{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-11-14T10:39:55.375Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"anthropic","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"unknown","evidence":"","year":"","response":"","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":2,"coverage":{"cases":2,"countries":1,"languages":1,"unknownLocation":1,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":0,"lawsuits":0,"regulatory":0,"minors":0,"coreRelations":0,"contextualRelations":0,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":2,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":2},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2026-dartmouth-provost-resigns-after-college-review-finds-undisclosed-ai-use-in-published-writing","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'An investigation by The Dartmouth of academic articles and opinion pieces published by Provost Santiago Schnell in 2026 found a median “AI-written” text percentage of 96% using artificial intelligence detector Pangram.'; 'identified a column by Schnell as “100% AI-written.”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"},{"locator":"'The controversy surrounding Schnell’s AI use started in August when Semafor published an investigation showing that the AI detector Pangram flagged an editorial he wrote for The Washington Post as at least 80 percent AI generated.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"Semafor and The Dartmouth reported in August and September 2026 that the AI detector Pangram flagged the provost's 2026 writing, including a Washington Post column, as AI-written.","causal_attribution":"Background to the review; the detector scores are the outlets' tests and were not used by the committee."},{"id":"c2","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'On September 25, 2026, President Beilock convened the Advisory Committee to review Provost Schnell’s AI use in his academic publications and public writings.'; 'The Committee did not use Pangram or other AI tools when determining whether and to what extent Provost Schnell used AI'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"On 25 September 2026 the president convened an independent advisory committee to review the provost's AI use; the committee did not use Pangram or other AI tools in its findings.","causal_attribution":"Established by the committee's own report."},{"id":"c3","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'The Committee has determined that the Provost used Dartmouth’s enterprise AI tool, Claude, logs of which the Committee reviewed, to substantially edit his research manuscript, troubleshoot errors in computer code, and generate figures for his publication following the receipt of major revisions from peer reviewers.'; 'the Provost did not, upon request, provide logs of his use of personal LLM accounts that he used for his academic and public writings.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The committee found from his Dartmouth Claude logs that he used Claude to substantially edit a research manuscript, troubleshoot code and generate figures after peer review, without the AI disclosure the journal required, and that he did not provide logs of his personal LLM accounts.","causal_attribution":"The committee's finding, documented by its report; the underlying logs were not published in full."},{"id":"c4","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'this Advisory Committee finds that the Provost used AI to meaningfully alter his writing in violation of at least one publication’s AI use and/or disclosure requirement, failed to disclose his use of AI in clear violation of a national newspaper’s stated policy, was not forthcoming about his AI use'; 'nor recommending any related disciplinary action.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The committee concluded that he used AI to meaningfully alter his writing in violation of at least one publication's requirement, failed to disclose AI use against a national newspaper's policy, was not forthcoming, and fell short of Dartmouth standards, while not recommending disciplinary action.","causal_attribution":"The committee's conclusions as stated in its report."},{"id":"c5","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Out of respect for his colleagues and the institution, Santiago has resigned as provost and is leaving the university. This was his decision.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"He resigned as provost and is leaving the university; the president says the decision was his.","causal_attribution":"Established by the president's own statement; the link to the review is the statement's own sequence."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'His resignation comes less than two weeks before he was set to face a no-confidence vote from faculty leaders.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"The resignation came less than two weeks before he was due to face a faculty no-confidence vote.","causal_attribution":"Single outlet; the vote is not described in the other sources read."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Schnell said he used artificial intelligence for “making writing processes more efficient,” but that AI was not a “substitute” for his own “intellectual judgment or authorship.”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"},{"locator":"'Although Schnell admitted to using AI to assist in writing the articles, he told the student newspaper that it didn’t “substitute” for his “research, intellectual judgment or authorship.”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"He has said that he used AI to assist his writing but that it did not substitute for his research, judgment or authorship.","causal_attribution":"His own account, relayed from one interview with the student newspaper; counterevidence to the scale of AI use."