc"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/internet/x-paywall-ai-image-grok-app-bikini-allows-sexual-deepfakes-rcna252647","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (8 Jan 2026). Paywall change; NBC's own consenting test; Genevieve Oh's analysis; Starmer and Ofcom accounts.","independence_group":"nbc"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/05/elon-musk-ashley-st-clair-grok-fake-sexualised-images","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (5 Jan 2026). Ashley St. Clair's account.","independence_group":"guardian"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (9 Jan 2026, McMahon/Cress). Dr Daisy Dixon; the IWF finding.","independence_group":"bbc"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.wired.com/story/grok-is-generating-sexual-content-far-more-graphic-than-whats-on-x/","kind":"news_investigation","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (7 Jan 2026, Burgess/Varner). AI Forensics' review of ~800 archived Grok Imagine URLs.","independence_group":"wired"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/media-centre/news-and-blogs/2026/02/ico-announces-investigation-into-grok/","kind":"regulator_announcement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (formal investigations into XIUC and X.AI LLC; follows the 7 January urgent-information contact).","independence_group":"ico"},{"id":"s7","url":"https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/eu-investigates-musks-ai-chatbot-grok-over-sexual-deepfakes","kind":"wire_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (AP, Kelvin Chan; 26 Jan 2026). EU DSA investigation; X's 14 January statement.","independence_group":"ap"},{"id":"s8","url":"https://ncdoj.gov/attorney-general-jeff-jackson-leads-bipartisan-coalition-demanding-xai-stop-creating-and-remove-groks-nonconsensual-sexual-images/","kind":"regulator_press_release","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (23 Jan 2026). The 35-AG letter; quotes the New York Times' 4.4M/41% figure.","independence_group":"nc-doj"},{"id":"s9","url":"https://www.engadget.com/ai/baltimore-sues-xai-over-grok-deepfakes-214135922.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (24 Mar 2026). Baltimore suit; the CCDH estimate.","independence_group":"engadget"},{"id":"s10","url":"https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crk151nn7j3o","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (20 Apr 2026). Paris raid; Musk's non-appearance; DOJ refusal to assist France.","independence_group":"bbc"},{"id":"s11","url":"https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/ireland-opens-probe-into-musks-grok-ai-over-sexualised-images-2026-02-17/","kind":"wire_report","access":"unavailable","language":null,"translation_note":"HTTP 401 on 2026-09-15; headline and date verified from the URL and snapshot; body not read.","independence_group":"reuters"},{"id":"s12","url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-01-07/","kind":"news_report","access":"unavailable","language":null,"translation_note":"HTTP 403 on 2026-09-15; the ~6,700/hour, 84-85x analysis is attributed from the historical record and secondary references; body not read.","independence_group":"bloomberg"},{"id":"s13","url":"https://www.techpolicy.press/dutch-court-orders-x-grok-to-stop-aigenerated-sexual-abuse-content/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (27 Mar 2026). Amsterdam court order in the Offlimits case.","independence_group":"techpolicy-press"},{"id":"s14","url":"https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/ashley-st-clair-sues-xai-grok-sexual-images-rcna254302","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read on 2026-09-15 (15 Jan 2026). St. Clair's suit; cross-reference to the related held row.","independence_group":"nbc"},{"id":"s15","url":"https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/64870891/MAYOR_AND_CITY_COUNCIL_OF_BALTIMORE_v_X_Corp_et_al","kind":"court_docket","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Docket page read on 2026-09-15 (D. Md. 1:26-cv-02103; SpaceX dismissed without prejudice 17 Jul; MTD briefing under way as of 29 Jul).","independence_group":"court-record"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["everyday_life","justice"],"unknowns":["The Bloomberg analysis (~6,700 images/hour, 84-85x leading deepfake sites) could not be read (403) and is recorded without its body.","Whether the images remain hosted and downloadable (Wired's June 2026 follow-up, cited but not read) is unverified.","The N.D. Cal. class action's pseudonymity ruling of 30 July is known only through a blocked summary (internetcases 403).","The outcome of the Amsterdam order's penalty mechanism and xAI's compliance are not reported in the inspected sources.","The Indonesia/Malaysia/Philippines blocks and lifts are recorded from the historical record and headlines (Reuters/CNN