{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-04T07:56:35.785Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"accessibility","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"core","evidence":"","year":"","response":"","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":2,"coverage":{"cases":2,"countries":0,"languages":2,"unknownLocation":2,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":1,"lawsuits":0,"regulatory":0,"minors":0,"coreRelations":2,"contextualRelations":0,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":0,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":0},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2026-disabled-autistic-user-says-declining-chatbot-help-with-administrative-paperwork-triggers-meltdowns-first-person","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Je suis handicapé, autiste et multi Dys donc'; 'beaucoup pour rédiger des papiers administratifs'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The poster says they are disabled, autistic and have multiple learning disorders, and that AI helped them a great deal in drafting administrative paperwork.","causal_attribution":"Poster's account."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'comprenant Claude, Chatgpt ou Gemini deviennent complètement médiocre'; 'Les réponses deviennent désuet dès les premières phrases conversationnelles malgré mes scripts'; 'Avant je pouvais sortir un dossier entier aujourdhui ils sont incapable'; 'rediger un simple mail'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The poster says absolutely all AI apps, including Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini, are becoming completely mediocre, with answers going stale despite their prompt scripts, and that where they once produced whole files with them, the apps can no longer help them draft a simple email.","causal_attribution":"Poster's account; what changed in the products is not established."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'À me déclencher des crises autistique violente'; 'Ça devient complètement contre productif'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The poster says the degraded answers trigger violent autistic crises and have made the tools counterproductive for them.","causal_attribution":"Poster attributes the crises to the chatbots' answers."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Since August 24'; 'mon ordi est trop nul pour ça'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"After a commenter dated the decline to 24 August and suggested a local model, the poster replied that their computer is too weak to run one.","causal_attribution":"The 24 August date is a commenter's assertion; the poster's reply is the poster's account."}],"effects":[{"label":"chatbots no longer able to help the poster draft administrative paperwork or a simple email (poster's account)","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"},{"label":"violent autistic crises the poster attributes to the degraded answers (poster's account)","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTcomplaints/comments/1wwbzbx/lia_devient_technofasciste/","kind":"forum_post","access":"read","language":"fr","translation_note":"Read in the original French on 2026-10-04: full self-text and the thread's 2 comments, one a reply by the poster, retrieved through the arctic_shift archive API by post ID. English renderings in this record are the research agent's (an AI's) own translations; no human translator reviewed them. The poster handle is not recorded.","independence_group":"reddit-fr-autistic-chatbot-paperwork-poster"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["accessibility","everyday_life"],"unknowns":["When the poster's difficulties began; the post gives no date and the 24 August date comes from a commenter.","What the administrative paperwork was for and whether any deadline or entitlement was affected.","How often the crises occur and whether the poster has other support for the paperwork.","The poster's location."],"geography":{"basis":"The post is written in French but does not say where the poster lives or used the apps; no country is inferred from the language.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter's public-forum rule as a concrete first-person account of an ongoing accessibility harm (loss of chatbot help with paperwork and resulting autistic crises), described with attribution and without corroboration. The poster's handle is not recorded and no health details beyond those the poster gives as context are included.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-04"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The poster names Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini among the AI apps that, they say, can no longer help them draft a simple email, and describes the change in their answers; no examples, dates or screenshots were published.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"First-person forum account (in French): a disabled autistic person with multiple learning disorders who relied on chatbots to draft administrative paperwork says ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini have become unable to help even with a simple email, and that the degraded answers trigger violent autistic crises","summary":"In a public French-language post to r/ChatGPTcomplaints at 02:32 UTC on 3 October 2026, a person who describes themself as disabled, autistic and affected by multiple learning disorders (\"multi Dys\") says AI chatbots used to help them a great deal in drafting administrative paperwork. They write that absolutely all AI apps, including Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini, are becoming completely mediocre: answers go stale from the first conversational sentences despite the scripts they use, and where they could once put together an entire file, the apps can no longer help them draft a simple email. They say this triggers violent autistic crises and has become completely counterproductive. Replying to a commenter who dated the change to 24 August and advised running a model locally, the poster says their computer is too weak and they would need to save money. The changes to the products are described only by the poster, and the account is uncorroborated.","incidentKind":"ongoing_experience","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"product_change","reportedDate":"2026-10-03","aiSystem":"Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini (general-purpose chatbots), used with the poster's own prompt scripts to draft administrative paperwork","aiProduct":"ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini","aiCompany":"OpenAI; Anthropic; Google","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress","functional_impairment"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The poster, a disabled autistic person, says the chatbots they relied on to draft administrative paperwork (ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini) can no longer help them write even a simple email and that the degraded answers trigger violent autistic crises (first-person account in French, uncorroborated).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the poster. Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","jurisdiction":"unknown","platformType":"assistant","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTcomplaints/comments/1wwbzbx/lia_devient_technofasciste/","primarySourceLabel":"r/ChatGPTcomplaints, 3 October 2026: \"L'ia devient technofasciste\" (French)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-04T03:22:09.949668+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-04T03:22:09.949668+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["first-person","reddit","french-language","chatgpt","claude","gemini","accessibility","autism","disability","administrative-paperwork","product-change","communicated-with"]},{"id":"2025-taiwan-cline-chatbot-translation-oversight-letter-wrong-reading-first-person","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Across four years of proceedings, no document was ever translated for me.'; 'Every summons, ruling, and prosecutor’s letter went into a chatbot, and what came back was the only version I had.