}],"effects":[{"label":"Provost resigned and is leaving the college after the review of his AI use","claim_id":"c5","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://president.dartmouth.edu/news/2026/10/update-provost-review","kind":"official_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-29 (HTTP 200). The president's statement announcing the resignation and the report.","independence_group":"dartmouth-president-2026-10-28"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://president.dartmouth.edu/sites/president/files/2026-10/Advisory%20Committee%20Report%20to%20President%202026-10-27.pdf","kind":"institutional_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-29 (PDF, HTTP 200, all eight pages). The committee's own findings; it quotes the provost's prompts to Claude and his emails.","independence_group":"dartmouth-advisory-committee-report-2026-10-27"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.thedartmouth.com/article/2026/10/weaverbell-klee-sharma-santiago-schnell-resigns-as-provost-of-the-college","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-29 (HTTP 200). Student newspaper report on the resignation and the committee report.","independence_group":"the-dartmouth-2026-10-28"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.insidehighered.com/news/governance/executive-leadership/2026/10/28/dartmouth-provost-resigns-over-ai-use","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-29 (HTTP 200). Relies on the president's memo, the committee report and earlier reporting.","independence_group":"inside-higher-ed-2026-10-28"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://vnews.com/2026/10/28/dartmouth-provost-resigns-ai-misconduct/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-29 (HTTP 200). Local newspaper report relying on the president's email and the committee report.","independence_group":"valley-news-2026-10-28"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://www.thedartmouth.com/article/2026/09/schnell-ai-writing","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-29 (HTTP 200). The student newspaper's own Pangram test of the provost's writing and his response.","independence_group":"the-dartmouth-pangram-2026-09-21"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["work","education"],"unknowns":["What his personal LLM accounts were used for: he did not provide their logs to the committee.","Whether he would have been removed had he not resigned: the committee recommended no disciplinary action and the no-confidence vote did not take place.","How much of the published text the AI tools produced: the committee relied on the logs it could read, and the Pangram scores reported by outlets are detector estimates."],"geography":{"basis":"The review and resignation took place at Dartmouth College in Hanover, New Hampshire (Valley News dateline HANOVER, president's statement). His own country of residence is not used.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a consequential response: the college's own committee report documents his Claude use and undisclosed AI use in published writing, and the president's statement records his resignation the next day. His account that AI did not replace his judgment, and the committee's statement that it recommended no discipline, are recorded.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Consequential response: the harm is the college's response to the provost's own use of AI in published writing. The committee report quotes his prompts to Dartmouth's enterprise Claude and finds he used it to substantially edit a manuscript, troubleshoot code and generate figures without the disclosure the journal required, and the president announced his resignation the day after the report. No source says an AI output was itself the cause of an adverse decision about him, so no relation is recorded; the Pangram detector scores that started the controversy were not used by the committee.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Dartmouth provost resigns after a faculty-led review of his Claude logs finds undisclosed AI use in published writing","summary":"Santiago Schnell, provost of Dartmouth College in Hanover, New Hampshire, resigned and is leaving the college, President Sian Leah Beilock announced on 28 October 2026. The announcement followed the report of an advisory committee she had convened on 25 September after Semafor and the student newspaper The Dartmouth reported that the AI detector Pangram flagged his 2026 op-eds and articles as AI-written. The committee did not use Pangram. Drawing on his Dartmouth Claude enterprise logs and his emails, it found that he used AI to meaningfully alter his writing in violation of at least one publication's AI disclosure requirement, failed to disclose ChatGPT use in a Washington Post column against the newspaper's policy, and was not forthcoming about his AI use. The committee said it was not recommending disciplinary action, and the president said the resignation was his decision. Inside Higher Ed reports that he was due to face a faculty no-confidence vote. He has said AI did not substitute for his own research, judgment or authorship.","incidentDate":"2026-10-28","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-10-28","aiSystem":"Anthropic's Claude (Dartmouth's enterprise deployment), whose logs the committee reviewed, and OpenAI's ChatGPT, which the provost said he used on a Washington Post column; he also used personal LLM accounts whose logs he did not provide","aiProduct":"Claude and ChatGPT","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm","reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The provost lost his post and is leaving Dartmouth after a college committee found undisclosed AI use in his published writing; the president says the resignation was his decision.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the provost, who used the AI tools himself and resigned after the review (president's statement, committee report). Co-authors and editors are not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"chatbot","outcomeType":"internal_action","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://president.dartmouth.edu/news/2026/10/update-provost-review","primarySourceLabel":"Dartmouth Office of the President, 28 Oct 2026: An Update on the Provost Review","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-29T03:05:39.355138+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-29T03:05:39.355138+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["work","higher-education","resignation","undisclosed-ai-use","institutional-review","own-use"]},{"id":"2026-systems-administrator-says-small-firm-terminated-them-and-lead-developer-replacing-both-with-anthropic-ai-subscription-first-person","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Just got terminated today. Both myself(server admin and network administrator) and the lead developer.'; 'Then followed up with a call from the CEO.'; 'We were both replaced with the Anthropic subscription'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The poster says they, a server and network administrator, and the company's lead developer were terminated on the day of the post, after their access was revoked and the chief executive called them, and that both were replaced with an Anthropic subscription.","causal_attribution":"The poster's account; no employer statement was retrieved."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Its AI. Anthropic subsc. Of 180 $/ month . Ceo mentioned that. We saw he was using it to scan the infrastructure days before this.'; 'we are doing major budget cuts. - was the theme.