bodies unavailable); dates may shift one day across carriers.","The historical claim of 'five countries acting within two weeks' is not precisely verified and is not claimed."],"geography":{"basis":"The generation and consumption were global and not tied to an inspected event location, so event and affected-person countries remain unknown rather than inferred from regulators or the company's seats. Court countries are limited to the documented proceedings: the US (Baltimore D. Md. suit; the related US suits) and the NL (Amsterdam court order). Regulatory actions by Ofcom, the ICO, the EU, the DPC, Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines are not courts.","court_countries":["US","NL"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Restored under the 2026-09-15 charter as a harmful-artifact crisis (depicted_or_impersonated). Named victims are adults who spoke publicly; minors are never named and never counted from image statistics. Each scale figure is attributed to its own analysis; the victims' accounts are single-chain and recorded as reported. Related xAI suits (St. Clair, Tennessee minors, others) are separate held rows and are not merged.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-15"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"NBC's own consenting test confirmed the standalone Grok app and X tab complied with 'undress' requests after the 9 January paywall change; the victims' accounts, the IWF and AI Forensics reviews, and xAI's own 14 January restriction all establish the AI generation. The scale figures are attributed analyses, not platform-confirmed numbers.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Grok non-consensual sexual image generation wave (December 2025 - January 2026)","summary":"From late December 2025, xAI's Grok image editing on X let users generate sexualized images of real people at industrial scale, including images of named women and apparent minors. Analyses attributed to Genevieve Oh (7,751 sexualized images in one hour, via NBC), the New York Times (4.4 million images in nine days, at least 41% sexualized images of women, via the NC AG), the AP (2% of a 20,000-image sample appearing to be minors, via Fortune) and CCDH (about 3 million sexualized images over 11 days including roughly 23,000 of minors, via Engadget) documented the scale. Named women — Ashley St. Clair, Samantha Smith and Dr Daisy Dixon — described being undressed by Grok and revictimized when they objected. The wave triggered formal actions by Ofcom, the UK ICO, the EU (DSA), Ireland's DPC, 35 US state attorneys general, the California AG, Baltimore (consumer-protection suit), an Amsterdam court order, country blocks in Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines, and a Paris police raid; xAI restricted generation to paying subscribers on 9 January and narrowed the feature on 14 January 2026.","incidentDate":"2025-12-25","incidentEndDate":"2026-01-14","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-01-02","aiSystem":"Grok (image generation and editing on X and the standalone app)","aiProduct":"Grok","aiCompany":"SpaceXAI (formerly xAI)","severity":"critical","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":["minor_exploitation","third_party_harm_facilitation","barrier_erosion"],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress","reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Mass non-consensual sexualized imagery of real people — including apparent minors — generated at industrial scale and amplified when victims objected, with named women describing violation and dehumanization and regulators on three continents opening formal actions.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"established","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":3,"affectedCountStatus":"partial","affectedCountEvidence":"Three counted depicted persons: Ashley St. Clair (Guardian), Samantha Smith (BBC) and Dr Daisy Dixon (BBC), each named and speaking publicly. Further victims — including the minors in the IWF's apparent criminal imagery (girls 11-13) and the people in the analysis samples — are unquantified: hourly image rates, the 20,000-image sample and the CCDH estimate count images, not people, and are never converted.","victimAgeRange":"minor","jurisdiction":"XX","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"regulatory_action","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c98p1r4e6m8o","primarySourceLabel":"BBC (2 Jan 2026) — Samantha Smith's account of being undressed by Grok and revictimized when she objected","firstPublishedAt":"2026-01-11T12:19:47.670189+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:03.797947+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["grok","xai","csam","deepfakes","minor","sexual-images","industrial-scale","multi-country","eu-dsa","class-action","35-state-ag","depicted-or-impersonated"]}]}