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Across four years of criminal proceedings in Taiwan, no document was translated for him and some hearings had no interpreter; he read every summons, ruling and prosecutor's letter through a consumer chatbot, the only version he had.","causal_attribution":"His account; he says the court file records interpreters sworn at two early interrogations and an evening hearing held after he was asked in Chinese whether he understood Chinese."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'They disagreed, not on nuance but on the central holding. I believed the one that told me what I had spent four years wanting to hear.'; 'I published that reading, cited it to journalists, and began building a legal submission on it.'; 'In October 2025 the agency confirmed in writing that its letter did not say what I had understood it to say.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Both statements were wrong and are withdrawn. No authority has found me innocent; I was convicted and the conviction is final.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"In 2025 two chatbots gave opposite readings of a Taiwanese oversight body's letter; he believed the favourable one, published it, cited it to journalists and began a legal submission on it, and in October 2025 the agency confirmed in writing that the letter did not say that, after which he withdrew the claim, dropped the submission before filing and published a correction.","causal_attribution":"His account; the letter, the chatbot outputs and the agency's confirmation were not inspected. He attributes the error to relying on a fluent but wrong translation."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'I was sentenced to six months in prison; the conviction became final at the Supreme Court on Oct. 16 2024'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"He was sentenced to six months' imprisonment under Taiwan's Personal Data Protection Act and the conviction became final at the Supreme Court on 16 October 2024; he does not attribute the conviction to the chatbot.","causal_attribution":"Context from his account with case numbers; recorded so the chatbot's role is not overstated."}],"effects":[{"label":"published and cited to journalists a wrong chatbot reading of an official letter and drafted a legal submission on it before retracting","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"},{"label":"read four years of court documents only through a chatbot, with no translation provided","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2026/09/when-court-interpretation-failed-in-taiwan-i-turned-to-a-chatbot/","kind":"first_person_commentary","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live in English on 2026-09-30 (JURIST Commentary, 29 September 2026, edited by JURIST staff, with the author's disclosure).","independence_group":"ross-cline-account"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://rosscline.com/blogs/scam/media-brief","kind":"author_website","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live in English on 2026-09-30: the author's media-brief page (version 2.0, updated 2 August 2026), reached from the JURIST disclosure link; carries the correction notice.","independence_group":"ross-cline-account"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["justice","accessibility"],"unknowns":["Which chatbots he used.","What the Control Yuan's letter held and what each chatbot output said; neither the letter nor the outputs were inspected.","Whether any legal decision in his case turned on a chatbot translation."],"geography":{"basis":"The proceedings were in Taiwan's Taichung District Court, the Taiwan High Court Taichung Branch and the Supreme Court (JURIST, with case numbers). The piece does not say where he was when he used the chatbots in 2025; he lived in Taichung for 15 years, his media-brief page (August 2026) gives New Brunswick, Canada, and JURIST says he now lives in Phnom Penh. He is Canadian, which does not establish a country of residence at the time, so the person country is unknown.","court_countries":["TW"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a first-person adverse experience of ordinary assistance (a chatbot used as the only translator of legal documents produced a wrong reading that the author acted on publicly). Uncorroborated, self-disclosed account by a named author in an edited commentary, with his own published correction; the conviction is recorded as context and not attributed to AI.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-30"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The author says he put every summons, ruling and prosecutor's letter into a consumer chatbot and that two systems gave conflicting readings of an oversight body's letter in 2025 (JURIST). The systems are not named and their outputs were not inspected; his media-brief page documents the resulting correction.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"First-person account (JURIST commentary): a Canadian convicted in Taiwan who read his court documents only through consumer chatbots says two systems gave opposite readings of an oversight body's letter in 2025; he published the favourable reading, cited it to journalists and drafted a legal submission on it before the agency confirmed in writing that it was wrong","summary":"In a commentary published by JURIST on 29 September 2026, Ross Cline, a Canadian who lived in Taichung for 15 years and was convicted there under Taiwan's Personal Data Protection Act (six months' imprisonment; final at the Supreme Court on 16 October 2024), writes that across four years of proceedings no document was translated for him, some hearings had no interpreter, and he read every summons, ruling and prosecutor's letter through a consumer chatbot, 'the only version I had'. In 2025 he ran a letter from a Taiwanese oversight body (the Control Yuan, per his media-brief page) through two systems; they disagreed on its central holding. He believed the one that told him what he wanted to hear, published that reading, cited it to journalists and began building a legal submission on it. In October 2025 the agency confirmed in writing that its letter did not say that; he withdrew the claim, killed the submission before filing and rewrote his public materials so that the correction leads. His own media-brief page carries a correction notice withdrawing two earlier statements. He argues that machine translation has become the interpreter of record by default for unrepresented non-citizens, that a fluent wrong translation reads as authoritative, and that courts should enforce the existing right to an interpreter. His conviction itself is not attributed to the chatbot.","incidentDate":"2025-01-01","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"year","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-09-29","aiSystem":"Consumer AI chatbots used to translate Chinese-language court and agency documents (two unnamed systems)","aiProduct":"Unidentified chatbot","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["impaired_judgment","reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A defendant relying on chatbot translation says a wrong but fluent rendering of an official letter led him to publish a false claim about his case, cite it to journalists and draft a legal submission on it, which he then had to retract and correct publicly (his own account in JURIST and on his media-brief page).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person, the author, who used the chatbots himself (JURIST). Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"TW","platformType":"chatbot","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2026/09/when-court-interpretation-failed-in-taiwan-i-turned-to-a-chatbot/","primarySourceLabel":"JURIST Commentary, 29 September 2026: When Court Interpretation Failed in Taiwan, I Turned to a Chatbot (Ross Cline)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-30T04:13:53.222314+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T04:13:53.222314+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["first-person","chatbot","machine-translation","court-interpretation","legal-documents","taiwan","canadian-abroad","access-to-justice","communicated-with"]}]}