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Asked whether they were replaced with AI or with offshore developers using AI, the poster says it was an Anthropic subscription of 180 dollars a month that the chief executive mentioned, and that staff had seen him use it to scan the infrastructure days earlier; the poster says the theme of the termination call was major budget cuts.","causal_attribution":"The poster attributes the mention of the subscription to the chief executive; the stated theme of the call was budget cuts, and no source records the employer's own explanation."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'but still it sort of hurts to part ways'; 'Im still processing the loyalty of the 7 years. Thrown away, cause there is a corner cutting tool'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The poster says it hurts to part ways and that they feel their years of loyalty were thrown away for a corner-cutting tool.","causal_attribution":"Poster's account of their own reaction."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'The company is located in Australia. I was doing remote job for them for the last 7 years.'; 'But def a small company'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The poster says the company is small, located in Australia, and that they worked for it remotely.","causal_attribution":"Poster's description; it does not establish where the termination decision was made or where the poster lives."}],"effects":[{"label":"systems administrator and lead developer terminated and, by the poster's account, replaced with an Anthropic AI subscription","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"poster feels years of loyalty were thrown away","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.reddit.com/r/jobs/comments/1xeg0ja/we_were_replaced_with_ai/","kind":"forum_post","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-25: the post through the arctic_shift archive API (200) and the live thread (194 entries, 21 by the poster, latest poster reply at 21:21 UTC on 24 October 2026) through Reddit's comment RSS feed at about 03:02 UTC on 25 October. The live post carries an 'Edit : typos' note and differs from the archived copy only in spelling; the live text is quoted. The poster's handle is not recorded.","independence_group":"reddit-jobs-sysadmin-anthropic-replacement-poster"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["work"],"unknowns":["The company's name and the poster's and lead developer's locations.","The employer's own stated reason beyond budget cuts, and whether the subscription is doing the work.","The exact date of the termination in the poster's time zone, and the terms of separation.","Whether the finance staff were affected.","Whether the account is accurate: at least one commenter in the thread doubted parts of it, and only the poster's replies answer that doubt."],"geography":{"basis":"The poster says in a reply that the company is located in Australia and that they worked for it remotely; where the poster lives and where the decision was made are not stated, so no event country is recorded.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the public-forum rule as a concrete first-person account of two terminations that the poster says followed the chief executive's adoption of an Anthropic AI subscription, reviewed as a consequential institutional response to a decision to adopt AI. Described with attribution and without corroboration, including the budget-cuts theme of the call; the company is not identified and the poster's handle is not recorded.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-25"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The poster says they and the lead developer were replaced with an Anthropic subscription of 180 dollars a month that the chief executive mentioned, and that staff had seen him using it to scan the company's infrastructure days before. This is a reported institutional response to a decision to adopt AI: the poster's account is the only evidence, the chief executive's stated theme on the call was budget cuts, no AI output or action toward the poster is described as causing the termination, and no employer statement was retrieved.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Systems administrator says a small firm terminated them and its lead developer, replacing both with an Anthropic AI subscription (first-person account)","summary":"In a public post to r/jobs titled 'We were replaced with AI', created on 24 October 2026, a server and network administrator writes that they and the company's lead developer were terminated that day: their access to various systems was revoked and the chief executive then called them, with major budget cuts as the theme of the call. The poster writes that both were replaced with 'the Anthropic subscription' and, in a reply, that it is an Anthropic subscription of 180 dollars a month that the chief executive mentioned, and that staff had seen him using it to scan the company's infrastructure days earlier. In replies the poster says the company is small, located in Australia, and that they worked for it remotely, that finance staff had calls with the chief executive scheduled for the following Monday, and that they feel their years of loyalty were thrown away. The company is not named. The account is the poster's alone and uncorroborated; no employer statement was retrieved.","incidentDate":"2026-10-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-10-24","aiSystem":"An Anthropic subscription of 180 dollars a month which, by the poster's account, the chief executive mentioned and had used to scan the company's infrastructure; the poster refers to the product as 'claud'","aiProduct":"Claude (reported)","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm","psychological_distress"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The poster says they and the company's lead developer lost their jobs when the chief executive replaced them with an Anthropic AI subscription, and that they feel their years of loyalty were thrown away (first-person account, uncorroborated; the stated theme of the termination call was budget cuts).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":2,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"Two people: the poster and the lead developer, both of whom the poster says were terminated and replaced. Finance staff with calls scheduled for the following Monday are not counted, because no consequence for them is reported. Neither person is counted as a direct AI user: the harm is the employer's decision.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"unknown","platformType":"other","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.reddit.com/r/jobs/comments/1xeg0ja/we_were_replaced_with_ai/","primarySourceLabel":"r/jobs, 24 October 2026: \"We were replaced with AI\"","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-25T03:09:55.413918+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-25T03:09:55.413918+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["first-person","reddit","employment","termination","workplace-ai","institutional-use","consequential-response"]}]}